Monday, June 29, 2026

USMCA Status – Canada in Recession, Mexico GDP Grows Double Expectations


You might remember recent reports outlining how the economy of Canada has slipped into a recession, posting two consecutive quarters with a negative GDP outcome.  There are multiple reasons for this shrinkage, but the dominant factor is, well, quite frankly, Canadian politics and economic policy.

Meanwhile, in Mexico the opposite is happening.  Mexico’s economic activity grew 1.2% in April from the prior month, the national statistics agency said, compared with a revised increase of 0.6% in March and beating a forecast of a 0.9% increase in a Reuters poll of analysts. {source}

It is not coincidental to see the Mexican economy performing well, while the Canadian economy is contracting.  Despite their identical proximity to The United States, each nation is currently executing a fundamentally different set of economic policies.

The Canadian government has been exceptionally combative with the U.S.A, leading to friction, tariffs and economic back-and-forth measures between the two nations.

The Mexican government has expressly understood the nature of their dependency, admitted it, taken no action to diminish it, and purposefully set out to align itself with the interests of America.

Canada is combative. Mexico is collaborating.

It seems unlikely that the three nations can agree on major economic policies, as a trilateral partnership would need alignment in core areas like energy policy. Canada’s energy policy is fundamentally separate from those of the U.S. and Mexico, and this is an issue that can’t be resolved through a trade agreement alone.

A large part of Mexico’s economy relies on remittances from Mexican workers in the U.S. sending money back to their families. As long as the U.S. job market stays strong—and it’s only getting stronger in the industries where many Mexicans work—Mexico will continue to benefit from America’s economic growth.

One datapoint that points to the USA-Canada disconnect comes in the auto sector. The Center for Automotive Research (CAR) reports that Canadian vehicle production dropped 15 percent year-over-year through April. It’s understood that factories in Canada built approximately 64,000 fewer vehicles through April than the year prior, while US production rose by roughly 44,000 units, or 1.2 percent. {source}

Auto manufacturing companies in Canada operate there as part of the business plan to sell vehicles into the USA.  As Canada increases friction with the USA, which is setting up a dynamic of U.S. withdrawal from the USMCA, those auto manufacturers will increasingly shift production from Canada to the U.S. market.

It appears that Prime Minister Mark Carney’s response to this predictable auto-sector outcome, is to flip those production facilities into venues for Chinese EV production (BYD and Geely).  However, Democrats and Republicans are united in alignment with President Trump on this issue and Chinese EVs will not be permitted entry into the USA.  This is a very big point of friction.

Right now, no company in their right mind would invest in Canada against the backdrop of a potential USMCA withdrawal by President Trump.  This is creating a scenario where our old nemesis, the U.S Chamber of Commerce, is spending tens-of-millions in Washington DC to purchase the votes and support of congress to retain the trilateral deal.

Right now, every multinational corporation in the world is looking closely at the White House as the July 1st deadline approaches.  Almost none of them can fathom what will happen if the U.S. announces the intention to fully exit the USMCA and triggers a six-month withdrawal process.

Despite what many have falsely claimed, it was specifically written into the original trade terms that if any of the three countries announce an exit to the trilateral agreement, they can fully exit six months later.  If the USA makes this announcement -whenever they make this announcement- a literal economic doomsday countdown begins for Canada.

Mexico would not really be too disturbed by the announcement as both USTR Jamieson Greer and his Mexican counterpart have been negotiating on a bilateral basis for over a full year.   However, for Canada the ramifications are so astronomical, it is almost impossible to fathom what might happen when 80% of their total exports face an unpredictable future.

The leverage President Trump carries are so formidable, the only thing that compares in scale is the ‘elbow’s up‘ ego of Prime Minister Carney.  ‘Splodey heads is an understatement.  Canadians are so unprepared it’s jaw dropping.

Make that exit announcement and as soon as reality sits-in, the Canadian dollar could collapse.


New Take From Kazakhstan's President: Trump 'Sent by Heaven'


RedState 

In international affairs, national leaders are frequently called upon to give their opinions on other national leaders. President Donald Trump has never shied away from this; he's not above calling another nation's leader a "loser" or worse, if that's his honest opinion; the notion of diplomacy that President Trump has has some decidedly rough edges.

Of course, President Trump has been the subject of comments from other national leaders as well. As is usually the case, some of those comments are good, some... not.

But one Asian nation's leader has some pretty enthusiastic things to say about the American president.

Donald Trump's business-centric approach in dealing with foreign countries has prompted one Central Asian leader to say the U.S. president has been "sent by heaven."

Kazakhstan President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev has embraced Trump's transactional approach to foreign policy, using it to deepen economic ties with the United States while seeking to reduce his country's reliance on Russia and China.

Kazakhstan, not all that long ago, was a "republic" in the Soviet Union, and the relationship between this largely Muslim province and officially atheist Moscow was not without difficulties, and people in that part of the world have long memories. But it doesn't appear as though President Tokayev is just playing one side against the other.

According to a New York Times report on Sunday, Kazakhstan has aggressively courted Washington during Trump's second administration, resulting in a wave of business agreements, high-level meetings, and billions of dollars in planned U.S. investment.

Tokayev praised Trump during a November 2025 visit to Washington, calling him "a great leader" and a statesman "sent by heaven."

That's high praise indeed. And before we go off claiming, "Well, it's just Kazakhstan," we might note that Kazakhstan is one of the most mineral-rich regions on the planet, being not only the world's largest producer of uranium, but also having about 30 percent of the globe's chromite reserves, along with being a major producer of bauxite (aluminum ore) copper, iron ore, coal, oil and natural gas - not to mention gold. Just as Alaska is America's treasure chest, Kazakhstan is Central Asia's. They also have substantial reserves of titanium, silver, tungsten, and rare earth minerals.

President Trump has made strategic minerals a priority, not only in developing domestic sources but in shifting our imports to nations more friendly than, say, China. At the moment, Kazakhstan would appear to be pretty friendly.

And trade between the two nations is increasing.

During Tokayev's visit to Washington last year, Kazakh companies signed 29 agreements with U.S. firms worth more than $17 billion, including a tungsten mining project, an agreement with Nvidia and Firebird to build an artificial intelligence data hub, a satellite internet deal involving Amazon's Project Kuiper, and a $4.2 billion purchase of rail equipment from Wabtec.

The momentum has continued.

We might note as well that Kazakhstan has signed on to President Trump's greatest diplomatic achievements: The Abraham Accords.

Granted, the old saying applies: Nations have no permanent friends, only permanent interests. But it would seem like a really good idea to maintain a friendly relationship with a nation with as much mineral wealth as Kazakhstan, and it would also seem a good idea to try to buy as much of that nation's uranium as we can - to avoid having them sell it to someone else, like a certain Persian nation that is only a short journey by ship down the Caspian Sea.