Sunday, September 20, 2026

Carney Marries Canada to Dying Europe


On Wednesday, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen gave an American-style “State of the Union” address to the European Parliament in Strasbourg, France.  During her speech, she proposed that Canada be admitted as an “associate member” of the ostensibly European Union.  Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney sat in the front row as an honored guest before delivering a speech of his own to the parliament the next day.  Taken together, the Leyen-Carney parade of oratorical self-puffery exuded a nauseating bouquet of arrogance, foolishness, incompetence, and stale entitlement.   

E.C. President (some say “Queen”) Ursula speaks as if she rules Europe (regularly invoking “our values” when describing a continent of distinct nations, dissimilar cultures, and over two hundred native languages), but European citizens never voted for her.  P.M. Carney is the former head of both the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England, and his globalist cronies installed him in Canada’s highest political office just last year.  While the central banker and the queen prattle on about “democracy,” neither ascended to the peaks of power in a democratic fashion.  They are “elites” chosen by “elites” to represent the interests of “elites.”

Since the Second World War, the United States has heavily subsidized the economies of Canada and Europe, providing for the West’s collective security while permitting one-way tariffs against American producers.  This eighty-year arrangement has endured long beyond its immediate post-war necessity, when European manufacturers were desperate to rebuild amid general ruin and the United States worried about losing more of the continent to the Soviet Union’s billowing Iron Curtain.  

Unfortunately, this part of Western history does not get an honest treatment in children’s textbooks, so Europeans and Canadians grow up believing that their economies succeed despite the United States instead of because of it.  When President Trump began insisting on fair and reciprocal trade terms between the United States and its partners, European and Canadian “elites” all screamed about “Trump’s trade war” as if it were a “surprise attack.”  They did not explain to citizens how their nations have greatly benefited for eight decades by tariffing U.S. products while selling European and Canadian goods to American consumers.  This is yet another example of the “misinformation” that the European and Canadian governments regularly disseminate to their respective peoples and a prime reason why governments cannot be trusted to objectively and dispassionately “police” so-called “disinformation.”

While Queen Ursula and Central Banker Mark denounced America’s so-called “trade war” in the harshest terms, they both spoke of an expanding security and economic alliance that would reintegrate the United Kingdom into Europe’s bureaucratic ranks and envelop Ukraine with military and financial support (paid for by Canadian and European taxpayers).  For all intents and purposes, the British people’s 2016 referendum in favor of Brexit (the withdrawal of the U.K. from the E.U.) has been sabotaged and nullified by government fiat.  As is true of Canada, Ukraine is not a member of the European Union, but, just as the British Establishment effectively cancelled Brexit, the European and American Establishments orchestrated a 2014 coup d’état against the last Ukrainian government opposed to integration with the E.U.  This is how the Canadians and Europeans do “democracy” — through sabotage, censorship, government propaganda, the installation of unelected “elites,” the blacklisting of political parties, the criminalization of speech, election nullification, and NGO-sponsored coups.  (To be sure, this is how Democrats and Establishment Republicans in the United States do “democracy,” too, which is why President Trump drives them and their Establishment friends in Canada and Europe absolutely nuts!)

All this rhetorical flexing is sad!  Canada, the United Kingdom, the European Union, and Ukraine are dilapidated vessels drifting in an open sea with huge and growing ruptures in their hulls.  They are taking on more water than they can dump back out, but they pretend as if they’re part of a glorious armada.  

Without U.S. military assets and personnel providing the backbone for the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), Canada, the U.K., and the E.U. would have but one defense posture: to lie down and play dead.  Canada can’t even fight forest fires, for goodness’ sake!  The U.K. lacks a sufficient number of seaworthy naval vessels to secure its own islands, let alone the ability to back up with military strength its territorial claims to the Falkland Islands (or what the Argentinians call their Islas Malvinas).  Most E.U. nations depend upon the U.S. nuclear umbrella and U.S.-NATO security guarantees to provide deterrence against military threats, which is why it is all the more preposterous when Denmark and France huff and puff about “keeping” Greenland (a North American landmass) in Europe or Spain and Italy refuse to permit U.S. military aircraft to refuel before engaging Iran.  And Ukraine (whose diminutive holdover-president must be fuming at the idea of Canada becoming an “associate member” of the E.U. while Brussels refuses to let his collapsing rump state join the club) remains an albatross of corruption, as one high-ranking official after the next flees the war-torn country with suitcases of jewelry and cash.  If Canada, the U.K., the E.U., and Ukraine were warhorses, they’d all be sent to the glue factory.

