Sunday, September 27, 2026

The Bennies Flowing to Americans from Trump’s Tariffs


From the beginning, I’ve supported Trump’s tariffs. Unlike protectionaist tariffs, Trump’s tariffs were not intended to confer benefits on a specific favored industry, no matter the consequences for American consumers. Instead, Trump used his tariffs as a negotiating tool against nations abusing America’s free market system. They could either lower their tariffs or pay our tariffs. Meanwhile, companies in those nations also had the choice of coming to America.

Trump’s tariffs definitely got results. At the country level, the Office of the United States Trade Representative now lists trade deals or frameworks with roughly 20 trading partners or partner groups, all of which are favorable to U.S. manufacturers. The agreements range from decent to exceptionally good. For example, Thailand eliminated tariffs on 99% of American goods, and Vietnam removed tariffs on most American goods. (Canada, of course, had a nervous breakdown and has gone all kinds of crazy.)

Things worked out well at the corporate level, too. At least a couple of dozen major companies have announced new or expanded U.S. manufacturing investments during the tariff push.

As of August 31, 2026, the U.S. had collected about $292.5 billion in tariffs. When balanced against $125.2 billion in tariff refunds, the net revenue (so far) is $167.3 billion. This contrasts with 2024, when customs-duty revenue was only $76.4 billion.  

What’s also nice is that the doom-and-gloom predictions haven’t panned out. The left-leaning Brookings think tank conceded in May that “for the most part, the tariff impacts have been muted in the U.S.” By the end of July, the still-left-leaning (although less so than before) WaPo went so far as to publish a guest editorial asserting that “Trump’s tariffs aren’t crushing global trade,” and had not produced a recession. Indeed, U.S. imports rose.

By August, Walmart was promising to lower prices by using some of the nearly $3 billion in tariff refunds it received after the Supreme Court invalidated some of Trump’s tariffs. Over the preceding quarter, Walmart had more than 11,000 price rollbacks. Shareholders benefited, too, because the refunds significantly boosted Walmart’s earnings.

Now there’s more good news for consumers, this time for Costco shoppers. Costco received $184 million in tariff refunds and said it was using most of that money to lower prices for its members.

The refunds themselves weren’t part of Trump’s original plan. But the larger picture looks remarkably like what he predicted when he embarked on his tariff war: foreign countries lowered trade barriers, manufacturers increased their American investments, the tariffs produced substantial federal revenue, and the recession and runaway inflation predicted by many economic “experts” never materialized. On those measures, Trump’s critics badly underestimated both the strategy and the economy’s ability to absorb it.


Don't Throw the Mullahs a Lifeline


After almost seven months of war, economic strangulation, and mounting isolation, the Iranian regime is searching desperately for an escape route. Astonishingly, America may be preparing to provide one. Negotiators gathered in New York are discussing a phased agreement under which Tehran would reopen the Strait of Hormuz while Washington would lift its economic blockade. Iran could also gain access to frozen assets. It would be a monumental strategic error. The clerical regime has rarely been weaker. This is precisely the moment when maximum pressure should be intensified, rather than exchanged for another temporary arrangement that allows the mullahs to regroup, replenish their finances, and prepare for their next confrontation.

The effectiveness of the pressure campaign is becoming increasingly obvious. The United Arab Emirates has suspended flights operated by Iranian airlines following sweeping American sanctions against Iran’s aviation sector. Iranian services to other regional destinations, such as the holy city of Najaf in neighboring Iraq, have also been disrupted. Washington has warned airports, fuel suppliers, ticket agents, and service companies that assisting sanctioned Iranian carriers could cost them access to the dollar system. At sea, the pressure is even greater. Iran’s oil exports have been squeezed by the American blockade, depriving the regime of desperately needed hard currency. Reuters reports that Tehran has now indicated that it could reopen Hormuz within seven days if Washington eases military pressure and lifts the blockade.

That offer tells us something important. The pressure is working. Iranian officials have spent decades boasting about resistance to Western sanctions. Yet today they are sitting in New York searching for economic relief. Why give it to them? The Strait of Hormuz is an international waterway through which much of the world’s energy supplies must pass. Freedom of navigation should never become a commodity that Tehran can seize and then sell back to the international community. Allowing the regime to close Hormuz, inflict enormous economic damage, and then receive sanctions relief for reopening it would establish a disastrous precedent. It would teach Tehran that aggression pays.

