Several months ago, I was asked to assist with what was called a “firehose of crazy.” I don’t ordinarily pay attention to the goofy stuff, and I didn’t look at most of the citations being referenced. That said and with recent events in view, I have a new appreciation for what that meant.
When President Trump responded to the goofball diatribe of Alex Jones, what he apparently was referencing was a segment Jones put out on his podcast when he first requested the administration to intervene and use the 25th amendment to remove Trump. Mr. Jones followed that call for the 25th amendment, by saying he wanted administration officials to conduct a soft-coup against the President of the United States, because Trump wasn’t following his advice. [Part of Video Below]
🚨 Alex Jones and Robert Barnes call for an internal coup of President Trump.
— J (@JayTC53) April 7, 2026
Jones "How do we 25th amendment his ass?"
Barnes "Tackle Trump and let him pretend he is President"
These are the people telling you you're not America First 🤡 pic.twitter.com/vjJO553vj5
President Trump rightly responded to the quackery of the podcast world, and collectively they have lost their mind over it.
In response, Jones is now saying Melania Trump is planning to divorce Donald Trump {CITATION}, and then, if President Trump says one more bad thing, Jones’ is going to unleash his podcast audience to destroy the President of the United States {CITATION}.
Folks, these characters are not psychologically stable people. This is a level of weird only evident now because Trump decided to address it.
I mean think about it. Stop for a moment, pull back from social media, and think about the stability of mindset here:
Tucker Carlson decides it’s a value to his position to attack Reverend Franklin Graham?
Megyn Kelly decides it’s a value to her position to support attacks on Charlie Kirk’s wife?
Alex Jones decides it’s a reasonable discussion to talk about organizing JD Vance to take control of the government using the military.
Laura Loomer decides it’s a value to her position to attack anyone who she defines as not supporting the government of Israel. One of her targets is Tulsi Gabbard.
Mark Levin decides it’s a value to his position to convince the President of the United States to undermine and remove the sitting Director of National Intelligence because his priority aligns with Loomer.
All because they disagree with decisions President Donald Trump has made about dealing with foreign policy issues.
I don’t usually watch any of these podcast groups or their internecine battles du jour. But c’mon, these are not stable people. It might be entertainment for many people, but algorithms pushed “for you” are not real life.
This stuff, all of it, is just plain goofy.
If this is representative of the minds that have been trying to push “information” into the Trump administration, well, yeah, that would be a ‘firehose of crazy‘. These are not serious people.
They are not alone, not by a long shot; there’s a whole infrastructure of crazy voices chasing money that’s provided by a big tech algorithm intentionally designed to promote it.
The professional UniParty in DC is watching this unfold with a very big smile on their face.
It is very clear where this algorithmic identity tracking and micro-targeting is going. If people are not careful, their stability will be personally defined by Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Alex Jones and a lot more.
We become what we consume, both physically and mentally.