Friday, October 30, 2020

Why Voting For Biden To Stop The Riots Will Ensure They Never Go Away

This republic endures when people vote based on what they think will be right and good for all of us. Americans don’t pay tribute.



There is a palpable fear on the left that each new spasm of rioting and violence in the streets will drive more people away from their side. While Joe Biden himself is not tossing bricks and setting fire to police cars, his Democratic Party is the home of those who would excuse the rioters while Republicans are more likely to condemn street violence. It is natural that people who oppose anarchy in their cities and towns might consider voting for the candidate who does the same.

One line of thinking from the leftists now holds that the real way to stop violence in the streets is to elect Democrats, who will surely be better at calming the far-left mobs by giving them at least part of what they want. To be sure, the mob would be gratified by Donald Trump leaving office, but giving in to violent demands never makes the threat go away. Instead, it proves that violence works and leads to more of it. A mob is never satisfied.

The Only Way to Stop the Left Is to Elect Them?

Shadi Hamid of The Atlantic explained this theory last month when he wrote:

A loss by Joe Biden under these circumstances is the worst case not because Trump will destroy America (he can’t), but because it is the outcome most likely to undermine faith in democracy, resulting in more of the social unrest and street battles that cities including Portland, Oregon, and Seattle have seen in recent months. For this reason, strictly law-and-order Republicans who have responded in dismay to scenes of rioting and looting have an interest in Biden winning — even if they could never bring themselves to vote for him.

This month in the same publication, Yascha Mounk wrote that people who are tired of illiberal leftism should vote for Biden. “[A] Biden victory would make it easier, not harder, to push back against antifa types who think engaging in violent tactics to resist the Trump administration is justifiable,” Mounk said. “So long as citizens can contest political injustice at the ballot box, there can be no excuse for burning down government buildings.”

Neither Hamid nor Mounk is saying explicitly that the only way to stop left-wing violence is to vote for left-wing candidates, but they’re not not saying it, either. Giving in to fear and conceding to the rioters sounds, for some tremulous voters, like a way out of the problem.

Paying the Dane-Geld Never Works

We have known for a long time that such concessions rarely, if ever, succeed. Rudyard Kipling wrote about it in his 1911 poem “Dane-Geld.” In it, he retold the historical events of nine centuries earlier, when Viking raiders came to pillage England. 

Rather than get murdered and robbed, King Æthelred proposed to just give the Danes money (called the “Dane-geld”) so they would go away. The Danes agreed — and then came back every year for more. Kipling described the exchange:

It is always a temptation to an armed and agile nation, ⁠
To call upon a neighbour and to say: —
‘We invaded you last night —
We are quite prepared to fight, ⁠
Unless you pay us cash to go away.’

And that is called asking for Dane-geld, ⁠
And the people who ask it explain
That you’ve only to pay ’em the Dane-geld
And then you’ll get rid of the Dane!

It is always a temptation to a rich and lazy nation,
To puff and look important and to say: —
‘Though we know we should defeat you,
We have not the time to meet you, ⁠
We will therefore pay you cash to go away.’

Then, as now, human reactions are pretty predictable. If you make something profitable, more people will do it. The Vikings were presented with an easy win: just show up and get money, no need to risk life and limb. For Æthelred, paying them off was the easy short-term fix.

The problem, however, was not solved, and the Vikings kept coming. Eventually, their king, Canute, conquered England and held it until his death.

Americans Must Vote for What Is Good and Right

Delivering votes and policy victories to a mob out of fear is little different. If some voters actually want to defund the police and to enshrine Ibram X. Kendi’s Orwellian Department of Anti-Racism in the Constitution, or want any other far-left idea to come to pass, then by all means, they should vote for lefty candidates. But if other, more reasonable voters think that giving in to rioters will pacify the streets of Portland once more, they are surely mistaken. The Dane never left for long, and neither will Antifa, not if their violence is rewarded. 

Kipling explained why we should act out of conviction, not cowardice:

And that is called paying the Dane-geld; ⁠
But we’ve proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld ⁠
You never get rid of the Dane.

It is wrong to put temptation
In the path of any nation,
For fear they should succumb and go astray,
So when you are requested to pay up or be molested, ⁠
You will find it better policy to say: —

‘We never pay any one Dane-geld, ⁠
No matter how trifling the cost,
For the end of that game is oppression and shame, ⁠
And the nation that plays it is lost!’

