Large Sample Study Shows Natural Immunity Confers Stronger and Longer Lasting Immunity Than Vaccine –

Large Sample Study Shows Natural Immunity Confers 

Stronger and Longer Lasting Immunity Than Vaccine – 

Which Again Defeats The Ridiculous Premise of Vaccine Passports

The original claim of the scientific medical community, in their advocacy for “vaccine passports”, was that vaccinated persons were less likely to transmit the virus.

That narrative only lasted until studies showed that vaccinated persons carried a much larger amount of viral load and shed the virus at a more significant rate….

…So they shifted the vaccine passport narrative goalposts, and said everyone needed to show proof of vaccinations because, safer, or something.

Now, in another collapse of the vaccine passport narrative, a large study comparing vaccinated immunity to non-vaccinated natural immunity shows:

CONCLUSION – “This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.

Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant.” [Data Link Here]

If the natural immunity is the preferred and more effective immunity, then why would anyone need a vaccine ID?

(DATA LINK)