Friday, November 4, 2022

Super woke NBC medical junk show tries to mourn the end of Roe V Wade, and it's as bad as you'd imagine

 



Source: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/11/04/watch-nbcs-new-amsterdam-mourns-supreme-courts-roe-v-wade-reversal-with-sappy-montage/

NBC’s medical drama series New Amsterdam mourned the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade in this week’s episode, using a maudlin montage set to an overwrought score to portray its characters’ devastation.

Tuesday’s episode, which the network timed to air just one week before the midterm elections, opened with a teary-eyed Dr. Max Goodwin (Ryan Eggold) looking forlornly at his young daughter as he reads about the high court’s decision then drops his smartphone in despair.

The dialogue-free montage depicts cast members in various states of panic, anguish, and shock before culminating at New Amsterdam Hospital where everyone gathers around a TV to watch the news because clearly there is nothing else to do in a major metropolitan hospital.

Watch below:

The sappy montage was followed by a storyline devoted almost entirely to abortion, with Dr. Lauren Bloom (Janet Montgomery) revealing to Dr. Floyd Reynolds (Jocko Sims) that she had an abortion when they were together.

“Deciding whether or not to have an abortion, that was clear. And I was able to do the right, responsible thing, and I was able to get it done safely and quickly,” she said, according to a TVInsider recap.

In one subplot, the show punishes its one pro-life character by giving her cervical cancer. 

The episode concludes back with Dr. Max who explains to his daughter why he looks so sad. “A sad thing happened today. Not just to me, to everybody. And I guess it made daddy a little sad, a little mad, and a little frustrated,” he said.

Democrats and their mainstream media partners are using the overturning of Roe v. Wade to stoke voter passion in the midterms, hoping lingering anger among leftists will motivate them to turn out.

But as Breitbart News reported, abortion doesn’t rank at the top of concerns among voters this election season. Half of U.S. voters say the economy or inflation is their number one issue heading into the November 8 midterms, according to a recent ABC/Ipsos poll.

--------------------------------------

My take: I have a strict Zero Tolerance Level for these propaganda episodes. So whenever a conservative site reports on these type of lying episodes, I'll feature them on here as well. Because combating lying pro choice propaganda against the truths about being pro life is very important and must come at all sides.

I sometimes can't even believe that I actually liked this POS show in it's 1st 2 Seasons. Also, as revealed in a TV Line interview earlier this week, every single idiot who works on this show is 'pro choice', which is not at all surprising, because no real conservative would ever approve writing this kind of episode, or even write it all.

This isn't the only show that's turned to this kind of pathetic propaganda either this Season. 'FBI Most Wanted' did it too (I even reported on it last month, it's still somehow in the Popular Posts section at the bottom of this site!), and 'Grey's Anatomy' (how is that virtue signaling POS even still airing?! it ran out of creative juice YEARS ago!) did it's own pro choice propaganda episode last night. And it's equally virtue signaling spin off 'Station 19' has also mentioned abortion this Season as well, in the most liberal way possible because you know, the only ones who are stupid enough to do these types of episodes are all pro choicers, most of whom probably have their own families (that they SOMEHOW didn't try to abort!🤣)  or are probably too old to get pregnant, or are men.

The Democrats’ Insurrection Flop


Turns out, the “Big Lie” is that January 6 ever mattered to anyone outside the Beltway.


If there is a poster child for the Democrats’ humiliating failure to make the events surrounding January 6, 2021 a winning issue in the midterm elections, it is U.S. Representative Elaine Luria (D-Va.).

The two-term congresswoman is fighting for her political life in a race now categorized as a toss-up; a recent poll showed Luria tied with Republican State Senator Jen Kiggans just a few weeks before an expected red wave election, despite Luria outspending Kiggans by a more than 2-1 margin. (Before the state’s remap process, Luria represented a district that voted for Joe Biden by 5 percentage points and Hillary Clinton by 6 percentage points. Her new district now has a 3-point Democratic advantage.)

It wasn’t supposed to be this way. No doubt anticipating a tough reelection for Luria, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) appointed her to the January 6 select committee—an exercise sold to the American people as a way to investigate what happened that day and prevent future “insurrections.” Primetime televised coverage promised to make Luria a national star, a defender of “democracy,” and a voice of reason in a country purportedly under siege by domestic terrorists—i.e., Trump voters.

