Monday, September 28, 2026

We Are So Tired of the Loudmouth Quitters


Every election cycle we hear the same stupid spiel from a certain band of pseudo-conservative quitters: “Oh no, I’m not getting my way. I’ve got no reason to vote. I’m not going to vote. The Republicans aren’t conservative enough, so I’m just going to let the communist pervert Democrats win. Waa, waa, waa.” I don’t know whether this is tactical stupidity or a cry for attention — maybe it’s both — but it’s exhausting. Boss, I’m tired. Tired of the ostentatiously blackpilling pundits and posers who think electing Democrats by sitting out the election is the way to morph the Republican Party from a bunch of crony codgers managing America’s decline like gentlemen into a party that’s making America great again. It’s not. You never win by losing. And in fact, we’ve been winning. If you’re mad because you think Donald Trump hasn’t performed, you’re not thinking at all. The only question is whether that’s because you can’t or you’ve chosen not to.

“But Kurt, we’ve got to teach the Republicans a lesson!” Yeah, we do. Do you think the Republicans haven’t learned anything? What’s Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) going to be doing after January? The answer is nothing. He’s not going to be doing anything because, after he voted for gun control and hinted at support for amnesty even as he awkwardly donned a Stetson to fool the Lone Star rubes, the Texas GOP decisively fired him. Ask tofu-spined Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) what he’s going to be doing. Again, nothing. The squish got squashed. How about the ridiculous Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC)? He didn’t even bother running because he knew he'd get drop-kicked into oblivion in the North Carolina primary. Oh, and of course there’s that fake-libertarian doofus Republican Rep. Thomas Massie (KY-4), whom most of these dim doomers probably adore, who got his walking papers in the primary. Now he’ll have time to finally get around to disclosing that Epstein list he keeps running his fool mouth about — that is, when he’s not blaming all his problems on the Jews.

The fact is that we are getting rid of the deadweight. We are making progress. The Republicans are learning their lesson. That’s what primaries are for. That’s what the primaries have done. But what the general election is for is stopping the communists. This is when it counts. This is when it matters. Yet a bunch of prima donnas — mostly on social media, because I haven’t actually met any of them in real life — are announcing they’re going to be AWOL because they didn’t get their way. They want to quit while we’re ahead.

Yeah, I know gas is too expensive. Get over it. Yeah, I know Donald Trump is fighting a war that we should’ve won 30 years ago and that bothers some people. But defeating a generational enemy and preventing it from being able to drop a hot rock on New York — again, a lot of these doomers probably wouldn’t mind the mullahs nuking Tel Aviv because, you know, the Jews — is a good thing. Donald Trump knew he was risking his majority and did what he had to do anyway. We should be proud of him, not act like whiny little teenage girls, pouting in our rooms and desperately scribbling our gripes and complaints in our figurative dream journals.

I just can’t deal with people who are so dumb, or so disingenuous, that they would actually argue that we must protest the Republicans not being conservative and populist enough by electing a bunch of perverted communist weirdos who want to castrate kids, throw open the penitentiaries, invite in the entire Third World, and persecute anybody to the right of Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14). Burn it all down? It’s our house! We’ve got all three branches of government. Did we get everything we wanted from Congress? No. And you know what? We’re never going to get everything we want from Congress. We’re never going to get everything we want from any institution. Because we’re adults — at least some of us — we understand that you don’t always get what you want.

But we have gotten a lot, all of which this nonsense strategy of sitting out the midterms puts at risk. See the border? It’s closed. What kind of idiot would think it’s a great idea to give power to the people who want open borders in order to protest Donald Trump not deporting quite enough illegal aliens so far? And you’re mad about gas prices? Do you think the party that hates fossil fuels, that wants us riding buses with homicidal hobos or pedaling bicycles like ponytailed gender-studies TAs, is going to make for lower gas prices? They’re going to shut down our entire petroleum industry. Do you think that’s going to make gas cheaper, Einstein? In what universe do you live? Did you think this through?

Once again, we’re faced with the classic “stupid or thinks you are stupid” conundrum: Are they really dumb enough to think that’s a good plan, or do they just think you’re dumb enough to think that’s a good plan? Be mad – good, you should be. But be smart.

