Many NATO members are as opposed to Ukraine membership as is Russia
Conrad Black Writes
Vice President JD Vance and Defence Secretary Hegseth have been in Europe and have caused further ripples with their remarks on other subjects.
Since my
column last week where I attempted to examine President Trump’s Gaza proposals
in terms that would be more plausible to Europeans than his initial
presentation, two senior members of his administration, Vice President JD
Vance and Defence Secretary Hegseth have been in Europe and have caused further
ripples with their remarks on other subjects.
The vice
president expressed his concern about the state of European democracy,
emphasizing that shared democratic values are the core of the partnership
between Western Europe and North America. He referred to the cancellation of a
Romanian general election on the implausible grounds of minor interference on
the internet from Russia, supposedly producing a result disagreeable to the
authorities.
But Romania
has little democratic tradition and it has been a habit in the European Union
to ignore unfavourable referendum results and simply re-put the question. This
is not easily reconcilable with democratic values, but nor is it, in itself, an
invalidation of Euro-democracy. Nor did Vance represent it as such.
More
worrisome, though it only ostensibly concerned a single person, was the case
that the vice president cited of a physiotherapist and army veteran in England
who was arrested and charged with a serious offense for standing alone and
without interacting with anyone else at some distance from an abortion clinic
and engaging, he said, with no reason to disbelieve him, in three minutes of
silent prayer for an unborn child he and his former girlfriend had aborted many
years before.
This is a
full-on assault on fundamental liberties that every Englishman has taken as his
birthright for a thousand years. Charging a person with thought-crime for
silently exercising the freedom of worship and the freedom to access to a
public place is an illustration of the autocratic dangers of extreme woke-ism.
The comparatively modest progress that the United States had made on the same
downward trajectory is now, with wide public approval, being systematically and
dramatically uprooted and discarded in almost every area of public
administration under the Trump administration.
This was no
rap on the European Union, of which the United Kingdom is no longer a member.
But it is a comment on the degeneration of European democracy and on the
accuracy of Dostoevsky’s famous comment that “Tolerance eventually reaches a
level where everyone is terrorized by imbeciles.”
Defence
Secretary Hegseth, speaking to the Ukraine group of NATO in Brussels, indicated
that early Ukrainian membership in NATO was not an option and that Ukraine
would have to give up some territory. Many NATO members are practically just as
opposed to Ukrainian membership in the organization as Russia is and it is rank
hypocrisy to accuse the Americans of pulling the rug out from under the
Ukrainians on this point.
My old
friend Carl Bildt, former prime minister and Foreign Minister of Sweden and
high representative of Europe in the former Yugoslavia, and holder of almost
every conceivable office in the European power structure, who has referred to
Europe as “a regulation superpower” in the same category as the United States
is a military and economic superpower, accused Hegseth of making pre-emptive
concessions.
The defence
secretary’s formulation of the issue was much more diplomatic than the usual
treatment of the same subject by German leaders or the prime minister of
Hungary among other prominent national leaders in the EU.
Since the
Ukrainians, despite a tremendous and courageous effort, have been unable to
dislodge the Russians from most of the positions they occupied, while
successfully defending and repulsing the Russians from approximately 90 per
cent of their country, despite the heavy imbalance of numbers and forces
between the two nations, and since neither the Europeans nor the Americans wish
to escalate the war by entering into direct combat with the Russians
themselves, which they are certainly not obliged to do and would be
inadvisable, the suggestion that Russia will gain some territory from this
illegal and nasty war cannot come as a startling surprise.
What the
defence secretary envisioned was that a group of NATO members would guarantee
Ukraine sovereignty in its revised borders as Russia would, and as the United
States will remain a member of NATO, it clearly will be standing behind the
European NATO guarantors of a Ukrainian peace.
This cannot
possibly be construed as anything but a very substantial victory for Ukraine,
which began the war with no plausible guarantees of support from anybody and
was generally assumed, including by the incompetent former chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States, General Mark Milley, to be subject
to complete Russian occupation within a few weeks.
It is not
practical for the West to humiliate Russia more fully than such a peace
effectively does, and it is not in the Western interest to antagonise Russia so
severely that when the Ukraine conflict ends, it will not be possible to entice
Russia out of the potentially deadly and strategically very dangerous embrace
of the People’s Republic of China. It has always been, next to the conservation
of a sovereign Ukraine, the leading strategic goal at least of the Republicans
in the United States and other sensible western parties, to preserve the
possibility for a reasonably swift postwar resumption of constructive relations
with Russia.
Nothing that
Vance or Hegseth said in Europe last week justifies the simulation of people
rushing about with their hair on fire that was the widespread reaction of
officious Europe, with the conspicuous and distinguished exception of the NATO
Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who grasped entirely the American defence
secretary’s position and effectively endorsed it. Europeans should be rejoicing
that the United States is now governed by such a purposeful administration,
emancipated from the delusional miasma and chronic enfeeblement that afflicted
its predecessor.
https://brusselssignal.eu/2025/02/many-nato-members-are-as-opposed-to-ukraine-membership-as-is-russia/
Post a Comment