A nation that votes out of fear is lost. Americans have not done so in the past, and we should not start now. That is true not only because it will not work, but because it is wrong.

This republic endures when people vote based on what they think will be right and good for all of us. Americans don’t pay tribute. Once we do, this grand experiment in republican self-government will be headed for failure.


Free Speech Has Limits, Canada's Trudeau Says

 Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau defended free speech on Friday, but added that it was "not without limits" and should not "arbitrarily and needlessly hurt" certain communities.

 

"We will always defend freedom of expression," Trudeau said in response to a question about the right to show a caricature of the Prophet Muhammad, as Charlie Hebdo magazine did.

"But freedom of expression is not without limits," he added. "We owe it to ourselves to act with respect for others and to seek not to arbitrarily or unnecessarily injure those with whom we are sharing a society and a planet."

"We do not have the right for example to shout fire in a movie theatre crowded with people, there are always limits," he argued.

Distancing himself from the position of French President Emmanuel Macron, Trudeau pleaded for a "careful" use of freedom of expression.

"In a pluralist, diverse and respectful society like ours, we owe it to ourselves to be aware of the impact of our words, of our actions on others, particularly these communities and populations who still experience a great deal of discrimination," he said.

 

 

As he had done the day before with the leaders of the European Union, Trudeau insisted on condemning the recent "appalling and appalling" terrorist attacks in France.

"It is unjustifiable and Canada wholeheartedly condemns these acts while standing with our French friends who are going through extremely difficult times," he said.

Three people were stabbed to death on Thursday in a church in Nice, in southern France, by a Tunisian man who was apprehended.

Anger erupted in the Middle East after the attacks against France and President Emmanuel Macron, vilified for having defended the right to publish the cartoons in France.

Macron made the comments during a tribute last week to Samuel Paty, a teacher beheaded in the street for showing caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad in class in a course on freedom of expression.

 

https://www.barrons.com/articles/these-7-european-companies-offer-solid-and-sustainable-dividends-51597734000 

 


 

A Day In The Life Of An Anonymous Resistance Member Inside The Trump Administration



It’s true. I am “Anonymous.” Those are words I hoped to never write, because I never wanted to be the story. I never wanted the attention. I never wanted the fame.

The book advance, yes, I very much wanted that. But not the notoriety, or accountability, or whatever word you want to use. What I wanted, besides the massive payday, was to stick it to Drumpf. For America. 

Since I came out as the extremely senior administration official and definitely not a low-level deputy adviser to the associate coffee fetcher in the east wing of the third floor of America’s fourth most-important federal agency behind the tell-all book “A Warning,” many people have asked me: How did you do it? How did you manage to bear such a great burden for America without ever cracking?

What kind of work did you force yourself to do, selflessly, to save America and secure that massive advance for a book that definitely doesn’t read like the rough draft of a high school junior’s “What I Did Over The Summer” essay in the slow kids’ English literature course?

Well, let me tell you. Not everyone appreciated my bravery, honesty, and courage, or stalwart bearing in the office. Many very junior staffers, who for some reason made more money than me, had better titles, and actually had facetime with the real decision-makers, were threatened by my deep love of this country.

Karen in accounting, for example, told me to stop leaving my dirty dishes in the kitchen and forcing everyone else to clean them so we wouldn’t constantly have to deal with ants invading the office. I told Karen that while she may have no problem putting ant children in cages, I would take no part in her xenophobic attempts to close the office borders to those who merely came here in search of a better life and the leftover cream cheese at the bottom of the sink.

And then there’s Michael from the human resources department. He told me to stop stealing office supplies and using the agency phones to call 900 numbers all day. I told him that I would never apologize for doing everything in my power to let sex workers know how much I appreciated their commitment to freedom and also their willingness to talk me off for $9.99 per minute. Michael clearly did not value my devotion to equality for all women.

Others throughout the office were clearly jealous of my influence and raw machismo. Becky in legislative affairs, for example, told me to “stop calling her” and “stop texting her suggestive photos” and said she would “get a restraining order” if I didn’t stop “standing outside her condo window without my pants on every night.” I talked to my friend Jeffrey Toobin about the incident, and he told me to live my truth and to never be afraid of letting the world see me as I am.

Inspired by his willingness to be himself and live his truth, I disclosed in my book that Becky and Michael and Karen secretly murdered immigrant children during their time off. My code of ethics simply would not allow me to keep those kinds of details hidden, even though I definitely kept them hidden until the check from the publisher cleared.