Like I said, we get the same ostentatious opt-out announcements every cycle. Once upon a time, I would try to gently reason with people like this. I would provide them evidence and facts showing that choosing defeat was not the best path to victory, either short-term or long-term. But cycle after cycle, we get the same loud, stupid people on social media who stand up and advocate failure as the key to success. You can’t argue with an idiot because he’s an idiot. And you can’t argue with somebody whose purpose is only to draw attention to himself. I don’t want to put these people in the spotlight; they’re political narcissists who want us to beg them for their support. I guess it gives them some sort of meaning, and the attention gives them the false impression that they matter.

There are demoralized Republicans out there, so there’s a market for dooming. It’s easier to exploit them than to energize them. Sadly, social media pays a premium to loudmouth posers who try to draw attention to themselves by taking obnoxious positions, like not voting in the general, as some sort of dimwitted protest. You just need a relatively small slice of the media pie to be successful, and the slice these guys are aiming to claim is topped with a heaping dollop of strategic stupidity.

“But Kurt, Congress hasn’t done anything!” Yes, it has. Putting the Big Beautiful Bill, a bunch of judges, and things like the Laken Riley Act aside, it has stopped all sorts of horrific Democrat initiatives. “But Kurt, we haven’t jailed all the Obama/Biden crooks, we haven’t deported every single illegal alien, and we aren’t guaranteed ponies at Christmas!” All true. In any human endeavor, you don’t get everything you want all at once. You make compromises. You set priorities. You win some, and you lose some.

Don’t be mad at me for telling you that — be mad at whoever told you differently, because they lied to you. So grow the hell up and stop acting like a bunch of sissies.

Now, I’m going to get a lot of grief about this column because I’m allegedly not taking legit complaints and dissatisfaction seriously enough. What they’re really mad about is that I’m not sufficiently catering to their caterwauling because they have to pay another buck at the gas pump to make sure we all don’t glow in the dark. Oh, do they need a hug? Well, this isn’t the time for hugging. This is the time for voting. This is the time for doing what you have to do to win in the long run. No, gritting your teeth and marching forward doesn’t provide the giddy emotional satisfaction of a temper tantrum. But then, adults aren’t out for emotional satisfaction. They’re out for victory. And the only way we’re going to have any chance of winning our country back is by defeating the communists who want to destroy what’s left of it.

So to those of you who want me to beg you for your support, here’s some sand. Feel free to pound it. I’m not going to pretend that anybody out there urging us not to do everything we can to win this midterm election — one where the deck is already historically stacked against us — is anything but a clown.

Life is hard. So is ensuring our freedom. Get over it and get to work.


Podcast thread for Sept 28

 


a week passes by faster then you think.

No Matter How High the Gas Prices, I Won’t Let Communists Win


Yes, the gas prices are high, but I live in California, where gas prices are always going to be higher than in the rest of the country. I don't blame President Trump, nor do I blame the conflict in Iran. If Iran wasn't trying to blow us up in a nuclear holocaust, then there would have been no reason for the United States to attack them! California shut down two refineries, and they add taxes and fees on top of more taxes and fees. Don’t scream at Trump, blue state residents. Blame your own incompetent state governments!

Am I happy about the inflation? No. Three percent inflation is bad. This is a problem of federal overspending, and I don't think that President Trump's $5,000 dividend proposal is any good. If he's joking, it's still not a great idea. There’s a better way to give us money: let us keep what we already earn. Congress can cut a trillion and a half out of the budget, and then give all of the taxpaying Americans a $5,000 rebate from our 2026 tax returns.

Affordability, housing costs, wars and rumors of wars: the doomers, the blackpillers, the corporate media, the Democrats and their academic acolytes, all want us to focus on what is wrong or bad. They want their communist pals to get elected up and down the ticket this November.

We must not let some setbacks distract us from the great work that Trump and team have accomplished.

President Trump is doing so much good that I can let the little stuff go. The fact that we have illegal aliens fleeing our country, that visa overstays are getting kicked out, that immigrants who came in legally but caused nothing but trouble are being deported as well, and the fact that President Trump is standing tall and fighting for America makes me so proud to support him and the Republican ticket going into Election 2026. 

I'm sick and tired of listening to Americans b***h and moan about how much the gas is. Maybe they should talk to someone who drove their first car in the 1970s, when the OPEC-driven gas shortages were so acute that people could only go to gas stations depending on certain days and whether they had a number or a letter at the end of their license plate. President Trump has been playing 4-D chess when it comes to ensuring energy dominance and stability, protecting American prestige, securing our interests, and advancing our future. Trump took out Venezuelan narco-dictator Nicolas Maduro, then scored an excellent oil deal with the new leadership of the Latin American Communist hellhole, soon to be freed to a republic once again. Trump has put Cuba on its heels and forced it to its knees. Mexico is no longer bailing out bad actors in the Caribbean and helping us defeat the drug cartels, too.

