Relaxing the definition of “White Nationalist” to include Andy Ngo
Clearly there is a shortage of White Nationalists in America if you have to so completely relax the definition of the term in order to accommodate a gay Vietnamese-American.
Say, did you know that Asian reporter Andy Ngo is a White Nationalist?
Seems crazy, no?
Clearly there is a shortage of White Nationalists in America if you have to so completely relax the definition of the term in order to accommodate a gay Vietnamese-American.
It is open season on Andy Ngo — the one reporter who covers the violent Anarchist group Antifa. Ngo’s fellow “journalists” can smear him, libel him, and even with a straight face call him a White Nationalist.
Anybody who threatens the Left’s Narrative is now a White Nationalist. Or a Nazi. Or an “alt-Right extremist.” They toss these words around like confetti on New Year’s Eve.
Hell, I’ve been called a Nazi cunt, alt-Right (which I don’t even know what that is), a Right Wing Extremist, and a White Nationalist.
These guys are so desperate to conjure out of nothing a mythical army of goose-stepping White Nationalists, they have no problem broadening the definition in order to include an Asian-American like Andy Ngo.
Ngo has been a target for a few years now. But the current round of attacks are a preemptive smear campaign because Congressman Jim Jordan has invited Andy Ngo to testify on the violence from Antifa.
Those who feel threatened by my work are repeating the same falsehoods from last year. It’s the same playbook with the same bad actors. They failed to bring me down before & will fail again. pic.twitter.com/TVewaxQqad
— Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) June 28, 2020
On Friday, OAN reporter Jack Posobiec was attacked by these cretins during the “protest” at the Lincoln Emancipation Statue in DC.
And how do “mainstream” reporters respond?
Well, most of them are silent as church mice – including all the “journalists” who rushed to defend poor Manu Raju when that meanie Martha McSally called him a *gasp* “Liberal hack.”
Though, some reporters have responded by arguing that Jack Posobiec isn’t a real journalist – as if somehow that erases the reality of the attack that is on video. And, of course, they’re accusing him of being an Alt-Right Nazi Sympathizing White Nationalist Conspiracy Theorist.
It boggles the mind how fully invested the media and the Democrats are in protecting Antifa. They even go so far as to deny the very existence of this band of anarchists that proudly declare themselves Antifa — as Congressman Jerry Nadler did from the House floor just the other day.
And just as they do with Andy Ngo, “mainstream” reporters have no problem slandering Posobiec to protect their militant compadres.
Like this NBC News “reporter.”
Yeah, there’s always a “but.”
How cute to put the word “assault” in quotation marks. I watched the video. He was assaulted. That’s what you call it when people, among other things, push and shove you, grab at your neck, and attempt to steal your phone.
If a police officer manhandled a Black Lives Matter activist the way these creeps manhandled Posobiec, we’d never hear the end of it. The video would go viral on Social Media, politicians would be calling for the officer to be fired or arrested, and Don Lemon would be quivering like a spastic colon while tearfully waxing on about “systemic racism.”
But since it’s Jack Posobiec, who cares? He’s not a real journalist and PizzaGate or something! Am I right?
As with Andy Ngo, the “justification” for Posobiec getting attacked is “he brought it on himself by being there.”
Honestly, I’ve never seen this level of mental gymnastics all to defend and excuse the actual violence of the Left.
Imagine if someone said, “George Floyd brought it on himself by breaking the law.”
Could you imagine the response from these same people claiming Jack Posobiec or Andy Ngo have it coming? They’d be apoplectic with rage.
But this is where we are.
As I said the other day, the Democrats and their media handmaids focus like a laser on the imaginary “violence” supposedly perpetrated by the Right while excusing — or flat-out denying — the actual violence perpetrated by the Left.
They toss around words like “Nazi,” “White Nationalist,” “Alt-Right” “Right Wing Extremist” with wild abandon – twisting and bending the meaning of these words to fit anyone no matter how non-existent the association might be.
But at the same time they hold tightly to the literal meaning of “Antifa” – maintaining the most narrow and restricted definition possible in order to absolve the anarchist group of any culpability.
“They’re not violent! Antifa literally means ‘anti-fascist!’ They are fighting fascists just like the Americans who stormed the beaches of Normandy!!!”
That is, when they’re not claiming that Antifa doesn’t exist at all.
In saner times, this kind of Orwellian Newspeak would be rejected completely.
But we don’t live in sane times, do we?
And the people advancing this dystopic Newspeak aren’t just random idiots on Social Media craving the dopamine hits that come from trolling everyone they hate. Instead, they are the so-called “Guardians of the Truth” in the news media and elected officials from the Democrat Party.
Post a Comment