The irony of the Fake News Media circling the wagons to protect Fake Native American isn’t lost on me.
Ironic to use the phrase “circling the wagons” given Liz Warren’s decades long lie about being Native American. But there you go.
In an effort to avoid dealing with the glaring, documented contradictions to Liz Warren’s latest tall tale, the media and Democrat politicians are most definitely circling the wagons around her.
It’s like 2008 all over again.
Much like when they tried to convince voters that Barack Obama sat in Jeremiah Wright’s church for twenty years and never heard a single psychotic, racist or anti-American thing he said, the media is trying to convince us that because other women in the 1970s were fired for being pregnant, Liz must be telling the truth.
It’s the one of the stupidest, most ham-handed things I’ve ever witnessed from the so-called “free and independent press.” And that’s saying something.
First, they’re dismissing documented evidence for no other reason than the report appeared in the Federalist. And since the Federalist is a “conservative outlet,” any primary-source documents that dispute Liawatha’s latest tall tale must be suspect.
I know! Ironic that someone who writes for the Washington Post would bemoan “unfair damage” from “bad-faith” revelations. It’s as if they didn’t smear the Covington Catholic kids based on bad faith revelations. Or Brett Kavanaugh. Or President Trump for that matter.
But it isn’t simply the documents unearthed by the Federalist.
Liz Warren herself contradicts her account that she was fired for being “visibly pregnant.”
The media refuse to address the contradictions.
Instead, they make it about other women who were fired for being pregnant.
We’re not talking about other women, you dinks.
We’re talking about one specific woman who has told two very different accounts of her leaving her teaching job.
Who cares if it happened to other women? The question is did it really happen to Elizabeth Warren?
If the media wasn’t so busy circling the wagons to protect their preferred candidate maybe they could do this little thing called “journalism” and check the facts themselves.
But no!
Oh, I see. CNN says scrutinizing Liawatha’s contradictory stories is sexist.
And her second account must be the true one because it happened to other women!!
Dear Lord.
Circling the wagons along with the media are such Democrat “luminaries” as failed Presidential candidate Kirsten Gillibrand. And she too points to other women’s stories to “prove” Liz Warren was truthful.
Something tells me they know this is yet another tall tale from Liawatha. Because if they truly believed she did get fired for being “visibly pregnant,” they wouldn’t waste time dragging out anecdotal accounts of other women – none of whom are named Elizabeth Warren – to tell their harrowing stories of pregnancy-related firings.
Does it not occur to Kirsten that perhaps Liz altered the story in order to capitalize on the “I am Woman, Hear Me Roar/You’ve Come a Long Way Baby” feminist battle cry?
She’s a seasoned panderer. Liz wants to be the new “breaking the glass ceiling despite all the sexist discrimination I’ve endured during my poor, pathetic life” female Presidential candidate.
And telling crowds “I decided to take a couple years to stay at home with my baby and figure out what my next move will be” is not Victimy enough for today’s Pussy-Hat-Wearing Democrat base.
So she tweaked her story to cast herself in the role of a Victim while smearing her employer as a misogynistic member of the Patriarchy.
It isn’t “conservative media” who contradict Liz Warren’s recent account; it is Liz Warren herself. You’d think that would pique the interest of those brave firefighters of the “Free Press.”
But the goal of the news media isn’t to ferret out the truth. It is to protect and defend their chosen candidate.
So they’re circling the wagons and claiming that any investigative reporting that exposes yet another Liz Warren lie is “smearing” her in “bad faith.”
Problem is, they’re being so obvious about it, most Americans who already think the media are partisan hacks just aren’t going to buy it.