Monday, July 14, 2025

Welcome to Florida: Leftist Nut Who Tried to Disrupt TPUSA Event Now Finds Himself Named and Charged


Bob Hoge reporting for RedState 

It’s with sadness that I report that a progressive zealot tried to disrupt the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit (SAS) event in Tampa, Florida Saturday but was met with overwhelming power and was forcibly detained.

Ok, I admit, I’m being sarcastic. In reality, this video footage is quite satisfying as an entitled wannabe tough guy gets what’s coming to him as he attempts to stop the flow of traffic and make what he probably hoped would become a viral scene, as RedState's Nick Arama initially reported.

It did go viral, but for all the wrong reasons for this fool:

He felt big in the moment, but then reality set in:

Unfortunately for this guy, he picked the wrong state to pull off his antics. This is Florida, not crime-happy California, and now he’s facing something called “consequences”:

Oops.

We’ve gotten so used to progressives thinking they can attack law enforcement, stop traffic and disrupt the normal flow of commerce and life without consequence. In places like CaliforniaSeattle, and Great Britain, that may be the norm, but not in the Sunshine State.

This guy found out.

It’s so easy to talk big and make a spectacle of yourself, but as Arama reported Sunday, there are actual legitimate enforcers out there, and they’re not playing around.

The video clip of this loser crashing to the ground is satisfying, but the ongoing leftist violence against law enforcement is anything but. As we know, on today’s one-year anniversary of the oh-so-close Butler, Pennsylvania assassination attempt against then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, creepy stories about weird deadbeats can go from chuckle-worthy to tragedy in a heartbeat. The left has been promoting political violence and domestic terrorism in this country for years now, and it’s anything but humorous.

I hope Trevor Smith enjoys his stay behind bars. He might want to reconsider his actions the next time he feels the need to pretend he’s a Hollywood action star.



refugee status to two Gazans outside UNRWA mandate

 

For the first time, a French tribunal awarded refugee status to a Gazan not recognized as one by the U.N. agency.   

 

 

A French tribunal for asylum seekers on Friday approved the residency of a Gaza woman and her son based on their alleged displacement by Israel, setting a legal precedent that some fear would trigger mass immigration, but which others downplayed.

The significance of Friday’s ruling by the tribunal—the Cour nationale du droit d’asile (CNDA)—is that for the first time, refugee status was granted to a Gazan who was not under the protection of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), Le Figaro reported.  

 

 Before the ruling, Palestinians fleeing Gaza who were not covered by UNRWA’s definitions—a segment that accounts for roughly 20% of Gaza’s population—were only eligible for subsidiary protection in France, not full refugee status, the newspaper reported. The court said the mother and son were persecuted “for their nationality” by Israel, and were therefore eligible for an asylum status created in 2003 

 

 

The ruling provoked the ire of many opposed to immigration in general and from Muslim countries especially, who warned the ruling could open France up to some 200,000 Gazans who are not covered by UNRWA and may now claim asylum based on Friday’s precedent.

But others disputed this, including Pascal Markowicz, a French jurist who is also a member of the steering committee of the CRIF umbrella group of French-Jewish communities.  

 

 “The ruling doesn’t necessarily signify an opening for mass migration,” Markowicz told JNS, explaining tribunals assess applications on a per-case basis that takes into account the level of risk each individual applicant is exposed to, and that this mitigates judicial dependency on precedents. 

 

Eric Zemmour, a French-Jewish right-wing politician, on Sunday warned in an op-ed in Le Figaro that the ruling meant “millions more Muslim whom no Muslim country wants” would be coming to France.

Many thousands of Palestinians reside in France. Throughout most of last year, Palestinians accounted for a small fraction of people who filed for asylum in France: Fewer than 200 out of 142,000 who applied in the first nine months of 2024, according to Le Monde, which cited data from the French Office for the Protection of Refugees and Stateless Persons (OFPRA.) 

 

https://www.jns.org/french-court-grants-refugee-status-to-two-gazans-outside-unrwa-mandate/   

 


♦️𝐖³𝐏 𝐃𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝

 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time. 

 

MSNBC Lawyer: Illegal Aliens Might Exercise ‘Their Lawful Right of Self-Defense’ for ICE ‘Kidnappings’

 

 MSNBC contributor Joyce Vance seems to believe illegal aliens are justified in shooting federal immigration enforcement agents because they think they’re being kidnapped. No, really.

Hear her for yourself. (WATCH)

Democrats just keep escalating the violent rhetoric.

Posters laugh at the absurd notion that illegal aliens don’t know who is coming for them.

