Friday, February 18, 2022

Ottawa Mounted Police Charge Horses Into Crowd, Disabled Elderly Woman Trampled Reportedly Killed


The Ottawa Police used horses to charge into a protesting crowd earlier today.  An elderly disabled woman (identified by red jacket) was standing with her mobility walker as the mounted police charged.  She was crushed by the horses and Fox News journalist Sara Carter {LINK} is reporting she died from her injuries.

Shortly after the police mounted the charge and trampled the crowd, the Ottawa Police claimed via Twitter someone threw a bicycle at one of the horses.  Video of the incident shows it wasn’t a bicycle, and it was not thrown, it was the mobility walker of the deceased victim as she was trampled by the horses.

Video of the events clearly shows the police were the aggressors as they charged into the crowd. The victims can be seen getting pinned between the horses, falling to the ground and then being trampled by the horses. The elderly woman (red jacket) and her mobility walker are in the picture above.

The first video shows the victim with her mobility walker just before the mounted police charged the crowd.

Another angle shows the mounted Ottawa Police charge as it reached the crowd and began trampling the protestors.

Another similar vantage point shows the incident:

Liberals (leftists), in Canada and around Ottawa, are cheering on the police and asking for stronger (more violent) attacks against the protest group.

The Ottawa Police are denying the reports that anyone was injured or killed and sticking by their demonstrably false claim that a bicycle was thrown at them.

 

If the elderly lady did succumb to her injuries these tweets are horrifically inappropriate and tone deaf.

Let us hope the Sara Carter reports of her being killed are false.


Calif. Student, Mother Protest Mask Mandates In Schools

 


Source: https://www.oann.com/calif-student-mother-protest-mask-mandates-in-schools/

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 2:00 PM PT – Friday, February 18, 2022

California parents are outraged over how schools are handling their children who are protesting mask mandates in the classroom. Video has emerged from some schools in San Diego County of children being forced to sit outside in the cold during instruction, segregated from their masked peers and marked absent.

One of those students, Micah Neglia, and his mother, Patrice Thomson, joined OAN’s Alicia Summers to discuss the matter.

.

08:08
-07:42
008:08

‘A Political Prisoner of the Democratic Party’

There is one standard of justice for rioters and cops on the 
side of the Biden Regime, and another for everyone else.


Three months after Ashli Babbitt, an unarmed veteran and Trump supporter, was killed by a Capitol police officer on January 6, 2021, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights division closed its investigation into the fatal shooting.

Omitting the name of Lieutenant Michael Byrd—the media, law enforcement officials, and congressional leaders concealed his identity for months—the Justice Department concluded Byrd did not violate 18 U.S.C., section 242, a federal criminal civil rights statute, when he shot Babbitt at point-blank range without warning, barely missing her face, around 2:45 p.m. that day. “The investigation revealed no evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer willfully committed a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 242,” the Justice Department said in an April 2021 statement.

Reports later revealed that Byrd had refused to participate in any substantive probe of his conduct on January 6. Not only did Byrd escape criminal charges or any internal reprimand, he is still employed as head of security for the House of Representatives and heralded as a hero in many quarters, including the national news media. 

Byrd was cleared not because he was innocent but because he shot and killed a Trump supporter, someone considered a subhuman terrorist by the Biden regime.

At the same time the civil rights division exonerated Byrd of any wrongdoing, the office was investigating a Louisville police officer for allegedly violating the civil rights of a Black Lives Matter protester during riots in that city following the police-involved deaths of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd. Louisville, Taylor’s hometown, was rocked by nights of violent protests resulting in millions of dollars in damages. Seven people were shot on the evening of May 28, 2020; rioters vandalized government buildings and looted stores downtown while attacking officers attempting to restore order.

One of those officers was Cory Evans, a member of the Louisville Police Department. A former Army special forces operative with a tour in Afghanistan, Evans was part of the department’s special response team to deal with large crowds or political protests, which included the BLM riots over Memorial Day weekend 2020.

In June 2021, the same civil rights division of the U.S Department of Justice that cleared Officer Michael Byrd for killing Ashli Babbitt charged Evans with one count of violating the civil rights of a violent BLM activist.

Following two nights of looting and destruction, Louisville Mayor Greg Fischer imposed a dusk-to-dawn citywide curfew to curb the violence. (In December 2020, Fischer declared racism a “public health crisis.”) Here is how federal prosecutors described the scene in Louisville as BLM rioters attempted to tear down the city: “Officers were at times struck with objects thrown by civilians. Civilians engaged in vandalism and other acts of property damage, including attempting to set fire to the state courthouse.”

Of course, the siege of the city was far worse than the Justice Department described it. Rioters refused to retreat, so Evans and his team were dispatched to downtown Louisville to enforce the curfew. 

Late in the evening of May 30, the fourth night of unrest, Evans and his team followed a group of protesters violating curfew. A man only identified as “M.C.” in federal charging documents was part of the mob. Police ordered the rioters to “get down on the ground,” at which point M.C. allegedly submitted to the commands. He was arrested for rioting in the first degree, unlawful assembly, and breaking curfew.

