WaPo: Doctors Should Be Allowed to Give Priority Treatment to Productive Members of Society, and NOT Treat Unvaccinated Populations

There it is… yet again.  It comes around in cycles as the issues shift and blend, but the underlying ideology remains.  Abortion to control breeding amid society was one of the first accomplishments of the Fabian Socialists, and ever since that accomplishment, they have been strong proponents for evaluating people and determining if they should be permitted to live in ‘their’ society.

The outlook of the Fabian group supports genocide and eugenics as an interventionist model for population control along the pathway of Darwinian theories of evolution.  Essentially, the ideology promotes a group of elites who form tribunals, commissions or boards of society, who will arbitrate which people should exist in society and which people should receive benefits; in this example COVID healthcare treatments.

Democrats or leftists throughout the world support the modern Fabian Socialist movement.  They are, by nature, totalitarians who despise the natural inequities created by free and unregulated human activity.  They have ongoing meetings and symposiums that are widely attended by current day politicians on the left and socialist side of the continuum.  The Fabian movement is very much alive and supported by the modern Democrat party.

Today, the Washington Post outlines how the Fabian mindset can be of great value as the world is facing the challenges of COVID-19.  The WaPo advocacy is saying that doctors and medical professionals around the world should be able to prioritize vaccinated people for medical treatments.  It is the exact same ideology that defines who the ‘productive members’ of society are.

(Washington Post, Author: Ruth Marcus) I’m going to come right out and say it: In situations where hospitals are overwhelmed and resources such as intensive care beds or ventilators are scarce, vaccinated patients should be given priority over those who have refused vaccination without a legitimate medical or religious reason.

This conflicts radically with accepted medical ethics, I recognize. And under ordinary circumstances, I agree with those rules. The lung cancer patient who’s been smoking two packs a day for decades is entitled to the same treatment as the one who never took a puff. The drunk driver who kills a family gets a team doing its utmost to save him — although, not perhaps, a liver transplant if he needs one. Doctors are healers, not judges.

But the coronavirus pandemic, the development of a highly effective vaccine, and the emergence of a core of vaccine resisters along with an infectious new variant have combined to change the ethical calculus. Those who insist on refusing the vaccine for no reason are not in the same moral position of the smoker with lung cancer or the drunk driver. In situations where resources are scarce and hard choices must be made, they are not entitled to the same no-questions-asked, no-holds-barred medical care as others who behaved more responsibly. (read more)

I would be remiss if I did not point out the connective tissue making the Fabian society more influential than many would believe.   The primary chapters of the modern Fabian Society group are currently located in The U.K, New Zealand, Australia, Canada and The United States.

Ask yourself, what other modern relationship is carried within this same specific group of five nations: U.K, Australia, U.S.A, Canada and New Zealand?

If you say, hey.. wait a minute, that’s the “Five-Eyes” intelligence group.  You would be correct.

It is not accidental the Fabian Socialist chapters and the Five Eyes Intelligence Network exist within the exact same partnership network.

Recognizing there is a relationship of social engineering (Fabian outlook) and intelligence operations (5-eyes) between the exact same group of nations….. and standing back to look at exactly how each of these nations is responding to the COVID pandemic…. Things start to look a little less cloudy.

There does seem to be this overarching element -just a weird sense- pointing toward something controlling, probing, testing how society is responding to the COVID-19 dictates.

Oh, and one last note.  Which agency uses The Washington Post to advance their pubic relations position?

Enjoy your day.