Pelosi on Impeachment Witnesses: 'It’s Not a Question' of 'Proof' It’s About 'Allegations'
Article by Matt Margolis in "PJMedia":
Today, Nancy Pelosi summed up, in a nutshell, the mission statement of their bogus impeachment: “It’s not a question” of “proof” it’s about “allegations.”
Seriously, Nancy? This just
goes to show you how much of a sham their impeachment really is. Back in
November, Rep. Devin Nunes condemned the Democrats' actions, calling
them a "sham drama" and "an impeachment process in search of a crime!"
He couldn't have been more correct.
Back in December, Rep. Jim Jordan slammed the Democrats for holding a "predetermined" impeachment.
"I
would argue it is not a fast impeachment, it is a predetermined
impeachment. A predetermined impeachment done in the most unfair,
partisan fashion we have ever seen," he said. "No subpoena power for
Republicans. Depositions done in secret. In the bunker in the basement
of the Capitol seventeen people come in for those depositions, no one
could be in there except for a handful of folks that Adam Schiff
allowed. In those depositions, Chairman Schiff prevented witnesses from
answering Republicans' questions. Every Democrat question got answered.
Not every Republican question," Jordan said. "Democrats denied
Republicans the witnesses that we wanted in the open hearings that took
place three weeks ago," Rep. Jordan continued.
"And of course Democrats
promised us the whistleblower would testify, and then changed their
mind," Jordan added. "And they changed their mind why? Because the whole
world discovered that Adam Schiff's staff had talked to the
whistleblower, coordinated with the whistleblower -- a whistleblower
with no first-hand knowledge, biased against the president, who worked
with Joe Biden, whose lawyer in January of [20]17 said the impeachment
process starts then..."
A predetermined impeachment process in search of a crime. That's exactly what it is.
Post a Comment