“We must leave behind any veil of partisanship at the door because the American people deserve answers on what happened on that day and how we can ensure this does not happen again,” Luria said in July 2021, before the committee’s first public hearing.

But that, of course, didn’t happen. The committee instead descended into the latest iteration of the “Get Trump” crusade; rather than press law enforcement and congressional leadership to explain why they failed to secure the Capitol or identify the alleged “pipe bomber,” or release thousands of hours of surveillance video, the committee, including Luria, fixated on the former president and his inner circle.

The public tuned out—rightly concluding Biden-created crises, such as the wide open border and exploding inflation pose far greater threats to the republic than the dude with the furry horn hat. This confounds the regime’s corporate media lackeys, who have devoted more coverage to the four-hour disturbance than perhaps any other event in American history.

Scott MacFarlane, a CBS News national correspondent assigned exclusively to the January 6 beat, traveled to Luria’s district to find out why her constituents don’t care about it. Claiming Luria had something “unique” to talk about—“what she calls her effort to prevent another attempted insurrection and attack on democracy,” MacFarlane explained—the reporter seemed gobsmacked that voters were more concerned with rising gas and food prices. The January 6 committee, MacFarlane lamented, is not “top of mind.”

Vox reporter Ben Collins shared MacFarlane’s mortification over voters’ lack of interest in a story that has monopolized the media’s attention for nearly two years. “In the first major federal elections after the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, the concerted effort by Donald Trump and his allies to overturn the results of the 2020 election seems to be having little impact on voters,” Collins whined. “That’s even the case here in Virginia’s heavily military Second Congressional District, where one might think voters would feel even more protective about democracy than those in other parts of the country.”

Or maybe, Ben, just maybe voters are a lot smarter than you and understand a four-hour disturbance that briefly delayed the certification of the presidential election doesn’t pose any danger to “democracy.” 

To the contrary, plenty of Americans believe retaliatory criminal and congressional investigations intended to criminalize political speech and activity represent an unprecedented abuse of power by a regime with no accountability, no decency, and no mercy.

But what really confuses the official commentariat is not only does poll after poll show Americans don’t care about January 6, their focus on it is actually backfiring on Democrats and the media. 

For example, a panel of Pennsylvania voters recently dismantled the prevailing narrative right before the stupefied eyes of MSNBC dunce Elise Jordan. Asking the panel if it was acceptable that Doug Mastriano, Republican candidate for governor, was at the “insurrection” that day, Jordan immediately got her lazy butt handed to her. All 10 panelists took turns schooling Jordan on the facts: Capitol police allowed protesters inside the building, citizens are being held as political prisoners, and the riots of 2020 produced far greater destruction than the Capitol protest.

When one panelist correctly reminded Jordan that no Capitol police officer died on January 6, she interrupted. “A police officer did die,” Jordan insisted.

She was, of course, referring to Officer Brian Sicknick, who died on January 7 of two strokes caused by a blood clot near his brain. The coroner concluded Sicknick died of natural causes, not at the hands of a Trump supporter, but that hasn’t stopped ghouls like Jordan, Joe Biden, and other Democrats from lying about it. Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), running for U.S. Senate, just this week accused Trump supporters of killing a police officer on January 6. “We all watched the video,” Ryan argued amid boos and shouts of “liar!” from the audience.

Sadly, even Sicknick’s loved ones are exploiting his untimely death at age 42 for political purposes. Sicknick’s mother is featured in a new ad produced by the Republican Accountability Project—a NeverTrump group run by former Republican and perpetual sore loser Bill Kristol—accusing Kari Lake, Republican candidate for Arizona governor, of contributing to her son’s death. Gladys Sicknick said her son was killed “defending the country” and condemned Lake for “spreading the Big Lie” that the 2020 election was stolen. “My son died because of people like Kari Lake.” (Lake, to her immense credit, offered a compassionate response to Mrs. Sicknick’s claims.)

In another example of the party’s desperation to make January 6 a decisive factor in next week’s election, Joe Biden arranged a hastily scheduled speech at Union Station on Wednesday night to compare January 6 with the attack on Paul Pelosi. 

