Romain Grosjean: Haas driver suffers burns after huge Bahrain GP crash and fire

 

Romain Grosjean is being treated in hospital for burns after a terrifying, fiery accident at the Bahrain Grand Prix.

The Frenchman's Haas pierced the barrier, split in two and burst into flames on the first lap of the race, which was stopped.

Grosjean's car was embedded in the barrier on its side and the driver appears to have been saved by the halo head-protection device.

"Romain Grosjean will remain in hospital overnight to be treated for burns sustained on the back of both hands," a Haas statement said.

 

 

• Hamilton wins after Grosjean escapes violent crash and fire

"It's a miracle that he's alive," said 1996 world champion Briton Damon Hill, who was Ayrton Senna's team-mate at the 1994 San Marino Grand Prix when the Brazilian three-time champion was killed.

Medical car driver Alan van der Merwe said: "It was a big surprise for us as well, we've never seen that much fire in 12 years.

"Romain started to get out of the car himself which was pretty amazing after an accident like that. It was a relief to see he was OK."

Ross Brawn, Formula 1's managing director for motorsport, said the halo, a three-point titanium structure introduced in 2018, had probably saved the Frenchman's life.

"Undoubtedly we've got to do a very deep analysis of all the events that occurred because there were a number of things that shouldn't have happened," Brawn told Sky Sports.

"The fire was worrying, the split of the barrier was worrying. I think the positives are the safety of the car and that's what got us through today."

"There's absolutely no doubt the halo was the factor that saved the day and saved Romain."

Grosjean lost control of his Haas car after clipping the front left wheel of Daniil Kvyat's Alpha Tauri at Turn Three on the opening lap.

 

 

His Haas team boss Guenther Steiner said: "When you see something like this the only thing you think is 'I hope we get lucky' - you don't think how it happened or whatever.

"I would like to thank all the marshals. They did a fantastic job to get him away as quick as possible from the fire. It was amazing what they did."

"It was horrible, when I saw the images I was shocked," said fellow French driver Pierre Gasly.

"It was really scary but I had no idea a Formula 1 car could break that way. The halo really proved to be working. I have text him to wish him a good recovery. I think he is fine but a really scary thing."

 

 

https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/55122594 

 

 

 

 

France must review COVID-19 crowd limits on church attendance

 

PARIS (Reuters) – France’s State Council, the country’s highest court, on Sunday ordered the government to review a law limiting the number of people in churches during religious services to 30.

The Council said in a statement that the measure was not proportionate to coronavirus infection risks.

 

 

Last week, the government announced that a nationwide lockdown in place since Oct. 30 would be unwound in phases.

Shops selling non-essential goods were allowed to reopen from Nov. 28 and indoor religious services were allowed to resume, but the number of worshippers was capped at 30 people, regardless of the size of the place of worship.

Catholic organisations have challenged the limit, arguing that churches and cathedrals are much more spacious than retail outlets, where the limit is one person per eight square metres.

“The claimants are right in saying that the measure is disproportionate in light of protecting the public’s health … thus it is a serious and illegal infringement on the freedom of worship,” the council said.

The Conference of French Bishops welcomed the ruling and said that it would meet French Prime Minister Jean Castex later on Sunday to discuss new rules to limit the risk of coronavirus infection during church services.

 

 

“No other activity is limited by such a limitation regardless of surface area,” it said.

Catholic organisations are proposing to allow churches to utilise 30% of their seating capacity.

On the first Sunday after a month-long lockdown, French churches reopened for the first time with services for Advent, the fourth Sunday before Christmas.

At the Saint-Sulpice church in Paris, a sign at the entrance read “space limited to 30 people”, but there were no controls on how many people could enter and about 50 to 60 people, all wearing masks, took part in the service, seated on chairs spaced far apart.

“I am so happy to be back. It is sad to see such a big church so empty, but it is better than watching mass on television,” said Jean-Baptiste Jeulin, an engineer.

Fellow worshipper Jean-Paul Lauras, a retiree, said the 30-people rule was incomprehensible.

“Catholics, but no doubt also Protestants, Jews and Muslims, perceive this measure as highly inconsiderate. It is a form of disdain,” he said

 

https://www.oann.com/france-must-review-covid-19-crowd-limits-on-church-attendance/ 

 

 

'Fireball' dazzles in the sky in Japan

 

A dazzling ''fireball'' has been seen lighting up the skies across large areas of western Japan.

The meteor was seen descending towards earth for a few seconds, before emitting a powerful light.