The Gulf states understand the danger. They have rejected Iranian demands for control over navigation and have insisted that freedom of passage must be restored. Reuters reports that Iran may now be prepared to defer its demand for transit fees because ending the American blockade has become the more urgent objective. Again, the conclusion is obvious. Tehran is hurting. For years, the international community repeatedly rescued the Islamic Republic when pressure became unbearable. Negotiations produced concessions. Sanctions were relaxed. Frozen funds became accessible. The regime received breathing space. Then the machinery of repression and regional aggression resumed. This time Washington should learn from history. President Donald Trump has called for the complete economic isolation of Iran. He should pursue that strategy with determination. The objective should extend far beyond reopening Hormuz. The objective should be a durable settlement in which freedom of navigation can never again be held hostage by Tehran and in which Iran ceases to threaten its neighbors and destabilize the wider Middle East.

Ultimately, the future government of Iran must be decided by the Iranian people themselves. For decades they have endured dictatorship, executions, imprisonment, censorship, and economic catastrophe. They have repeatedly taken to the streets demanding fundamental change. The democratic opposition argues that Iran can become a secular republic based on popular sovereignty, gender equality, human rights, and peaceful relations with its neighbors. Those ideas should be allowed to compete freely before the Iranian people in democratic elections. Western governments should neither manufacture an alternative nor attempt to impose one. Their responsibility is different. They should deny the dictatorship the resources it uses to repress its people and export violence abroad. That means maintaining economic pressure. It means enforcing sanctions rigorously. It means targeting the financial networks that sustain the Revolutionary Guards. It means preventing sanctioned Iranian airlines, banks, shipping companies, and front organizations from operating internationally. It means refusing to reward the seizure of international waterways. Above all, it means resisting the temptation to rescue the regime when the consequences of its own policies finally become unbearable.

There is also a profound difference between negotiations that secure a lasting settlement and negotiations that merely postpone the next crisis. Iran previously reached an interim understanding with Washington. It collapsed within weeks. Reuters reports that this failure now hangs over the New York discussions, with both sides questioning whether concessions would endure. Why repeat the experiment? The mullahs understand leverage perfectly. Hormuz has become their bargaining chip because they believe Western governments fear high oil prices more than Tehran fears economic collapse. That calculation must be reversed. The message from Washington should be unequivocal. Freedom of navigation is an international right, rather than a favor granted by the Islamic Republic. Reopening Hormuz should therefore be the beginning of compliance, rather than the price for ending pressure.

Iran stands at a historic crossroads. Its rulers can see their economic lifelines disappearing. Their airlines are being squeezed from foreign airports. Their oil revenues are under extraordinary pressure. Their regional strategy has brought conflict and isolation. Their people continue to pay an appalling price for decades of clerical dictatorship. This is the worst possible moment to throw the regime a lifeline. America and its allies should maintain pressure while supporting the Iranian people’s right to determine their own democratic future. The goal should never be another temporary deal that keeps the mullahs afloat. The goal should be a free Iran, a permanently open Strait of Hormuz, and a Middle East finally released from the malign influence of the Islamic Republic.



🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


It's (D)ifferent When They Do It: China Edition



President Trump met with Chinese President Xi Jinping for a major state visit last week. President Trump said the meetings were "very productive." 

"Tremendous things will be happening," the President wrote on Truth Social. U.S. Ambassador to China David Perdue also told CNBC that President Trump warned Xi that any help given to Iran in the war is unacceptable. First Lady Melania Trump hosted a state dinner attended by Elon Musk, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang, Jeff Bezos, OpenAI's Sam Altman and Mark Zuckerberg.

This is what a president is supposed to do: diplomacy. Statecraft. 

But for Democrats, it's never good enough. Their official X account attacked the President (again) for meeting with Xi.


We'll start with a story I (and others) wrote about in 2023. The streets of San Francisco are, as we all know, riddled with homeless drug users, rife with crime, and literally full of human excrement. There's an app to warn people about it. But when the Chinese were in town for the APEC meeting between ... Xi Jinping and then-President Joe Biden:

The typical drug addicts & homeless who wander the city like zombies have disappeared as 20,000 people are expected to visit the San Francisco thanks to the APEC summit.

The New York Post says sources have told them that the homeless are being "herded" out to other areas of the city.

"They started clearing the tents earlier this week and there is definitely a lot more police presence," said one resident.

The resident also explained that the city appeared to have the capability to do this all along but they refused.

"They’ve cleared out the tents that were near the Moscone Center on Howard Street, which tells me the city had the capability to do this all along... We need is a permanent solution."

Another resident said: "They are just essentially herding the problem around but offering no long-term solutions."

"I don’t know if these tents will be in physical view during APEC, but it will be virtually impossible to eliminate all of that."

Newsom himself admitted that's the only reason he did it, too. 

"Folks say, 'Oh they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming into town.' That's true," Newsom said. "Because it's true. But it's also true for months and months and months, prior to APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation), we've been having different conversations."

The Chinese saw through this, of course.

