Conrad Black: American decline is a myth
The widespread drivel about American decline has been drowned out in the fall-back lamentation of Trump hate
The Middle
East is changing unpredictably from one week to the next.
It is clear that U.S. President Donald Trump
is determined to achieve his objectives of ending Iran’s nuclear military
aspirations and its sponsorship of terrorist activity especially on the borders
of Israel but also across the world, and he is determined that Iran not
interrupt the flow of oil from the Middle East, even though the United States
is not much affected by it.
It is also
clear that he will go to considerable lengths to achieve his objectives without
inflicting terrible violence on the unoffending and long-suffering civil
population of Iran.
It is not
the least of Trump’s achievements that he has developed a technique for
accomplishing foreign policy goals with minimal casualties to the United States
and civilians of affected countries: this was the case in removing the
president of Venezuela and blowing up Iran’s nuclear laboratories last summer.
Trump knows
that he will lose all credibility if he fails in Iran and he knows that his
strong claim to be an important and successful president of his country depends
on his accomplishing a reasonable success in the current Middle East crisis. It
is also more obvious than ever that the correlation of military forces between
United States and Israel on one side, and Iran on the other is overwhelmingly
in Trump’s favour.
Iran has no
significant air defences or navy left, a sharply reduced supply of missiles and
launchers for retaliation, and the United States possesses the ability to close
Iran’s ports, stop its exports, and strangle it at minimal risk to itself. (The
ability of the United States Navy to close or regulate passage through the
Hormuz Strait is much greater than Iran’s.)
It is
clearly difficult for observers to evaluate Trump’s statement that the people
with whom his administration is dealing in Iran are in fact more flexible and
reasonable than the horrifying theocracy that has been riveted upon the back of
that country these 47 years.
If he
is dealing now with a faction capable of committing and delivering Iran to an acceptable
settlement, this is an immense accomplishment and he was absolutely right to
accept a ceasefire to work out an agreement. The history of negotiation with
this regime in Iran is so negative that optimism is in short supply.
On the other
hand, even his detractors acknowledge that Trump is an experienced negotiator.
He is in a position of incontestable strength and he has made it clear that he
believes (and is correct in believing) that the peace, and peace of mind, of
the world cannot be preserved if the absolute and partly suicidally distracted
leadership of Iran continues its pursuit of nuclear weapons and its sponsorship
of terrorism.
For all of
these reasons, I think Trump can be given the benefit of the doubt that he will
either get a solution without massive further destruction visited upon Iran, or
he will inflict that destruction and impose that solution.
As was
mentioned in previous columns here, international developments are tumbling
along in such a syncopated way that it is difficult to see the underlying
trend. Trump has effectively eliminated Syria, Venezuela, Cuba, and Iran as
functioning Russo-Chinese allies, has prepared conditions to make Ukraine an
unaffordable war for Russia, has put great strain on China’s oil supply, and
has ended the post-Cold War NATO hibernation of the free-riding “alliance of
the willing.”
He has
effectively ended American oil imports, substantially reduced the trade
deficit, nearly stopped the free flow of migrants with no particular attachment
to the United States flooding into it (including large numbers of violent
criminals), and drastically reduced violent crime rates and the flow of lethal
narcotic into the country.
He has also
cranked up economic growth, deregulated, lowered taxes, ended the nonsensical
green obsession, and broken the stranglehold of the teachers’ unions which had
transformed American schools into disorderly daycare centres and most of higher
education into an unemployment deferment program in which lazy tenured and
often subversive faculty qualified America’s youth to do things that could not
possibly earn them a living in adult life.
(How many
professors of gender studies does America need?)
He has also
sharpened up American armed forces and the extraordinary precision and
efficiency with which they’ve carried out their missions in his second term,
including the substantial deconstruction of Iran without widespread civilian or
significant American casualties and the clockwork deployment of very large
number of people and aircraft to rescue a downed pilot in Iran, are a stark
contrast with the Russian and Chinese equipment that Iran has used to try to
defend itself. It is also an amazing contrast with the four years of
floundering and heavy casualties of Russia in its failed aggression in Ukraine.
All of these
steps have strengthened America. And the world is shifting finally to allow for
the final disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of Russia as a
superpower.
The major
countries of Western Europe are collectively and even individually much
stronger than Russia and they don’t really need American protection if they are
prepared to pay for their own defence and guarantee the new post-Soviet states.
Russia is
not a rival to the United States and there is no reason for there to be serious
abrasions between them or for Russia, which remains a proud and important
nationality, to be reduced to near-vassalage by China.
Insofar as the United States has a rival, it
is China, and that’s where America is turning.
Europe,
including Russia, is in decline and will have to determine if it possesses the
genius of renewal. But the United States economy is 150 per cent of China’s and
its military and scientific superiority are evident. By every available
measurement, the United States is rallying from its recent torpor of vapid woke
self-flagellation and is accelerating forward much more quickly than the
ramshackle totalitarian People’s Republic.
The
widespread drivel about American decline has been drowned out in the fall-back
lamentation of Trump hate. Trump is a vulgarian and a number of his mannerisms
as a public personality are jarring. He bullied Iran into dropping its
conditions for promising not to harass traffic in the Strait of Hormuz by
essentially the same hyper-aggressive and crudely stated formula by which he
launched his business career by winning the contract to renovate the Commodore
Hotel in New York 50 years ago.
These were
constant outrageous statements and demands while waving about a thick wad of
papers which he represented as a “signed agreement;” which it was, but signed
only by him until he finally exhausted his interlocutors and they gave him his
deal.
These are
his methods. They are frequently undignified and unnerving, but they work.
Canada
should not be padding around trying to raise “middle powers” in resentment of
the U.S. We have no good reason to resent the Americans. We should make
ourselves competitive again and resume our progress to ever greater success.
National
Post
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/american-decline-is-a-myth
Post a Comment