Let the Waters Roil

Is this the way real Americans react to treason?

by Bruce Bawer for American Greatness

Time isn’t on our side,” said President Trump on Friday. “Everything else is on our side. Facts are on our side.”

The president was referring, of course, to the vote counts that currently are being disputed in several states. Indeed, if you’ve been following the actual developments on this front closely, you are becoming increasingly aware of just how much evidence there is of massive electoral fraud. 

The question is not whether the Democrats tried to steal the election; they did. At this point, there’s no honest question about that. The only question is whether there’s enough time to prove it in court, and whether the judges involved will dare to make honest rulings. 

To tens of millions of Americans, to be sure, there’s no story here. Since Election Night, they’ve been told by the media sources they trust that there’s no doubt about the results. Biden won; Trump is a sore loser; all claims of electoral fraud are “baseless” and “false”; right-wingers, by maintaining otherwise, have abandoned all reason. 

There’s one thing you can fairly say about all of the so-called journalists who dismiss claims of fraud as “baseless” and “false”: not a single one of them actually examines the evidence. Not in writing or on camera, anyway. Not objectively. Not honestly. All they have to say about the evidence is that it doesn’t add up to anything. 

And they don’t prove this. They just assert it. Indeed, assertion—repeated assertion; endless, mindless assertion—is their favored rhetorical device. When in your life have you ever run across the word “baseless” so frequently? 

Trump’s baseless claims of Georgia voter fraud spark fears among Republicans (Guardian, November 28)  

Trump’s baseless election fraud claims in Georgia turn Senate runoffs into a “high-wire act” for Republicans (Washington Post, November 28)

Trump’s ex-lawyer rebuked by election technology firm over baseless fraud theory    (Independent, November 28)

The word “baseless” (or one of its synonyms) doesn’t just appear frequently. Over and over again, it crops up in ways you wouldn’t ordinarily expect. Ways that sound awkward. As if editors are under orders to make sure it’s there, and to put it in if it isn’t.  

Some so-called journalists have gone the extra mile to discredit the blatantly obvious fact of calculated, organized fraud. The premise of David Brooks’ Friday column was that Republicans are “detached from reality,” while Democrats are, well, the opposite. 

His first piece of evidence? Seventy-seven percent of Trump supporters believe that Biden “won the presidential election because of fraud.” Which, he implied, is proof of mass delusion. 

All this, mind you, while mountains of evidence were being laid on the table in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and other states. 

The sheer chutzpah is beyond belief. 

For most of this year, leftists have rioted in the streets of major American cities. Democratic mayors and governors have defended them—or, at the very least, refused to condemn them or send police out to crush them. Decent citizens have been robbed, burglarized, beaten, and even killed. 

Before the election, there were widespread fears that a Trump victory would lead to a spike in violence. But the media called the election for Biden—and was there violence? None. Then evidence of fraud surfaced. Was there violence? None. 

Trump supporters—repeatedly demeaned by Democrats, and by NeverTrump Republicans like David Brooks, as low-rent vulgarians—remained civilized. 

As this despicable story has developed, the mainstream media, and the Left generally, have gone beyond all previous bounds in dismissing the plain, cold facts—and in smearing Trump supporters as reality-denying cretins. 

Meanwhile those Trump supporters have behaved themselves. Many pro-Trump politicians and commentators have reacted with equanimity to the smears against them—as if it’s all in a day’s work, all just politics as usual. 

Indeed, some Trump supporters have even suggested that the proper move, at this juncture, would be to bow out gracefully—to accept defeat, however illegitimate, and walk offstage. To borrow a favorite expression of George H. W. Bush, they feel that doing otherwise simply “wouldn’t be prudent.” 

Is this the way real Americans react to treason? 

In a word, no. 

Some of us may tell ourselves that this isn’t a big deal—that, in the name of national unity, continuity, harmony (you pick the word), this crime should be accepted, swept under the rug, so that we all can move on and live together under a Biden presidency. 

I’m sorry, but this is the logic of domestic abuse. My limp? That scar on my forehead? No, I just fell. Really. Honest. We have a good marriage. We love each other. Really we do. Even if something should come between us, even if there’s yelling and discomfort, it’s not worth making a fuss over. 

Excuse me, but you wouldn’t have encountered that kind of thinking among George Washington’s young soldiers at Valley Forge. Or the Union forces at Gettysburg. Or the men who stormed the Normandy beaches on D-Day. 

For 16 years, Americans lived under two of the worst presidents in our entire history. However disappointed we were, we endured them because we believed that they’d both been elected fair and square. 

Trump has been in there for four years. He’s made up for those sixteen crummy years, and then some. He deserved another term. He earned it. He won it. And now they want to steal it from him—from us. 

