LEIPZIG, Germany (Reuters) – The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency has
devised technology to restrict the use of anti-aircraft missiles after
they leave American hands, a researcher said, a move that experts say
could persuade the United States that it would be safe to disseminate
powerful weapons more frequently.
The new technology is intended for use with shoulder-fired missiles
called Man-Portable Air-Defense Systems (MANPADS), Dutch researcher Jos
Wetzels told a cybersecurity conference
Wetzels said the system was laid out in a batch of CIA documents
published by WikiLeaks in 2017 but that the files were mislabeled and
attracted little public attention until now.
Wetzels said the CIA had come up with a “smart arms control solution”
that would restrict the use of missiles “to a particular time and a
particular place.” The technique, referred to as “geofencing,” blocks
the use of a device outside a specific geographic area.
Weapons that are disabled when they leave the battlefield could be an
attractive feature. Supplied to U.S. allies, the highly portable
missiles can help win wars, but they have often been lost, sold, or
passed to extremists.
For example, Stinger MANPADS supplied by the United States are
credited with helping mujahedeen rebels drive Soviet forces out of
Afghanistan in a conflict that spanned the 1980s and 1990s. But U.S.
officials have since spent billions of dollars
https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007-09/features/countering-manpads-threat-strategies-success
to clear the missiles from the country – and from other conflict zones
around the world.
Wetzels said it was unclear whether the CIA’s design ever left the
drawing board or where it was meant to have been deployed, but he noted
that the apparent period of development in the documents’ metadata –
2014 to 2015 – roughly coincided with media reports about the deployment
of MANPADS to rebels in Syria. Geofencing might have been seen as a way
of ensuring the missiles were used on the Syrian battlefield and
nowhere else, he said.
The CIA declined to comment.
Outside experts who reviewed Wetzels’ analysis said they found it plausible.
N.R. Jenzen-Jones, who directs the British-based ARES intelligence
consultancy, said geofencing has long been discussed as a safeguard to
allow powerful weapons “into the hands of friendly forces operating in
high-risk environments.”
Wetzels said geofencing was no panacea, running through a list of
security vulnerabilities that could be used by insurgents to bypass the
restrictions.
“It’s not a watertight solution,” he said.
FILE PHOTO: A MANPAD (Man-Portable Air Defiance Systems) missile is
detonated along the shore facing the Firing Range, east of the Libyan
capital Tripoli, on December 11, 2011.
https://www.oann.com/cia-devised-way-to-restrict-missiles-given-to-allies-researcher-says/