Nevertheless, unelected Queen Ursula used her address to the European Parliament to sweet-talk Central Banker Carney: “Dear Mark, I said we must urgently reimagine our partnerships….We share one ocean, one set of values, one way of seeing the world.  And we will now build our shared future as well.”  Canada’s premier banker smiled from ear to ear at the thought of casting off his country’s New World trailblazing and shackling Canadians’ futures to the fate of Old Europe.  If economic genius Carney thinks Canada will become more prosperous by decoupling from the United States and hitching its wagon to a European coalition already sinking to the ocean floor, so be it.  

Canada’s state-controlled news media are enamored of Mark Carney, his love affair with Europe, and his war of words with President Trump.  Canadian “journalists” still talk about Carney’s “middle powers” speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos last January as “historic” and a “worldwide viral moment,” while most Americans never stopped laughing at big, bad Carney’s pretend “tough guy” words.  Now the press is desperate to paint Carney as the natural “leader of the free world.”  

Meanwhile, the same guy who keeps telling the United States that “Canada is not for sale” has decided to sell control over his country’s airports (most likely to communist China) for extra cash while his economy continues to shrivel.  When he’s not kissing King Charles III’s derrière, Carney’s bowing to Queen Ursula and General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party Xi Jinping.  Marky Mark and the Flunky Bunch apparently want to “preserve” Canadian sovereignty by becoming a vassal state of China and the European Commission.

What will the good people of Canada gain by marrying the European Union?  They will get additional “green energy” regulations, a slower economy, and more inflation.  They will get to watch more of their businesses close shop and relocate to the United States.  They will get to send more of their taxes to Ukraine so that some of the most corrupt government officials on the planet can continue to buy luxury cars and vacation homes.  They may even get to send their children off to fight a European war against Russia!  

Canada’s Carney-cheerleaders will find no shortage of good news as their country handcuffs itself to an insane European bureaucracy that loves taxes, mass migration, economic malaise, censorship, and distracting the public with unnecessary wars.  Bon voyage and bonne chance, Canada!  You’re going to need it.


This Is The War That Ends The Endless Wars



President Trump said this week he was contemplating taking "decisive action" against Iran, a move he said he would discuss with Arab Gulf allies when they visit New York next week for the UN General Assembly.

"Do I want to annihilate them or do I not?" he said, referring to the Iranian regime.

Sure, the President is responding to the growing unpopularity of the war. A FoxNews poll on Thursday showed that 71% of registered voters think we don't have a strategy to end the war.

Sure, I get it that Democrats would give that answer. The war, affordability, and scare-me-about-AI are their national talking points. But 43% of Republicans? And 83% of Independents? 

I don't know how the pollsters chose their sample, but if you ask me, what it really shows is that 71% of Americans aren't paying attention. Or that they are economically illiterate. Or that they have zero knowledge of history.

Let's stick with not paying attention, which is easy to understand. As my good friend Morgan Murphy said on Newsmax yesterday, "Americans are pretty simple. We want to be able to fill up our F-150 for less than $150. We want to be able to buy our wives and girlfriends pumpkin spice lattes."

(You can watch our whole segment at Newsmax here).

And so high prices, which are the daily reminders of the war, have overpowered any serious analysis of what is actually going on.

By every measurable metric, we are winning this war and the Iranian regime is losing. The fact that they can still fire off missiles, or get their proxies in Yemen to fire missiles, does not mean they are winning, as the Panicans claim. It just means they are alive.

Every day their economy is growing weaker. And every day what they thought was their trump card -- the Strait of Hormuz -- becomes increasingly irrelevant.

We are now getting on average ten million barrels of oil through the Strait every day, thanks to U.S. Navy escorts. That is more than half the amount transiting the Strait before the war.

When you add the seven million barrels the Saudis and Emiratis have diverted to the Red Sea, that is a net reduction of just three million b/d -- and two million of that is the Iranian oil that we have prevented from reaching the market through our blockade.