Biden began his rant with unsubstantiated reports that David DePape, the man involved in the incident, attempted to take Pelosi hostage and yelled “Where’s Nancy?” before he was apprehended by police. “Those are the very same words used by the mob when they stormed the United State Capitol on January the sixth.” Americans shouldn’t settle their differences, Biden warned, “with a riot, a mob or a bullet or a hammer” then implored Americans to vote for continued one-party rule in support of democracy or something.

It was an appropriately angry and incoherent closing argument by Biden—a failed president who helped launch the “insurrection” narrative as the chaos unfolded that day in an effort to deflect attention away from the numerous ways in which he unfairly found himself in the White House. Since then, Biden and Democrats including Elaine Luria gambled that voters would share their faux outrage over the faux insurrection, a losing bet that voters likely will settle next week. Turns out, the “Big Lie” is that January 6 ever mattered to anyone outside the Beltway.




X22, And we Know, and more- Nov 4

 



Last weekend left before our world officially changes, how we feeling?! 😁 Here's tonight's news:


Michigan Secretary of State Flouts Court Order on Election Integrity

 https://thenewamerican.com/michigan-secretary-of-state-flouts-court-order-on-election-integrity/?fbclid=IwAR1jfn9DF7FtOvvI7k-drlQ7FkWBcHkSlxrETGy-zUNpJEN5NPMawrGWAJI



Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson is asking her state Supreme Court for permission to ignore election law during the upcoming midterms.

Last week, 4th District Judge Brock Swartzle ordered Benson and Director of Elections Jonathan Brater to revise or rescind a manual they published in May that contains guidelines for poll watchers and challengers.

Swartzle detailed five directions in the manual that clearly violate state election law.

In his decision he noted that an “executive-branch department cannot do by instructional guidance what it must do by promulgated rule,” and enjoined Benson and Brater from “using or otherwise implementing the current version of the May 2022 Manual.”

The officials immediately appealed the ruling, but on October 28, Benson also filed an emergency application to leapfrog that appeal, requesting “expedited relief… no later than 3:00 p.m. on November 1.” Should the Supreme Court grant her request, her illicit manual will continue to be used during the midterms on November 8.

“If Benson is successful in obtaining her desired relief, the 2022 election would literally be conducted in an unlawful manner thus bringing into question any election results,” states a press release from the Michigan Grassroots Alliance. This outreach is part of MGA’s Operation Election 2022 Overwatch, a program the group launched in September to proactively “ensure lawful elections.”

MGA accuses Benson of subversion and deceit, and says she claims that there is not enough time to update the guidelines before November 8. Meanwhile, her defense team, “which now features Marc Elias, former lawyer for Hillary Clinton,” has filed more than “460 pages of pleadings to date in opposition to updating five paragraphs of her election manual to comply with Michigan law.”

“Since certified poll challengers have been instructed to ensure compliance with the law while poll inspectors have been instructed to follow Benson’s unlawful guidelines, it appears that the relief that she is seeking is designed to create conflict during oversight of election activities,” states MGA.

Republican Kristina Karamo, who is challenging Benson for secretary of state on November 8, criticized her opponent during an Oakland County media event following Swartzle’s ruling. She labeled the guidelines as “an attempt to suppress poll challengers from their lawful duty – their constitutionally-protected rights to supervising the election process.”

Karamo also filed a lawsuit this week seeking a court order that would prevent thousands of potentially fraudulent absentee ballots from being counted in the midterms. She is asking the court to require Detroit voters to cast ballots in person or to show valid photo identification at their clerk’s office to vote absentee. According to the Detroit Free Press, election officials now rely on signature verification only rather than photo ID.

Why is she targeting the city of Detroit and not the state? “The city of Detroit is illegally utilizing privately funded Relia_Vote technology to ‘verify’ signatures,” Karamo tweeted Friday. “This illegal process is an attack on voting rights.”

Karamo also accuses Detroit officials of improper administration of drop boxes and absentee counting procedures, as well as illegal duplication of ballots.

“Illegal ballots and the manipulation of citizens’ votes are a threat to our Constitutional Republic,” reads her tweeted campaign press release. “With the future of our nation at stake, make sure YOUR VOTE determines election outcomes – not SoS Benson-managed corruption.”