Yes, that’s crazy. Illegal aliens can’t legally own or purchase guns in the U.S.

No illegal alien is surprised or confused when ICE shows up in force to arrest them. It's a ridiculous talking point.

It’s ‘journalists’ and their fellow Democrats trying to muddy the waters in their sad, dishonest attempt to keep all illegal aliens in the U.S.

Posters notice that Democrats are hoping for a deadly confrontation between ICE and the illegal aliens they prioritize over all Americans.

Democrats and their legacy media cohorts are eager for a deadly confrontation between ICE and illegal aliens. They relish the opportunity to lie and spin it to usurp the will of voters who elected President Donald Trump to enforce the nation’s immigration laws and mass deport all illegal aliens. They're going to keep lying and escalating their violent rhetoric until they get what they want.

Editor’s Note: We voted for mass deportations, not mass amnesty. Help us continue to fight back against those trying to go against the will of the American people.



Source:
Twitchy:

Senator Lindsey Graham Outlines President Trump’s Plan Against Russia


Senator Lindsey Graham and Senator Richard Blumental appear on CBS with the always dramatic Margaret Brennan to discuss what President Trump is going to do against Russia and President Vladimir Putin tomorrow.  Senator Lindsey Graham is very happy with the plans President Trump will outline tomorrow; very happy.

The action appears to center around the confiscation of Russian assets, Russian central bank reserves held in European bonds. The money belongs to the people of Russia in the form of bonds previously purchased by Russia using a system that many nations follow, including all those nations who buy U.S. treasuries.

If the USA or Europe end up confiscating those funds, the only thing this action would prove is that the western financial system cannot be trusted. Many Nations are already reluctant, some fleeing from EU/U.S treasuries as a result of this threat, and we are seeing changes in the bond rates as a result.  Senator Graham doesn’t care about the strategic financial interests of the USA, he’s more concerned about fighting Russia regardless of long-term ramifications.  WATCH:



[TRANSCRIPT] – MARGARET BRENNAN: Good morning, and welcome to Face the Nation. We have a lot to get to this morning. So, let’s begin with Senator Lindsey Graham in Clemson, South Carolina, and Senator Richard Blumenthal in Bridgeport, Connecticut. They both just returned from Europe, where they met with Ukrainian President Zelensky. Good morning to you both, Senators.

SENATOR RICHARD BLUMENTHAL: Good morning.

SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM: Good Morning.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Graham, I want to start with you. Russia is escalating. They’re not ending this war in Ukraine. NATO’s Secretary General is going to be here, in Washington, this week and will be meeting with President Trump, who is, according to our reporting, considering fresh funding for Ukraine. That would be the first time since he’s taken office. What do you know about what is coming?

SEN. GRAHAM: Well, I don’t want to get ahead of the President, but I’m having dinner, along with Senator Blumenthal and other senators, with Secretary General Mark Rutte, tomorrow night. A turning point regarding Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is coming. For months, President Trump has tried to entice Putin to the peace table. He’s put tariffs against countries that allow fentanyl to come in our country. Other bad behavior. He’s left the door open regarding Russia. That door is about to close. Dick and I have got 85 co-sponsors in the United States Senate for congressional sanctions with a sledgehammer available to President Trump to go after Putin’s economy, and all those countries who prop up the Putin war machine. China, India, and Brazil buy oil and petroleum products and other goods from Russia. That’s the money Putin uses to prosecute the war. And this congressional package that we’re looking at would give President Trump the ability to impose 500% tariffs on any country that helps Russia, and props up Putin’s war machine. He can dial it up or down. He can go to 0%, to 500%. He has maximum flexibility. But we’re going after the people who keep Putin in business and additional sanctions on Russia itself. This is truly a sledgehammer available to President Trump to end this war.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Blumenthal, on those sanctions, the President said he expects the Senate to pass this measure you put together. And he described being able to terminate it as totally at my option. It, very respectfully, lets the President do whatever he wants, and decide whether or not to exercise it. I know that has raised some concerns among your fellow Democrats, like Senators Kane and Senator Coons. How do you assure them that this is as tough as you promise?

