Friday, August 6, 2021

Jen Psaki Lists the GOP Governors 'Getting It Right' and Laughter Ensues


Bonchie reporting for RedState 

While the White House is clearly terrified of Gov. Ron DeSantis in Florida because he represents a clear and present danger to Democrat hopes in 2024, Jen Psaki wants you to know that some Republicans are out there “getting it right.” Yes, apparently, there are GOP governors that are bad enough at their jobs to garner the approval of Joe Biden.

Honestly, this might as well be a list of people not to nominate in 2024.

When I first saw this, my response was to laugh out loud.

Let’s first note that Charlie Baker is governor of a state with the 3rd highest COVID death rate in the nation. By the numbers, he’s clearly not “getting it right.” I realize this is Massachusetts we are talking about, so the term “Republican” is applied pretty loosely to Baker, but even still, he’s managed to embrace Democrat policies like lockdowns and mask mandates to little or no effect. By what metric has he done a better job than DeSantis or Greg Abbott, for example?

Then there’s Asa Hutchinson, whose spine has compressed into dust over the last few years. This is the same guy who claimed it was government overreach to stop the chemical castration of children but he’s now lamenting that he can’t reimpose a mask mandate. How’s that for consistency? There’s a reason Psaki praised him.

By the numbers, Hutchinson’s state of Arkansas is 15th in the nation in COVID death rate, ten spots higher than much-maligned Florida. So again, how is he “getting it right?” Because he’s willing to virtue signal over ineffective mask mandates? Is that really the bar now for succeeding against COVID?

Finally, last and definitely least, there’s Larry Hogan of Maryland. The anti-Trump figure has spent the better part of the last several years demonstrating exactly how to not be a good Republican. But once COVID hit, he really upped his game, embracing lockdowns and mask mandates longer than many Democrat-run states. Right now, it’s still not clear all of Maryland’s schools will be open this year. Never mind that Baltimore has descended into a level of chaos that would make Afghanistan blush during Hogan’s tenure.

With that said, at least Hogan’s state does have a death rate below Florida’s, if only slightly (163 vs. 182 per 100,000). I suppose that’s got to count for something, but when you consider how much Marylanders have suffered to garner nearly the same results, obviously Florida’s model was better.

I know it’s a long way off, but I’m partially looking forward to 2024 just to see these establishment figures get rejected. If you’ve got Jen Psaki singing your praises, you are doing something wrong. That should be obvious. In a healthier Republican Party, Hogan, Hutchinson, and Baker would be defending DeSantis instead of being pawns to be used by the White House to attack him. That they’ve remained quiet shows just how much delusion they are operating under to believe they have a future in the GOP outside of their current positions.


X22, And we Know, and Stew Peters Show-August 6

 


It's good news time! Here's the latest videos on the 'taking down evil' front:


On Today's Episode of "What the Actual F*%#?!" BBC asks if kids need age appropriate porn





BBC Woman’s Hour Asks ‘Should There be Age-Appropriate Porn’ for Children??




By Kurt Zindulka • 5 Aug 2021


The BBC’s Woman’s Hour programme has seemingly attempted to normalise the question of providing pornography to children, asking the public whether they believe “age-appropriate pornography” should be made for them.

On Monday, the social media account for Woman’s Hour posited the questions: “What’s the best way to inform teenagers about porn? Should there be age-appropriate porn as has been suggested so they can learn about consent and what’s respectful and what’s not? What do you think?”

“Email us your opinions,” the publicly-funded programme went on to urge.




The post was likely a response to the controversy surrounding the daughter of former Home Secretary Amber Rudd and Sunday Times contributing journalist Flora Gill, who drew considerable backlash for a now-deleted tweet in which she called for the production of “porn for children”.

“Someone needs to create porn for children. Hear me out. Young teens are already watching porn but they’re finding hardcore, aggressive videos that give a terrible view of sex,” Gill wrote last week.

“They need entry-level porn! A softcore site where everyone asks for consent and no one gets choked,” she declared.

Noticing a backlash against the perverted post, Gill quickly deleted the tweet and said: “Apropos of nothing, I really think if someone quickly deletes a tweet, it shouldn’t be screenshotted and shared like… just let it die, you know? no? no one else agree?”