In the course of M.C.’s arrest, prosecutors claim Evans struck the rioter on the back of the skull with a riot stick, causing him to bleed from the head. The blow, according to the government, required three staples in M.C.’s head and led to hearing loss for a week and other related health problems.

M.C., who is white, filed a complaint with the department one week after his arrest. An internal investigation to prove Evans actually hit M.C. was inconclusive based on body camera footage (Evans’ camera was not operating that night) and largely revolved around hearsay. 

But Joe Biden’s newly configured Justice Department—which included the appointment of Kristen Clarke, who has a history of racist comments, as head of the civil right division—took over the investigation and subsequently charged Evans with “depriving M.C. of his Constitutional right to be free from unreasonable force by a law enforcement officer.”

In an interview earlier this week, Evans told me that the account offered by the government is inaccurate. 

“Several FBI investigators went through all the body cam footage for about 70 riot officers trying to find evidence against me,” he said. “They found a split second [of video] where I tackled the guy. No one said I hit him, no footage showed he was hit.”

Evans’ defense lawyers told him that the powers-that-be in Washington directed the assistant U.S. attorney in the western district of Kentucky “to make this happen.” Investigators threatened to scour past use-of-force investigations—Evans had 10 complaints filed against him—and build a compelling case of systematic brutality before a grand jury that would “put me away forever,” Evans told me. (This happened during the trial and sentencing of Minneapolis police officer Dererk Chauvin, who also was charged with violating George Floyd’s civil rights.)

So, the father of two young boys accepted the government’s offer to plead guilty to the federal civil rights charge in August.

The charges against M.C., meanwhile, were dropped and his record expunged.

In a November sentencing motion, prosecutors asked for a prison sentence of four years for Evans as both punishment and deterrence. 

“The specific circumstances of Defendant Evans’ crime necessitate an adequate sentence of imprisonment,” Michael A. Bennett, the U.S. attorney handling the case, wrote. “Officers are taught to avoid blows to the head unless involved in a lethal force situation. This is because blows to the head can result in death or serious bodily injury. The victim received staples in his head and lost hearing in his left ear for a week. However, his injuries could have easily been worse—or fatal. Our society cannot condone such conduct. Federal law forbids it.”

Ashli Babbitt was unavailable for comment.

Earlier this month, Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings sentenced Evans to two years in prison and two years probation and ordered him to pay $1,962 in restitution. “Former officer Evans abused his authority by violently retaliating against a surrendering arrestee who had been exercising his First Amendment rights during a demonstration in Louisville, during the racial justice demonstrations in the spring of 2020,” Kristen Clarke wrote in a statement after the sentence was announced. “The Justice Department will continue to hold accountable officers who violate their oath and the Constitution.”

That is not actually the case—but facts and fairness are of no interest to Clarke or any Biden apparatchik.

In the double-standard, vengeful, race-baiting world of Biden’s Justice Department, prosecutors are dismissing cases against 2020 rioters, arguing for reduced jail sentences for convicted rioters, and charging police officers allegedly involved in civil rights violations during those riots while systematically rounding up hundreds of nonviolent Americans for any participation in the January 6 protest, denying bail to dozens of offenders, and exonerating at least one police officer clearly responsible for depriving a Trump supporter of not just her rights, but her life.

Evans, meanwhile, was forced to resign from the police department and is awaiting orders to report to prison.

“I am a political prisoner of the Democratic Party,” Evans told me.

And that’s exactly how the Justice Department wants it.


X22, On the fringe, and more-Feb 18

 



For anyone on here today who might be feeling really depressed, or feeling like there's no hope out there, turn those frowns upside down! Things are working out like they are supposed to. There is always a light at the end of a dark tunnel, you just have to look hard enough!

Here is why I do these articles each day: Because I want to bring hope to good folks on here who need encouraging. And to also viciously annoy the liberal trolls on here because of how braindead they are. 😂😂 And this is what I keep doing each day, because there IS a reason to hope for a bright future no matter how bleak it might look.

Here's some wise words today that a good friend of mine posted earlier today:

I suggest you pay attention to them.

Here's tonight's news:



Another All-Time Media Faceplant

After the Biden administration and the press wrongly predicted a Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 16th, they kept compounding the error in spectacular fashion




If cluelessness can be art, American journalists unveiled their Sistine Chapel this week, in a remarkable collection of misreports and hack stenography surrounding a predicted invasion of Ukraine. 

The mess began last Friday, February 11th, when National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan gave an address warning American citizens to evacuate Ukraine. “If a Russian attack on Ukraine proceeds, it is likely to begin with aerial bombing and missile attacks that could obviously kill civilians without regard to their nationality,” he said. “I will not comment on the details of our intelligence information,” he added, before doing just that: “I do want to be clear: It could begin during the Olympics,” i.e. before the Beijing games end on February 20th. 

Around the time of Sullivan’s comments, American reporters began telling audiences a curiously detailed story about upcoming Russian invasion plans. PBS NewsHour’s Nick Schifrin cited “three Western and defense sources” in saying Vladimir Putin had already made up his mind to invade. He then cited six sources — “US and Western officials” — who told him the U.S. expected an invasion of Ukraine the following week. These voices left little to the imagination, saying the invasion would be a “horrific, bloody campaign,” with two days of aerial bombardment, followed by electronic warfare and possible regime change:

That afternoon of the 11th, Politico cited “a person familiar” (not even “a person familiar with the matter,” just “a person familiar”) in reporting that Joe Biden held an hourlong call with Western leaders pegging February 16th as a possible invasion date:

NatSec Daily was told by a person familiar that President JOE BIDEN told Western leaders about the Feb. 16 date on an hourlong call today.

Russia will start a physical assault on Ukraine as soon as Feb. 16, multiple U.S. officials confirmed to POLITICO, and Washington communicated to allies that it could be preceded by a barrage of missile strikes and cyberattacks. One person said the leaders’ call indicated that cyberattacks are “imminent” and another said the intelligence is “specific and alarming.”

This produced the following header:

“Could” headlines are always interesting. Last year’s inspired effort from the Washington Post, “Contacting aliens could end all life on earth. Let’s stop trying,” showed the difference between the full-pucker paranoia of pandemic America and the goofy optimism of the Close Encounters days. Technically anything “could” happen, so these stories aren’t wrong. The issue is what message they send. In this case, the two obvious PR imperatives were 1) Putin is a menace, and 2) we’re still one step ahead of him.

It does seem Biden held a call with world leaders, as the same story about a detailed invasion prediction began appearing all over. Der Spiegel on February 11th wrote about info the U.S. had given European diplomats and military officials. “Routes for the Russian invasion were specifically described, as well as individual Russian units and what tasks they were to take on,” the Germans reported, adding, “February 16th was given as the possible date for the start of the invasion.”

The Daily Mail took things further. Their story, which referenced how “the plans were passed on to Biden's government and discussed in a series of secret briefings with NATO allies” — apparently they weren’t that secret! — turned into another memorable headline that seemed to imply there was something about invading on a Wednesday (as opposed to a Tuesday, Saturday, etc.) that was important to Putin:

It should be clear to any reporter that a national security source who whispers not only the alleged date of a coming invasion, but the number of days of aerial bombardment and the war’s expected level of horror and bloodiness, is either yanking your chain with a fairy tale, or using you, or both. Reporters on this beat nonetheless repeated this tale over and over, as if it were patriotic duty.



Fla. House Passes Bill Barring Abortions Past 15 Weeks

 



Source: https://www.oann.com/fla-house-passes-bill-barring-abortions-past-15-weeks/

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 10:15 AM PT – Friday, February 18, 2022

The Florida House of Representatives voted to pass a bill further restricting abortion access for women in the Sunshine State. The Republican-controlled House passed the measure with overwhelming support early Thursday morning, ruling over Democrats who argued the bill would impose an ”unnecessary burden” on Florida women.

Republicans touted the bill as “protection for the unborn” while admitting that it runs counter to the protections given under Roe v. Wade. However, the GOP lawmakers noted the bill would set Florida in line with federal regulations should the Supreme Court overturn the monumental case. They asserted current federal abortion laws show how much Americans have devalued human life.

“Abortion strikes at the core of everything that is wrong with our communities in our country today because we have devalued human life to such an extent that we should not be surprised about the outcomes that we see and the failures that we face every day in our communities,” stated State Rep. Erin Grall (R-Fla. “With that, I’d ask for your favorable support.” 

The bill mirrors a similar six-week measure passed in Texas as well as one passed in Mississippi in 2018, which is now under review following an appeal by the Supreme Court. While no exceptions for rape, incest or human trafficking were explicitly named in the measure, lawmakers noted abortions would be permitted in the case having the baby would endanger the mother’s life, well-being or if the baby had a fatal abnormality.

During the hours-long deliberation in the House, lawmakers expressed their deep-rooted beliefs surrounding abortion, including the tragedy that many aborted children could havve grown into key pieces of today’s society.

“One of the greatest tragedies of abortion is that we will never know who we aborted,” said State Rep. Dana Trabulsy (R-Fla.). “Perhaps it was the next Mozart. Maybe it was the next Martin Luther King. The next Benjamin Franklin, or maybe it was someone like you and I. A state legislator, a housekeeper, a carpenter or a rabbi. We’ll never know because we never gave them a chance and that chance is a chance that everyone deserves.”

According to 2021 reports, abortions past 15 weeks account for around 3.5 percent of all abortions performed in Florida. Republican Governor Ron DeSantis has previously signaled his support for such a measure, which now heads to the GOP controlled state Senate for a vote. Under the current law, abortions are permitted up to 24 weeks into pregnancy. Should the new measure get passed, it will reportedly go into effect July 1.