SEN. BLUMENTHAL: This has to be a critical moment for these sanctions and bringing down this sledgehammer at this moment was emphasized by all of the European allies who were at the meeting that Senator Graham and I attended in Europe. They are absolutely in solidarity. One after another, in that closed-door setting, expressed the view that the sanctions have to be tough and rigorous to change behavior. And so, the waiver language that we will have in this bill is very much alike the provisions that have existed in past, similar measures that give the President the ability to act in the national security, but also provide congressional oversight. And, I think that kind of assurance to my Democratic colleagues is very important. But, what is most important, I think, at this moment, is our unity. Senator Graham and I, Republican and Democrat, coming together, the European leaders with diverse views, also in unity. And we want to make use of the seized assets, again, in a unified way. I think a multi-faceted approach here is the only way to bring Putin to the table, because he’s a thug. He understands only force.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Just to follow up on that, the- the seized assets. There’s what, $300 billion in Europe. There’s about $5 billion here, in the United States. Do you get the sense that the President is going to be willing to tap that, and that the European leaders are going to be willing to seize and use that money?

SEN. BLUMENTHAL: Part of the plan that I think will be sought in this meeting involving the Secretary General is for Ukraine to be given assets by NATO and their purchasing those military assets from the United States. But the seized property, the seized assets from Russia, can be accessed by the Europeans. They are devising a plan to do it, at least for a part of those assets, billions of dollars, and the interest that is derived from them. Very, very important resources for Ukraine. And the $5 billion that the United States has also could be accessed, and I think it’s time to do it.

MARGARET BRENNAN: And we’ll be talking to one of the congressmen who put together that law to be able to seize those assets later in the program. Senator Graham, I want to ask you on the battlefield, and when it comes to weapons. CBS’ Jim Laporta has learned a recent defense intelligence assessment shows Ukraine’s shortfall in artillery and in drones will lead to marked Russian territorial gains in 2026, with Russia gaining seven to one firepower superiority by this winter. How can you get them what they need if Congress will not approve, in the House, any new funding? Is it what Senator Blumenthal just laid out?

SEN. GRAHAM: Well, just stay tuned for tomorrow’s announcement. The idea of America selling weapons to help Ukraine is very much in play. We’ve given Ukraine a lot. We give them the money, we give them military aid. We now have a minerals agreement with Ukraine that’s worth trillions of dollars. So, I don’t want to get ahead of the President, but stay tuned about seized assets. The Europeans want to limit the interest on the assets to go to Ukraine. Secretary Bessent wants to go further. Stay tuned about a plan to go after the seized assets more aggressively. Stay tuned for a plan where America will begin to sell to our European allies tremendous amounts of weapons that can benefit Ukraine. Putin has calculated that we would get tired, and Europe would get weary. He made a huge mistake. NATO is bigger and stronger, and we’re more committed to ever to make sure he does not take Ukraine by force. So, Congress is on the verge of passing the most consequential sanction package in the history of the- of the country. It will give President Trump tools he doesn’t have today, a literal sledgehammer. And the big offenders here is China, India, and Brazil. India buys oil from Russia cheap and resells it. That’s despicable. I’ve talked to President Trump. He said last week, it’s time to move. He’s tried to entice Putin to the table. But my goal is to end this war, and the only way you’re going to end this war is to get people who prop up Putin make them choose between the American economy and helping Putin. And you can only have one negotiator, and that’s going to be President Trump, with maximum flexibility to end this war. China, India, and Brazil, you’re about to get hurt big time if you keep helping Putin.

MARGARET BRENNAN: But Senator, respectfully, the President’s rhetoric has changed this week on Russia. He is making clear his patience is very thin. But, he’s got, right now, at his fingertips, just short of $4 billion in presidential drawdown authority. He doesn’t need to ask Congress. He doesn’t need to ask the Europeans for that money. He’s got it if he wants to tap it. Wouldn’t it be a stronger sign if he just sent those weapons or surged them?

SEN. GRAHAM: Well, the $4 billion and not nearly enough. I expect him to exercise that draw-down authority. But the game, regarding Putin’s invasion of Russia, is about to change. I expect, in the coming days, you will see weapons flowing at a record level to help Ukraine defend themselves. I expect, in the coming days, that there will be tariffs and sanctions available to President Trump he has never had before. I expect, in the coming days, more support from Europe regarding the efforts to help Ukraine. Putin made a miscalculation here. For six months, President Trump tried to entice Putin to the table. The attacks have gone up, not down. One of the biggest miscalculations Putin has made is to play Trump. And you just watch, in the coming days and weeks, there’s going to be a massive effort to get Putin to the table. And to those who are helping him, China, buying cheap Russian oil and having no accountability, those days are about over.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Blumenthal, on- on Ukraine, North Korea has been sending troops, as you know, to fight for Russia in Ukraine. Russia’s top diplomat was just meeting with Kim Jong Un. We know that the missile technology Russia is providing them is, sort of, their payment for sending bodies to fight. Is that going to make a measurable difference in the North Korean nuclear program? Is there more of a threat today to the US because of it?