How the January 6 Committee Made the Attack on Pelosi More Likely

Congress should formally enact legislation restoring the bodyguard’s privilege before something even worse than the DePape attack happens.


Paul Pelosi should not have been left unguarded on October 28 when he suffered David DePape’s hammer attack. Pelosi is the husband of the speaker of the House and he should have been safe in their house in the upscale San Francisco neighborhood of Pacific Heights. So why was he left unguarded? The answer has more to do with Nancy Pelosi’s January 6 committee than you might think.

Whatever Mr. Pelosi was doing, and whomever he was with on the night of October 28, he wasn’t properly protected by security. While some suspect the incompetence of the Capitol Police (who are now 0-2 for two major security incidents involving Congress in less than two years) one cannot escape the most logical conclusion: Paul Pelosi was not being guarded by security because that’s the way he wanted it. 

Of course, he is entitled to privacy within his own home. But thanks to his wife he had to choose between privacy and safety. In the headlong rush to get Trump, Nancy Pelosi’s House of Representatives destroyed the “bodyguard’s privilege,” and placed her husband in greater danger. 

The attack on Pelosi dramatically demonstrated exactly what lawyers for Bill Clinton warned might happen if political enemies became able to turn bodyguards into de facto spies against the protectee. Bill Clinton famously enjoyed the company of women who were not his wife. In 1998, Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr’s jurisdiction somehow morphed from investigating Clinton’s role in a land deal in Arkansas into a sprawling inquiry into Clinton’s sexual dalliances. He reasoned that Clinton’s protective detail in the Secret Service likely saw evidence of his infidelity and, accordingly, he sought their testimony. 

Since then, the January 6 committee followed Starr’s example—seeking texts and observations of Secret Service agents charged with protecting the president. The committee’s most dramatic testimony came from Cassidy Hutchinson who claimed second-hand knowledge of a confrontation between Trump and the Secret Service agents charged with his protection. 

Regardless of the legal basis for piercing that inner zone of privacy, the January 6 committee paraded the sordid account before television cameras to an international audience. It’s not unreasonable to assume that Mr. Pelosi might have been watching this testimony and concluded that the worm could easily turn the other direction. The Hutchinson testimony likely informed him of the perils of private conduct in the presence of security.

There are obvious and glaring gaps in the official account of what happened on October 28 when Pelosi was attacked. The FBI, which seems to specialize in protecting Democrats from their scandals, has filed a problematic affidavit which clearly leaves out or distorts information about the attack. Notably, the FBI claims that, “When the door was opened, Pelosi and DEPAPE were both holding a hammer with one hand.” That seems to suggest that a third person opened the door. But later in the affidavit the FBI claims, The police arrived and knocked on the door, and Pelosi ran over and opened it. Pelosi [then] grabbed onto DePape’s hammer,” after which DePape, “pulled the hammer away from Pelosi and swung the hammer towards Pelosi.”

So, according to the FBI affidavit, Paul Pelosi let the police into the house but then ran over to DePape to grapple for the hammer? That makes zero sense and we’re obviously missing some information. There are, of course, many more unanswered questions. How did DePape, who lived on Shasta Street in Richmond, make the 15.6 mile trip to Pacific Heights? Did he have a ride? Why did police send DePape to the hospital instead of taking him straight to jail? 

But these questions don’t really matter in light of the bigger problem the January 6 committee created in its headlong assault on the important privilege of protecting communication within the presence of a security detail. 

Democrats, but not the Pelosis, have blamed speech critical of the speaker as the root cause of the attack. But Mr. Pelosi was not injured by a mean tweet or misinformation. As much as Democrats want protection from unflattering political speech, that’s not how politics work in a free country. Even George Washington had to contend with misinformation. If anything, Democrats enjoy historically unprecedented censorship protection coordinated between the administrative state and social media. 

Even that is not enough. Democrats want more, of course. Some Pelosi critics have quietly snickered over innuendo that Mr. Pelosi might have been in the midst of something private or embarrassing when the attack occured. Well Mr. Pelosi should have been entitled to privacy and physical safety. He should not have had to choose between the two. But he apparently did because, as his wife’s January 6 committee so dramatically illustrated, your bodyguards might someday be turned against you.