The post from Woman’s Hour has also drawn considerable criticism, with many questioning why the public is forced to pay a license fee to subsidise such far-left ideology.

Conservative Home commentator Bella Wallersteiner responded: “Age-appropriate porn is grooming,” adding: “It’s becoming clear there aren’t any adults left at the BBC capable of critical thinking.”

Human trafficking survivor advocate Eliza Bleu commented: “Raising children that understand healthy boundaries and consent is not the responsibility of the porn industry.”

British rapper Zuby also took aim at the post, simply writing: “It’s not too late to delete this.”




It is not the first time that the BBC’s Woman’s Hour has sparked controversy over the issue of showing children pornography.

A former presenter for the programme, Dame Jenni Murray, previously suggested that pornography should be shown in the classroom, saying in 2016: “We might show them a news bulletin that has been on television the night before. Why not show them pornography and teach them how to analyse it?”

“You put boys and girls together in a class and you show them a pornographic film and you analyse it in exactly the same way as you teach them to read all the other cultures around them,” she explained.








Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Why Won’t the Government Release Officer Fanone’s Bodycam Video?

The government used a little trick to prevent video from being formally entered into the judicial record. Federal judges played along.


At least one federal judge handling several Capitol protest criminal cases is paying attention to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s show trial about the events of January 6.

Judge Thomas Hogan, 83, who has served on the D.C. District Court for nearly 40 years, referred to public testimony given last week by four law enforcement officers while he scolded a husband and wife over their involvement in the protest. 

“[H]e begins by talking about the violence, and makes clear he listened to the police officers who testified before Congress last week about their experience, and notes the recent suicide of [a Metropolitan Police Department] officer,” Zoe Tillman, a reporter for BuzzFeedlive-tweeted during the couple’s sentencing hearing on Wednesday.

Set aside for a moment how the inflammatory and unsubstantiated accounts by those officers will taint an already highly biased jury pool in Washington, D.C. when trials begin next year; it’s clear the January 6 select committee already is influencing court proceedings. Judge Hogan, and presumably others, will take witness testimony at face value and use it as proof that Capitol defendants, even the nonviolent ones, contributed to “violence” that day.

Which is why, as we have argued repeatedly at American Greatness, the government and U.S. Capitol Police should agree to release more than 14,000 hours of surveillance video captured by security cameras on January 6. If the four-hour melee indeed compares to the worst terrorist attacks against Americans, and ranks among the worst days in U.S. history, the public deserves to see what happened, minute-by-minute, inside and outside the building.

But it’s not just Capitol complex security video that the government is trying to conceal from the public. In a recent filing, Joe Biden’s Justice Department argued against the release of footage recorded by officer Michael Fanone’s bodycam on January 6. The D.C. Metropolitan Police narcotics officer was one of the four cops who testified last week. 

Fanone, 40, said he was not supposed to be on Capitol Hill that day but that he put on an official, unworn uniform—including a body camera—for the first time in 10 years to help assist his colleagues control the chaos. Fanone also testified he was afraid he would be killed that day—either shot with his own gun or torn limb from limb by Trump fanatics. In one outburst, Fanone called insurrection deniers in Congress “disgraceful” and claimed they were “betraying their oath of office.”

Fanone is working hard to become a household name. He’s been on a part-pity, part-publicity tour for the past seven months, detailing his harrowing experience and stalking Republican members of Congress. He’s become a regular on CNN; following his testimony last Tuesday, Fanone headed to the CNN studio for an interview with Don Lemon. The two ended the segment with an embrace and expressions of love for each other.

In a front-cover profile in this week’s Time magazine, Fanone recalled how he phoned the network from his emergency room hospital bed on January 6. “Fanone looked up CNN, called the number that came up on his phone and told the woman who answered that Mike Fanone with the metropolitan police department needed to talk right away to that jerk on the air who was insulting the good name of every police officer,” Molly Ball reported. “The following week, at his urging, the department set up a round of interviews with the Washington Post and major TV networks. Fanone, one of several officers authorized to speak to the press, was the star of every segment.”

Four months later, Ball writes, Fanone was in a D.C. ritzy wine bar with other cops looking “to meet girls”—Fanone is divorced and living with his mother—when they asked the bartender to turn on CNN. Lemon was airing exclusive footage from Fanone’s body-worn camera. “The bar fell silent as the body-cam footage played,” Fanone told Ball. “And suddenly, for the first time since that day, Fanone was sobbing uncontrollably, shoulders heaving as his buddies put their arms around him.”

The Justice Department continues to release cherry-picked video clips from its massive trove of digital evidence to support the White House’s narrative that January 6 was a deadly insurrection executed by domestic terrorists. The government continues to blow through discovery deadlines in court; during a hearing last Friday, a prosecutor admitted full discovery obligations in the Capitol breach probe won’t be fulfilled until early 2022 at the earliest.

Three men have been charged with assaulting Officer Fanone; they’ve been held behind bars since March, denied bail after the Justice Department successfully sought pre-trial detention for Thomas Sibick, Albuquerque Head, and Kyle Young. As is the case in most motions for pre-trial detention, the government used a brief selective video clip from Fanone’s body camera in the case against his attackers.

But a group of 16 news organizations called the Press Coalition wants to see all of Fanone’s body camera footage from January 6. Media companies including the Associated Press, Wall Street Journal, and NBC News are suing for access to video evidence in several cases. In June, the group asked Judge Amy Berman Jackson to release “Officer Michael Fanone’s body-worn camera, and . . . surveillance footage for the Lower West Terrace of the United States Capitol.”

The Justice Department objected to the request. “The government opposes the release of [the] Videos . . . as the government has never submitted those videos to the Court, the videos have never been the subject of any judicial decision, and thus they are not a ‘judicial record’ to which any public right of access might attach,” prosecutors wrote on June 25. “Furthermore, [the Capitol surveillance] Video . . . is designated as ‘Highly Confidential’ under the parties’ Protective Order in this case.” (As I explained here, the Justice Department has deemed all USCP surveillance video as “highly sensitive” government material.)

The reason Fanone’s bodycam video is not court material is that prosecutors, shrewdly, used screenshots of the videos rather than links to the actual evidence in court filings. “Entering a screenshot as an exhibit does not make the entire video from which the screenshot was taken an exhibit.”

Judge Jackson, who earlier this week unleashed an anti-Trump tirade from the bench in another Capitol case, unsurprisingly sided with Biden’s Justice Department. “The Court further finds that [the] Videos are not ‘judicial records’ subject to public access because they were not provided to the court,” Jackson wrote in a minute order posted July 6. “Accordingly, the Application . . . is hereby DENIED.”

So the government uses a little trick to prevent video from being formally entered into the judicial record, and federal judges play along.

What are they hiding?

The Press Coalition, in addition to other news outlets, should keep pushing. Fanone has made himself into a media celebrity while gaslighting the public; worse yet, his unproven accusations now contaminate potential jurors and federal judges.

Joe Biden also is using the police as a way to influence the ongoing investigation and also taint the jury pool and federal bench. Biden signed legislation Thursday afternoon to award the Congressional Gold Medal to the U.S. Capitol Police and D.C. Metro police for defending the country from “thousands of violent insurrectionists.” Biden also referred to hundreds of Americans now facing criminal charges related to January 6 as “terrorists.”

In his congressional testimony last week, Fanone said he hopes the American people will be able to see all of his bodycam footage at some point. I’m sure the American people wholeheartedly agree.


The Left Wants A Permanent Pandemic Because ‘Isolated People Are Easier To Manipulate’


(video segment below)

Federalist Publisher Ben Domenech said the left is making the pandemic a permanent crisis to distract Americans and achieve its goal of seizing power by undermining community and family structures.

“If you are wide awake, you understand that the authoritarian left is using the permanent pandemic to achieve as many ends as they can imagine,” Domenech said Thursday night on Fox News “Primetime.” “Weakening the family, restricting faith, and undermining community in order that they may rule over us as they see fit.” 

“They want you beholden to government above all else from cradle to grave,” Domenech said, likening the left’s vision for life in the permanent pandemic to former President Barack Obama’s “Life of Julia” re-election campaign ad, which portrayed a girl whose life was defined by total dependence on the state.