Now, is it true that I have “zero evidence” of any of the charges I levied against people who prevented me, who was so senior in the administration that I was basically the president, from saving the republic from the awful orange man? Well, that depends on what you mean by “evidence.”

The reality is that anyone who demands “evidence” — itself a term invented by slaveowners to assert dominion over oppressed minorities — hates this country and the Constitution that I swore an oath to defend. I did my duty, and I told my truth, and I don’t care what Karen or Becky or Michael or the entire Office of Professional Responsibility, which is now auditing me for the fourth time over allegations that I “defrauded the government,” have to say about it.

Treadwell Chadwick Johnson IV is a very important low-level deputy adviser to an associate coffee fetcher.

New York sinkhole: Man's horror over fall into rat-infested chasm

 The family of a man who fell into a sinkhole brimming with rats in New York have spoken about how the incident left him traumatised and needing hospital treatment, local media report.

 

 

Leonard Shoulders was walking by a bus stop in the Bronx area on Saturday when the concrete cracked beneath his feet.

A chasm up to 4.5m (15ft) deep swallowed Mr Shoulders, trapping him underground for about 30 minutes.

New Yorkers have described reports of his ordeal as a "nightmare".

"Rats crawling on him, he can't move," his brother, Greg White, told CBS New York. "He didn't want to yell because he was afraid there were going to be rats inside his mouth."

Firefighters were called to the scene, where a CCTV camera had captured the moment 33-year-old Mr Shoulders suddenly disappeared into the pavement. 

 

 

"I looked down and the guy was only moving his hand," one witness said.

Eventually, an emergency crew managed to rescue Mr Shoulders from the hole. Video showed him being wheeled into an ambulance on a stretcher.

He was taken to St Barnabas Hospital after suffering injuries to his arms, legs and face. As of Thursday, he remained there in a stable condition, the hospital told the New York Times.

"He's traumatised," his mother, Cindy White, told NBC New York. "He said he went straight down, and he was falling, falling, but the debris was falling and hitting him in the head."

The man's fall drew a visceral reaction from New Yorkers, many of whom described his ordeal as a "nightmare".

America is at stake

 

Article by William Ciosek in The American Thinker
 

America is at stake

A friend of mine from overseas asked me, “What’s the biggest issue which defines the American presidential election? What’s the main difference to America and the world if Trump wins or Biden wins?”

The answer seemed to well up out of me without forethought, as if by a force all its own. This is what I said:

If President Trump wins reelection to a second term, Western civilization and the sovereign nation-states that comprise it will be given an impetus to defend and maintain its history, heritage, and culture.

If Joe Biden and the now quasi-Marxist Democratic Party win the presidency, the opposite will be established as the new world order.

The Democratic Party in the United States is no longer the party of John F. Kennedy that many fondly remember.  It has been taken over by the extreme left, by quasi-Marxist radicals.  

The new quasi-Marxist Democratic Party hates America, its founding, its Constitution, its history, and heritage.  It wants to change what America is and has been from its very beginning -- a beacon of light and freedom to inspire those condemned to live in darkness and fear.

If the new Democratic Party wins the Presidency of the United States, it will join with other elitist, globalist forces such as that bloc of excessive political correctness, the European Union.  

A radical left-wing American government in alliance with a radical left-wing European Union will put a boot of oppression on our rumps and that of, for example, Eastern Europe.  The powerful combination of a radical left-wing American government in alliance with the European Union will accuse Poland and the Baltic states of racism and xenophobia and hate speech and lack of diversity for not submitting to their radical left-wing religion. The radical left hates Catholicism and Christianity and all religions different from their own religion of one-world elitist rule.

The quasi-Marxist global elite speak about the need for diversity, but what they mean by diversity is simply this:  You and I can look different from one another and have different sexual orientations, but we must think the same.  We must adhere to the same political religion, the religion of the far-left radicals who would take over America if the new, extreme left-wing Democratic Party wins the presidency on November 3rd.

It may seem rather ironic that the quasi-Marxists have made common cause with corporate elites.  But, you see, the elites are now transnational.  They too want nation states, and especially the United States, to lose sovereignty and collapse so that nothing might impede their exploitation of global markets.  

The biggest issue is the preservation of national sovereignty and representative self-government.  

The biggest issue is what we used to take for granted, that government of the people, by the people, and for the people shall not be superseded by quasi-Marxist mish-mosh sweetened by racial platitudes.