And they expect us to roll over—to deny another term to our duly elected president and allow them to install, in his place, their morally bankrupt, half-dead tool. 

All for the sake of peace. All to keep from roiling the waters. All to preserve an illusion of civilized institutional continuity—an illusion that only an imbecile, or a low-information voter, could ever believe in. 

To hell with them. Let the waters roil. They’ve already shown us that they’re prepared to tear down homes and businesses for no reason whatsoever. Well, let’s give them a reason. Let’s make it clear to them that if we’ve been reticent so far, it’s not because we’re weak—it’s because we’re civilized. 

And let’s teach them that when barbarians try to sabotage a cornerstone of civilized society—an election—then civilized people will, finally, act. 

Joe & Kamala Will Usher In America's Ultimate Demise

by Ron Coleman via threadreader

I had lunch with a very wise friend yesterday. He had a number of observations about the current crisis. The first is that, if indeed it's Biden, liberals are going to be horrified by what he delivers. Nothing "liberal" or "progressive" will happen. 

The middle and working classes are being destroyed and that will continue to its conclusion. The Swamp creatures in the wings will also crush anyone associated with Trump or populism, including platforms, professionals and vendors. 

The uber rich will get richer as Wall Street continues acting as the CCP's finance and propaganda arm as well as the mechanism for transferring vast amounts of taxpayer money to Wall Street and the CCP. 

OTOH we agreed that, as the actual voting showed, there's less trust and deference to traditional institutions than ever before. Their trust equity is near bottom. Unfortunately, because they won't be able to control the population by lying, they'll use more coercive means. 

Regular folks are seeing and contemplating civil disobedience and social disruption in a whole new light, though. And they are going to start planning it and doing it. Moral qualms and civic duty are off the table: this "election" proved that it's eat or be eaten. 

The disintegration of the old American, largely inherited Anglo-Saxon social order that the power structure relied on began, ironically, with the destruction of civic norms via Covid lockdowns. People no longer interact or deal with each other in person. New game is on. 

Government is trusted only by those profiting from it personally. Everyone knows legislatures no longer function at all. Judges have no courage and decide cases based on politics. Governors are lawless tyrants and the presumptive new SCOTUS is a golem. New game, as I said. 

Universities will crumble as their value for all but the super rich as finishing schools and indoctrination centers, combined with absurd costs and an environment that teaches adolescents only social and sexual dysfunction, makes them a ridiculous value proposition. 

Ironically though even the elite schools and networks will suffer as social, economic and civic life become more atomic and technological. The interpersonal relationships that are built by years of in person serial interactions asking elites will no longer occur. 

He enjoyed the kosher pizza I brought over and ate three slices of it. We agreed that we are embarking on terribly interesting times and wished each other Thanksgiving greetings as I took my leave. 

I left out a couple of points that I remembered later. I'll add them tomorrow 

🌅

Good morning. The first point I left out is the obvious domination of the technology behemoths in what is essentially a regime of authoritarian corporatism that makes talk of civil rights and justice quite irrelevant. I've been tweeting about that for years of course. 

The salient point here (and it's one Thomas Wictor made this week) is that the people in charge of these companies are at once moral retards yet preen about what they think is a moral superiority which to them justifies every act of censorship, lying and oppression. 

This makes them no different from every arrogant Jacobin-Bolshevik bully in modern history of course. Another point from our discussion involves the extent of moral derangement common & accepted among the Wall St / Silicon Valley elite. I will only say the word, "Epstein." 

My friend texts: Well...our lunch convo seems to have people “talking”! Yes, of course, Biden is a kind of political “Trojan Horse.” And, of course, Kamala is potentially waiting in the wings as the stealth progressivist. Two thoughts? 

(1) Don’t underestimate the ambitions of Jill Biden. Some might think they’ll marginalize (or discard) the old man - and they may - but they’re going to have to go through Jill to do so. 

(2) Harris is complete bereft of principle and is absolutely OWNED...lock, stock, and barrel by Silicon Valley and Wall St. IMO, in politics, there are basically 3 types of people...Crusaders (i.e. Obama), Gangsters (i.e. Clinton), and Groupies. 

(Groupies are those in the political entourage, the courtesans, the journalist hacks, the activists, the “lawn sign” set, etc.)Harris, like Biden, is a gangster. She’s not a true progressive...she is an ugly narcissist and a power-hungry, political “street walker.” 

There isn’t a genuinely progressive bone in Harris's body. She’ll do whatever her overlords tell her to do. All of that progressive shtick is for the “little people”...the suckers. 

