Mitch McConnell Urges GOP Senators to Vote Against the Border Security Bill
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell recommended that Republicans vote against the $118 billion border security bill, at least for now. Even Oklahoma Senator Jim Lankford, one of the bill's authors, indicated that it was too soon to bring the bill to a vote. The sudden about-face on the part of the GOP caucus left Democrat Brian Shatz saying on X, "Just gobsmacked. I’ve never seen anything like it. They literally demanded specific policy, got it, and then killed it."
The cloture vote scheduled for Wednesday is certain to fail. Without the momentum of its much-anticipated release and the tactical advantage of not giving anyone time to read it, it seems that if the bill does pass, it is unlikely to resemble the atrocity unveiled Sunday night.
The whole bill reeked of bad faith. The drafting was not done using the traditional committee process. Instead, a small group wrote the bill without sharing the contents or general direction with their colleagues. The draft text was released Sunday night, with the first vote scheduled for Wednesday. Two other important but unrelated issues were attached to the border security bill. Though, in fairness, that isn't the Senate's fault; it was in answer to a stupid demand by Speaker Mike Johnson. Unfortunately, this kind of dishonest process seems to have been baked into the Senate.
The big question is, what now? Can this bill be saved?
I think the short answer is "no." The border security bill included billions for resettling illegals in American cities and providing them free legal representation, but it did not contain a penny for constructing the border wall. Arguably, the dumbest thing in the bill was the creation of a quota of illegals allowed each day or the free giveaway of work permits. Or... no, there was a lot of stupid sh** in this bill.
Establishing a threshold of illegal immigration, making the declaration of a border emergency dependent on the whims of an imbecilic dementia patient, and gutting the ability of future administrations to deport illegals revealed this bill for what it really was, a pathway to citizenship for about two million illegals per year.
On the Democrat side, they have no interest in securing the border as a massive influx of illegals dovetails perfectly with their vision of this country.
Under a new president, this needs to be revisited. Instead of being cute and creating daily quotas, the next bill needs to tighten rules, make Trump's "remain in Mexico" policy the law of the land, build a border wall, and set the acceptable number of illegals at zero per day.
Post a Comment