At the same time that Benjamin Netanyahu is in Washington DC to rally U.S. support for the ongoing Israeli conflict against Hamas in Gaza, FBI Director Chris Wray is informing congress of the potential for domestic Iranian interests to be involved in the assassination attempt against President Trump.
What does each narrative have in common?
When outgoing President Barack Obama had his final “transition” meeting with incoming President Donald Trump, he informed the incoming administration the biggest geopolitical threat to national security interests comes from North Korea. President-elect Trump asked President Obama if he had ever spoken to Chairman Kim Jong-un. The response was that U.S. policy is not to reward aggressors with direct contact. As the story is told, those types of discussions are perceived within the USG as rewarding our adversaries.
That was that.
Subsequently, and in a complete departure from national security norms and USG policy as created by those who run USG policy – ie. The Deep State, President Trump told his national security team to arrange contact with Chairman Kim. I will not repeat the week-to-week events, but not surprisingly, things radically changed.
The intelligence community (IC), the true control elements of the deepest part of our USG Deep State, were not happy. When President Trump spoke to Chairman Kim, he violated one of the governing sacraments constructing the walls around the compartmented Silos.
If a president is told it is raining outside while sitting in a room without windows, is it really raining?
….Back to the IC and Iran.
Today while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is warning about the great threat that Iran represents, Director Chris Wray is telling congress of the likelihood that domestic Iranian influences might, repeat – might, have been associated with contact toward Thomas Crooks, the Trump assassin.
Netanyahu is warning congress. Wray is warning congress. Both warnings seemingly identify the same “enemy.”
President Netanyahu is going to Mar-a-Lago to tell President Trump the same message.
Should we see a signal through the noise, or just brush it off?
Again, it is irrelevant for the purposes of this discussion whether it is true or untrue. What matters is who is assembling the information that Chris Wray is telling congress?
Chris Wary maybe a willing salesperson, willfully blind, or just an idiot who speaks to the constructed analysis of those within the IC who relay information to his office. Again, it matters not.
If the assassin had succeeded, at the end of a long and painful period of investigation, would the 1,500-page report on the assassination of Trump, the ‘mistakes were made dissertation’, eventually end with the 17-agency IC conclusion that Iran was a culprit? Thankfully, we will never know.
I return to the originating example….
… Would President Donald Trump in 2025 ever be allowed to make contact with the leaders in Iran? Would he try? Are all of these current elements trying to ensure such a proposition never takes place.
We can easily predict that President Trump will stop the Russia -vs- Ukraine conflict very quickly, because the USA is essentially the unspoken source of that conflict.
A change in USA policy completely changes the dynamic in Ukraine. However, the same domestic political voices that are beneficiaries of that Ukraine conflict are the same domestic voices who are beneficiaries of the Israel/Gaza conflict. The difference is that we clearly see the former, the latter is only just starting to surface.
The IC most likely won’t be able to stop Trump from ending the Russia/Ukraine war, but they will try. However, the IC might be able to stop Trump from ending the Iran/Israel war.
Is that what we are seeing.
When Chris Wray is being informed, who is informing him?