(Source: https://threader.app/thread/1332146155292160003)

 

Article by Brent Smith in World Net Daily

 

From the Bad Biden Idea file: The post office bank

 Brent Smith predicts government loans would end up pulverizing private lenders

Recently, the leftist site Vox posted an article of 10 executive actions a President Biden (almost choked on that) can do without congressional approval.

All were lame – energy, Green New Deal stuff, etc. – but one stood out because it has so far gone relatively unnoticed by the right, yet would be a disaster in the making.

It's the creation of a U.S. Postal Service national bank. Yes, the leftist geniuses on the Biden transition team want the Postal Service, which is $160 billion in debt and lost a staggering $2.2 billion just last quarter, to create a national banking system.

The idea is also being pushed for by both the public sector American Postal Workers Union and the Biden-Sanders unity task force. If you knew no more than just this, you'd conclude, like me, that nothing good for America could ever come from a demand by a public sector union or anything involving Bernie Sanders.

"The idea is to provide free, or at least extremely low-cost, banking services to people currently outside the mainstream banking sector."

That's terrific – free banking services, like free college and free health care. Everything is free, and no one ever has to pay. Now let's all mount our winged unicorns and follow the rainbow to that secret pot of gold for some free money, too!

And of course, this being the federal government, it won't just provide checking and saving accounts to "millions of Americans [who] are un- or underbanked." We know that the purpose of government is no longer to secure the rights of its citizens, but to grow, like a Kraken.

Piddling little banking services for the underprivileged is only the beginning, just as Obamacare was always to be a transition to full government-run health care, laying waste to the private sector.

This will mean that the USPS government bank of the public sector will be in direct competition with private sector lenders. And we know it never ends well for the private sector. It just ends for most; crony corporatism assures the survival of a select "plugged-in few." And by few, I mean mega-donors to the Democratic Party.

So don't be fooled be the false premise of looking out for the poor and less fortunate.

Like all leftists, these understand the power of framework. Just get something started – get something on the books. Pour the foundation and erect the framework. Just get it started. Then give it enough time to grow into something the spineless legislature would never dare touch.

This new Postal Service bank will "progress" beyond this and venture into direct lending – mortgage, corporate, etc.

It's no different than DACA, which were both created with no more than an Obama pen. No legislation necessary.

"I'm going to do this. Now catch me if you can – stop me if you have the guts." And leftists know, as do we, that very few will muster the courage to do so.

If this calamitous idea is carried out, it will severely wound if not kill private sector banking and lending.

Just imagine government-run single payer health care as a banking system.

 If you like your bank, you can keep your bank!

 

https://www.wnd.com/2020/11/bad-biden-idea-file-post-office-bank/ 

Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage

The Media's Most Fevered Conspiracy Theory Just Died a Fiery Death

Bonchie reporting for RedState

There is perhaps no less self-aware, or no less shameless if you rightly assume bad motives, of a group than the mainstream media. They manage to routinely do the very things they are currently denigrating others for, all the while pretending to be vastly morally and intellectually superior. Pushing conspiracy theories over the last four years may be the most egregious example of this, with CNN and MSNBC, among many others, essentially becoming no better than Alex Jones (and at least he’s entertaining).

Remember, these are the same people who insisted for four long years that Donald Trump was a Russian agent, that the 2016 election was “hacked,” and that Hillary Clinton had the election “stolen” from her.

Well, Trump just blew up the media’s most current, fevered conspiracy theory. Namely, that the President would have to be frog-marched out of the White House to the cheers of the far-left because he would otherwise refuse to leave office.

President Trump on Thursday said he would leave the White House on Jan. 20 if the Electoral College declares President-elect Joe Biden the winner of the election, but indicated he was not prepared to concede defeat.

“Certainly I will. And you know that,” said Trump when asked if he would leave the White House if the Electoral College voted for Biden.

Wait, you mean the billionaire who’s married to a model and has his own Boeing 757 doesn’t care about fulfilling Don Lemon’s fantasies? Who could have foreseen this?

This was always the dumbest of conspiracy theories. It was also the most self-absorbed. While the expectation that Trump would attempt some kind of military coup was always ridiculous, the real reason behind its prevalence was because the media and their left-wing base desire to see Trump punished. They wanted him to attempt a coup so they could then play the role of protector, heroically removing the President from office while simultaneously confirming every crazed assertion they’ve made.

