Sunday, September 26, 2021

The Greatest Existential Threat to America

Anti-white racism and ignorant attacks on the American founding, not “white supremacy” and “domestic extremism,” constitute the greatest threats we face.

Our secretary of defense, Lloyd Austin—the man who presided over the worst, most incompetent, most humiliating military defeat in the history of our nation—is black. Of course, he’s black. He was appointed by Joe Biden to display the wonderful diversity of the most progressive president in history. He wasn’t chosen because he was a brilliant military leader (obviously). He was chosen because he was a political hack ready and willing to embrace even the most suicidal left-wing policies. Left-wing policies are by their very nature suicidal because the defining characteristic of the Left is that it hates America and wants to “dismantle” it and replace it with the left-wing fantasy of a socially just future.

In February, with the deadline for withdrawal in Afghanistan a bare three months away, General Austin was not ordering a military alert to prepare for what was going to be a major humanitarian and military reckoning. Instead, he was ordering a military “stand down” to indoctrinate all America’s troops in Black Lives Matter hate white people and hate America propaganda.

In passing, may I note that 85 percent of the troops who gave their lives in Afghanistan to protect America and to give the Afghan people (and women especially) the right to breathe free were white? So much for actual diversity. 

Diversity training in practice is a racist scam whose promoters have the hateful mentality and low IQ level of the Jim Crow bubbas of the past. Their goal is to demonize white Americans and (white) America, and to promote an anti-American agenda that strikes at the heart of a soldier’s military oath to defend the Constitution. Here is a dose of the beliefs that our soldiers were being indoctrinated in during the two-month stand down during the run-up to the Afghanistan catastrophe:

“That the country was founded by racists, that the country has always been racist . . .”
“That the Constitution’s ratification codified white supremacy as the law of the land . . .”
“That whites are inherently racists (whether they realize it or not), and that the country must transform and become something altogether different than what it was and is.”

We know this is the diversity training curriculum because a courageous patriot, former Lt. Colonel Matt Lohmeier, a commander in the U.S. Space Force and head of unit assigned with identifying ballistic missile launches, experienced it first-hand. Lohmeier had the personal courage and love of country to tell the civilian world about the rot that is eating away the confidence and patriotic dedication of the military. He did so in a learned, self-published book about it called Irresistible Revolution from which the aforementioned bullet-points come.

For this gesture of patriotism-as-dissent, the Space Force removed Lohmeier from his command and then kicked him out of the military entirely. They stripped him of his pension earned during 15 years in the armed services. From his testimony, we know that to criticize the Marxist, insurrectionists, and pathological liars of Black Lives Matter or their poisonous doctrines is forbidden in today’s military, presided over by diversity commander-in-chief Lloyd Austin.

What is the impact of these doctrines on the troops? How do you take an oath to defend a Constitution that institutionalizes “white supremacy”?

Lohmeier tells you:

[It] is wrecking young people’s motivation to serve in the U.S. military, regardless of their political leanings. Many of those who believe these false narratives are finding their motivation for continued service shattered. Many of those appalled by the accusations are likewise demotivated. These narratives are teeing up a lose-lose scenario for the uniformed services and for the American people. I know because I am hearing about it all the time from people at my own base and elsewhere.

In October 2020, Lohmeier attended a discussion group, set up as part of the military’s indoctrination program. It was led by a black female officer who assigned a book by Ijeomo Oluo called, So You Want to Talk About Race. Oluo is a Nigerian and a Black Lives Matter star. Her book has been widely read and praised. Here is its wisdom as Lohmeier reports it: “The book teaches that the United States is ‘a white supremacist society’ that must be ‘dismantled piece by piece.’ It teaches that speech that makes ‘people of color feel unsafe’ is ‘an act of violence,’ but that if whites are uncomfortable, ‘do not allow [them] to be treated as if harm has been done to them.’” Could the mind-numbing racism be any clearer?

This racist garbage would be of little consequence if it were not the dominant theme in America’s culture, promoted by the White House, the popular culture itself, and corporate giants like Google that have instituted the same racist indoctrination programs for their employees and everyone within their reach—which is everyone.

