The Real Reason for Shampeachment

 

A quick editorial by Believe it!

I didn't bother to watch any of the shampeachment. The outcome was known before it was even initiated. Nothing more than theatrics. The real danger is in the fact it was allowed at all. The reason why is what we should all be concerned about.

Ask yourself why Pelosi would bother bringing this weak case when she knows both she and her fellow communists are guilty of actually inciting violent mobs, and have even worked with them.

Trump Derangement Syndrome doesn't cover it. There is something more sinister behind this.

Democrats, much like their worshiped leader, Satan, often work in baby steps. Some battles are lost by inches, and democrats have employed this tactic for decades. Every now and then they get impatient and greedy and take giant leaps, provoking backlash from the public. Another analogy for this is the boiling frog example. Sometimes they raise the temperature too high too quickly and frog jumps out. The stolen election was an example of that. Which leads to the current day dilemma the establishment faces.

Trump's election and reelection are proof that the American people are sick of the sham two-party system, and now the republican party has been exposed as nothing more than the other side of the same mono-party coin. A fraudulent union that ensures no matter which side the coin lands on, Americans always lose.

Thus the party of The Swamp has come up with a new way to dispose of presidents they don't like, just in case their recent method of stealing elections doesn't hold up in the future.

This is of course the "impeachment" process. Normally, if we were following the Constitution, impeachment can't even get off the ground unless the charges brought are treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors that rise to the same level as treason or bribery. Another requirement is that the president actually still be in office during this process.

Yet after two baseless impeachments we have seen three important constitutional requirements be eroded. 1. Charges for anything that offends a simple majority of House members. 2. Lack of the Chief Justice presiding over the Senate Hearing. And 3. Trial of a private citizen.

This sets a dangerous precedent, which is what democrats use to keep the ground they slowly gain inch by inch. So now even someone who might RUN for president can be impeached and tried for any bogus charge without a fair-minded Justice presiding over the trial, and that person's eligibility to become or remain as president all comes down to a popularity contest in the House, and a shadowy agreement between corrupt politicians in the Senate, which requires 2/3 to convict.

What This Means for America

This essentially means no third-party candidate can ever be president. Imagine if Trump, or someone better than Trump, were to run for president at a time when the majority of voters believe, with cause, that the federal government is corrupt and does not represent them. So they throw their support behind this third-party candidate who promises to launch investigations into the 2020 election fraud, to secure the border, to bring the troops home, to reestablish America's energy independence, to punish China for their bio-weapon attack, etc. The establishment wouldn't like that one bit, and it wouldn't be able to get away with election fraud this time because too many people from both sides are now watching them, or the states tighten their election laws and enforce them.

What do they do?

Simply impeach the third party candidate. For what? Who cares? There is no more legal standard. Trump was just impeached over a speech and a re-tweet. The "evidence" against him was fabricated. The only thing that saved him from this was the fact there weren't enough republicans in the Senate willing to sacrifice their political careers.

But what happens when the target is neither democrat nor republican?

You get a fraudulent impeachment where a private citizen can be banned from holding office simply because both parties colluded to block a political opponent. Obviously this would go for even republican candidates who run on conservative platforms. Look what McConnell and the other RINOs did to Roy Moore for example. They want to ban ordinary people from running. They've learned from their social media cronies how to cancel those they don't like.

The precedent has now been set.

This should have been, and still should be challenged in the Supreme Court, then struck down for being unconstitutional from start to finish. Otherwise the establishment is here to stay.

Believe it!