If the electoral college selects Joe Biden in December, Trump will leave office and Biden will be sworn in.  That’s a reality that even Trump himself has accepted, though he’s never promised to stop fighting until all options are exhausted. Further, the President is not going to be sent to prison. He’s going to go fly on his big private jet and use his gold plated toilets. None of the wild conspiracy theories the media have pushed are real, and that’s been obvious for a very long time.

That the media spent the past year hypothesizing insanity that would make Coast to Coast blush is simply an indictment on how useless and partisan they truly are.

 

Article by Tom R. Keltner in The American Thinker

 

Seven Quotes to Lay Out a Totalitarian America

How might a Biden administration lead us to a totalitarian state?  What parallels may exist with previous pathways that lead to totalitarianism?  These seven quotes could provide some insights.

1. "The press is our chief ideological weapon."

—Nikita Khrushchev

The lion's share of the press seems to disparage Republicans or dismiss their arguments as baseless while praising Democrats.  These people bury Democrat misdeeds (Clinton emails, Hunter Biden, etc.) while advancing critical narratives against Republicans (Russian collusion, questionable impeachment, etc.) without diligence or evidence.  Why did the mainstream press seem to bury Republican legal challenges regarding the 2020 election, calling them false on day one, before evidence was produced and analyzed?  A press that regularly sides with only one point of view and takes no accountability begins to resemble Khrushchev's ideological weapon.  A Biden presidency could cement a state-controlled media establishment that fulfills Khrushchev's vision.

2. "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."

—Benjamin Franklin

Additionally, there is a notion of censorship not only by the historical press, but within all other communications with the public that did not exist in the time of Khrushchev.  Why would Twitter and Facebook subdue reports of Hunter Biden's relationships with Ukraine and China and emails with possible ties to his father Joe?  Meanwhile, the president was subject to an intense three-year investigation regarding collusion with Russia to win an election that resulted in no collusion being discovered.  What would an aggressive three-year investigation of Hunter Biden's emails produce?  In a society with freeness of speech, we would know.  With the direction we are headed in now with social media and other censorship, we might not know.

Also concerning is the silencing of conservative voices across universities.  Janet Mock was banned from speaking at Brown University.  Ben Shapiro was banned from speaking at Cal. State at L.A.  There are others.  Upon a Biden presidency with sympathetic voices from Twitter, Facebook, other social media, universities, and others, we could find ourselves bearing out Ben Franklin's observation and overthrow our own liberty by subduing the freeness of speech even beyond Khrushchev's historical press.

3. "Indeed, you won the elections, but I won the count."

—Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza

Is it possible for a presidential candidate in the United States to legitimately have the votes to win but then lose the election to the counting of those votes?  Elections happen around the world, and there are those in totalitarian states, as indicated by the Somoza quote above, that are controlled by manipulating the election counts.  In dispute at present with the 2020 presidential election is the flood of mail-in ballots that may have distorted the 2020 election results through the vote-counting process in Democrat-controlled cities.  How can we know if this is true?  It requires total re-verification and re-counting all mail-in ballots from Milwaukee, Detroit, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Phoenix, and Las Vegas before the existing counts and the election result could be believed.  Absent that, as implied by Somoza, Trump may have won the election, while Biden won the count.

4. "The implementation of a multi-party governing system offers people an avenue for giving constructive criticism to the government.  This prevents leaders from becoming dictatorial and repressive."

—Sharon Rondeau

For a democracy, even our republic, to succeed requires at least two "legitimate" political parties.  For a party to be "legitimate," it needs to be recognized as being able to govern once elected.  Our nation's two predominant parties have had mutual legitimacy — that is, up until Donald Trump and the Republicans won the 2016 election.  The Democrats never recognized the Republican victory's legitimacy.  They formed a "resistance" and attempted to take down the president with a false Russian collusion narrative, a low-bar impeachment process, and on and on.  With a Biden presidency, could this resistance expand to writing off the Republican Party as an illegitimate organization that will need to be eliminated, placing us squarely in totalitarianism's crosshairs?

5. "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past."

—George Orwell

The founding of our country — "the past" — is under direct assault from the "woke" initiative.  Wokeness, being a Marxist concept, is trying to tell us that our nation's founding is based on slavery — a false narrative.  Why false?  Slavery was an accepted, legal process at the time of our country's founding, and many of our founders had slaves along with others across the world.  But slavery contradicts the founding principles these great men advanced.  The Declaration of Independence and Constitution held the principles of freedom and equality that contributed to the abolition of slavery, not slavery's justification.  Should Biden gain the presidency, being Orwell's "the present," this woke notion and the "1619 Project" could be expanded to redefine "the past" and orient "the future" education narrative that might have our Declaration of Independence and Constitution labeled ill founded and discarded, along with our democratic republic, based on a false historical slavery narrative, moving us toward a totalitarian state.  