What makes these doctrines sinister is that the Marxists who devised them always had the goal of dismantling America in the process. Their success in Afghanistan should be a code blue warning to every American who loves their country. America’s current corrupt leaders are always talking about “the existential threat to America.” And their answer is always the same “white supremacist domestic terrorists.” And where are they? Our leaders deploy this fiction to empower their witch-hunts, of which Matthew Lohmeier is a prime victim. 

But any patriotic American not seduced by the Black Lives Matters’ lies knows that the opposite is the truth. Anti-white racism, and ignorant attacks on the American founding—these constitute the greatest existential threat to America. And the fact that Black Lives Matter fictions make up the crippling doctrine of our military leaders should wake everyone to the menace we face. There never has been a greater threat to our patrimony and freedom since the darkest days of the Civil War.


X22, Christian Patriot News, and more-Sept 26



 





Slept in a bit. Here's tonight's news:


Border Chaos Reflects Migrants’ Home Countries

Before we let in even one more immigrant, we should ask, 
“Who are we letting in? And for whose benefit?”

The United States and Mexico share the largest border between a first and third world country on earth, and Mexico has long been a source of significant illegal immigration. Poverty, high crime, and social problems on the Mexican side lead naturally to movement north, absent strong efforts to prevent it. Think of it as demographic osmosis. 

Someone not paying attention might assume, therefore, that the large camps of immigrants appearing suddenly on the U.S.-Mexican border are made up of Mexicans. But the presence of so many different nationalities—Salvadorans, Guatemalans, Middle Easterners, Africans, and now Haitians—is a product of the interplay of refugee law and Mexico’s function as a transit point. Once the migrants make it into the United States, they can claim asylum. Mexico now permits them to transit, though they used to take a harder line, worried about the economic competition with their own people already living in the United States, as well as the impact of such migrants on Mexico itself.

Most of these asylum claims are laughable. These are people fleeing poverty and generally bad conditions, not modern-day political activists, punished for their beliefs by authoritarian regimes. This is why, in those rare cases when such claims are adjudicated, the vast majority are denied. Knowing this, most show up, are given a court date, as well as some temporary legal status, and disappear forever.  

It’s merely the simulation of an orderly immigration process.

Biden’s Policies Invite Migrants

In response to a similar border surge in 2019, Trump did something logical: If the people fleeing to safety face no persecution in the countries of transit, why do they need to go further to the United States itself to make their claims? He required any asylum seeker to apply at American consulates in Mexico or in one of the other transit countries, rather than being given immediate legal status once they arrived in the United States. This was the “Remain in Mexico” policy.  It reduced the pressure on the southern border from people from all over the world who were trying to get into the United States.  

Biden reversed this policy. Then, he put an immigration weakling, Alejandro Mayorkas, in charge of DHS. Predictably, illegal immigration has surged under Biden. Now, instead of dealing with the problem, our brain-dead ruling class is responding with a media outcry at the desperate efforts of the Border Patrol to control this surge. 

One wishes the media would talk more about the Haitians hijacking buses. This shows not only violent criminality, but zero gratitude to the United States for its insane, but undeniably generous, policies. This news is in keeping with other predictable developments, including the rise of Haitian gangs in Miami after the mass influx in the 1990s. 

As I have discussed before, Afghan immigration to Europe has also led to a rise in violent crime, particularly a series of horrific rapes. Ignoring this recent history, Biden bragged last month about bringing in 100,000 Afghan refugees to the United States. Thirteen service members died for this dubious humanitarian effort. Now, at least two of these refugees, in the United States less than a month, have been arrested for sex crimes. Afghanistan and Haiti are different countries with different problems and cultures, but neither is an improvement on that of the United States.

Of course, living in Florida, I have met assimilated Haitians, many of whom are models of dignity and good citizenship. This is the promise of immigration: that talented people flourish here, people whose talents would go to waste in their homelands. This is undoubtedly true in a number of cases, but surely it cannot be true on average, or Haiti itself would be a model of dignity and good government. It is the opposite, and the “magic dirt” of America cannot raise most of these newcomers immediately to the level of the average American. Surely nothing about the process at work in Del Rio suggests we are sifting through the mass of migrants to find the diamonds. 

The implications are maddeningly obvious. Haiti is a violent, poorly run country. It has had numerous coups, counter-coups, massive corruption, and decrepit infrastructure since its bloody origins in the mass massacre and mass rape of their erstwhile French masters. This violent history has continued up to the present day, as one faction has apparently hired some mercenaries to kill Haiti’s president. Two of those involved were Haitian-Americans from Miami. 