President Trump gave a great presentation of American greatness at the UN last week. I normally don't watch the UN speeches, but I listened to everything he said on September 23, 2026, and I applaud everything. He stood up to Iran — to its face; he denounced Cuba, and the communist delegation saved face by walking out in shame; he stood up for American sovereignty once again, and he asserted clearly that there is no right to illegal immigration, but there is a right for nations to assert their sovereignty. 

I voted for all of this. I loved that he’s doubling down on why we elected him in 2024, and he’s not allowing some bad polling or nasty press to stop him from doing what is best.

The general public, including the conservative commentary class, is not paying enough attention to the massive rightward shift overtaking Latin America. For the first time in decades, the American President enjoys considerable, consummate allies at the UN from throughout the Americas. From Argentina to Ecuador, and now including a traditional Catholic president of Colombia openly allying with us and fighting transnational drug cartels, we have allies helping us in our fight to protect our country, and you can bet your bottom dollar (or peso) that they're stopping the flow of mass immigration to our country. Canada is the only country not getting along with us right now, but that will change soon. 

Look at the major win that President Trump scored with Greenland! We get all of the power, we get to call the shots, we get to maintain our military presence, and we cut off hostile nations both to the west and to the NATO alliance. That means China and Russia don't get to call dibs or take advantage of the mineral deposits in Greenland. Frankly, I would have had no problem incorporating that massive territory into the American sphere as a commonwealth along with Puerto Rico or Guam. But President Trump is making the best deals to do what will serve our country for the long term.

Also at the UN, the conservative president of Paraguay, after ending sex mutilation of minors in his country, declared that Latin America must stop depending on the United States to do all the work for them. Have we not been praying for this day? The whole world has viewed the United States as the Battered Women's Shelter of the World or the Backup Plan for every failed State and for the voters in these countries who insisted on voting for those failed politicians. Sovereign countries around the world are taking responsibility for their defense, their sovereignty, their culture, and their future. WINNING!

I voted for all of this. No matter the domestic disturbances or disappointments that we face stateside, we should not ignore the fact that Trump 2.0 far exceeds not just his first term, but the terms of all the Republican and certainly Democratic presidents who have governed our country since the end of World War II. 

Because of this incredible success at the domestic level, the cleaning out of the federal government, the ending of mass immigration, the increase in respect and sovereignty for our country, plus the fact that wages are rising and poverty has plummeted across the nation, I have no problem voting for the Republican ticket up and down the ballot. 

We shouldn't just be motivated by what makes us glad, but we need to pay attention to what we're running against. From a twinky, flimsy, fake Christian playing pastor running against an effective attorney general in Texas, to an accomplished former congressman running against a pro-jihad militant in Michigan, we've got crazy Communists gunning for power all over the country.  I don't care how high your gas bills may be; it will be nothing compared to the energy crisis and domestic destruction if communist Democrats take the levers of power in Congress and in state legislatures across the country.

Don’t worry about high gas prices now. The war will end. Right now, we must choose American success and continued sovereignty, or communist failure. Election 2026 is the most important election yet. Don’t sit out the vote and pout. Trump is doing great, and our country is improving. I'm going to make phone calls for candidates in California and abroad. You should as well.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Fetterman's Latest Remarks About His Party Affiliation Have Dems Losing Their Minds

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) has gotten the Democrats' goat by daring to buck the extremists in his party. 

But the comments he made at the Texas Tribune Festival on Saturday in response to questions from the moderator, CBS News chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett, were making Democrats lose their minds even more over him. 

Sen. Fetterman was asked an audience question: "Why not become an independent?"

His response was, "Because I’m a lifelong Republican."

That immediately had Garrett responding, saying the comment was going to be clipped.

Garrett corrected Fetterman, "You mean a Democrat." 

Fetterman corrected himself and confirmed that yes, he meant Democrat. 

“I guarantee you, that’s gonna break through,” Fetterman said, acknowledging it was likely to go everywhere. He basically acknowledged it was a slip of the tongue. 

But, of course, that wasn't assuaging Democrats and other folks on the left, who were off to the races on it and losing their minds about it. 

But Fetterman wasn't done yet in giving the left agita. While he has done things like attend the Republican National Convention (RNC) to support Sen. Dave McCormick (R-PA), he said again at Trib Fest that he wasn't contemplating becoming a Republican. 