SEN. BLUMENTHAL: The threat of cooperation on that score in sending missile technology to North Korea, as well as support for Iran, that potentially could come from Russia, is a major piece of evidence why we need to be strong with our allies against this axis. It still exists. The success against Iran’s nuclear program ought not to make us complacent about the dangers of proliferating nuclear arms. And, absolutely, yes, we should be coming down stronger, not only on Russia but North Korea, and our plan has to be to deter this kind of nuclear arms cooperation, which is why our working with our allies is so important. As they went around the room, these are the major European leaders, all of them, assembled together last Thursday in Rome, thanking us for being there, Senator Graham and myself, and General Kellogg, representing Trump. This moment of unity must be seized, and the timing is absolutely critical. President Zelensky has been robust and stalwart, but his people are being killed by bombs and drones. Children kidnapped. We need to, really, express the strength of the United States, because only strength can get Putin to the table.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Graham, on another topic here, you have been an advocate for the allies of the United States who were left behind in Afghanistan following that chaotic 2021 withdrawal by the last administration. On Friday, the State Department laid off the personnel in the department that helps place those refugees and other allies in the United States. Two sources with direct knowledge told CBS that there are about 1,400 Afghan allies with connections to the Pentagon, with connections to US intelligence, and they’re stuck there. They don’t know what’s happening next. Can you stop them from being sent back to the Taliban?

SEN. GRAHAM: Yeah, I don’t think there’s any desire by anybody to send people who helped us in Afghanistan back to the Taliban control. That’s not going to happen. As to trimming up the State Department, if you’re telling me we can’t reduce the number of people working in the State Department and still run it effectively, I don’t buy that. We can do both.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, there are some questions about who’s going to actually help prevent them from going back to Afghanistan, which is why I was asking you that if you’re going to advocate on their behalf. Senator Blumenthal, you sit on the Judiciary Committee, I believe. CBS has reported yesterday that the Attorney General, Pam Bondi, fired 20 DOJ employees who worked on the classified documents cases and the January 6 investigations. There are more firings expected. These are career officers and lawyers who don’t pick their assignments. They’re handed out to them. Is there anything that Congress can do to protect some of these civil servants?

SEN. BLUMENTHAL: Margaret, that’s a really important question, because Pam Bondi has so politicized, and weaponized the Department of Justice and now firing these career professionals who have devoted their lives to the Department of Justice, it’s only one facet of the continuing politicization. And, yes, Congress ought to be investigating. The Judiciary Committee ought to begin, right away, its inquiry. But, I’m calling for an Inspector General investigation, not only of these firings, but also of the dropping of a prosecution into the Utah physician who was mid-trial on charges of conspiracy, fraud against the government, in connection with a COVID vaccine scheme, apparently, at the behest of politicians who were deeply angry about the MAGA issue there. And, I believe strongly that now Congress must investigate

MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Graham, do you want to quickly respond to those allegations of politicized handling up at the Justice Department?

SEN. GRAHAM: Yeah, y’all missed a lot. The Justice Department was used to destroy President Trump, his family, and tried to change the election by bringing a bunch of B-S charges against him for years. We’re going to clean that mess up. As to Pam Bondi, I have all the confidence in the world she will do her job. And if somebody has been terminated, they have rights under civil service law to say it was wrongfully done. But, I’m almost amused at the idea that people are now suddenly worried about politicization of the Justice Department, while everybody sat quiet for all those years. Literally, the Justice Department, under Biden, tried to change the election by prosecuting Trump based on a bunch of B-S.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, there are mass firings, which is why I was asking you about them, sir. Senators, thank you for joining us for a bipartisan interview, up until that last section. Appreciate it. Face the Nation will be back in a minute. Stay with us.

[END TRANSCRIPT]



Homan Explains 'Reasonable Suspicion' - Hits Back at CA Federal Judge's Order


Jennifer Van Laar reporting for RedState 

Dems lost their minds on Friday after White House Border Czar Tom Homan listed "physical appearance" as one -- one -- of the criteria ICE officers and Border Patrol agents can take into consideration when developing reasonable suspicion to briefly detain and question people, accusing Homan of saying that ICE officers and Border Patrol agents can and will detain people simply based on their appearance.

Here's what Homan actually said:

“Look, people need to understand, ICE officers and Border Patrol don’t need probable cause to walk up to somebody, briefly detain them, and question them. They just need totality of the circumstances, right? They just go through the observation, get our typical facts — based on the location, the occupation, their physical appearance, their actions.”