6. "As for civil liberties, anyone who is not vigilant may one day find himself living, if not in a police state, at least in a police city."

—Gore Vidal

We have all seen the recent effort to delegitimize the country's police as overreaching, racist entities — yet another false narrative.  Among the 800,000 armed policemen in this country, there have been incidents of criminal behavior that need to be addressed.  But to characterize Michael Brown's shooting as a criminal act is another false narrative (look at the evidence).  Yet this incident was leveraged by Black Lives Matter to accelerate that movement's Marxist agenda to take down and defund the police.  Then we have Marxist Antifa's involvement.  With Biden, what could happen here?  Could defunded police be refunded and re-established and transition from an entity to "protect the people" to an entity that "protects the state," moving to a "police state"?

7. "The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism.  But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."

—Norman Thomas

This is a quote that defines overall what may be happening.  We have lived through the decades of gradual transition of socialist sentiments and actions in our country, becoming more socialist every day through the transition.  We have seen universities, K–12 school systems, the media, large companies, philanthropic organizations, and other entities transition from idealistic to socialist, largely unnoticed — until now.  Would Biden's administration be a massive socialist revolution into a totalitarian state?  No.  But given what has happened already, it could be the straw that breaks democracy's back.

Our transformation to a totalitarian state must be resisted.  Buckle up and stand tall.  Do not fear Black Lives Matter, Antifa, social media, the press, your school's curricula, your employer, or any of these forces.

We must heed the words of Andrew Jackson:

But you must remember, my fellow-citizens, that eternal vigilance by the people is the price of liberty, and that you must pay the price if you wish to secure the blessing.

As individuals, it is our price to pay to ensure our democratic republic's survival and have its blessing secured.

It is on us.

 https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/11/seven_quotes_to_lay_out_a_totalitarian_america.html#ixzz6fBiV3sIZ

Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage

‘Weird’ Spike in Incomplete Nevada Voter Registrations, Use of ‘Casinos’ as Home Addresses

Jack Phillips reporting for Epoch Times

An affidavit filed by Republicans in Nevada, citing a data scientist, shows an allegedly inexplicable jump in voter registrations in the state.

The scientist, Dorothy Morgan, referenced in their affidavit, said she spotted a “historically strange” increase in voter registrations missing the sex and age of the voter, as well as registrations where casinos and RV parks are provided as “their home or mailing addresses” in the Third Congressional District, which covers much of Clark County and Las Vegas.

Citing the other presidential elections as a reference point, Morgan said there were 68 voter registrations missing the critical data in 2016. But in 2020, there were 13,372 voters missing that data, she said.

About 74 percent of the allegedly incomplete registrations occurred between July 2020 and September 2020, Morgan found, according to the affidavit.

“This investigation found over 13,000 voters whose voter registration information revealed no sex or date of birth. Not only does this mean we cannot verify whether these voters are old enough to vote, it is also historically strange: While one does not expect voter registration information to be perfect, it is very strange that there were very, very few of these kinds of imperfect records with missing or invalid information until this year—when there are 13,372 of them,” the data scientist said, according to an affidavit obtained by the Washington Examiner.

Morgan noted the unusual address, saying that casinos and RV parks were listed.

“I have also identified dozens of voters who listed as their home or mailing addresses a temporary RV park and casino,” she wrote.

In an interview with the newspaper, Morgan said on Thanksgiving Day that she found the data “weird.” There were “just a lot of people who have zero birthdays, zero birth month, and then, unknown sex,” she continued.

“I saw is that you have a handful of people and then all of a sudden you have 13,000 people making that error in 2020, and that’s just, that’s not right,” Morgan added.

The scientist said that her findings are merely scratching the surface.

“Based on the results I have found in the limited time I have had to analyze this dataset, I expect to find additional oddities in the election data as I conduct further analysis,” she wrote.

Nevada’s Secretary of State’s office has not responded to a request for comment on Friday.

Nevada’s election data shows Democrat Joe Biden with a more than 30,000-vote lead over President Donald Trump. Earlier this week, the state’s Supreme Court certified Biden’s win.

Jesse Binnall, an attorney for the Trump campaign in Nevada, said on Nov. 24 that he will prove that many fraudulent votes were cast in the Silver State, asserting that Trump is the rightful winner of Nevada’s six Electoral College votes.

Thousands of Fake/Manipulated Ballots Found During Dane County, Wisconsin Recount

As previously reported by Wisconsin election reviewers the badger state does not have a formal process for ordinary absentee ballot submissions.  Instead there is a process for a very specific type of absentee request used by persons labeled “indefinitely confined.”

