You are not missing much if you are not watching the House hearing
led by Rep. Adam Schiff regarding the bogus Ukrainian whistleblower
complaint with Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire.
The whole point of this is supposedly to determine the veracity and
truthfulness of the unnamed "whistleblower's" complaint. So far, we know
the "whistleblower" overheard that President Donald J. Trump had a
conversation with Ukrainian President Zelensky in which the leader of
the U.S. pressured the Ukrainian government to investigate Joseph Biden
for the purposes of effecting the 2020 election. Or so he claims. What
the transcript from the call shows is that all Trump was trying to do
was get the Ukrainian government to investigate how Biden's son, Hunter,
was able to earn at least $50,000 per month while sitting on a
Ukrainian energy board despite not having experience in energy
whatsoever. It looks like it is very obvious that Hunter was only given
that position to gain influence in the Obama White House. But the
Democrats are beating this impeachment drum, and will be doing so for
quite some. "The Great One" Mark Levin broke down on Twitter what
Thursday's government hearings are actually about.
"Today's
hearing, already...now we have the spectacle of Schiff trying to
pressure the acting DNI, trying to put words in his mouth that were
written by a so-called whistleblower, the latter of whom was not a
direct witness to virtually anything," Levin remarked, "...and who is
represented by counsel who once worked for Clinton and Schumer."
"We
will learn nothing. This is just another spectacle, another drama for
the media, another sham...a hearing on hearsay -- shouldn't the
so-called whistleblower be the 1st witness, his identity known, his
complaint question & scrutinized, etc., before questioning the
acting DNI about the complaint? Of course, but that wouldn't serve the
purposes of the Dems and the media," he observed.
Today's hearing, already … now we have the spectacle of Schiff trying to pressure the acting DNI, trying to put words in his mouth that were
written by a so-called whistleblower, the latter of whom was not a
direct witness to virtually anything..
...and who is represented by counsel who once worked for Clinton and Schumer. We will learn nothing. This is just another spectacle, another drama for the media, another sham...
...A hearing on hearsay -- shouldn't the so-called whistleblower be the 1st witness, his identity known, his complaint question & scrutinized, etc., before questioning the acting DNI about the complaint? Of course, but that wouldn't serve the purposes of the Dems and the media.
Levin is, of course, correct. As Townhall's Political Cartoon
today shows, this is nothing but a circus led by Pelosi, Schiff, and
the cabal of Democrats who want to destroy the president however they
can.
If you would like to become a W³P Lives contributor, please fill out the contact form below. You may submit any email address; however, you will need a gmail to login to blogger.com and access the back end of the blog where posts are created.
If you do not want to submit your actual email, please create a gmail specifically for this purpose and submit it to us via the form below. It will skip a step, since a gmail will be required to login anyways.
After filling out the form keep any eye out for your email invitation in your inbox. Accept the invitation, login to blogger.com, and start making discussions.
...and who is represented by counsel who once worked for Clinton and Schumer. We will learn nothing. This is just another spectacle, another drama for the media, another sham...
Post a Comment