Some Chinese netizens also joked that the U.S. media tend to hype China's efforts to improve a city's environment before a big event. "In China, we already have clean and safe cities. So what we do is a little bit of cleanup. But the U.S. has pulled out all of its strength; not only did it remove the homeless, but it also covered graffiti and cleaned the rubbish-covered road. I thought they did not care," said a Sina Weibo netizen.

It's particularly galling for the Democrats to pretend to care about free journalism. Especially with Gavin Newsom chomping at the bit to be our next president. 


Not only have Democrats wanted to remove Fox News from the press pool and made censoring critics, conservatives, and others a major part of their political platform, but Newsom himself signed Assembly Bill 2624 (AB 2624), which criminalizes independent journalism in the state. All to protect fraudsters, the Democrats' real constituency, from being exposed.

With Democrats, every accusation is a confession.


Trump Terminates Biden's EV Mandate, Promises Cheaper Cars for American Families

President Donald Trump says that he has approved new fuel economy standards that should cut the costs of the vehicle market. 

“BIG DAY FOR AMERICAN AUTO WORKERS AND CAR BUYERS! I have just approved new Fuel Economy Standards that TERMINATE Sleepy Joe Biden and Pete Boot-EDGE-EDGE's ridiculous EV Mandate," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "The Dumocrats cost our Great Auto Manufacturers $Billions, forced Americans into cars they never wanted, and wasted Billions on Chargers that were never built.”

The new standards terminate the EPA’s electric vehicle mandate. 

"These new Standards will take the waste out of ⁠building cars in America. That means LOWER PRICES, saving families thousands on a new, beautiful, and safe car," Trump wrote. “Far better than the Environmental Monsters that we were building heretofore. Every Manufacturer, from General Motors to Ford to Stellantis, has called me wanting to build here, and now they can!”

The final rule isn’t available yet. Under former President Joe Biden, the EPA had ordered about 67 percent of new light-duty and medium-duty vehicle sales to be electric by 2032.

Trump’s administration destroyed the EV subsidy and removed the mandate. 

Trump said that tariffs and other policy decisions have driven auto manufacturers back to the U.S. 

Big Three automaker Stellantis, which owns Jeep, Chrysler, and Ram, has said it will invest $13 billion in Midwest auto factories in Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan. 

“Under my Administration, over 100 $Billion is being invested in American Autos, and that's just the beginning,” Trump wrote. “The Plants are coming back, and Jobs are returning, to Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, South Carolina, and all over our Country. Thank you to our Great Secretaries of Transportation and Commerce, Sean Duffy and Howard Lutnick. AMERICA IS BACK. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”

The average price of a new car sold in July was around $50,000, according to Kelley Blue Book. 


Bill Maher Credits Trump’s Tough Image for Big, Beautiful Drop in Crime

There are a few sane, old school liberals around. In recent months it seems like the "democratic socialists" have overshadowed them. Some of the old school liberals have been subsumed, co-opted to the far left, lest they be called bad names; but a few have resisted the descent into socialist nitwittery. Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) is one of them. And talk-show host and comedian Bill Maher is another. Maher, in particular, who hosts HBO's Real Time show, at least makes some effort to look at the facts and give credit where credit is deserved.

His latest observation is about the Trump administration and the recent dramatic drop in crime rates, which Maher attributes to, as he puts it, Trump being the "FAFO president."

Warning: Typically Maher-ian bad language follows.

Public safety has improved across the US because criminals have gotten the message from “badass” President Trump — a “f–k around and find out president,” talk host Bill Maher told his audience Friday.

Maher spoke about the reasons behind stunning drops in the national crime rate on his “Real Time with Bill Maher” on HBO – and gave at least some of the credit to the president’s macho image.

“It’s just childish to pretend that when you elect a “f— around and find out” president, a ‘no more Mr. Nice Guy-booting-your-ass-V-for-vendetta-kick-ass—and-take-names-say-hello-to-my-little-friend’ president, that’s not going to have some effect on crime,” Maher said to laughs from his studio audience.

In another one of his trademark mixed ideological takes, he praised Trump after also giving some credit to the left and bashing the surveillance state.

“It’s not just drug crime that’s way down – it’s all crime. And again, probably much of it is not political. It’s because you can’t move two inches in America without being tracked, photographed, and followed by a flock camera,” he quipped.

Credit where credit's due. Maher is a liberal but in this he's right; crime is dropping. And, yes, part of that may be due to our uncomfortable surveillance state, but here's the one thing that Maher doesn't mention, and that's the hundreds of thousands of illegal alien criminals who have been taken off the streets, and either sent home or imprisoned. That's got to be making a big difference, but it doesn't fit even the moderate Democrat/liberal mind-set, so he won't credit that.

But then, Maher reels himself back in with a Democrat talking point.

“But it’s also because when Democrats expand the safety net, there are less desperate people – and because Trump is a badass. No, I don’t agree with many of his methods, like how they sometimes just deport people to countries where they have absolutely no connection – like Meghan and Harry,” he said, giving the line a royal finish. Is doing it this way the right thing? No.”

