Header Ads

ad

U.S. and Allied Lawmakers Demand UK's "48 Group" Open Its Books on Beijing's Elite Capture Network

 

Yang Tengbo, left, with the former Prince Andrew in October 2019 business networking event called “Pitch at the Palace.”

WASHINGTON — A transatlantic coalition of lawmakers formally demanded Thursday that the 48 Group Club — a London-based private organization with 500 members, deep access to the current British government, and links to an alleged Chinese spy accused of cultivating the former Prince Andrew — produce records documenting its relationships with individuals tied to the Chinese Communist Party’s United Front Work Department, the covert influence arm Beijing uses to groom foreign elites, suppress dissent, and shape the political environments of democratic nations.

Transatlantic lawmakers, including U.S. Senators and UK MPs, have formally demanded the 48 Group Club disclose documents regarding its ties to the Chinese Communist Party's "United Front" operations. The letter, signed by U.S. co-chairs of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) and UK counterparts, warns that the CCP views the group as a tool for "elite capture" and narrative shaping in Britain. 

Lawmakers specifically requested compliance, risk, and due-diligence assessments the 48 Group conducted when partnering with individuals affiliated with the CCP's United Front system.  They argue the group, which boasts over 500 members including prominent British figures, serves as a networking hub through which Beijing grooms Britain's elites to advance Chinese strategic objectives. 

The 48 Group Club has denied being a vehicle for Beijing, describing itself instead as an independent body promoting Sino-British relations, while also taking legal action to block a book titled Hidden Hand that details these alleged influence operations.  Despite these denials, the group's board has faced scrutiny over its high-profile connections, including former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair and Deputy Prime Minister Lord Heseltine, and its role in facilitating access to Chinese leadership. 

Select Committee on China Chairman John Moolenaar (R-MI), Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and leading UK lawmakers from the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) have formally written to the 48 Group Club to demand transparency regarding the organization’s extensive ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its “United Front” influence operations. The letter targets the organization’s deep-rooted links to Beijing’s “United Front” influence operations.

Moolenaar and Merkley, who serve as U.S. co-chairs of IPAC, sent the letter with Sir Iain Duncan Smith MP (IPAC UK Co-Chair, former leader of the Conservative Party) and Sarah Champion MP (IPAC UK Member).

In the letter, the lawmakers warn, “United Front work is a sophisticated blend of engagement, influence, and intelligence operations that the CCP employs to shape its political environment and advance its strategic objectives. These operations... seek to influence companies, associations, universities, think tanks, civic organizations, prominent individuals, and public opinion worldwide.”

They also write that “The CCP sees the 48 Group as a tool for its ability to shape British narratives and for elite capture. Reportedly with over 500 members, the 48 Group has been described as serving “as a meeting place and networking hub for friends of China, through which Beijing grooms Britain’s elites.” Given the 48 Group’s political access to the current UK government—the CCP is incentivized to cultivate influence with the organization to provide it with channels of leverage over the United Kingdom, its government, and, by extension, its British and international audience. In turn, senior leaders of the 48 Group have been on the record repeatedly spouting CCP talking points and propaganda.”

In conclusion, the lawmakers ask the 48 Group to turn over documents including, “compliance, risk, and due-diligence assessments that the 48 Group conducted when entering or expanding its partnerships with individuals affiliated with the CCP’s United Front system.”

https://chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/media/press-releases/transatlantic-lawmakers-demand-transparency-from-uk-48-group-over-ccp-united-front-ties