Politicians and their spouses, like all of us, are human beings who do things they would prefer remain private. But under the January 6 standard, a zealous political enemy can turn a guard into a witness against you. Thus, to engage in truly private conduct, a protectee must duck their detail placing themselves in greater danger. This is an obvious gap in security that must be remedied. Congress should formally enact legislation restoring the bodyguard’s privilege before something even worse than the DePape attack happens.




If Republicans Win, They Will Burn Your Home, Steal Your Possessions, Take Your Lives, And Laugh When They Enslave Your Children


Alarmism and crass projection come from 
those who desire a one-party state.



Schadenfreude doesn’t normally do it for me, but I have to admit watching people who think they’re about to lose political power engage in panic-stricken hysterics has a certain appeal.

I’m sure, by now, you’ve heard that the end is near-ish. About a week away. Sure, there were rumblings it was coming when we passed net neutrality. Those who survived were subjected to the fiery lake of burning sulfur known as the Trump tax cuts, which Nancy Pelosi had presciently noted was “armageddon.” “People will die if Trumpcare becomes law,” she warned. Then came the overturning of Roe v. Wade — a decision that “released the whirlwind.” And, now, here we are at the midterms of 2022, the most momentous election not only in your life but perhaps in the history of mankind.

Last night, the President of the United States, a man whose pathological lying has been ratcheted up to surreal levels lately, gave one of the most transparently toxic partisan speeches in memory. Biden, quite paradoxically, warned that American “democracy” could only survive if the nation functioned under one-party rule. Despite historic early turnouts, the president lied about widespread attacks on voting rights, preemptively engaging in the kind of election denialism he contends is “un-American.” Biden has probably forgotten that virtually every major Democrat was an “election denialist” not only in 2016 but in 2000, as well.

The president then blamed the actions of the mentally ill, drug-addled individual who viciously attacked the husband of Nancy Pelosi on all of MAGAdom — which, according to Democrats, includes everyone who disagrees with any of their positions, including a pro-life movement that’s been around forever. Biden, who has likely engaged in more blatant executive abuses than any post-war president, leads a party that makes little distinction between “democracy” and its own power, treating any deviation, whether it be by the courts or voters, as illegitimate and “undemocratic” — a word that has been sapped of any real meaning.

This corrosive hyperbole isn’t only found in the rantings of hair-brained Twitter celebrities or in the desperate, last-ditch campaigning of a cognitively suspect president. Erstwhile historian Michael Beschloss, a man who imparts his alleged wisdom on the president, warned that the nation was “six days away” from a new GOP dictatorship in which innocent children were at risk of being “arrested and conceivably killed.” This is not the first time Beschloss has dropped insane hyperbole, not long ago claiming “that we are all in existential danger of having our democracy and democracies around the world destroyed,” and it surely won’t be the last.

Sunny Hostin, a cohost of the most popular daytime television show in the country, claimed that white suburban women who backed the GOP were “like roaches voting for Raid.” Hostin is a historical illiterate, perhaps, but surely even she understands that comparing people to bugs is dehumanizing, racist language that would never stand if “white” was replaced by any other identity. But, then, identitarianism is now so firmly embedded in left-wing rhetoric, I doubt she even realizes it. If Tucker Carlson had suggested something similar about anyone, we would be knee-deep in a national conversation, and the ADL would be sending all-points bulletins declaring the country at Defcon one.

That’s just in the past 24 hours.

No one is innocent, of course, but there is a popular myth that maintains the left generally engages in prudent, thoughtful, scientific, non-inflammatory rhetoric, while the right does little more than incite violence and luxuriate in its “sadism.” The “cruelty is the point” is the kind of vacuous phrase that brainless partisans living in hermetically sealed bubbles think is smart.

The media will be out scouring the land to find some nuts who are mocking the Pelosi attack to prove that one side is hankering for violence while largely glossing over the outlandish rhetoric regularly spouted on our biggest platforms. Most Democratic voters surely don’t see the world in these Manichean terms. The “election-denying” left-wing punditry class and media, however, who spy Hitler lurking behind every milquetoast Republican governor, have no problem smearing all those with a slightly different worldview as fascists. In this world, there is no policy debate; there is only alarmism and crass projection from those who desire a one-party state.




