"California," argues Victor Davis Hanson,
is "becoming pre-modern" despite ballooning government solutions. Like
fictional pre-modern societies, it is becoming a two-tier society; a
landscape of fantastical castles amid a sea of peasants. It is as if the
technologically sophisticated components of the Golden State were
creating its shadow of poor, homeless, drug-addicted and unskilled
populations.
Huge global wealth in high-tech, finance, trade and academia poured into the coastal corridor, creating a new nobility with unprecedented riches. Unfortunately, the new aristocracy adopted mindsets antithetical to the general welfare of Californians living outside their coastal enclaves. The nobodies have struggled to buy high-priced , pay exorbitant power bills and deal with shoddy infrastructure -- all of which resulted from the policies of the distant somebodies.
Yet in some
respects, not only California but the whole global world is morphing
into a similar two-tier arrangement. This may be driven by something
called knowledge inequality.
The processes by which a society produced its goods and governed itself
were once common knowledge to a large percentage of the population. But
they are not now.
Relative
technological simplicity and cultural homogeneity made knowledge
equality easier. This, in turn, facilitated rational governance. At the
time of the American Revolution, the knowledge of what was possible and
affordable was within the grasp even of a farmer or workman. However
today -- and California may be an extreme example -- society is reliant
on processes only a tiny few understand. Under these circumstances
public policy and even economics become recondite.
Annie Lowrey of The Atlantic
writes that "California is becoming unlivable" and suggests solving the
wildfire/electricity outage problem by banning development. "One
solution ... is to build more dense housing in urban areas ...
California isn’t doing enough to discourage building in fire-prone
areas." Yet regulation is what caused the problem in the first place.
The bulk of wildfire destruction in California happens in the Wildlife Urban Interface (WUI) ... Although much of the WUI is naturally vulnerable to fire, human behavior is primarily to blame for the destruction. People start more than nine in 10 fires ... If building in the WUI is so dangerous, why do it? In part because building new housing is so very difficult in many urban regions in California, due to opposition from existing homeowners and strict building codes.
Knowledge
inequality makes "magical" solutions inevitable because an ever-smaller
fraction of the public know how things work or are paid for. Healthcare
woes? Medicare for All. Housing crisis? Make affordable housing a
"right." Students choking under loans? Write it off. Graduates without literacy or numeracy? Teach Woke Math.
Fix the wildfires by tightly regulating development sounds like a solution.
Following Arthur C. Clarke's famous adage that "any sufficiently
advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic," many things are
now solved by linguistic legerdemain. Ever since, Apollo politicians have been invoking associative magic as political spells:
"Nothing is impossible in this age of miracles. If we can put a man on the Moon, we surely are capable of seeing that our temporary surplus agricultural products are placed in many hungry stomachs of the world.” ...Nixon’s Democratic opponent, Vice President Hubert Humphrey, used the phrase in his standard stump speech: “If we can put a man on the Moon, certainly we can afford to put man on his feet on Earth.”
Sending a
spacecraft to the lunar surface and solving homelessness might be
different problems, but with a few similes and metaphors, they can be
"magically" connected and thus solved. Associative magic is especially
strong in Bernie Sanders, who uses it to solve housing. "This is the richest country in the history of the world. No one in America should be homeless." With it, he can set salaries. "In the richest country in the world, our teachers should be the best-paid, not among the worst-paid." The same magic
can pay for healthcare: "In the richest country in the world, it is
obscene that millions of people are pushed into poverty and insolvency
because they had the bad luck of getting sick and needing to see a
doctor."
There's no
objection to magic because many people, especially in or from the Third
World, are surrounded by found marvels like cell phones, machine
learning, GPS, CRISPR therapies, etc. They are used to things that
simply work -- though none but the sages know how. Immigrants can be
forgiven for thinking, as they wander in their misery through the
technological wonders of California, why the magi have simply not waved
their wands and created the same level of comfort for them. In a world
of magic, what's one more spell, because that's all it takes, right? It
must be because -- and the politicians never tire of telling them -- the
wizards are selfish and holding back.
The difference between science and magic, noted Chaz Orzell,
is that in the world of sorcery some people are born with amazing
powers. Wealth does not come from the application of truths external to
humanity but rather from birth powers, celebrity, or beauty.
The primary distinction between these magic systems and science is that magic relies on inborn talent in a way that science doesn't-- science and the products thereof will work for anyone, but only certain special people are able to do magic ... magic ... is fundamentally not amenable to scientific investigation-- something not bound by easily discoverable rules.
In such a
world the solution to every problem is redistribution. To effect this
political parties ceaselessly put up magical people as candidates whose
powers derive from certain associative properties. Nobody runs anymore
on the strength of competence but because they are gay, lesbian,
disabled, a person of color, or imbued with some other property. Only
with this talisman can they approach the tower of capitalism to demand more of who abides within.
Thus, I had so long suffer’d, in this quest,Heard failure prophesied so oft, been writSo many times among “The Band”—to wit,The knights who to the Dark Tower’s search address’dTheir steps—that just to fail as they, seem’d best.And all the doubt was now—should I be fit?
In 1926 the French sociologist Lucien Levy-Bruhl
wrote: "The primitive mind does not differentiate the supernatural from
reality, but rather uses 'mystical participation' to manipulate the
world. According to Levy-Bruhl, moreover, the primitive mind doesn't
address contradictions." Except for the wizards we are, most of us,
primitives now.
In an ironic
sort of way, the more technologically advanced a society becomes the
more medieval and superstitious its governance can become. Then we will
truly become pre-modern, supplanting nuclear power plants with windmills
and electricity with candles. Perhaps the biggest problem of the 21st
century will not be income, but knowledge inequality.