The biggest issue is to ensure that Americans remain more inspired by the iconic George Washington than the psychopathic George Soros.

The biggest issue is whether we can recover from our national tailspin, reaffirm our confidence in a free and sovereign United States, abide by and respect the Constitution, focus our resources on assisting people in need rather than provoking them, and restore confidence in our traditions, pride in our culture, and safety on our streets.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/10/america_is_at_stake.html




Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Joe's Fossil Fuel Folly



A numbers guru (not me) ran a few numbers to see how Joe would plan to power 500,000 charging stations without the use of Fossil Fuels. Now this just constitutes the Biden Charging stations he's proposing to have in place by 2025. 
Keep in mind he's claiming to end carbon-based electrical generation by 2035 with zero mention of nuclear in his plan, which is simply an absurd lie he cannot possibly deliver on but that aside here's the numbers for JUST the charging stations 
The chargers 
500,000 - The number of charging stations Joe is planning
$250,000 - The cost per station (Tesla 150kW Super Charger) [caveat Tesla uses fossil fuels to build these]
12 years - The estimated life of a charging station
$125 Billion - The cost to build 500,000 charging stations 
150 kW - A typical Tesla supercharger than can charge two cars at one
75,000,000 kW - The amount of power required for 500,000 charging stations
75,000 megaWatts = 75MM Kw 
Wind Turbines

1.67 MegaWatt = Mean Turbine Capacity in the US
44,910 - The # of turbines required to power the charging stations
3.75 Million Acres - # of acres of land required (average windmill on 50 acres per Megawatt ) 
$15 Billion - $37 Billon - Land Cost average farm land $4k - 10k per acre (much higher in some areas)
$1.5 MM - The cost of an average wind turbine
$67 Billion - The cost to build 44,910 wind turbines
54,000 - Total # of wind turbines CURRENTLY in the US 
3,000 - # of wind turbines installed per year currently
15 years - # of years it would take to reach required # of turbines
20 years - The average life span of a wind turbine
8% - Percentage of US electricity provided by wind energy 
Solar

1 MegaWatt takes 4 acres of land
300,000 acres - Required to produce 75,000 MegaWatts
$1 Billion - $3 Billon - Land Cost average farm land $4k - 10k per acre (much higher in some areas) 
$75 Billion - Cost for 75,000 Mwatt Solar Farm (Avg cost $1 per watt at scale)
25 to 30 years - Average life of a solar farm
2% - Percentage of US electricity provided by solar energy 
0 - The number of vehicles that could be built without fossil fuels for the steel, rubber tires, rubber hoses, plastic panels, plastic knobs, door handles, nylon coating on wires, etc. 
Lots of data, but in short, Joe will be dead before 30% of his plan was implemented if he lives to be 100 years old. It will take 15 years just to install all the wind turbines needed. 
Also, interesting how he thinks we can get rid of ALL fossil fuels, but we are sitting at 10% renewable energy (2019 numbers) after 20+ years of development + subsidies for renewable energy for much of that time. Yet, Joe thinks we can phase out all fossil fuels in 15 years. 
The Green New Deal is just BS and is a slush fund that will cost close to 100 trillion dollars by some estimates, not to mention the fact that to truly phase out all fossil fuels puts us back to little house on the prairie days. 
All these far left idiots aren't going to survive without xBox and their vape pens and those stupid toboggans they wear on their heads all summer because they think it's hip and cool. And I got news for you hipsters, those skinny jeans are made with fossil fuels. 
Roscoe Out....... 


From free press to enemy of the people

 

Article by Eric Utter in The American Thinker
 

From free press to enemy of the people

A free press is essential to a democratic republic. Our Founders knew this in their marrow. Unfortunately, as recent events have proven, we no longer have one. Bizarrely, those in the mainstream media have muzzled themselves, locked their minds and souls in a prison of their own making, and relinquished their integrity for power and the affirmation of their peers. They will not hold their own feet to the fire. They won’t speak truth to themselves. They may not even realize what it is any longer.