High Drama in Washington, D.C. As the Kamala Harris 2024 Pivot Begins


Sister Toldjah reporting for RedState 

When then-Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden chose then-Sen. Kamala Harris to be his vice presidential running mate in August 2020, it was hailed by the Usual Suspects as an important turning point in American politics, one which demonstrated that no matter your background if you work hard enough and stay devoted enough to The Cause™ that eventually you will be rewarded.

Left out of those glowing commentaries on the supposed importance of naming a woman (and a woman of color at that) to be your running mate were two key things: How Harris advanced her career in California – which was by way of having an affair with a much older, politically well-connected, powerful Democrat “leader” in the state who also happened to be married, and how Joe Biden chose her to run with him specifically because he was pressured intensely by woke Democrats to choose a black female.

Though it was obvious well before she was sworn into office that Harris wasn’t fit for the job, the first 20 months or so of her time as Biden’s second in command have been filled with failure upon failure, waves of bad press, and word salads galore, so much so that even so-called comedians who had previously hailed Harris as the greatest thing since the invention of sliced bread couldn’t help but take notice.

Throughout it all has been persistent speculation about whether Joe Biden will run again in 2024, and Harris obviously fits prominently into those discussions. There have also been rampant reports of infighting between the Biden and Harris camps, and even some growing tensions between Biden and Harris directly.

But with the Democratic ticket on the ropes and a political red wave projected to place Tuesday during the midterm elections, a new narrative log is being tossed onto the fire to heat things up at a very convenient time for Harris, namely that she has – at long last – finally found “her footing”:

From the “report“:

Harris’ growing comfort amid the steady beat of political activity marks a period of relative stability. There has been a perceptible absence of negative noise hanging over her every movement — to the point that the VP’s allies now don’t so much vent about Beltway coverage as they do a lack of it.

Karen Finney, a Democratic strategist who has sat in on events with Harris, contended the VP has proven helpful for Democrats “in talking about reproductive freedom and also stumping for candidates to help build enthusiasm and rally the Democratic base.” But Finney acknowledged, “part of the nature of the job of vice president is if you’re doing a good job, we don’t hear much about you. That is a challenge in and of itself, because then people don’t know as much about what you’re doing.”

[…]

It all adds up to something of a page turn for Harris. The hiccups are still there, magnified by critics on Twitter, though they come less frequently. The struggles to gain broader popularity exist, but there’s less chaos swirling. People around her feel like she’s been able to exert more independence and has started in earnest to dig out from the painful early months marked by uneven performances and staffing troubles.

[…]

Though doubts persist about her future, Harris’ last year has provided her with some political benefits, mainly, firmer connections with the party’s core constituencies.

Take a minute if you need to unwind and decompress from that impressive level of spin.

And spin is indeed what it is. The Harris of today who has allegedly “found her footing” is the same Harris from yesterday who has little depth to her beyond what she’s told to say and think by her handlers, a documented fact for anyone interested in learning more.

None of us have any idea who the Democratic nominee for 2024 will be. But one thing is for certain, Kamala Harris wants it and wants it badly, which is why we can expect to be gaslit over again with glowing media profiles on how she’s “grown” as a leader during her time as vice president while rattling off a list of supposed accomplishments (including on how she’s perfected Venn diagrams) that might sound good on paper but in the end mean absolutely nothing.

Meanwhile, potential opponents like Harris ally and California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders are waiting in the wings for an announcement from Joe on whether he will or won’t run. So stock up on the popcorn and maybe a couple of bottles of Tylenol, because I have a feeling that not long after next week’s election, things are going to get interesting like really quickly.




When Twitter Blacklists a Common Opinion as 'Misleading,' It Shows That Fascism Is Still Alive and Well in San Francisco


streiff reporting for RedState 

Last Friday, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk took over Twitter. There were some initial waves made when three top Twitter executives and an anti-free-speech nazi were shown the door (see The Crying Begins After Elon Musk Drops the Hammer at Twitter). A lot of schadenfreude ensued this week when Musk proclaimed Twitter’s “verified” user system that awards a blue checkmark to accounts that jump through enough hoops “bullsh** and seemed to say that such accounts would be open to everyone for $8/month, see Elon’s Move to Change Twitter Verification System Is Causing Liberal Blue-Check Tantrums. From the wailing and gnashing of teeth on the left, one would think that a new day of liberty was at hand on the liberal plantation.

