Article by Loyd Pettegrew and Jim McCoy in "Townhall":
The Oxford English Dictionary defines progressives as “supporters for or advocacy of social reform.” Ironically, the reforms that most progressives seek are actually regressive and take us back to darker and less liberal eras. A synonym for progressive is advancing, but it begs the question, advancing what?
A 2005 article in the Journal of Economic Perspective by Princeton’s Thomas C. Leonard argues that “less well known is that a crude eugenic sorting of groups into deserving and undeserving classes crucially informed the labor and immigration reform that is the hallmark of the Progressive Era.” Reform-minded economists of the Progressive Era defended exclusionary labor and immigration legislation on grounds that the labor force should be rid of unfit workers, whom they labeled “parasites,” “the unemployable,” “low-wage races” and the “industrial residuum.” This is where progressivism came from at the turn of the 20th Century.
Rigorous history documents that for nearly a century Democrats were the supporters of slavery in America. The Republican Party was formed by Abraham Lincoln to counter Democrat-supported slavery and the Civil War was started because of two major issues. The first was states rights. Southern states believed the high federal taxes on agricultural production unfairly hurt the south and benefited the north—taxation without sufficient representation. The second was slavery. The south was, by significant degrees, better off economically because of cheap slave labor, despite the federal taxes they paid from this labor disproportionately benefiting the north. This was at a time when slavery was still practiced among most nations of the world. For example, progressives in Canada might be surprised to learn that slavery in Canada was not just a white man’s failing but included slavery practiced by First Nation (indigenous) people from the earliest times and even later under European colonization. Much of the world including the United States realized the error of their ways and progressed, ending slave trading with Africa throughout the 1800s.
Paradoxically, the proud progressive label impounds a history that is the opposite of wokeness. Victor Davis Hanson has characterized them succinctly in these words, “The woke but godless, the arrogant but ignorant, the violent but physically unimpressive, the degreed but poorly educated, the broke but acquisitive, the ambitious but stalled—these are history’s ingredients of riot and revolution.” This cast of characters don’t want a democracy because it entails mutual answerability and reciprocal respect. Progressives have no idea who they should respect other than anyone who is against everything—tear it down and start anew like CHAZ in Seattle--a great and lasting progressive accomplishment!
A recent case in point comes from Heather Mac Donald who revealed in the Wall Street Journal that two psychologists, one from Michigan State University and the other from the University of Maryland retracted their 2019 study debunking endemic racism among police, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, only because she had the temerity to cite the study in a previous Journal Op-Ed. Heather Mac Donald concludes, “If scientists must disavow their findings because they challenge reigning orthodoxies, then those orthodoxies will prevail even when they are wrong.” This is exactly the goal of progressivism, to wipe out history and rewrite it to a version they can abide by.
Welcome to our new Civil War in America.
https://townhall.com/columnists/loydpettegrew/2020/07/13/the-regressive-progressives-n2572338