 Today, the “Fourth Estate” literally wouldn’t report it if they came across information proving that Joe Biden was a Russian stooge, though they’ve spent years trying to find evidence that President Trump might be. (Biden is, apparently, a stooge for China). In light of their breathtakingly universal—and steadfast-- refusal to report on the shocking Hunter Biden laptop revelations and the multiple, credible instances of graft and payola in which Joe Biden himself was almost certainly involved, mainstream media outlets have revealed themselves to be nothing more than members of an authoritarian,  shockingly close-minded leftist cult. I am left with no doubt that, if conclusive proof surfaced that Joe Biden recently raped an underage girl at a Church of Satan gathering while texting Vladimir Putin asking for a substantial campaign contribution, not one single legacy media outlet would report it.

How times have changed. America’s reverence for a free press can be traced all the way back to Cato’s Letters, a collection of essays criticizing the British political system that were written by John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, under the pseudonym Cato, and published between 1720 and 1723. (Cato was a Roman soldier, senator, historian, and outspoken critic of corruption in the late Roman Republic. He was a man of moral integrity, immune to bribes and graft.) Those letters offered a vigorous defense of freedom of speech and conscience.  

The Founders wanted to codify these principles. And they did. After America declared independence and (eventually) ratified the Constitution, it also adopted the Bill of Rights. This was done to make absolutely certain there would be no mistaking what rights its citizens possessed. The Bill of Rights (for those of you voting for the Harris-Biden ticket) is comprised of the first ten amendments to the Constitution. The First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech and freedom of the press, and it was adopted on December 15, 1791. For well over 220 years, the press, in general, with notable exceptions, has interpreted its freedom mandate as an obligation to inform the republic’s citizens without significant bias, wherever a worthy story might lead.

No longer. It is now unreservedly engaged in an attempt to systematically dismantle America as it was founded. Think that is an exaggeration? It is not. That is why it is wholeheartedly cheering on those who want to do away with the Electoral College and pack the court. It’s why those in the mainstream media—ironically—seem to disdain the First Amendment and want to repeal the Second Amendment. And why they support those who have literally dismantled and destroyed statues and monuments…and those who distort our history. It is also why they no longer act as a free press would, but as utterly shameless champions of a one-party socialist state. They have excused or supported those engaged in ritualistic orgies of speech suppression on college campuses, even while proclaiming that “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” They have made a mockery of their own slogans. And themselves. They utilize their visceral hatred of President Trump and his tendency to exaggerate as an excuse to flat out lie. They claim those to the right of center have violent tendencies, even as they excuse the looting, pillaging and physical assaults committed by the so-called progressives who they deem to be their constituents. And they lie about their lying. (As in, “we are the truth.” Sound familiar New York Times?) And Big Tech aids and abets them, while cravenly genuflecting towards China, in the hopes of raking in cash.

Thomas Jefferson said: “I have sworn on the altar of God, eternal hostility to all forms of tyranny over the minds of man.”

Today’s “journalists” say: “We have sworn eternal hostility to the minds of those who dare to disagree with us.” So they try to stifle dissent, ban the truth and cancel reality. Tragically, they are, in a very real sense, a clear and present danger to the republic.

 

 
 




Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage


Flynn’s Judge Believes He Has Power to....

Flynn’s Federal Judge Now Believes He Has Power to Act as U.S. Postmaster General



Judge Emmet Sullivan’s far-ranging inquisition into the Justice Department’s handling of the Michael Flynn case apparently isn’t keeping him busy enough. Now he’s trying to run certain operations of the U.S. Postal Service.

You heard that right. A federal judge—the same federal judge who appointed a private citizen to argue in favor of continuing the prosecution of another private citizen even when the government itself sought to dismiss the charges—has now issued what Politico calls “a highly detailed order” concerning USPS operations and procedures.


Too bad Sullivan can’t seem to find the time to issue “a highly detailed order” dismissing the unjustified continuation of the Flynn prosecution – despite the Court of Appeals telling him to “proceed with appropriate dispatch,” which is formal court-speak for telling a judge to act quickly. Sullivan is exhibiting the same dangerously broad views of his powers here that he has displayed in the Flynn case.


Here’s what happened: In June 2020, Louis DeJoy took the helm of the USPS. The first postmaster general to come from outside the agency in more than 20 years, DeJoy drew upon his expertise in logistics to implement commonsense measures that would put the struggling service on a firmer financial footing.


Action was needed because the USPS has lost $78 billion over the past 13 years, leaving it basically insolvent. At the time DeJoy came on board, the coronavirus pandemic had “reduced its revenue and put the agency on track to run out of cash in September.”