Homan appeared on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday to explain slowly and meticulously (for the intellectually-challenged) how reasonable suspicion works and the factors (plural) taken into consideration before law enforcement officers stop or detain someone. Of course, they're not detaining/arresting people simply because of the color of their skin or where they work:

Well, first of all, let me be clear. Physical description can't be the sole factor to give you reasonable suspicion.

As I said in that interview, it's articulable facts, with an S. So appearance can be just one. For instance, if someone has an MS-13 tattoo on their face, that may be one factor to add to other factors to raise reasonable suspicion.

I want to be clear about that again, because my words were taken out of context. Physical description cannot be the sole reason to detain and question somebody. That can't be the sole reason to raise reasonable suspicion. It's a myriad of factors. And I could sit here for the next half-hour and give you all the factors.

So, every officer -- every situation is different. But I can tell you this, that every ICE officer goes through Fourth Amendment training every six months, and reminded what their authorities are for arrest, detention, and questioning. So, the officers are very well-trained.

As we've covered, a Biden-appointed federal judge in Los Angeles on Friday ruled in favor of the ACLU and other plaintiffs who alleged that agents are stopping and arresting people based on physical appearance and the language they speak, saying that "Roving patrols without reasonable suspicion violate the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution, and denying access to lawyers violates the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution" and concluding that that's what federal immigration officers are doing.

The judge is correct in stating that "roving patrols without reasonable suspicion" are unconstitutional, but no reasonable person believes that federal immigration officers are doing that. In the hours since Homan's appearance, the administration has filed an appeal of that order; here's what Homan had to say about it:

So, I look forward to DOJ litigating this judge's decision, because I don't -- I think she is making a decision without knowing what that officer knows when they get out of that vehicle to question somebody.

. . .

Look, we're going to litigate that order, because I think the order's wrong.

I mean, she's assuming that the officers don't have reasonable suspicion. They don't need probable cause to briefly detain and question somebody. They just need reasonable suspicion. And that's based on many articulable facts.

So, unless she's in the officer's mind, I don't know if she would make that decision that, well, they're not using reasonable suspicion. How does she know that? I mean, every officer has to bring articulable facts to raise reasonable suspicion, and then they can briefly detain.

Watch Homan's appearance below:


Trump Praises FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino: 'He's a Very Good Guy'


JenniferOO reporting for RedState 

It's been a dramatic weekend, with both sides of the aisle trying to make fetch happen: The influencers who pretend to be MAGA (and some who actually are) are demanding the resignation of Attorney General Pam Bondi after her mishandling and doublespeak surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein files. The Democrats and the Left are trying their darndest to create a narrative that Trump is hiding these files because he is not only named in the records, but complicit in Epstein's crimes. This is patently stupid. With all that they have and still are throwing at Trump, if he had any connection to Epstein and his crimes, the Democrats, who were in power for the balance of the decade, would have treated it just like "Russia, Russia, Russia!" and promoted it six ways to Sunday.

Neither side is happy after Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that he, in so many words, stood behind Pam Bondi as AG and that Jeffrey Epstein should be a dead subject. The drama was further quelled when FBI Director Kash Patel said he's not going anywhere either.

As our editor Bob Hoge wrote:

At issue is a creepy pedophile financier who’s been dead now for almost six years. As I reported, Jeffrey Epstein continues to haunt us long after his alleged suicide:

On Friday, the D.C. news cycle was dominated by apparent tumult at the Department of Justice and reports that either FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino and/or Director Kash Patel were considering resigning. The drama was caused by the DOJ’s statement Sunday that Jeffrey Epstein did in fact commit suicide and that there was no “client list.” 

Many observers had expected more information and were critical of the report.

Putting the rumors to a rest, Patel indicated Saturday that he had no plans to step down as FBI director. The status of Bongino is still unclear at this time.

Well, what of Deputy Director Dan Bongino? After deplaning Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews after the FIFA Club World Cup in New Jersey, President Donald Trump took some questions. One reporter asked, "Is Dan Bongino still your Deputy FBI Director?"

Trump's response was quick, but direct and decisive.

WATCH

Oh, I think so. I did, I spoke to him today. Dan Bongino is a very good guy, I've known him a long time. I've done his show many, many times. And he sounded terrific actually. No, I think he's in good shape.

So much for MAGA is crumbling, and cue the leftist tears. While nothing will be certain until Bongino returns to his post in D.C., it sounds as though a unified front is forming. With Thursday's ICE raid on Glass House Farms in Camarillo, CA, which netted 361 illegal alien criminals and 14 unaccompanied minors, it is clear that this type of sting operation is only the tip of the iceberg.

Those who myopically focus on the Epstein files alone are missing the bigger picture.