Not so fast.

This morning, radio talk show host Jesse Kelly tweeted about the upcoming elections.

This is an opinion. You don’t have to like it,  but opinions can’t, by definition, be misleading. They can be ill-informed; they can be nonsensical, but they can’t be misleading. Making it impossible to reply to, share, or like a tweet containing an opinion is not the way a free society handles ideas. We went through this with the opinions about the Russia Hoax that Robert Mueller perpetrated on the country. We went through this during the COVID “pandemic” on the likelihood of the virus originating in a lab leak and the efficacy of the Covid vaccine, mask wear, and lockdowns. I might add that Twitter was on the wrong side of the truth on all these issues.

For the record, I think the overwhelming body of evidence indicates this is precisely the case. There is no excuse for any state election apparatus to fail to produce a winner on election night (night being defined as the dawn on Wednesday). I’ve served as a chief judge at a precinct in Maryland for nearly 20 years, so I have a bit of experience in this matter.

What we’ve seen is that the longer the count is dragged out, the more dumps of ballots that are statistically improbable in their allocation of votes take place (see Georgia in 2020), the more troves of ballots that are “found,” the more “pipes” that “burst.”

There are, in my view, two primary reasons that have caused people to doubt election outcomes. First, the rules are changed by a coalition of partisan judges and Democrat election officials at least until Election Day, so no one is quite sure what the rules are. The judicial meddling sometimes continues after Election Day. Second, counting is not transparent, and the closer the election is, the more apparent shenanigans that take place.

The only exception for “no winner on election night,” other than the Democrats trying to find a way to make up for their deficit, is when a race becomes a recount. But, even then, numerous recounts are marred by the “sudden” discovery of previously uncounted ballots.

Elon Musk says he wants Twitter to be open; that he wants it to be a public square. That can’t happen when opinions are essentially proscribed instead of debated and challenged. If this doesn’t change, then all of Musk’s pronouncements don’t mean a whole lot.



Mauna volcano close to erupting in Hawaii

 

OAN Newsroom

UPDATED 3:10 PM PT – Thursday, November 3, 2022

It has been 38 years since the last eruption of the world’s largest volcano, but geologists warn it may be close to happening again.

As earthquakes shake the islands of Hawaii, the Mauna Loa volcano remains in what scientists call “a state of heightened unrest.” This is part of what worries experts, as they say this bears some similarities to previous eruptions.

Tina Neal, the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey’s Volcano Science Center, made a statement.  

“There are a lot of similarities in the patterns that we’re seeing at the volcano now to prior to 1984’s eruption and prior to the 1975 eruption before that,” she said. “And that is an increasing the number of earthquakes below the summit of the volcano. Some indication of deformation or swelling of the volcano as the shallow magmatic system is, is receiving input of new magma.”

 

This has caused an alarm among residents who are fearful of a repeat of the aftermath of the 2018 eruption of Mount Kilauea.

“When you look at some development including residential development that has occurred in the highest hazard zones in Hawaii, those people should all be ready for such an eventuality,” Neal said. “And as we learn in 2018, things can happen quickly. The volcano can change behavior quickly.” 

 

 

Mauna Loa is one of five volcanoes that makes up the island of Hawaii. The mountain is not the tallest of these, but it does make up the largest amount of the island’s mass. Its size is part of what worries geologists, as it could store much more magma. The steeper slopes along its side may also lead to faster moving lava flows once an eruption occurs.

As the event approaches, many are worried as they look back on the Mount St. Helens eruption of 1980. However, experts argue that it will be quite different.

Hannah Dietterich of the U.S. Geological Survey commented on the matter.  

“So the volcanoes in Hawaii produce these very large wide volcanoes that are called shield volcanoes,” she said. “And that’s because the composition of the magma that’s being erupted there is very fluid. It’s erupting fluid, hotter and drier magmas than here, say, in Alaska or at Mount St. Helens, where the magmas are compositionally different.”