In all prior years those submissions were in the hundreds; however, in the 2020 election that process was used by people appearing to be “ballot harvesting”, a process not allowed by state law in Wisconsin.  The number of those ballots skyrocketed.

According to exclusive information provided to Gateway Pundit thousands of “indefinitely confined” ballots in Wisconsin have been identified with a single signature: “MLW.”

Review the Evidence Here

It appears all of those “MLW” ballots, were unlawfully harvested/manufactured for Joe Biden in Dane County, and could quite possibly be disqualified.

Reasons why the 2020 presidential election is deeply puzzling

If only cranks find the tabulations strange, 

put me down as a crank

posted by Patrick Basham at Spectator USA

To say out-loud that you find the results of the 2020 presidential election odd is to invite derision. You must be a crank or a conspiracy theorist. Mark me down as a crank, then. I am a pollster and I find this election to be deeply puzzling. I also think that the Trump campaign is still well within its rights to contest the tabulations. Something very strange happened in America’s democracy in the early hours of Wednesday November 4 and the days that followed. It’s reasonable for a lot of Americans to want to find out exactly what.

First, consider some facts. President Trump received more votes than any previous incumbent seeking reelection. He got 11 million more votes than in 2016, the third largest rise in support ever for an incumbent. By way of comparison, President Obama was comfortably reelected in 2012 with 3.5 million fewer votes than he received in 2008.

Trump’s vote increased so much because, according to exit polls, he performed far better with many key demographic groups. Ninety-five percent of Republicans voted for him. He did extraordinarily well with rural male working-class whites.

He earned the highest share of all minority votes for a Republican since 1960. Trump grew his support among black voters by 50 percent over 2016. Nationally, Joe Biden’s black support fell well below 90 percent, the level below which Democratic presidential candidates usually lose.

Trump increased his share of the national Hispanic vote to 35 percent. With 60 percent or less of the national Hispanic vote, it is arithmetically impossible for a Democratic presidential candidate to win Florida, Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico. Bellwether states swung further in Trump’s direction than in 2016. Florida, Ohio and Iowa each defied America’s media polls with huge wins for Trump. Since 1852, only Richard Nixon has lost the electoral college after winning this trio, and that 1960 defeat to John F. Kennedy is still the subject of great suspicion.

Midwestern states Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin always swing in the same direction as Ohio and Iowa, their regional peers. Ohio likewise swings with Florida. Current tallies show that, outside of a few cities, the Rust Belt swung in Trump’s direction. Yet, Biden leads in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin because of an apparent avalanche of black votes in Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee. Biden’s ‘winning’ margin was derived almost entirely from such voters in these cities, as coincidentally his black vote spiked only in exactly the locations necessary to secure victory. He did not receive comparable levels of support among comparable demographic groups in comparable states, which is highly unusual for the presidential victor.

We are told that Biden won more votes nationally than any presidential candidate in history. But he won a record low of 17 percent of counties; he only won 524 counties, as opposed to the 873 counties Obama won in 2008. Yet, Biden somehow outdid Obama in total votes.

Victorious presidential candidates, especially challengers, usually have down-ballot coattails; Biden did not. The Republicans held the Senate and enjoyed a ‘red wave’ in the House, where they gained a large number of seats while winning all 27 toss-up contests. Trump’s party did not lose a single state legislature and actually made gains at the state level.

Another anomaly is found in the comparison between the polls and non-polling metrics. The latter include: party registrations trends; the candidates’ respective primary votes; candidate enthusiasm; social media followings; broadcast and digital media ratings; online searches; the number of (especially small) donors; and the number of individuals betting on each candidate.

Despite poor recent performances, media and academic polls have an impressive 80 percent record predicting the winner during the modern era. But, when the polls err, non-polling metrics do not; the latter have a 100 percent record. Every non-polling metric forecast Trump’s reelection. For Trump to lose this election, the mainstream polls needed to be correct, which they were not. Furthermore, for Trump to lose, not only did one or more of these metrics have to be wrong for the first time ever, but every single one had to be wrong, and at the very same time; not an impossible outcome, but extremely unlikely nonetheless.

Atypical voting patterns married with misses by polling and non-polling metrics should give observers pause for thought. Adding to the mystery is a cascade of information about the bizarre manner in which so many ballots were accumulated and counted.

