The 11 Foot Pole
While trying to keep tabs and sharing information on current events for discussion, as many of you are aware, I have been working on a deep project surrounding the intelligence community and the weaponization against President Trump.
Shortly before Charlie Kirk was murdered, I informed this audience that a senior influential member of the IC govt had reached out with a request for help. However, in the immediate aftermath of the Charlie Kirk murder, several alarmed people involved in the request immediately contacted me and said, ‘Wait, stay safe, pause until we can see what this is all about.’ Several weeks have passed, and I’m back on track.
♦ Here’s an update. One of the core pieces of evidence surrounds the 2019 timeframe, when the Mueller phase finished and the impeachment phase began.
As many of you know, I have been on the hunt for a few key documents that tell a much bigger story. One of those documents is the transcript of Intelligence Community Michael Atkinson’s October 2019 testimony to a House joint Intelligence and Judiciary committee closed-door hearing. Within the transcript, ICIG Atkinson was questioned about his authorities to change the CIA whistleblower rules and permit an anonymous complaint.
As most of you also are aware, the commonly accepted narrative is that ICIG Atkinson changed the CIA rules arbitrarily. This is the common narrative, as pushed by the media, allowed to permeate by the larger Intelligence Community, and supported by the willful blindness of a complicit Congress.
Almost everyone involved in Spygate research accepted this premise – I did not.
It never made sense to me how an Inspector General, especially one that involves review of CIA employees/operations, could make such a substantive change in rules for an agency that is opaque by design.
My position has always been that the ICIG does not have that power, and there is no way that ICIG Atkinson made that rule change by himself to permit the CIA whistleblowing allegation made by CIA employee Eric Ciaramella.
Nothing about the narrative ever made sense to me, especially when you consider this is the CIA we are talking about.
There’s just no way an IG can make that decision about the CIA without the Director, Deputy Director and CIA General Counsel being involved.
It’s absurd when you contemplate the common narrative. Alas, to destroy this nonsense we must ask the right questions, and few people ever do.
The ICIG office exists under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). In addition to the CIA Director and General Counsel, the DNI would have to be part of the process for such an ICIG request/decision.
From my frame of reference, ICIG Atkinson would have to ask all of these stakeholders for approval before he could change the internal procedures and permit an anonymous CIA whistleblower report. I was not wrong.
This puts the motive of then House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Adam Schiff (the future co-chair of the House impeachment committee), to hide the testimony of ICIG Atkinson into an entirely different perspective. What was Schiff hiding in that inquiry?
I think we know the answers now, and I will be updating this specific point of issue very soon in an open article for everyone. The ramifications are quite stark, all things considered.
CIA employee Eric Ciaramella went to see HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff before the CIA whistleblower rule changes were made. ICIG Atkinson then changed the CIA rules. ICIG Atkinson later told the HPSCI what authorities were used to change the CIA rules. The same HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff, that Ciaramella went to see beforehand, then sealed Atkinson’s testimony.
More soon….
In the interim, remember: “You don’t want those CTH folks on your ass“… they don’t quit.
[SOURCE]
Remember where the fraudulent Trump-Russia CIA Intelligence Community Assessment originated? Ciaramella!
Remember the specific unit inside the CIA that Tulsi Gabbard grabbed control of? The NIC, Ciaramella!
WASHINGTON DC – Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has fired the top officials leading the National Intelligence Council – whom whistleblowers describe as “radically opposed to Trump” — and has moved the agency to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, or ODNI, to ensure she can block any “politicization of intelligence,” Fox News Digital has learned.
CIA Analyst Eric Ciaramella pushed Trump-Russia 2016. CIA Analyst Eric Ciaramella fabricated Trump-Russia 2017. Then later, CIA Analyst Eric Ciaramella fabricated the Trump-Ukraine impeachment effort.
Post a Comment