Thousands of Iranian trucks are backed up at the Pakistani border because the Pakistanis have joined the blockade, making the resupply of daily goods next to impossible.

The regime has even lost its rail line to China, thanks to Scott Bessent's efforts to get the governments in Tajikistan and Kazakhstan to join our economic blockade.

The regime is panicking. They can no longer pay government salaries. They can no longer even pay the Revolutionary Guards and bassijis except with promissory notes.

Fearing imminent U.S. strikes, this week they paraded new IRGC recruits through the streets of Tehran. The regime claimed they were all "volunteers" in their Janfaday-e Iran ("Sacrifice for Iran") initiative.

If you watch the video, they are decidedly a very unwarlike lot. Most of them look like they have just been dragged out of their homes at gunpoint and put in uniforms. They don't even know how to march. Maybe the regime goons promised them lunch.

President Trump is the one with options, not the Iranians. He could allow the economic pressure to continue to build until, as I believe it will, the regime collapses in on itself and the top leaders flee to Russia in their private jets.

In the meantime, Centcom can continue its three-for-two rule: we sink three of your ships if you target two of ours.

Or the President could authorize devastating decapitation strikes against the regime and the Revolutionary Guards so locals can seize the armories and government buildings.

The only way the Iranians win this war is if enough Republicans join Democrats in voting to end funding it.

The Iranians had been banking that the Democrats and their media mouthpieces would make the war so unpopular that Trump would order our forces to withdraw before the November midterms.

That hasn't happened. The President has shown he has a spine. Now Republicans need to show they have a spine as well.

President Trump is the first American leader to say enough is enough to an Iranian regime that has spread terror through the region -- and the world -- for the past forty-seven years.

Remember, this is a regime that began with an act of terror: seizing the U.S. embassy in Tehran on Nov. 4, 1979 and keeping them hostage for 444 days. They blew up our Embassy in Beirut in April 1983, and murdered 241 Marines that October. (I tell those stories in And the Rest is History).

All during the 1980s, they took Americans hostage in Lebanon, which led President Reagan to secretly ransom them with arms shipments in what became the Iran/Contra scandal.

In the early 1990s, they joined forces with al Qaeda in Khartoum, Sudan, and together attacked us in Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Tanzania, Yemen, and ultimately in New York, Washington, D.C., and Shanksville, PA on 9/11.

During the Iraq War, they sent explosively formed penetrators (EFPs) as roadside bombs into Iraq, killing over 800 U.S. servicemen. And on, and on.

President Trump campaigned on ending the endless wars in the Middle East. But that doesn't happen by magic.

This is the war that ends them.

Republicans, grow a spine and explain to your constituents what this war is all about. 

Here are all the times Donald Trump publicly dissed Canada in the past ...

 Diplomacy isn't a strength of POTUS 47

Since entering the White House, President Donald Trump has spent a lot of time bashing both America’s adversaries and its allies. Canada has not been immune from such swipes.

Here are the many shots Trump has taken at Canada over the past couple of years:


1. ’Canada has been very difficult to deal with ... they’re very spoiled’ - May 23, 2018

Speaking to reporters as NAFTA negotiations continue to drag on, Trump had choice words for both Canada and Mexico: "Mexico has been very difficult to deal with. Canada has been very difficult to deal with. They have been taking advantage of the United States for a long time. I am not happy with their requests. But I will tell you in the end we win, we will win and we’ll win big. ... They’re very spoiled because nobody’s done this. But I will tell you, what they asked for is not fair."

MORE: All Donald Trump’s NAFTA mood swings in one chart


2. ’Wrong Justin’ - March 15, 2018

Trump hasn’t just dissed Canada, he’s lied to the Prime Minister and boasted about it. 

At a fundraiser meeting in March Trump bragged that he deliberately made up statistics about America’s trade deficit with Canada in a conversation with Trudeau, even though he had no idea if they were true.

’The best country for Trump to be contained in is the one he lives in now’

 "Trudeau came to see me. He’s a good guy, Justin. He said, ‘No, no, we have no trade deficit with you, we have none. Donald, please,’ ” Trump said, mimicking Trudeau, according to audio of the private event in Missouri obtained by The Washington Post.