The following peculiarities also lack compelling explanations:

1. Late on election night, with Trump comfortably ahead, many swing states stopped counting ballots. In most cases, observers were removed from the counting facilities. Counting generally continued without the observers

2. Statistically abnormal vote counts were the new normal when counting resumed. They were unusually large in size (hundreds of thousands) and had an unusually high (90 percent and above) Biden-to-Trump ratio

3. Late arriving ballots were counted. In Pennsylvania, 23,000 absentee ballots have impossible postal return dates and another 86,000 have such extraordinary return dates they raise serious questions

4. The failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots. The destruction of mail in ballot envelopes, which must contain signatures

5. Historically low absentee ballot rejection rates despite the massive expansion of mail voting. Such is Biden’s narrow margin that, as political analyst Robert Barnes observes, ‘If the states simply imposed the same absentee ballot rejection rate as recent cycles, then Trump wins the election’

6. Missing votes. In Delaware County, Pennsylvania, 50,000 votes held on 47 USB cards are missing

7. Non-resident voters. Matt Braynard’s Voter Integrity Project estimates that 20,312 people who no longer met residency requirements cast ballots in Georgia. Biden’s margin is 12,670 votes

8. Serious ‘chain of custody’ breakdowns. Invalid residential addresses. Record numbers of dead people voting. Ballots in pristine condition without creases, that is, they had not been mailed in envelopes as required by law

9. Statistical anomalies. In Georgia, Biden overtook Trump with 89 percent of the votes counted. For the next 53 batches of votes counted, Biden led Trump by the same exact 50.05 to 49.95 percent margin in every single batch. It is particularly perplexing that all statistical anomalies and tabulation abnormalities were in Biden’s favor. Whether the cause was simple human error or nefarious activity, or a combination, clearly something peculiar happened.

If you think that only weirdos have legitimate concerns about these findings and claims, maybe the weirdness lies in you.

 

Article by Larry Brandeis in The American Thinker

 

America as a Wonderful Life...if we can keep it

I love this country.  I love the people, the freedom, and the blessings we enjoy and often take for granted.  The election of 2020 has polarized our country into two divisions — those who love this country and those who hate Donald Trump and all of his Bible-reading, gun-toting, God-loving deplorables at his side. 

America 2020 reminds me of the town Bedford Falls in the movie It's a Wonderful Life.  On one side you have George Bailey who loves his town, his life, his family and the freedom to praise almighty God daily for all of his blessings. On the other side, you have soulless Mr. Potter, who is a curmudgeon obsessed with obtaining power, more power, money, and absolute control over absolutely everyone unfortunate enough to live within his evil realm.

Donald Trump is our George Bailey.  He loves the United States of America.  He became president not to enrich himself, but instead to enrich the lives of the people who live in this magnificent free country.  Donald Trump loves people, and he loves to help people — often anonymously.  He prays to God for help and guidance.  We fervently pray to God to help Donald Trump on a daily basis because we understand that he is fighting evil spirits who lurk in dark places and threaten to destroy the country that we so love.  Donald Trump loves his family, loves God, and stands now between us and evil Mr. Potter and his machinations.

Mr. Potter in America is the far left wing of the Democratic Party.  This is not the Democratic Party we remember from our youth in the fifties and sixties.  That Democratic Party might have disagreed with Republicans but, in the event of a China virus that threatened the lives of Americans, would have reached across the aisle, joined hands, and collectively attacked this terrible pandemic.  A unified House of Representative and Senate could have pressured China to divulge the origins of COVID-19, including the doctor who engineered the virus, and collaboratively found a vaccine before millions of people across the globe perished and our economy tanked. They might have even suspended the election of 2020 until this crisis had passed.

Mr. Potter's Democratic Party had no intention of doing something so admirable.  Instead, Mr. Potter's Democratic Party impeached the president, spied on him, slandered his family, and then beat him senseless with an ugly COVID club during the election.  Mr. Potter's angry minions rioted, burned cities, defunded the police, and threatened anyone who just wanted to live happily and free in Bedford Falls.  Mr. Potter's Democratic Party wouldn't allow that to happen.  They want to turn Bedford Falls into a new fiefdom called Pottersville.   Guns, God, and freedom would not be allowed.  Freedom of speech would not be tolerated.  Pottersvillians plan to pack the Supreme Court, add states, open the borders, and continue cheating to ensure that no Republican ever holds office again.  They are as giddy as Mr. Potter, who, at the end of the movie, thinks George Bailey has been defeated.

Mr. Potter was as evil as he was wrong.  George Bailey triumphed, and so will God and President Donald Trump for all of us who like Bedford Falls just the way it is. 

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/america_as_a_emwonderful_lifeemif_we_can_keep_it.html 

Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage