Poster's comment: Why people aren't going to vote themselves out of this anymore, they've amassed too much power and ruling by persistent fear is the new "paradigm" moving forward. When Poland and Hungry went up against the globalist and their demands to use parts of funding, taxpayer funded funding at that, to invest in renewables, the EU withheld two billion in covid funds, and somehow mysteriously every fish in a major waterway somehow died. Hungry had to finally relent after billions in aid was withheld from them for refusing to use parts of the funds for renewables. This is how they intent to play the game. You may think, this is Europe not the US, but we are moving in that direction, it just a matter of time. Don't like women getting abortions in your state, no federal funding, don't like gay marriage, no federal funding, don't like men in women's sports, no federal funding, don't want to accept a man can be a woman and vice versa, no federal funding. Don't want to invest in renewables, no federal funding. This is what happens when the elites have figured out a way to equalize your vote to theirs, even if you want to be in denial of it now, you'll find once you can't vote your way out of it anymore, how very true it's become.
***********
In a recent video, economics and geopolitics YouTuber Lena Petrova discusses a significant move by Ukraine, supported by the European Union, to cut off the oil supply to Hungary and Slovakia. This decision is seen as part of a broader geopolitical strategy amidst tensions in Europe, particularly in light of Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s peace initiatives, which challenge the prevailing narrative on the Ukraine conflict.
As Lena Petrova highlights, energy security is becoming a critical issue in Europe, especially with persistent high inflation and the increased cost of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from the United States. These factors are expected to put pressure on EU consumers this winter. The recent decision to cut oil supplies is a strategic move with potential repercussions for the economies of Hungary and Slovakia, which are already feeling the strain of rising energy costs.
Petrova suggests that Hungary’s Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, is being punished by the EU for his diplomatic efforts to promote peace between Russia and Ukraine. Orban’s historic peace mission, which included visits to Kyiv, Moscow, Beijing, and Washington, stands in contrast to the EU’s more aggressive stance. Ukraine, with EU backing, has halted the transport of Russian oil through the Soviet-era Druzhba pipeline, a critical supply route for Hungary and Slovakia.
According to Lena Petrova, the actions against Hungary and Slovakia reflect a broader reluctance to engage in diplomatic solutions within the EU. Petrova criticizes the stigmatization of peace and negotiation efforts, noting that the EU’s current approach is a departure from its past practices of encouraging dialogue and diplomacy in conflict resolution.
The decision to cut oil supplies affects both Hungary and Slovakia significantly. Slovakia’s Prime Minister, Robert Fico, who also advocates for negotiation and peace, has been vocal about the detrimental impact of this move. According to Petrova, Slovakia relies heavily on diesel fuel supplies from Ukraine and has made it clear that these shipments will cease unless the oil flow through the Druzhba pipeline is restored.
Petrova argues that the decision to sever ties with Hungary and Slovakia as winter approaches is unwise, particularly for Ukraine. The loss of transit royalties from the pipeline represents a significant revenue stream for Kyiv, which is already facing economic difficulties. The move is seen as a decision made at the expense of Ukrainian citizens, further exacerbating the country’s financial challenges.
In response to the oil supply cut, Hungary is preparing to take retaliatory measures. Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto has announced that Hungary will not approve €6.5 billion from the EU’s Peace Facility Fund for weapons to Ukraine unless the EU pressures Kyiv to resume oil transit. This standoff highlights the complex interplay of energy politics and diplomatic relations within the EU.
Petrova notes that Ukraine’s actions are reportedly coordinated with Brussels, indicating a unified EU stance on this issue. However, the lack of oil flow to Hungary and Slovakia raises questions about the EU’s willingness to compromise energy security for political objectives. The move has sparked discussions about the EU’s commitment to its member states’ economic stability.
The situation underscores the challenges facing Europe as it navigates energy security, political alliances, and economic stability. Petrova argues that the EU’s approach could have long-term consequences, not only for Hungary and Slovakia but also for Ukraine, which is already grappling with significant debt and economic instability.
In conclusion, Lena Petrova’s analysis sheds light on the geopolitical dynamics at play in Europe as Ukraine and the EU make strategic moves that affect energy supplies to Hungary and Slovakia. The decision to cut off oil supplies is a complex issue with far-reaching implications, highlighting the intricate balance between diplomacy, energy security, and political alliances in the region. As winter approaches, the consequences of these actions will become increasingly apparent, raising questions about the future of EU-Ukrainian relations and the broader geopolitical landscape.