Given the Established Facts We know So Far....

by @TheLastRefuge2 via Threadreader

My suspicious cat instinct now leans toward the U.S. intel community releasing the virus in Wuhan intentionally, knowing it would travel to the U.S. and give them plausible deniability.

Why else would the Pentagon give China the keys to a biological weapon?

2. Eleven Days before leaving office President Obama’s administration re-authorized funding for the creation of biological weapons using SARS viruses.

January 9, 2017:

Recommended Policy Guidance for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and OversightOSTP Issues “Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanisms for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO)"https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2017/01/09/recommended-policy-guidance-poten

3. However, essentially this re-authorization was only kickstarting funding within the U.S. because the funding of weaponization of SARS-CoV-2 never actually stopped in 2014. The media reporting on this is misleading, if not downright false. 

4. In the original guidance for the 2014 research pause of into weaponization of SARS viruses there was a footnote that everyone seems to have missed:

See Page 2

phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Doc…

5. This exception essentially permitted the Pentagon to continue funding the creation of SARS as a biological weapon in Wuhan, China, under the auspices of national security. 

6. Which is exactly what the defense department did: “Grants from the Pentagon included $6,491,025 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from 2017 to 2020”

The Pentagon funneled $39million to a charity that funded Wuhan labFederal data seen by DailyMail.com reveals The Pentagon  gave $39 million to charity EcoHealth Alliance (EHA), which funded a lab in Wuhan, China.https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9652287/The-Pentagon-funneled-39million-charity-funded-Wuhan-lab.html

7. Given the workarounds, exceptions and plausible deniability for the consequences, built into the original moratorium guidance in 2014, the defense department was operationally permitted to keep funding the biological weapons research in Wuhan, China. 

8. Why would the U.S. be handing China keys to a biological weapon?

Why would we be funding that research in Wuhan, knowing the CCP would known of, and be in control over, the research? 

9. 2014 through 2017 - There are political and ideological benefits from the perspective of Obama’s ideological group for unleashing the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic as an opportunistic “crisis” to create totalitarian government solutions regardless of who was in office.

10. The timing of the subsequent biological release is very suspicious in relation to the 2020 presidential election and the downstream benefits of manipulating that election via mail-in ballots.

Note the date:

11. What efforts to remove Donald Trump was the entire apparatus of the DC system willing to undertake?

We already know of several...

12. So is it really a stretch to think the IC writ large would simply exploit an arrow -a virus they created- within the political quiver available to them?

13. I think we already know the answer to that question.

/END