New York Times Admits Hunter Biden Laptop Evidence Was Accurate, The Intelligence Community Was Lying
Apparently, the motive everyone inferred about Joe Biden to making those bizarre statements about compromising sexual material and blackmail was accurate. Less than 12 hours after his weird comments, yesterday the New York Times released a devastating article finally admitting that every previously denied allegation surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop was accurate.
For almost two years, the United States government, using resources from the Dept of Justice and FBI, have been trying desperately to bury the truth of Joe and Hunter Biden’s corrupt and illegal activities that relate to the country of Ukraine and the business company Burisma. However, the reality of the information is so overwhelming even the DOJ cannot completely hide the problems.
The legal issues are massive, yet one of the key takeaways from the admission and revelations is even bigger than the scandal within the story. All of those intelligence agencies, that said the Hunter Biden laptop was “Russian disinformation”, were purposefully and intentionally lying. All of the current and former administration officials were also lying, and the entire institutional media complex was part of the lying construct.
All of their denials, false statements, malicious attacks against the people telling the truth, and all of the Big Tech censorship that was purposefully and intentionally deployed to keep the lies retained, was done in an effort to manufacture a protective shield for Joe Biden. They didn’t get it wrong, they were not mistaken, they didn’t misreport or misstate the facts – they willfully and purposefully lied.
To the extent that any institutional credibility remained, all of that is now gone – as the house of cards collapses. However, there is a more consequential aspect that needs to be emphasized. When you accept that our government, all intelligence agencies and officials, and all of the collaboration with media and big tech was built on a foundation of manipulative lying, WHAT DOES THAT SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT NARRATIVE AROUND UKRAINE?
How can any intellectually honest person believe anything, yes ‘anything’, proffered by any media outlet about the situation in Ukraine, knowing how complicit this same media apparatus was in lying about Joe Biden, Hunter Biden and the same country of Ukraine?
The bloom is off the ruse.
(New York Times) – […] Last year, prosecutors interviewed Mr. Archer and subpoenaed him for documents and grand jury testimony, the people said. Mr. Archer, who was sentenced last month in an unrelated securities fraud case in which a decision to set aside his conviction was reversed, had served with Mr. Biden on Burisma’s board, starting in 2014.
People familiar with the investigation said prosecutors had examined emails between Mr. Biden, Mr. Archer and others about Burisma and other foreign business activity. Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have come from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.
In some of the emails, Mr. Biden displayed a familiarity with FARA, and a desire to avoid triggering it.
In one email to Mr. Archer in April 2014, Mr. Biden outlined his vision for working with Burisma. In the email, Hunter Biden indicated that the forthcoming announcement of a trip to Ukraine by Vice President Biden — who is referred to in the email as “my guy,” but not by name — should “be characterized as part of our advice and thinking — but what he will say and do is out of our hands.”
The announcement “could be a really good thing or it could end up creating too great an expectation. We need to temper expectations regarding that visit,” Hunter Biden wrote.
Vice President Biden traveled to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, about a week after the email.
In the same April 2014 email, Hunter Biden indicated that Burisma’s officials “need to know in no uncertain terms that we will not and cannot intervene directly with domestic policymakers, and that we need to abide by FARA and any other U.S. laws in the strictest sense across the board.”
He suggested enlisting the law firm where he worked at the time, Boies Schiller Flexner, to help Burisma through “direct discussions at state, energy and NSC,” referring to two cabinet departments and the National Security Council at the White House. (read more)
Joe Biden was selected in 2020 specifically because this compromising evidence existed against him.
In addition, to the benefit of his cognitive decline, those who run and manipulate the Fourth Branch of Government (the deep state per se’) knew that Joe Biden was compromised, and they would always have a way to control him in everything.
The modern control mechanisms for the Fourth Branch were constructed by Barack Obama and his fellow travelers when they took control of the White House in 2009. {Go Deep} This same group of political ideologues were the people who determined the outcome of the 2020 democrat primary.
Barack Obama and Eric Holder did not create a weaponized DOJ and FBI; the institutions were already weaponized by the Patriot Act. Instead, what Obama and Holder did was to take the preexisting system and retool it so the weapons of government only targeted one side of the political continuum. This point is where many people understandably get confused. (GO DEEP)
All of the policies, from the current installed administration, are specifically detrimental to our nation because the people who are pulling the strings to deliver the policy are using Biden as a disposable tool. The people pulling the strings are the same people who installed Joe Biden. The same people who installed Joe Biden are the people who constructed the modern Fourth Branch of Government. This is Barack Obama’s long-lasting legacy.
The same people who manipulated the 2020 outcome are the same people who weaponized the COVID-19 crisis; they are the same people currently weaponizing the Ukraine crisis and demanding the United States get further involved in a war against Russia.
All of these individual crisis actions are within the boundaries they control. Vaccine passports, digital identities, the elimination of the dollar as a reserve currency, the expansion of multinational corporations to control government, all of it is a created crisis opportunity to achieve the long-term goal of fundamental change.
It is all connected.
We have no national security interest at all in Ukraine.
Post a Comment