But another statement he made was intriguing and got people going. Does it mean he might switch in the future?

Yet Fetterman acknowledged that the political landscape could put him in a consequential position after the midterms, discussing the possibility of Democrats regaining control of the Senate — and him potentially serving as the 51st vote.

“Let’s revisit this after the midterms, and let’s see what happens, you know, if I happen to be 51. I don’t know,” Fetterman said.

The comment is probably more of a power move. If that ends up true- that he's the 51st vote- that could give him a lot of power over his present party to dictate votes his way. That may be what he's saying there. That might mean that even if the Republicans were to lose the Senate in the midterms, they might have him as an ally on some critical votes. If that's what Fetterman is thinking, that will tick off the left even more; he would basically be indicating he could be a constant thorn in their side to halt their more radical hopes. 

Now obviously, I'm hoping that we win the Senate so it doesn't come to that, and/or that he switches. 

But if it came to that, the meltdowns to come from the left would be epic to behold. 


AOC Gets Brutal News As She Test-Runs Senate Bid: She Is 'Rejected'

AOC is getting major pushback from swing-state Democrats in the run-up to the 2026 midterm elections.

Their message? Please, just stay away.

Axios unleashed the nasty news and blasted it into the ether on Sunday night.

Democrats in some of this year's most critical congressional battlegrounds are sending a clear message to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: We don't want you to campaign for us.

Why it matters: If they continue, the snubs could hurt AOC's standing as a potential contender in the 2028 Democratic presidential primary, when many voters will prioritize electability.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is currently testing the waters for a potential Senate bid, so this is not a great sign that she has enough mainstream appeal for the “big leagues.”

Axios reports that Democrats in some of the most important battleground races this fall are shunning Ocasio-Cortez, with party officials saying some candidates have explicitly asked her team to stay away. One senior Democrat strategist working in a key swing district was especially blunt.

"The polling is atrocious for her," the strategist told Axios. "She's a lightning rod."

Here is the background Axios gave on the recent developments:

•  Ocasio-Cortez and her allies argue that her unapologetic advocacy for big progressive policies like Medicare for All would make candidates like her more electable than moderate liberals, but many Democrats in tight races this fall have disagreed.

•  She was welcomed by many Democrats in competitive primary races, but some of those candidates have distanced themselves as they've moved to the center to take on Republicans in the Nov. 3 election.

The timing couldn't be much worse for AOC because she's currently trying to prove that the AOC brand can travel.

She's barnstorming through upstate New York, meeting local officials and building a voter-turnout operation as she weighs whether to run for Senate or president in 2028. Her stops in Buffalo and Ithaca have effectively doubled as a test of her appeal outside her Queens-and-Bronx political base.

"I want to be very forthright about our intentions here, which is to transform the state of New York," AOC told activists in Buffalo.

There's just one small complication with that transformation project: Democrats who have to face competitive general-election electorates apparently aren't nearly as excited about attaching themselves to AOC as Democrat primary voters are.

Montana Democrat Sam Forstag provides a perfect example. Forstag happily rallied with AOC in May on his way to winning the Democratic House primary. Now he's running in conservative Montana in November, and Axios asked whether he'd like AOC to come campaign for him again.

"I don't intend to be having a lot of folks from out of state campaigning with me over these next 40 days," Forstag replied.

And he doesn't intend to advertise her support much, either. Forstag has scrubbed Ocasio-Cortez's endorsement from his campaign website. Ouch, how Stalinist of him.

Democrats when they’re trying to win a Democrat primary? AOC, come on down.

When they’re trying to convince Montana swing voters that they’re not some socialist from Brooklyn wearing a cowboy hat? Sorry, AOC, we're all booked up.

The same disappearing act is playing out in Michigan. Democrat Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed brought AOC in to campaign with him during the final weeks of his primary. He and his allies spent nearly $1 million on television advertising featuring her, according to AdImpact data reported by Axios.

Then El-Sayed won. Since then, Axios reports that he has spent almost nothing on television ads featuring Ocasio-Cortez. She also hasn't campaigned with him while Republican Mike Rogers attacks him as too far left for Michigan, although El-Sayed's campaign insists she'd be welcome back.

See the pattern?

