HR
1 is Nancy Pelosi’s signature bill, and exploring it is like taking a
deep dive into political depravity. A partisan House passed it on March
3, without any Republican votes. While it’s currently before the Senate,
provided the filibuster continues to exist, it’s predicted to fail. The
filibuster’s continuation depends on ethical behavior by a few moderate
Democrats, who are probably getting their arms twisted by Chuck
Schumer, who wants it gone.
The
ludicrously named “For the People Act of 2021” is a wet dream for elite
progressives and a nightmare for everyone else in our great country.
Whether or not it fails, it can be viewed as an exposé into the caviar
wishes of these liberals, who are the only ones it would serve. Its
primary purpose is to prevent fair elections from ever taking place
again and to create a one-party dictatorship in perpetuity.
HR
1 is designed to eliminate state control of elections, which was
specified in the constitution to safeguard against exactly this type of
takeover. Because there are more Republican state governments, 27
Republican governors and 30 legislatures, the only way to destroy our
electoral process thoroughly is at the federal level.
No
doubt, if the bill is passed, it will be challenged in court on
constitutional grounds; the problem is, we now know we have a Supreme
Court whose majority is made up of liberals and cowards who would rather
not make waves. We’ve seen that with Obamacare and most recently, with
the integrity of the 2020 elections being wholly disregarded by the
court.
HR
1 wipes out any possibility of a clean election. Most of the provisions
of the bill are meant to cause irremediable chaos in the electoral
process, thereby obfuscating obvious fraud. There are nine parts to the
long bill and, within each, there are multiple sections. Here are just a
few “highlights”:
Registering
to vote via the internet would be legal and you’d be automatically
registered (whether you already were or not) when doing any business
with a governmental entity. Election-day registration would be
legalized.
Signature
verification and voter ID would be eliminated. Teens can “pre-register”
when they turn 16. Without signature verification or voter ID, what
this means is that they could easily be able to vote. Indeed, anyone
could vote anywhere they want, which means, with no verification, as
many times as they want.
Felons
could vote the day they leave prison. Ballots would be mailed to every
voter, drop-boxes for collection would be mandated, and ballot
harvesting would not only no longer be illegal, but it would also be
encouraged.
States
would have to accept absentee ballots up to 10 days after the election.
This means that, once people see which way the wind is blowing on the
actual election day, they can then start voting in dead earnest for
their candidate or cause.
The
bill outlines a new process for the District of Columbia to attain
statehood, again circumventing the Constitution. It also grants the
House of Representatives the authority to redistrict (gerrymander) via
an appointed “independent” commission within each state, which panel is
specifically taken from an “approved selection pool,” partly designated
by race.
Those are just some highlights. The entire bill is available to plow through, should you be interested.
I
must ask why these people are hell-bent on destroying the US. It’s hard
to fathom. Greed, of course, is at the bottom of it. If no fair
elections can happen, the ruling classes can do whatever they please.
They
can tax the middle class out of existence, creating a socialist haven
where the elite get very rich, and the rest of us get zilch. They can
redistribute wealth to all their cronies, and they can create “equity”
that sees those who don’t have wealth given a boost up to the level
playing field, provided they are willing to be wholly
dependent on the largesse of their masters. Those of us who have worked
for what we have will be kicked off the playing field entirely.
Once
they have consolidated power, look for a wealth tax to bleed not the
“uber rich” of their money — those are the people who can manipulate the
system, donate to the right people, etc. to avoid losing anything — but
the rest of us. Remember Margaret Thatcher’s oft-quoted maxim on the
direction we’re heading? “The problem with Socialism is that you
eventually run out of other people’s money.”
There’s
another old proverb that pertains, too: “Sandals to sandals in three
generations.” I’ll add just one more, for my three liberal readers:
“Buyer, beware!”