 “Nice guy, good-looking guy, comes in — ‘Donald, we have no trade deficit.’ He’s very proud because everybody else, you know, we’re getting killed.

“... So, he’s proud. I said, ‘Wrong, Justin, you do.’ I didn’t even know. ... I had no idea. I just said, ‘You’re wrong.’ You know why? Because we’re so stupid. … And I thought they were smart. I said, ‘You’re wrong, Justin.’ He said, ‘Nope, we have no trade deficit.’ 

I said, ‘Well, in that case, I feel differently,’ I said, ‘but I don’t believe it.’ I sent one of our guys out, his guy, my guy, they went out, I said, ‘Check, because I can’t believe it.’

‘Well, sir, you’re actually right. We have no deficit, but that doesn’t include energy and timber. … And when you do, we lose $17 billion a year.’ It’s incredible.”

3. ’Canada Is Very Smooth’ but Trump’s onto us - Feb. 26, 2018

Trump has regularly claimed that the U.S. runs a massive trade deficit with Canada. 

That can be argued several ways, but one of Trump’s stranger trade deficit tirades came in February. At a meeting with governors Trump declared he was wise to Canada’s sly ways: "We lose a lot with Canada. People don’t know it. Canada is very smooth,” he said.

 “They have you believe that it’s wonderful. And it is. For them. Not wonderful for us. It’s wonderful for them. So we have to start showing that we know what we’re doing.”


4. ’Canada does not treat us right’ - Feb. 12, 2018

While talking about a long-awaited infrastructure plan, Trump reverted to one of his favourite topics: how America’s "so-called allies" have taken advantage of his country. "Canada does not treat us right in terms of the farming and the crossing the borders."


5. ’We will not stand for this. Watch!’ - April 25, 2017

Trump has taken several runs at Canada over the issue of U.S. dairy access to Canada, taking to Twitter to vent:


6. ’Canada, what they’ve done to our dairy farm workers, it’s a disgrace’ - April 20, 2017

Two months after praising America’s "very outstanding trade relationship with Canada," we were back in the bad books after Trump heard complaints from Wisconsin dairy farmers about Canada’s supply management system. "Canada, what they’ve done to our dairy farm workers is a disgrace," Trump said, in an Oval Office speech.

 "It’s a disgrace.  I spent time with some of the farmers in Wisconsin, and, as you know, rules, regulations, different things have changed.  And our farmers in Wisconsin and New York State are being put out of business, our dairy farmers."


7. ’Canada’s health care system is catastrophic’ - Oct. 12, 2016

There was once a time when Trump loved Canada’s public health care system. 

That time was in 2000, when he wrote: "We must have universal health care" and "The Canadian plan also helps Canadians live longer and healthier than Americans" But that was then. 

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump attacked Hilary Clinton’s health care platform by going after Canada’s single-payer system. "Canada’s [health care] system is so slow," he said during a debate. "It’s catastrophic in certain ways."


8. ’We lose with Canada — big-league’ - June 28, 2016

At a speech in Pittsburgh, Trump lashed out at Canada—among a long list of countries—for putting one over on the U.S. with free trade deals. "I like free trade, but free trade is not free trade, it’s dump trade because we lose with China, we lose with Mexico, we lose with Japan and Vietnam and every single country that we deal with," Trump said. "We lose with Canada — big-league. Tremendous, tremendous trade deficits with Canada."

https://macleans.ca/politics/washington/donald-trump-canada-trudeau-insults/

🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


President Trump Identifies H1B Visa Abuse as a “National Security Threat”


This is big.  Through this executive order President Trump is defining fraud, corruption and abuse within the H1B visa system as a “national security threat.”  That designation gives DHS and State Dept officials an elevated power-set to immediately introduce corrective action.

….”The systematic and organized abuse of the H-1B program is also a national security threat”…

Many of us have wanted urgent action on this matter.  President Trump has addressed forcefully. [EXECUTIVE ORDER HERE]

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. The H-1B nonimmigrant visa program was created to identify uniquely skilled and highly specialized foreign temporary workers to strategically supplement the United States economy. Instead, the program has been widely abused by certain employers, third-party placement groups, and outsourcing firms to undercut and displace the supply of skilled United States labor. The large-scale, systematic abuse of the H-1B program to obtain non-qualifying foreign labor has undermined the additive purpose of the program and harmed the wages, working conditions, and job opportunities of skilled American workers.