On what basis would anyone assume that Haitians, any more than Afghans, would not tend to make our country resemble their home countries as they become more numerous? We have seen this before in more benign ways. This is why there are Chinatowns and Little Havanas. 

But does America really benefit from a Kabultown or a Little Port-au-Prince? 

As with real osmosis, when foreigners come into the United States, they will continue to do so until conditions in the destination reach equilibrium with the source.

A Nation of Clichés

Our immigration debate is replete with clichés, such as the idea that “America is a nation of immigrants” or that massive immigration is “good for the economy.” As with discussions of diversity, the details of actual immigration, including widely varying levels of human flourishing around the globe and the consequences for existing American citizens, are absent. We talk in abstractions, rather than recognizing that the particulars of the world’s peoples have much to do with the conditions of their home countries and portend similar conditions for our own.   

We also do not talk about numbers. The world is a big place, with almost 8 billion people at the moment. Our country only has about 4 percent of the world’s population. Many of those other 7.7 billion people would like to come here. And the population in the Third World is growing at a much faster rate than ours at home.  

What is the optimal population of the United States? Today it’s about 330 million, of whom 10 million (likely many more) are reportedly illegal. Without immigration following the 1965 Hart Cellar law, the American population would be pretty flat. Almost all of the growth above 260 million or so is driven by immigration since 1965, legal and illegal, and their progeny. Would America be better off if 500 million people lived here? A billion? Would it remain the same nation if one third of the country were foreign born (it’s presently 14 percent)? Would life be better for your children if that came to pass? 

Not wanting to look at too much reality, we retreat into familiar debates born of domestic politics. After the summer of anti-police riots, now we discuss endlessly whether our Border Patrol, who have a thankless job, are being sufficiently gentle with those who have broken our laws and entered our nation uninvited. The people who talked endlessly of treason and foreign collusion now care nothing about national honor. They will say nothing when some of these people become violent criminals five minutes after entering our country.  

The tone of these discussions does not demonstrate that we have a serious ruling class or a serious country. A country is made up of its citizens residing on its land. Its leaders are duty bound to look out for their welfare, not that of the whole world. Just as your home would be a different place if you added a bunch of strangers, so too is it with a country. 

Before we let in even one more immigrant, we should ask, “Who are we letting in? And for whose benefit?” 


Scientist & Expert Discuss COVID-19, Scientific Investigation, the Viral Revolution and Political Media


An interesting discussion between two of the world’s prominent voices Geert Vanden Bossche, expert vaccine developer (Belgium); and Robert Malone MD, the inventor of mRNA vaccines (USA).

The meeting is hosted by Dr. Phillip McMillan (UK), who previously interviewed Vanden Bossche and Malone on separate occasions.  This video interview is an update on the prior conversations and predictions, along with a discussion by the two leading voices in the scientific community who urge caution.

Vanden Bossche takes the current Israeli data and shows how the widespread vaccination rate is creating pressure on the virus to mutate into variants with higher levels of contagion.  The unvaccinated group has been keeping the pressure down by defeating the virus and carrying natural immunity.  However, as the unvaccinated population is increasingly made smaller, the pressure on the virus to mutate increases.  Subsequently, these mutations stay at higher or more effective levels of infection. WATCH:


Politico ‘Scoop’ On Biden Laptop Proves The Dangers Of ‘Disinformation’ Police



Politico thought it broke a major story this week, claiming to have confirmed the authenticity of emails found on Hunter Biden’s laptop, emails that were suppressed by Politico itself at the height of the 2020 presidential campaign.

Playbook claimed on Tuesday that a new book by Politico reporter Ben Schreckinger “finds evidence that some of the purported Hunter Biden laptop material is genuine, including two emails at the center of last October’s controversy.”

The story continued:

A person who had independent access to Hunter Biden’s emails confirmed he did receive a 2015 email from a Ukrainian businessman thanking him for the change to meet Joe Biden. The same goes for a 2017 emails in which a proposed equity breakdown of a venture with Chinese energy executives includes the line, ’10 held H for the big guy?’ (This person recalled seeing both emails, but was not in a position to compare the leaked emails word-for-word to the originals.)

This comes eleven months after blockbuster reporting from the New York Post on the exact topic shook up the election. Politico meanwhile, participated in the seemingly coordinated media smear campaign to discredit the Post’s major scoop.

“Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say,” blared a Politico headline on Oct. 19.

By the time of the election on Nov. 3, the Post’s report had been supported by forensic analysescorroborating reports, the rare reveal of an active FBI investigation, an on-the-record witness, and on-the-record statements debunking the idea of a Russian disinformation campaign from the FBI, the Department of Justice, the Department of National Intelligence, and the Department of State. Even if the content found on the hard drive turned out to be foreign hoax, it was certainly far more credible than the years-long conspiracy campaign alleging President Donald Trump was as a covert Russian agent.

New York Post editor Sohrab Ahmari pointed out his own paper was suspended from Twitter for weeks, had its links disabled on the platform, was accused of peddling Russian disinformation, and had its traffic suppressed on Facebook, all for reporting what Politico claimed to reveal this week—that Joe Biden lied repeatedly when he denied ever discussing business with his son, and also stood to rake in thousands from Hunter’s ventures.

Politico confirmed details of the Post’s reporting free of censorship this week, 11 months after the story broke and 10 months after the election. Conclusion: Politico is apparently superior to the nation’s fifth largest paper by circulation.

It’s difficult to overstate the damage done by the media’s cooperative shut down of incriminating information to surround the Biden family. A study commissioned by the Media Research Center in late November surveyed Biden voters across eight swing states after the election and examined their knowledge of several news stories the group felt the media had not fairly or adequately covered, including the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.

Of the 1,750 surveyed, 17 percent said they would not have voted for Biden had they known just one of eight stories presented. Biden carried seven of the eight states where voters were polled, including Arizona, Wisconsin, and Georgia. Trump would still be in office had the incumbent just captured 45,000 more votes across the three tipping-point states.

Would every crisis of Biden’s presidency—Afghanistan, the border collapse, runaway inflation, deteriorating world alliances—happened without the corporate suppression of Hunter’s emails? The answer speaks to the dangers of a disinformation police force with a monopoly on truth.


The FBI Admits to Having Informants at January 6th Protest


Bonchie reporting for RedState

Over the weekend, a judge forced federal prosecutors to release surveillance footage of the happenings on January 6th, and despite claiming the video would endanger national security, what was shown was far from an “insurrection.” Instead, unidentified men in black systematically entered and opened the doors for perplexed protesters to walk through, at which point they mingled and took pictures. The video did not show a violent rush as part of an organized attempt to overthrow the government.

It was another blow to the predominant narrative that January 6th was “worse than 9/11” and the “worst attack” on our country since the Civil War. It also illustrated how far the federal government has been willing to go to push false perceptions. Why hide that footage in the first place? And why do we not know who the men in black are, but we know who every other random grandma is who took a selfie at the Capitol that day?

For a long time, onlookers have suspected that the reason is that the FBI had agents and informants at the January 6th protest. Now, that’s been confirmed, at least in one case.

The informant in question was a member of the Proud Boys, and while it doesn’t say specifically, I’d guess it’s the same guy people have suspected all along as working for the FBI. I won’t mention his name here, because the fact-checkers would love to ding this article, but he’s an outspoken personality that just so happened to be one of the only attendees that the DOJ didn’t charge for being in the Capitol Building.

But, I think it’s a distraction to focus on this one informant. Understand, as someone who has watched many prior leaks from the government get published by The New York Times and The Washington Post, this kind of thing only gets printed if it’s an attempt to get out in front of a much bigger revelation. Remember that recent leak to The Washington Post involving John Durham indicting Michael Sussman? The Post’s write-up made it sound like Sussman was innocent. Then the actual indictment dropped and it was far, far worse.

That’s the pattern going well back into the Trump years, and that’s likely what’s happening here. The FBI needs to normalize for the public the idea that they had people participating in what happened on January 6th. That way, when we learn who the men in black are that opened the doors, or something else related to the FBI’s involvement, it seems like less of a big deal.

In short, you can bet this doesn’t end here. Stay tuned.



10 (Holy) Ways To Woo A Godly Christian Girl



It's autumn, and that means Bible colleges are back in session and holy love is in the air. Young men everywhere are looking for ways to impress their new Christian peers. She's gotta get that ring by spring, or who knows if she will ever get married? 

Here are ten holy ways to woo the perfect godly Christian girl so you can live a perfect, sin-free life together until the day you die:


1. Show you're an alpha male by carrying more chairs than the rest of the youth group guys. — Christian females are attracted to guys who can carry dozens of chairs at once. It's science.

2. Try to lock eyes with her while you lead the worship song "In The Secret" around the bonfire. — Let her know that when you sing "I want to know you/I want to see your face" you're really singing to her.

3. Tell her the reason you're scrawny is that you spend all your time on spiritual fitness. — Physical training is only of some value, right, men? This will have her swooning right into your tiny little arms.

4. Drive a 15-passenger van and ask her if she wants to help you fill it up. — The perfect pickup line.

5. Tell her God said you were meant to be together and He'll be really mad if she says no. — She doesn't want to upset God, does she?

6. Time your worship swaying so you accidentally bump into each other. — If performed correctly, this is the perfect way to initiate first contact.

7. Whisper into her ear "Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy Him forever." — The twelve words every woman wants to hear.

8. Tell her you're a Calvinist so she has no choice. — Works every time, as it was predestined to.

9.  Offer to work for her dad for seven years. — The biblical approach to getting a spouse. Watch out for trickery, though!

10. Invite her over to Pureflix and chill. — "Hey, babe, wanna come over and watch some Kevin Sorbo movies while we sit three feet apart on the couch?" Tell her not to worry, as your parents will be chaperoning.


10 Ways To Attract A Godly Christian Man (For The Ladies Only, Guys Please Do Not Click)



The worst thing that could ever happen to you, ladies, is that you end up with the gift of singeleness. Nobody wants that! Name one good Christian who was single. We'll wait.

Got nothing? Darn right you don't. So, don't wait around for a Christian guy to notice you: follow these ten tips to attract his attention right this very instant.


1. Tantalize him by showing a little more ankle. — Hike up that floor-length denim skirt a few inches! Hubba hubba!

2. Ask him to mansplain the Bible to you. — "Can you explain this Bible verse to me? I'm a girl and don't understand it." He'll go crazy for this line.

3. Compliment him on the number of chairs he can carry — "Wow, 3 chairs at once? Are you doing anything later?"

4. Try to seem as desperate as possible — Send as many signals as possible that you're super desperate and clingy and you're really counting on this to work out.

5. If he doesn't propose to you in the first few weeks of dating, take charge and just propose yourself — Guys LOVE this move.

6. Get a coveted spot on the worship band so he'll see you while worshiping every Sunday. — Every time you sing one of the girl echo parts he'll be thinking about you. Which is what worship is all about.

7. Try to find his secret source of strength so you can cut his hair or whatever and domesticate him. — You've gotta change him so he'll be more sensitive and stuff.

8. Don't be picky -- be willing to convert to a different denomination to get a guy. — What's a little theological difference when it comes to romance? Be willing to become a Presbyterian or Catholic to find your soulmate.

9. Casually mention that your favorite book of the Bible is Song of Solomon. — Awooga!

10. Whisper in his ear, "You contribute nothing to your salvation except the sin that made it necessary." —  The thirteen words every guy wants to hear.

 


That New CDC 'Study' Showing Masks Work in Schools Is Misleading Garbage


Bonchie reporting for RedState

The lengths to which the federal government is willing to go to push their chosen narrative continue to amaze, especially when dealing with the supposedly sacrosanct realm of science. Enter the CDC, the largely discredited bureaucracy that is fresh off overriding the vote of government health experts on vaccine boosters for those under 65.

With masks continuing to show little to no effect on spread throughout not just the United States, but the entire world, it’s no surprise the CDC would keep “studying” the issue until they got the result they wanted. Thus, we got this result being touted this morning.

When I first saw this, my spidey sense immediately started going off. Notice the massaging being done to the language in this announcement. It doesn’t actually say schools with mask mandates show a smaller increase in pediatric COVID-19 case rates. Rather, it says “counties,” and we’ll get to why that is in a minute. Further, the CDC absconds from including in their graphic the actual, numerical difference being touted.

For posterity, here’s the link to the full study so you can see exactly what it actually covers.

So, what’s the real story here? The real story is that the CDC cherry-picked a time period from July 1st-September 4th, meaning that children weren’t even in school for the vast majority of the study. In fact, in some of the counties covered, children were only in school for a week or so by the time the study concluded. The study also cherry-picked some counties that already had rising infection rates prior to school beginning, with no control for testing so as to compare counties with similar case trends.

It gets worse, though. Even the actual results, forgetting the fact that the study is misleading garbage on its face because of how it was conducted, don’t really say what the CDC claims. Rather, the change in infection rates is arguably statistically insignificant.

In short, what we have is a “study” that didn’t even cover a period where children were in school — save for a week or so. The “study” is also based on a data set of counties that do not control for prior infection rates, testing capacity, etc. in order to conduct a valid comparison between areas that have school mask mandates and ones that don’t. And even still, they came up with a result that shows almost no difference in the real number of cases.

Lastly, just to put a fine point on all this, the CDC’s own study admits that it’s ecological and should not be used to assign causation in regards to masks and infection rates. They also admit a lack of control regarding several other key variables.

First, this was an ecologic study, and causation cannot be inferred. Second, pediatric COVID-19 case counts and rates included all cases in children and adolescents aged <18 years; later analyses will focus on cases in school-age children and adolescents. Third, county-level teacher vaccination rate and school testing data were not controlled for in the analyses; later analyses will control for these covariates. Finally, because of the small sample size of counties selected for the analysis, the findings might not be generalizable.

Despite those realities, the CDC rushed out to push causation anyway without a second thought. That’s just deeply dishonest, and this is the kind of stuff that makes people distrust our scientific institutions. If you are concerned about vaccine hesitancy, you should be speaking firmly against the manipulation of data we are seeing from the federal government to push what ultimately boils down to a political narrative.



Biden Lies His Head off When Challenged by Reporter on His Policies


Nick Arama reporting for RedState

Joe Biden’s staff doesn’t like him taking questions. They never know when he will gaffe. But in addition to the gaffing is the other problem that Biden has — often when he’s challenged, he tends to lie.

As we reported, Biden spoke on a few subjects Friday, including Afghanistan and COVID booster shots. Unbelievably, he claimed he had “no apologies” for the debacle that he caused with the way he rolled out the Afghanistan withdrawal. He showed he has absolutely no shame.

But after he finished his remarks, this time he actually took some questions. That’s where he got into trouble again.

One reporter asked Biden a great question that put him on the spot. “You came into office on a message of competence and unity,” the reporter asked. “We’ve witnessed what’s happened in the country over the past several months. We’ve seen the chaotic troop withdrawal from Afghanistan. The threat of a government shut down right now. And Democrats, members of your own party, are still divided over your agenda going forward. So, what do you say to Americans who say that you have not delivered on that promise?”

Biden claimed it was going to take him a year to deliver on everything he promised. A year until he’s competent and actually a unifier? Why would that take a year? The problem is he isn’t now and he won’t be in the future.

He’s not even answering the question that’s being asked; he’s answering the imaginary question he constructed in his head. “Um, uh. Take a look at what I inherited when I came into office, when I came into office, the state of affairs and where we were. We had 4 million people vaccinated, we had no plan – I could go down the list…I’m not complaining, it’s just the reality.”

He literally is complaining — and trying to attribute his failures to President Donald Trump — with a straight-up lie.

What he inherited was a country in good position because of the competence and efforts of Trump. Trump was responsible for getting the vaccine in record time, starting to put it out in December. By the time Biden came in, in just that short period of time, the CDC said it had administered 16,525,281 doses of COVID-19 vaccines, as of the morning of Jan. 20, and distributed 35,990,150 doses. And of course there was a plan or it never would have happened. He inherited the plan. He also inherited a system which was averaging administering shots at just under 1 million a day at that point and had already achieved more than one million doses a day on a few occasions during the Trump administration.

He should have been grateful at the extraordinary achievement that Trump laid in his lap. Instead, he frequently tries to blame Trump for his failures. We’re still waiting on Biden’s plan to “shut down the virus.”

Notice how Biden also avoided the part of the reporter’s question about Afghanistan and doesn’t really answer the question about the division within the Democratic Party on his plans.

So, can we expect the media to fact-check him on his lie and administer a few Pinocchios? Doubtful.