“We’ve seen churches close under the guise of preserving life, neighbors reporting on each other under the guise of unity. We’re all in this together — so long as we stay in our homes and don’t socialize,” Domenech said. “Teacher’s unions are the most powerful political entities in American life to the point of wrecking the lives of their students if the teachers don’t want to work. Local small businesses have to close, but Walmart can stay open. And don’t forget, Fauci knows best, parents. If you disagree with any unelected bureaucrat, even if it conflicts with what they said mere days earlier, you must hate science, and you’re putting your kids and everyone else at risk.”

Domenech said bringing back the same failed policies as the previous lockdown will result in the further breakdown of traditional institutions.

“Why is worshipping God, burying our loved ones, celebrating our birthdays, graduations, and marriages banned, but protests and riots allowed, if not to break the tenuous hold we have on family, faith, and community?” Domenech asked. “They tell you the reason for this is your own good, keeping you safe and sound. But the truth you need to wake up to is despite over one and a half years of bitter failure, our public authorities are bringing back the same policies they did before.”

Domenech said the renewed mask mandates and lockdowns are a result of the government’s desire and ability to control us, not a necessity to save us.

“Isolated and divided people are easier to manipulate. You’ve got a 60-inch TV. Who cares if there are opioid deaths and virulent homelessness a block away?” Domenech said. “Normal times don’t produce the outcomes that the authoritarian left wants because people are not scared enough to give them the limitless power they crave. Crises are necessary. And so, if there aren’t any on offer, they manufacture them.”

The billions of dollars poured into COVID relief funds are “designed to raise subjects, not citizens,” Domenech said. But he is hopeful Americans will “wake up to the truth” and take back control of their lives.

“For the insistence on pandemic permanence, the facts are encouraging. Cases may rise but deaths aren’t. Thank the vaccines for that, thank God for that. Do not though thank the unthinking officeholders who had nothing to do with it and who merely see this as an opportunity to exploit the moment to achieve their authoritarian aims,” Domenech concluded. “The left’s only answer to the crisis is the only answer they’ve ever had. It’s the only answer that they wanted: their boot on your neck. But they can’t do that if you are wide awake. So are you?”



Man Getting Evicted Wishes There Were Some Way He Could Go Out And Exchange His Labor For Money To Pay Rent



MARTON TOWNSHIP, TX—Ryan Flowers has a problem: he's getting evicted. His evil landlord has asked him to vacate the premises, since he hasn't taken care of one tiny detail in over a year: "paying rent." 

"If only there were some way I could go out and exchange my labor or services for money I could use to pay rent," he said sadly as he sat on a bench in the city, right in front of a giant "HELP WANTED" sign. He sighed and shuffled his feet. 

"Alas. No such system of voluntary exchange of labor and services for money exists, so I have no choice but to be evicted."

"Sad! Not good!"

He then joined a group of protesters marching through the town demanding an eviction moratorium. The group marched past no fewer than 27 "Help Wanted" signs on their way to city hall.

UPDATE: the CDC has passed an eviction moratorium, so he's in the clear. Phew!


Jill Biden’s Office Reportedly Abusive, Compared To ‘Devil Wears Prada’

 

Reports surfaced in June surrounding Vice President Kamala Harris’ apparently “abusive” office, catching the eye of the office of President Joe Biden. Now, adding to the rumors of chaos, reports have surfaced about the allegedly abusive nature of first lady Jill Biden’s office.

An advisor to Jill Biden, Anthony Bernal, has been described as the most powerful person in the office of the first lady, who already holds a highly influential elevated role, as outlined in a recent Vogue puff piece.

Bernal is also reportedly somewhat of a tyrant.

“[T]he way he has wielded that power has made Bernal one of the most polarizing people in the White House, according to interviews with more than two dozen White House staffers, former campaign aides, and people who worked with him during the Obama administration,” Politico reported.

In Bernal’s “pursuit of perfection” for FLOTUS, Politico said, the advisor has treated staffers poorly, so poorly that the atmosphere has been likened to the movie “The Devil Wears Prada.”

 

 

“Many described him as ‘berating’ and ‘toxic’ because of his unfiltered criticism of others and tendency to trash talk his colleagues behind their backs,” the report said. “Some compare him to [Meryl Streep’s] character in ‘Devil Wears Prada’ while another equated him to the ever-conspiring Littlefinger in ‘Game of Thrones.’”

The report detailed Bernal’s alleged behavior toward staffers, some of whom apparently “surreptitiously” recorded the advisor during meetings:

Stories of Bernal making staffers cry are an open secret in the Biden world with seemingly everyone knowing someone who has been on the receiving end. Two former campaign staffers said they heard Bernal call people “stupid” in meetings or over the phone. During the campaign and in the White House, some staffers felt the behavior was so noxious that they began surreptitiously recording him in meetings, according to two officials who others confided in about recording him. West Wing Playbook has not heard the recordings. The First Lady’s office did not address the recordings in their comment.

“He has a constituency of one and he’s very effective on her behalf,” one Biden official told Politico. “The problem is that no one who has worked with him trusts him, and that’s not good for him or her.”

 

 

VP Harris reportedly has a troubling office atmosphere, too, as highlighted by The Daily Wire in June:

Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly runs an “abusive office” where morale is low, staff concerns and ideas are ignored, and aides are often surprised with hastily made decisions, like Harris’ recent visit to El Paso, Texas.

The morale of the vice president’s team is apparently sagging and the office has had to handle several high-level departures less than six months into the term. The vice president’s plans are often only known to her and a close group of staff and advisers, and senior members of the office often do not communicate important details down the chain, or shift blame when something goes wrong, according to 22 former staff members, administration officials, and associates of the vice president interviewed by Politico.

“People are thrown under the bus from the very top, there are short fuses and it’s an abusive environment,” said one person with direct knowledge of how the vice president’s office is run. “It’s not a healthy environment and people often feel mistreated. It’s not a place where people feel supported but a place where people feel treated like s***.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/jill-bidens-office-reportedly-abusive-compared-to-devil-wears-prada 

 

 


 

These Gun Myths Are Driving Biden’s Anti-2nd Amendment Policy Push.


The numbers are maddening and heartbreaking:  614 Chicagoans were shot in July 2021, compared to 561 in the same month last year, per the NBC5 Chicago 

posted by Jim Nelles at The National Pulse

According to the same report, there have been 1,973 shootings in the city, with 2,471 total victims during the first seven months of this year.  Both of those numbers are up over last year’s statistics and dwarf the numbers in 2019, when there were 1,210 shootings and 2,471 total victims.

There have been 445 homicides in Chicago through the end of July 2021.  To put the homicide number in perspective, from Memorial Day 2020 through Memorial Day 2021, 18 U.S. service members died supporting overseas operations, according to the Military Times 

Chicago is not alone.

Per Axios, a sample of 37 cities with data available for the first three months of 2021 indicates that murders are up 18 percent over the same period in 2020. This continued increase comes after a year in which major U.S. cities experienced a 33 percent rise in homicides, and 63 of the 66 largest police jurisdictions saw an increase in at least one category of violent crime, according to a report from the Major Cities Chiefs Association, as reported by CNN.

This rise in crime, especially gun violence, has driven two opposite reactions: a spike in gun sales as people look to protect themselves and their families, and a renewed call for more gun control.

The FBI performed 39.7 million background checks on people seeking to buy firearms and accessories in 2020, more than any previous year.  According to statistics reported by CNN, 23 million guns were purchased in 2020 and more than 5 million Americans were first time gun buyers.  This trend has continued in 2021, with gun sales surging in January by 60 percent to 4,137, 480. Illinois led the charge in January, with 1,002,118 guns sold in the state – 24 percent of the national sales for that month.

It isn’t just white, conservative men purchasing guns. Women and Black Americans have purchased guns at a record pace since 2020. Black Americans bought guns at a rate 58 percent higher than in previous years, the largest increase for any demographic group, per Forbes.

In addition to increased firearm sales, the number of people legally carrying concealed weapons is increasing. Per John Lott’s Crime Prevention Center, there are 19.48 million people licensed to carry a concealed weapon, 820,000 more than in 2019 – the number of people who carry is likely much larger as 19 states do not require a permit to do so.

Gun control advocates frequently claim that an average of nearly 40,000 people die from gun violence each year and that we must enact “common sense” gun laws to reduce that number. What they fail to tell their audience is that most of those deaths are from suicide. Every year from 2015-2019 an average of 23,500 people died from a gun-related suicide while 14,000 people died from a gun-related homicide, per the CDC 

Joe Biden has called for new gun laws as well as an assault weapons ban and a ban on high-capacity magazines. On April 28, 2021, the President gave a gun violence prevention speech at the White House, wherein he stated: “No amendment to the Constitution is absolute…from the very beginning you couldn’t own any weapon you wanted to own.”  

That statement is one of several myths that gun control advocates perpetuate as they call for new gun laws.

Gun Control Myth 1: Gun control laws have existed since the Second Amendment was ratified in 1791.

The first piece of national gun control legislation was passed on June 26, 1934, as part of the National Firearms Act (NFA). The NFA imposed a tax on the manufacture, sale, and transportation of firearms listed in the law. In the Revolutionary War period, private citizens were allowed to own any and all weapons they could purchase or manufacture, including cannons – otherwise, the Privateers who served during the war would not have enjoyed their success.

Gun Control Myth 2: Banning assault weapons will reduce gun violence.  

There is no commonly accepted definition of an assault weapon. But let us assume that all rifles can be defined as an assault weapon. Per the Washington Examiner, in 2019, rifles of all kind made up just 2.6 percent of gun homicides. Of the 13,927 murdered with a gun in 2019, only 364 of them had their lives taken by a rifle of any kind.  

Per the FBI, in any given year, for every person murdered with a rifle, there were 17.5 murdered with handguns, 1.6 with hands and fists, and 1.1 with blunt instruments. More people die falling out of bed and are killed by hippopotamuses each year, 450 and 500 respectively, than die from a homicide committed with a rifle in America

Gun Control Myth 3: Universal background checks to prevent criminals from obtaining guns.

Federal law requires criminal background checks for all firearm sales and transfers by licensed dealers. The challenge is that most criminals do not legally obtain their guns. A 2016 Survey of Prison Inmates (SPI) reported that approximately 1 in 5 (21 percent) of all state and federal prisoners reported possessing or using a firearm when they committed the offense for which they were serving time. Of those people, only 7 percent of prisoners purchased the weapon under their own name from a licensed firearms dealer. More than half of prisoners (56 percent) had stolen the weapon, found it at the scene of a crime, or obtained it off the street or from the underground market.  

Gun Control Myth 4: Closing the “gun show loophole” will prevent criminals from obtaining guns.

In his April 8 speech referenced above, President Biden stated that “but you go to a gun show, you can buy whatever you want and no background check.” Even the left-wing PolitiFact ruled the statement “mostly false.” When a federally licensed seller is a vendor at a gun show, they must run a background check on the buyer, just as they would if they were at their local gun store. Non-licensed sellers do not have to run background checks. 

Even if true and there are no background checks conducted for any sale at a gun show, would closing that loophole reduce the gun-driven homicide rate? Referencing the same SPI study above, among prisoners who possessed a firearm during their offense, 0.8 percent obtained the firearm at a gun show.

What can be done? Are there policies and laws that could reduce the amount of gun violence in the United States?  

Criminals, by definition, do not abide by the law. It is already against the law to commit murder or to rob a bank, so thinking that creating more gun free zones or banning a high-capacity magazine will deter a criminal from committing a crime is ludicrous.  

According to the Center for Criminal Justice Research, Policy, and Practice at Loyola University, Chicago, more than 80 percent of those arrested for a gun crime in Illinois between 2009 and 2019 had at least one prior arrest and 50 percent of those arrested for the commission of a violent crime with a gun had a prior conviction. Thus, we should increase the penalties for certain types of gun crimes, including the illegal possession of a firearm, using a firearm in gang-related crime, using a firearm in the commission of a drug offense, using a firearm in a crime against a minor, illegal discharge of a weapon, etc.  

We also need to keep accused felons in jail while awaiting trial. According to CWBChicago, through July 28, 2021, 32 people have been accused of killing, trying to kill, or shooting someone in Chicago while awaiting trial for another felony.”  

Increasing the penalties for certain gun crimes or keeping accused felons in jail while awaiting trial will not stop crime but will keep those who commit gun crime off the street for longer periods of time.  

Additionally, we need to “flood the zone.” 

According to Thomas Abt, writing in The Trace, “more than a quarter of homicides in 2015 occurred in neighborhoods containing just 1.5 percent of the American population and collectively covering an area smaller than Green Bay, Wisconsin.” This data is supported by a study by the Crime Prevention Research Center, which showed that 68 percent of murders committed in the United States occurred in 5 percent of the nation’s counties.  An increased police presence in these areas would both reduce the amount of firearm-related crime and increase the likelihood that those committing firearm-related crimes will be apprehended.

