I’m having trouble believing the constructed narrative around President Trump’s attempted assassin, Thomas Matthew Crooks.
First, I’m not talking about the ridiculously sketchy events that day. I’m also not talking about the hours, days and weeks leading up to the shooting and the background of what he would be doing in those timeframes. I’m talking about the actual personage of Thomas Mattew Crooks, the description of him, his identity, who he is.
According to what little data footprint is available and shared by media, Thomas Matthew Crooks, age 20, DOB: 09-20-2003, had no social media presence. Let that sink in for a moment. A 20-year-old in 2024 with no social media presence.
No TikTok, WhatsAp, Telegram, SnapChat, Insta, Twit, FB, gaming profile or Apple ID to correspond with his almost guaranteed iPhone, XBox or Playstation? Sorry, not even close to plausible.
Second, it’s Deja-vu all over again with the picture (seen above left) that is widely being used by media in stories about Matthew Crooks. The above image is his freshman high school picture. [SEE HERE] There are no recent or current pictures of 20-year-old Crooks taken by friends, family, or in this era, selfies? And the picture on the left is the best image the media can come up with?
Compare that picture above to the screen grab of Thomas Matthew Crooks taken during the shooting.
The most recent photograph of him is something from High School, with a flag T-Shirt? Seriously?
This, optical narrative control has serious Trayvon Martin vibes to it.
For those who do not know, below is the picture of Trayvon Martin that was used to set the “if I had a son” narrative, as advanced by President Barack Obama. However, on the right is a selfie taken by 17-year-old Trayvon Martin the week he encountered George Zimmerman.
I detect a similarity between the imagery of Thomas Crooks presented by media, in comparison to what we can seemingly identify from the blurry images of him as he carried out his assassination attempt. Someone inside a silo is intent on establishing a very specific narrative.
In the days, weeks and months after the Trayvon, Mike Brown (Big Mike) and Freddie Gray constructs, we were able to dig deep and discover the reality hidden by media pretense. However, just as DHS began controlling the content on social media, the people within the Deep State silos modified and organized in the years that followed the Trayvon fraud.
The issue seems small but looms large because the ramifications of control over the identity of Thomas Matthew Crooks. If this much exhaustive effort is put into concealing his footprint, it only makes the sketchy outcomes of his activity seem that much more nefarious.
If Crooks is what government silos claim he is, then there’s no reason to have such a strong level of control over his data footprint. Something isn’t right.
At this point, I’m not sure what it means, because the absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence.
As we learned in the months and years after the Trayvon Martin shooting, there are little known agencies within government with capabilities to permanently control information. The Community Relations Service (CRS) within Main Justice is one such omnipotent agency.
It was the DOJ-CRS that took control over the Vegas shooter background and information. However, this is even another level stronger than that.
I do not expect the legislative branch to unpeel this issue because the legislative branch is subservient to the CRS; but it’s amazing how so many people just accept the absence of a 20-year-old’s social media footprint as just something that can, well, maybe, just happen. It doesn’t happen.
Something is very odd about this.
“Investigators Continue to Puzzle”… SEE HERE