One of his reform measures aimed to get postal employees to complete their deliveries on time, and discourage late and extra mail delivery trips. That drew the ire of union leaders. After all, why should their members have to get eight hours worth of work done in eight hours, when they could stretch it into 10 or more hours and continue pocketing hefty overtime checks?


In crying “foul,” opponents of this commonsense reform cast it as a nefarious scheme to inhibit timely delivery of mail-in ballots. It was a frivolous claim, of course. After all, both Democrats and Republicans use absentee and mail-in ballots, so any deliberate attempt to delay mail delivery would hurt all candidates, regardless of party affiliation.


Still, lawsuits were filed, and on August 18 DeJoy announced: “To avoid even the appearance of any impact on election mail, I am suspending these initiatives until after the election is concluded.”


But that wasn’t enough for Judge Sullivan. Acting on an emergency motion filed by four plaintiffs from Texas, Pennsylvania, New York, and Wisconsin, Sullivan issued a series of preliminary injunctions finding that the now-suspended “July 2020 Policy Changes aimed at reducing the number of late and extra trips would impose an undue burden on Plaintiffs’ and other voters’ constitutional right to vote, and that absent injunctive relief, Plaintiffs face irreparable harm.”


Please note: As the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals recently reminded everyone, “as long as the state allows voting in person, there is no constitutional right to vote by mail.” Also note: Each of the four states allows and encourages in-person voting; each also allows ample time to return any mail-in ballots before the election.


The idea that unenforced policy changes could unconstitutionally interfere with someone’s right to vote by mail where none existed in the first place is absurd.


But Sullivan’s orders stand. His “highly detailed order” specified the exact language to be used in a notice that he decreed had to be issued to USPS personnel by the next day. In addition to saying that “The guidelines issued on July 14, 2020, by USPS Vice President of Logistics, Robert Cintron, regarding the use of late and extra trips are rescinded,” the notice also had to say:


USPS personnel are instructed to perform late and extra trips to the maximum extent necessary to increase on-time mail deliveries, particularly Election Mail. To be clear, late and extra trips should be performed to the same or greater degree than they were performed prior to July 2020 when doing so would increase on-time deliveries. Any prior communication that is inconsistent with this instruction should be disregarded.

Sullivan further required that he be given daily status reports by 10:00 a.m. each day providing “(1) updated data on the number of extra and late trips performed the preceding day, at the Nation, Area, and District level, including any available date specific to Election Mail, to the maximum extent feasible; (2) updated data on the percentage of on-time deliveries at the Nation, Area, and District level, including any available data that is specific to Election Mail to the extent feasible; and (3) any other reports generated after the date of this Order and produced to Congress, other courts, or other litigants.”


He also ordered daily 3:00 p.m. status conferences until he decides differently.


Just where does Sullivan get the authority to direct the day-to-day activities of the Postal Service? And just where will he find the additional funding necessary to implement his newly imposed requirements?

Oh, that’s right—he doesn’t have the authority to do that. Though, at this rate, who knows what he might try.


At any rate, if he’s going to function as the de facto postmaster general, we’ve got a few commemorative stamp ideas. Should we just send them directly to his chambers?


China's Communist Party Has a Long-Range Plan to Overtake the United States

 


Article by Bryan Preston in PJMedia

 

China's Communist Party Has a Long-Range Plan to Overtake the United States

Asia Times reports on the Chinese Communist Party’s congress, which concludes today.

The allegedly free but increasingly leftist U.S. media isn’t reporting much on it, which is interesting all by itself.

Granted, foreign policy doesn’t drive as many sick burns or clicks as your average Instagram influencer, but it’s still important.

Lately, a question about our media, and the Democrats it clearly favors at the expense of its own credibility, has slipped into my mind unbidden.

When the Hunter Biden scandal first erupted, media, social media, and the Democrats attacked it in concert from three directions.

Media and social media both acted to disrupt the story’s path to American eyeballs and ears from their respective angles. They censored it and continue to pretend it’s not even there. The NY Post is still locked out of its Twitter account, and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, who looks like he’s auditioning to play Russian lunatic Rasputin in some badly-funded Netflix movie, offered all kinds of circular reasoning and even outright lies under oath, according to Sen. Ted Cruz, to justify it. Meanwhile, the Democrats have trotted out Rep. Adam Schiff from the people’s republic of California to slam the Biden story — without a shred of evidence — as “Russian disinformation.”

Schiff had no evidence. He didn’t need any for CNN, MSNBC, and the like to trumpet his claim uncritically. The “Russian collusion” tale has been long discredited by now. But that doesn’t seem to matter.