I'm not buying the safety net corral litter. People don't break into jewelry stores or loot Apple outlets because they can't afford diapers or bread. People don't stage street takeovers because they are hungry. And yes, if an illegal alien's country won't take him or her back, we're under no obligation to keep them here; if they don't like it in whatever country "where they have absolutely no connection," well, they had a very generous option to self-deport, and they didn't take it. I have no sympathy for such people.

But Maher is correct in the main point: Leadership matters, and the image of authority matters. Under President Trump, over 650,000 illegal aliens have been deported, over a million have gone home voluntarily, and the order in January of 2025 was to focus on known criminals first. Now we're seeing the results; and even Bill Maher has to admit, what a difference a president makes.


Trump Cites 25,000 One-Month Death Toll, Pushes New Ukraine-Russia Deal

On Saturday, President Donald Trump spoke about the Russo-Ukrainian War, and he had some startling numbers as to the losses both sides have suffered. This conflict is now the costliest, in terms of blood and treasure, since 1945, and President Trump is anxious to help broker a deal.

The question is, how anxious are Russia and Ukraine to come to the table? And how long can they keep absorbing these losses?

President Donald Trump said Saturday that 25,000 people were killed last month and another 32,000 the month before in the war between Ukraine and Russia

"Last month, 25,000 people died in the Ukraine-Russia war, okay? 25,000," he told reporters on the White House lawn Saturday.

"The month before that, 32,000 people died … mostly soldiers, 97% soldiers. But whether they're soldiers or civilians, think of it: 32,000. Two months ago, 33,000 people; this month, 25,000 people died. What a shame," he added.

These are, if you'll allow some belaboring of the obvious, serious numbers. The total numbers are more dire; Russia has reportedly lost 1,400,000 soldiers and civilians, including people wounded and missing, while Ukraine has come off marginally better with only 55,000 troops killed, but numbers for Ukrainians wounded and missing are not readily available; and Ukrainian towns and cities have been hit hard, as well. 

This thing has become a modern version of the Great War, with largely fixed lines but adding long-range weapons to the unpleasant mix. President Trump is pushing both sides to make a deal.

Trump also told reporters he wants to see an end to the war soon, revealing he spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy recently.

"I spoke to him a lot, and he's going along and Putin's going along. And someday, hopefully in the not too distant future, maybe before the heavy winter, they'll make a deal," he told reporters.

He claimed that he pushed Zelenskyy to try to make a deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"I agreed with Zelenskyy that we talked about a lot of different subjects, and many of those subjects, very strong agreement. But you know what I want him to do? Make a deal. I want him to settle with Putin, and I want Putin to settle with him.

It's a safe bet that most people in Europe want to see these two make some kind of a deal.

The situation remains as it has been for months; like with most of these kinds of deals, neither side will get everything they want. Crimea will stay in Russia's hands. Vladimir Putin isn't about to give up the warm-water port at Sevastopol or the old Soviet-era submarine base they are rumored to be refurbishing. The best Ukraine can hope for is a return to the status quo ante 2022, wherein both sides return to the starting blocks; it seems more likely that Russia will hang on keeping at least that part of eastern Ukraine that they currently hold. Ukraine, on the other hand, no doubt wants the Russians out and the Crimea returned to Kyiv's control.  

It's not at all clear that even President Trump's vaunted deal-making skills can bridge this gap.

Meanwhile, the butcher's bill will keep running up. Russia may be losing more troops, but Vladimir Putin has many, many more young men to throw into the meat grinder. 


Sunday Scripture


 



Overview of Psalm 19:14 - Bible Hub


Psalm 19:14 expresses a heartfelt prayer from the psalmist, asking for the words spoken and the thoughts meditated upon to be pleasing to God. 


This verse highlights the importance of both speech and inner thoughts in one's relationship with the divine.


Key Elements of Psalm 19:14

  • Content of the Verse:
    • "Let the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable in your sight, O Lord."
  • Titles for God:
    • The verse refers to God as "my Rock" and "my Redeemer," emphasizing His role as a source of strength and salvation.

Themes in Psalm 19:14

  • Surrender and Purity:
    • The psalmist seeks to align his speech and thoughts with God's will, indicating a desire for purity and acceptance in his relationship with God.
  • Divine Acceptance:
    • The request for acceptance suggests a recognition of human imperfection and the need for divine grace.


Significance

This verse encapsulates a profound spiritual principle: the alignment of one's inner life (thoughts and meditations) with outward expressions (words). It serves as a reminder of the importance of integrity in both speech and thought in the pursuit of a godly life.


♦️𝐖³π πƒπšπ’π₯𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 π“π‘π«πžπšπ


 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time.