Due to the higher water content in its magma, Mount St. Helens exploded with a massive column of ash and dust, reaching some 80,000 feet high. The initial explosion of magma reached more than 13,000 feet.

As concerns grow, scientists agree there is a certainty of an eruption soon, although it will not happen immediately.

“It’s picking up in terms of unrest and this could lead to an eruption,” says Neil. “We are not smart enough yet to give you an exact time frame for when that will happen. But we do know it will erupt again.” 

https://www.oann.com/newsroom/mauna-volcano-close-to-erupting-in-hawaii/    




Multinational Advertisers Begin Pulling Out of Twitter


In the prediction section of the recent Twitter discussion {Go Deep} CTH mentioned the reason and unspoken motive behind a prediction that multinational corporations would start to pull their advertising money from Elon Musk.

We are simply in an era where there is no distinction between the WEF guidance for multinational corporations and the instructions toward governments’ they support.  Free speech and freedom of expression are against both their interests.

Multinational corporations are political entities.  The former distinctions between the private and public sector have been purposefully erased.  Evidence can be found in the vaccination mandate and within corporate responses to voter outcomes during elections. {Go Deep}

As predicted, it begins….

(Via Wall Street Journal) – Food company General Mills Inc., Oreo maker Mondelez International Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Volkswagen/Audi are among a growing list of brands that have temporarily paused their Twitter advertising in the wake of the takeover of the company by Elon Musk, according to people familiar with the matter.

Some advertisers are concerned that Mr. Musk could scale back content moderation, which they worry would lead to an increase in objectionable content on the platform. Others are temporarily halting their ads because of the uncertainty at the company as top executives exit and Mr. Musk considers a raft of changes, some of the people said.

Kelsey Roemhildt, a spokeswoman for General Mills, whose brands include Cheerios, Bisquick and Häagen-Dazs, confirmed the company has paused Twitter ads. “As always, we will continue to monitor this new direction and evaluate our marketing spend,” she said.

A Twitter representative didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

General Motors Co. paused its spending on the social-media platform last week.

Several ad buyers say they expect the number of brands pausing Twitter ads to rise. They say that the platform isn’t considered a must-buy for many advertisers, with far larger budgets going to tech giants such as Alphabet Inc.’s Google and Meta Platforms Inc., and that pausing makes sense during the bumpy transition under Mr. Musk.

Many executives on Madison Avenue are uneasy with the rash of sudden executive departures from Twitter’s advertising sales and marketing units. Among those who have exited are Chief Customer Officer Sarah Personette, Chief Marketing Officer Leslie Berland, and Jean-Philippe Maheu, Twitter’s vice president of global client solutions. Those executives helped reassure advertisers that their ad dollars were being spent wisely and appropriately on Twitter. (read more)

Fascism was traditionally defined as an authoritarian government working hand-in-glove with corporations to achieve objectives. A centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, using severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

That system of government didn’t work in the long-term, because the underlying principles of free people reject government authoritarianism.  Fascist governments collapsed, and the corporate beneficiaries were nulled and scorned for participating.  Then, along came a new approach to achieve the same objective.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) was created to use the same fundamental associations of government and corporations.  Only this time, it was the multinational corporations who organized to tell the government(s) what to do.

The WEF was organized for multinational corporations to assemble and tell the various governments how to cooperate with them, in order to be rewarded by them.   Corporatism was/is the outcome.  The government is now doing what the multinationals tell them to do, and in return the multinationals install the compliant politicians.

Fascism, the cooperation between government and corporations, is still the underlying premise; the World Economic Forum simply flipped the internal dynamic putting the corporations in charge of handing out the instructions.

What results is a slightly modified definition of fascism:

A massive multinational corporate conglomerate; telling a centralized autocratic government leader what to do; and using severe economic and social regimentation as a control mechanism; combined with forcible suppression of opposition by both the corporations and government.

Doesn’t that define our current reality, especially visible in the era of COVID?

The instructions from the multinational corporations to government would be called the “Great Reset“, or as commonly transposed by the government officials receiving the instructions, “Build Back Better”.

 ~ Go Deep ~