Democrats know exactly what Republicans know: AOC is one of the most recognizable faces of the party's socialist wing. She is the Democrat Party’s pitch for “cosmetic socialism.” Put her onstage and voters don't need a 30-page opposition-research packet to understand what they are getting: Wild-eyed, unrealistic, but “fun” socialism.

The fun wears off, however, when the Democrats force you to pay for it. 

If you want to understand why America is in an affordability crisis, this is it: The U.S. government is forcing you to pay for socialist nonsense, and all of the endless trillions of dollars in corrupt spending that comes along with it.

Reckless government spending is why taxpayers are having a hard time paying for gas and groceries and mortgages and the rest of it, more than any other reason.

But America's mind-boggling $40 trillion in national debt is child's play compared to the hundred-trillion-dollar-plus pricetag that socialists have in store for Americans who are foolish enough to vote them into power.

So, AOC has been frantically trying to pivot to the middle with her 'Woke 1 was crazy' nonsense. Axios notes that her rhetoric increasingly echoes Barack Obama's 2008 "hope and change" pitch. Gag me with a spoon.

The New York congresswoman is trying to prove she can travel beyond the radical base at the same time candidates in competitive districts are telling her to keep away.

Swing-state Democrats are behaving as though their association with the country's most famous “democratic socialist” is something to conceal since their primaries are over.

It raises a great question: Since radical Democrats all vote the same way at the end of the day, why should they even pretend they aren't socialists as well?

The Americans need to stop falling for this act. Until proven otherwise, there is no such thing as a “moderate Democrat.”

Democrats might as well be campaigning with Chairman Mao. They aren't fooling anyone.


More of This, Please: DOJ Shakes Up Immigration Courts Amid Massive Case Backlog

The Trump administration, under the auspices of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), has been quietly removing immigration judges. Some have been let go after their two-year probationary period; others have been actively removed and replaced by new civilian and JAG lawyers. One of the EOIR reforms is that new judges do not necessarily need to have immigration experience.

In recent months, EOIR leadership has criticized judges for not efficiently managing their caseloads, and has encouraged adjudicators to streamline asylum reviews and give oral, as opposed to written, decisions on case dismissals.

Earlier this month, about 600 military lawyers were authorized to work for the Justice Department as temporary immigration judges. And the DOJ made changes to who could qualify as a temporary immigration judge — effectively lowering the requirements and removing the need to have prior immigration experience.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBB) allocated $3.3 billion to the Department of Justice (DOJ) for immigration enforcement, and EOIR is a subset of the DOJ. The money is slated toward hiring new judges, of which the EOIR currently has around 700 in place. The money's allocation also inserted a required cap on judges, limiting them to 800 judges effective November 2028.

So, it looks like what it is: a house cleaning, and a fresh wave of terminations and replacements is underway. 

Nearly 20 immigration judges received emails this month informing them that they are being let go, NPR has learned, adding to the over 80 judges that have already been cut by President Trump so far this year.

At least 14 immigration judges learned last Friday that they would be put on leave and that their employment would terminate as soon as Wednesday in some cases, according to two people familiar with the firings and a confirmation from the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE), a union that represents immigration judges. The two people spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals. Courts in Florida, New York, Maryland, California and Washington state are among those affected.

EOIR is tasked with the administration of the immigration court system: from assigning judges to setting the legal precedents and procedures on how immigration courts conduct business. But with a backlog of cases at four million, they are falling down on this job. The fact that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is focused on targeted and sweeping enforcement to remove illegal aliens who have overstayed their welcome is a clear indication that something is broken within the EOIR, and the Trump DOJ's aim is to fix it. 

So, new judges with a different perspective might just correct this. However, the pro-immigration-by-any-means-necessary lobby misses the plot.

The firings are seemingly at odds with the Trump administration's goals of immigration enforcement, advocates say. 

[...]

The dismissal of more immigration judges is an illogical and costly setback for the nation's immigration courts," said IFPTE President Matt Biggs in a statement to NPR. "At a time when the backlog has reached historic levels and the administration has made immigration enforcement a central issue, the removal of experienced judges is hypocritical, undermines the law, wastes taxpayer dollars, and further delays justice for citizens and immigrants alike."

If a system is to be reformed, that system needs fresh blood through personnel that is not institutionalized or inured in a certain mindset. A four-million-case backlog indicates a seriously embedded problem. So, it appears EOIR chose to reboot the system to break up the institutionalized procedures and thinking that created this logjam, and to encourage cases moving more quickly through the subagency. 

Which is exactly how the administration responded to this criticism.

