Samantha Power Says Food Crisis Presents Opportunity to Push Climate Change and Other Weird Stuff
If you are not familiar with Cass Sunstein’s wife, Samantha Power, I would suggest spending some time on any search feature of the internet. Power is the archetype ideological traveler within the academic peer group of the Obama team. Former U.N. Ambassador Power is the person who takes the ideological theory [example Responsibility to Protect (R2P)], and then constructs the mechanisms and network to turn theory into applicable policy.
Samantha put down the filtered Brazilian rainwater coffee this morning and gave a few interviews, that are rather telling of what is going on in the background of the Biden administration. Discussing Ukraine {Direct Rumble Link} Power let it slip that the absence of industrial fertilizer is a good thing because in the spirit of “never letting a crisis go to waste,” the transition of food growing to more “sustainable farming” through organic fertilizer is a key transition for the bigger picture issue of Climate Change. WATCH:
Samantha is the prototype backpack, academic, Birkenstock traveler who all model U.N. types view as the person to emulate. She’s a sustainable algae cake eater, who bridges the space between the Kennedy Center ballroom crowd and the cross-legged, sitting on the grass, NYU commons activists.
A very dangerous mind, with no practical skills beyond very dangerous ideological theory.
The 2011/2012 crisis in Libya represents an outcome of Power’s R2P theory applied. Create equitable freedom for the animals by killing the Zookeeper and removing the cages. The tree dwelling primates are fine, at first, until the big cats run out of deer to eat. The only way to prevent primate slaughter is to supplement and satiate the cats with alternative meat. The primates are now forever dependent on foreign intervention for survival…. and yet the free range believing ideologues take no responsibility for the natural mess and absence of ruminants.
Samantha Power, now in charge of USAID (U.S. Aid and International Development) and a host of Non-Governmental Agencies (NGO’s) who rely on USAID, turns her meddling focus from the middle-east toward the crisis in Ukraine.
Notice how she says weird shit like, [02:53] “what we do Margaret, is to work though our implementing partners. So, er, we have, um, folks who are indirectly on the ground, but who are receiving U.S. taxpayer resources in order to provide everything from flak jackets and helmets, again to those safehouses etc.”
How does a person become “indirectly on the ground” in Ukraine, in order to receive funds?
Oh wait, that’s what we need the U.S. government information, disinformation and language approval bureau to figure out before we can start to talk about it…. or something. Seriously, watch this interview carefully and spot the bureaucratic globbledyspeech. WATCH:
Post a Comment