Last, we must examine the social issues that drive gun crime. Neighborhood and faith-based groups should partner with local government and police officials to implement anti-violence campaigns and programs, raze or repair abandoned buildings, improve street lighting in certain areas, etc.

There is no easy answer, but punishing law-abiding gun owners and burdening them with additional laws and regulations will not solve a gun violence challenge in America.


Study Finds Greater Antibody Response In Recovered COVID-19 Patients Than Vaccinated Ones



A new study has found that individuals that have previously contracted COVID-19 show a more potent antibody response than those who were solely vaccinated for the respiratory virus.

Conducted by a research team at Rockefeller University in New York, the analysis found “that between a first (prime) and second (booster) shot of either the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccine, the memory B cells of infection-naïve individuals produced antibodies that evolved increased neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2,” but also that “no additional increase in the potency or breadth of this activity was observed thereafter.” 

Meanwhile, researchers determined that not only do recovered COVID-19 patients possess neutralizing antibodies up to a year after infection, but that such infection simultaneously assists in offering protection against developing variants.

“Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection produces B-cell responses that continue to evolve for at least one year,” the study read. “During that time, memory B cells express increasingly broad and potent antibodies that are resistant to mutations found in variants of concern.”

The analysis later goes on to conclude, “Memory antibodies selected over time by natural infection have greater potency and breadth than antibodies elicited by vaccination.”

Moreover, the results suggest that “boosting vaccinated individuals with currently available mRNA vaccines would produce a quantitative increase in plasma neutralizing activity but not the qualitative advantage against variants obtained by vaccinating convalescent individuals.”

The study’s findings add to further mounting evidence detailing the level of protection natural immunity offers previously infected COVID-19 patients. Last month, Emory University published an extensive investigation describing the efficiency of long-term immunity against the respiratory virus. Similar discoveries have also been identified in research released by the Cleveland Clinic and the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, respectively.


Psaki Admits They Have 'Guidelines' They've Given to Private Businesses to 'Police' Proof of Vaccination


Nick Arama reporting for RedState 

We’ve been seeing the Democrats bandying about the concept of vaccine passports for a while.

Now, with them pushing fear porn about the Delta variant, we hearing more about that. New York City just announced this week that they would be requiring evidence of vaccination before being allowed into places like restaurants and gyms. Mayor Bill de Blasio said they were specifically doing that to try to force the vaccine-hesitant to get the shot.

Biden has said that he fully endorses such ideas.

That’s how they get around not having a federal mandate, they just go through the backdoor and try to push behind the scenes, shaming everyone into it, hoping to create social pressure to have businesses, schools and organizations make it mandatory.

Today, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said perhaps a little more than she intended to say, revealing that they actually had “guidelines” that they were talking with private businesses in how to “police” requiring vaccine passports/proof.

First, Psaki repeated what Biden said that they supported the concept. Then she went further. “We want to ensure that it’s done in a transparent way, that it’s in an equitable way, that if there are verification requirements — it can be done digitally, there are a range of ways to provide the information — so there are basic guidelines along those lines that we have conveyed and that we will continue to convey.”

So no, we’re not instituting a national mandatory vaccine passport. We’re just encouraging businesses to do it and telling them how we think it should be done. But we’re not really doing it. Meanwhile, as they try to slip this stuff past us and claim that restrictions are for our “own good,” illegal aliens from all over the world are pouring through the Southern border at a record pace, increasing each month that Biden has been in office, and Psaki also had to admit that some of those folks are positive for the Wuhan coronavirus.

They’re being overwhelmed in McAllen.

According to the city of McAllen, since mid-February of 2021, there have been over 7,000 confirmed COVID-19 positive immigrants released into the City of McAllen by CBP, including over 1,500 new cases in the past seven days. [….]

Cortez also told ValleyCentral the infection rate for migrants rose to a shocking 16%, doubling the numbers from last time. Sister Norma Pimentel of the Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley also says the federal government needs to step in.

Both Cortez and McAllen Mayor Javier Villalobos said they have not heard “a single word” from the federal government.

The federal government is too busy trying to pushing restrictions on Americans.