Democrats never say, and media never ask, whether a given story might be Chinese disinformation — despite the fact that, as Asia Times reports, China does have a plan and the ambition to overtake the United States as the world’s leading superpower. Russia lacks the means and the ambition for such a global role. That went away with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Is it impossible for a given news story to be Chinese disinformation? They have more money and much more savvy than Moscow. Disinforming and dividing America would reasonably be expected to be among China’s strategies to overtake us. Right?

China has been buying American researchers through its Thousand Talents Plan, which we’ve repeatedly reported on here. So there is precedent, happening right now, for China to use the wealth it has gained over the past few decades against those of us who have made it wealthy.

We know it can buy silence and even open support from major American athletes and leagues. The National Basketball Association seems to forget which nation it plays in. Facial recognition at NBA arenas if fans are allowed in next season?

We know China has planted its Confucius Institutes at universities all over the United States, putting sweet cash into the coffers of bloated, leftist universities that now teach open hatred for the United States and its alleged sins — but not, curiously, the sins and murders of communists Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, and so forth.

Isn’t that interesting?

So the question is, have our media also become instruments of China’s foreign policy?

While you ponder that question, take a look at the Asia Times report.

Justin Lin, aka Lin Yifu, head of the Peking University’s (PKU) National School of Development, told a forum in Beijing on Wednesday that the economy could ride out the geopolitical headwinds and keep expanding at 6-8% annually for the next ten years.

That’s interesting. Recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic which originated in China (though Democrat Andrew Cuomo keeps insisting it came here from Europe, which might or might not be true for New York but is totally irrelevant since the virus started its global tour in Wuhan, and it didn’t only come in from one direction in a global interconnected economy), the U.S. economy just posted 33% growth for the quarter. Appearing on Fox News earlier Thursday, Biden economic adviser Austan Goolsby said that the Joe Biden economy could hope for 2.5% to 3% growth maximum.

Biden’s own advocates seem to lack ambition for the economy they want to lead.

Here’s communist China projecting much more robust growth for its strongly state-controlled and influenced economy.

Lin, a former deputy governor at the World Bank, was quoted by Xinhua as saying that China had turned the corner in its fight against Covid-19 and amid the current testing times may take an unassailable lead over major Western economies in terms of economic recovery and in nurturing emerging new high-tech industries.

He said China was well-poised to press its advantages as one of the world’s largest markets with well-rounded, full-stack supply chains.

Maybe, maybe not. The freer world is decoupling from China rapidly. The United States, at least while Trump is in office, is warming up to India as a strategic partner and future manufacturing hub (one of many, along with Vietnam and others, to take up the load formerly held pretty much alone by China). So some of that is wishcasting. If Japan, South Korea, Australia, Europe, and the United States continue decoupling from China, its growth rate will suffer.

Unless Biden gets into the White House. Trump has consistently criticized China, and the American leaders who he says let China take advantage of us. Biden is one of those.

Biden has long favored China, even dismissing it as any level of threat, for whatever reason, and our media have never questioned him about this favoritism. Why?

The official communique of the just-concluded plenum revealed that Xi had also teased the 400 attendees with his expectations for the next 15 years, though the document did not specify the leader’s aspirations. It is widely rumored, however, that Beijing aims to leapfrog the US in gross domestic product (GDP) and economic power by 2035.

That will be much easier for China to accomplish if the best we can do is a measly 3% growth while they’re doubling or nearly tripling that, which is Biden’s goal.

China covered up the coronavirus outbreak during the most critical days for stopping it. Democrats refuse to criticize them for that. Cuomo keeps blaming Europe. The media keep letting him. Why?

Joe Biden has long been a study in mediocrity. When he wasn’t toxifying our judicial nominations process, which he did consistently for decades to pad his own meager CV or deflect from his plagiarism, he was busy getting foreign policy issues wrong for about 40 years. That’s not just my opinion, Obama’s Defense Secretary Robert Gates has publicly said and reiterated as much.

The media have gone into the tank for the walking bore that is Joe Biden like they have never gone into the tank for any previous candidate in my lifetime. Why?

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/bryan-preston/2020/10/29/xis-gotta-have-it-chinas-communist-party-has-a-long-range-plan-to-overtake-the-united-states-n1106510





Don't Forget to Recommend
and Follow us at our

W3P Homepage