The abuse of cheaper H-1B labor places downward pressure on domestic pay. H-1B visa holders earn far less than comparable United States-born workers, despite the statutory mandate that H-1B workers be paid equally to their domestic peers, with the estimated wage gap starting at $9,000 and climbing as high as $20,000 in H-1B reliant industries. One company even warned its shareholders that restrictions on cheap H-1B labor could force the company to use “local” workers, which “may only be available at higher wages.”

Many employers have laid off large numbers of highly skilled American workers, only to promptly hire large numbers of H-1B workers who are often lower-skilled and lower-paid. For instance, technology sector employers have collectively requested H-1B visas for hundreds of thousands of workers, yet have also laid off somewhere between 800,000 to 1.3 million American employees from 2022 through 2026. Employers have even forced laid off American workers to train their foreign replacements.

Many jobs held by H-1B workers eventually leave the United States entirely. Employers with outsourcing business models use teams of H-1B visa holders to replace United States workers at third‑party client businesses and liaise with other individuals working off-site from their country of origin. As soon as practicable, much of their own work is transferred offshore. In Fiscal Year 2026, the top six users of the H-1B program operating with this outsourcing business model accounted for over 25,000 H-1B cap registrations. One foreign country’s foreign minister even publicly admitted that H-1B “has become the outsourcing visa.”

The systematic and organized abuse of the H-1B program is also a national security threat. Domestic law enforcement agencies have investigated H-1B-reliant outsourcing firms for engaging in visa fraud, conspiracy to launder money, and other illicit activities to encourage foreign workers to come to the United States. Abuses of the H-1B program also present a national security threat by discouraging Americans from pursuing careers in science and technology, risking vital United States leadership in these fields.

Numerous executive departments and agencies (agencies) have flagged employers’ large‑scale, systematic abuse of the H-1B program to obtain lower‑paid, lower-skilled labor from abroad. These ongoing Government probes continue to identify widespread fraud and noncompliance among H-1B employers, such as: displacing American workers or otherwise giving preference to alien workers; misrepresenting the duties, requirements, or working conditions of job opportunities to avoid hiring or training American workers, falsely qualify jobs as specialty occupations, or lower applicable wage requirements; and misrepresenting aliens’ qualifications to perform specialty occupations by submitting questionable foreign degrees from diploma mills as support for their H-1B visa applications. The pervasiveness of these violations and the persistence of the violators confirm that more needs to be done to preserve the H-1B program’s integrity.

I have determined that continued efforts must be made to protect and prioritize the American workforce. It is therefore the policy of the United States that all relevant agencies shall implement appropriate measures to protect American workers from abuse of the H-1B program and ensure that the program serves the national interest.

Sec. 2. Interagency Coordination. When processing petitions, labor condition applications, and visas for the entry into the United States of aliens as nonimmigrants to perform services in a specialty occupation under section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)), the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Labor, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall coordinate and consult with the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Education, and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to ensure the compliance of such petitions, applications, and visas with statutory requirements, including those in sections 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 212(n), 214(i), and 274B of the INA. The Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Education, and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall provide any relevant wage, employment, academic, industrial, or other economic information.

Sec. 3. Consideration of Applications, Petitions, and Visas. (a) Consistent with sections 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 212(n), 214(i), 215(a), and 274B of the INA, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Labor, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall take into account in any labor condition application, petition, visa, and entry of aliens entering or attempting to enter the United States as H-1B nonimmigrants to perform services in a specialty occupation whether the employer sponsor directly or indirectly engaged in layoffs within the previous year or plans future layoffs that negatively affect the employment of similarly situated United States workers.

(b) Within 30 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Labor, through the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, shall begin reviewing data related to previously submitted labor condition applications to determine whether further action against sponsoring employers is warranted under section 212(n)(2)(G).

(c) Pursuant to 3 U.S.C. 301, the authority granted to the President under section 215(a) of the INA is hereby delegated to the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of Labor, and the Secretary of Homeland Security to the extent necessary to implement this order, including the authority to issue or adopt rules, policies, operational guidance, or other guidance to carry out this order.

Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

(d) If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstances, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of any of its other provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(e) The costs for publication of this order shall be borne by the Department of Homeland Security.

{SOURCE}


President Sheinbaum and President Trump Agree on Terms for Bilateral Trade Deal


We can expect the pace of things to become increasingly fast in the next few weeks.

To our north, a small percentage of Canadians are just beginning to realize what the term “Associate Member” really means when it comes to a Canada joining with the European Union on strategic objectives.

Prime Minister Mark Carney has been selling a sovereignty argument to his constituents within his political package of antagonisms toward the U.S. trade team and President Trump. However, Europe has far greater restrictions and regulations on trade autonomy than the USA.  If Canada is to be partnered to the EU, then suddenly Canada has to adhere to a higher level of trade restrictions.  The EU makes the rules.

With Europe dictating trade standards, rules of production, manufacturing, access etc. Canada is no longer in alignment with the USMCA.  This plays right into the hands of President Trump and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, who would prefer two distinctly different bilateral trade agreements; one with Mexico and one with Canada.

The question then becomes, when do Trump and Greer announce the termination of the USMCA.  The most reasonable answer is after the U.S. and Mexico finalize a bilateral trade agreement.  With the U.S. and Mexico agreement confirmed, the Canadian leverage evaporates.

Carney had previously tried to pressure Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum not to reach bilateral terms.  However, again return to what Carney just did with Europe.  Telling Mexico to sit on their hands while organizing a separate side deal with Europe is more than a little hypocritical; in fact, it is really, really insulting.

This opens the door for Trump and Greer to exploit Carney’s self-centered political duplicity, and when you understand that dynamic you have context for why there’s suddenly a warmer embrace of such an agreement by Sheinbaum.  Any hope that Carney had to rely on Mexican favor toward them, was just eliminated by the gleeful backslapping in Strasbourg France witnessed by everyone.

That’s why we are seeing reports that Mexico and the United States have reached terms for a bilateral agreement.  Yesterday, President Trump and President Sheinbaum held a phone call to discuss final aspects of mutual agreement.

That leadership call doesn’t happen unless Greer and his Mexican counterpart, Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrand, have already ironed out the sticking points and eliminated any points of friction.

The trade negotiations led by Greer and Ebrand have been conducted over the past year as Canada sat on the sidelines and organized a political economic narrative on behalf of the British Commonwealth.  Those U.S-Mexico terms are now complete as noted by President Trump and Claudia Sheinbaum.

I strongly suspect the next meeting between Greer and Ebrand sometime around September 28th will contain an announcement of a completed bilateral free trade agreement.

Once that U.S-Mexico announcement is made, the next step will be the formal notice to Canada that the United States is terminating the USMCA, or what Canadians call CUSMA.

It is no longer possible for Carney to pick up the phone and call Sheinbaum, given recent events and his behavior as it pertains to bilateral terms between Canada and the European Union.  Carney has done this to himself, to his own position and to the Canadian people.

MEXICO CITY, Sept 18 (Reuters) – Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said on Friday that she spoke with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday, and they reached some agreements.

Washington is speeding up its efforts to reach a bilateral trade deal with Mexico before the US midterm elections in October.

Sheinbaum did not provide details about the agreements during her daily press conference, but described the call as “very good.” (more)

This series of actions and consequences has been very predictable from the outset.  However, most people have been unwilling or unable to see exactly how President Donald Trump has outmaneuvered Prime Minister Carney every step of the way.

President Trump used Carney’s ego and Canada’s hubris against him/them by directing the Canadian Prime Minister to take actions against his own interests.  Carney never realized the guiding hand behind the path he was following, and suddenly if Carney now turns to the American congress and requests support, he is facing an audience that points out the incompatibility of his Canada-EU trade position.

People will try to deny that President Trump handled this perfectly, but when you look at all of the political elements Trump needed to overcome in order to get to this moment, there’s no denying that if this very specific sequence of events did not occur in exactly the way they occurred, the United States would not be in this incredibly strong position.

This was gamed out perfectly, and honestly, it’s been a lot of fun to watch!