The administration counters that immigration judges have not managed their mounting caseloads effectively, and that it has taken steps to streamline the process involved in adjudicating cases. The dispute provides a window into just how complicated the Trump administration's efforts to lower illegal immigration and deport millions of undocumented people are.

It is not complicated when people do their jobs and follow the law. This realignment in the EOIR is working to ensure the judges simply do that.


Bessent Says Iran Now on Its Knees As Final Oil to China Dries Up

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is, as I have said many times, the best Secretary of the Treasury since Alexander Hamilton. He has been turning the financial screws tighter and tighter on Iran. He is very likely hurting the mullahs and what's left of the regime more than American and Israeli high explosives have done, and now he's making a bold prediction: Iran is running out of oil it can trade, and they will be broke in two weeks. 

That would be good news indeed.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent predicted Sunday that Iran will complete its remaining oil shipments to China within two weeks, leaving Tehran with "nothing left to trade for anything" as the Trump administration intensifies its economic pressure campaign against the regime.

Bessent said only about 15 million barrels of Iranian oil remain out for delivery now that the U.S. is blockading the ports, describing the dwindling shipments as evidence that Operation Economic Outcast has left Tehran economically isolated.

"They will have nothing to trade for anything, probably within the next two weeks. They are going to make their final deliveries of oil to China, and then they will have nothing," he said.

Secretary Bessent made those remarks on Sunday, speaking on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures with Larry Kudlow. Watch:

Secretary Bessent says:

They are isolated from the world. They are a pariah state. And, my job is to make sure that when they come with a deal, that they want to stick to it. They did not stick to the (Memorandum of Understanding). And, next time, if there is a deal, that's at President Trump's discretion, that they will stick to it. Because they are on their knees. 

Let's hope that proves true. We do know that China is a primary customer for Iranian oil. We also know that Iran's economy is heavily dependent on oil sales. The United States has largely cut off those sales, and has cut off Iran's access to the international banking community, and the U.S. has even successfully cut off part of Iran's commercial air travel; perhaps even most of it. Oil is in fact heading out through the contested Strait of Hormuz into the international market; the administration claims 15 to 22 million barrels a day. That's comparable to the roughly 20 million barrels per day, pre-war. Or, as Secretary Bessent puts it, a billion barrels have gotten through the Strait since March; but none of the oil getting out now is coming from Iran.

That's a heck of a squeeze to be in.

Things will be growing very spare in Tehran in the next few weeks. Oh, what's left of the top tier no doubt have golden parachutes, assets safely tucked away in someplace like Switzerland or the Cayman Islands. And that's how we'll know the curtain is coming down; when those regime principals start heading for Moscow, or Pyongyang, or whatever feces-hole that will have them. But when they start to bail, then maybe, just maybe, the people of Iran can take their country back.


♦️𝐖³π πƒπšπ’π₯𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 π“π‘π«πžπšπ


 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time. 

 

British Police Intercept Five Suspected Islamic Terrorists Targeting U.S. Airbase Fairford


Royal Airforce base Fairford, is a U.K-owned base operated by the United States under an agreement that goes back to the 1950’s cold war era. However, recently Airbase Fairford has been used by American strategic bombers for strikes against Iranian missile sites under an agreement with former British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Overnight, at 12:45 a.m British police received a warning about three suspicious vans traveling toward RAF Fairford, with a tip that a coordinated terrorist attack was planned against the American base.

U.K police alerted the base, which immediately triggered threat alerts, then police intercepted the vans and arrested five males on suspicion of terrorism.

LONDON (AP) — U.K. police said Sunday that five men arrested in the middle of the night near an air base used by the United States during its war against Iran are being held on suspicion of preparing a terrorist act that appeared to involve three trucks.

London’s Metropolitan Police, which takes the lead on potential terrorist activities, said police received a call at 12:45 a.m. related to the three suspicious vehicles that appeared to be traveling toward RAF Fairford, a U.K.-owned base that is operated by the U.S. under an agreement dating back to the Cold War.

Fairford has been used by American bombers for strictly limited strikes against Iranian missile sites under an agreement with former British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who voiced opposition to the war after it was launched by the U.S. and Israel on Feb. 28.

Iran has previously indicated that a base used to attack its territory is a legitimate target. (read more)

More AP Information HERE

President Trump gave remarks about the incident as he travelled today: “Working with Britain, it was an amazing job. We had them under investigation. They were looking to do big damage to our fort, and working with the British worked out great and we got them”