Sunday, August 30, 2026

The Big Secret about Teen Takeovers


Soon it will a long, hot Labor Day weekend, and police in many cities are bracing for multiple teen takeovers.

These takeovers, usually of crowded downtown areas, are organized on social media and escalate rapidly into large-scale brawls involving the use of fists, knives, and guns.  Bystanders and police are hurt, and businesses are damaged and have their hours curtailed.

Footage from a large teen takeover from the Wisconsin State Fair in Milwaukee has aired on national media, with commentators noting that “these kinds of takeovers have become all too common.”  What was not said is that “these kinds of takeovers” are largely, though not entirely, black teen takeovers.  Although white teens are certainly guilty of committing crimes, teen takeovers are mostly relegated to blacks.  The question is, why?

Certainly, the Wisconsin State Fair takeover involved mostly blacks, including women punching, kicking, and brawling, and striking a police officer.  As Fox News states, “malls, beaches, and restaurants become battlefields.”  In New Jersey, Georgia, Wisconsin, Detroit, and other states, “massive crowds of juveniles overwhelm public spaces.”  One of the most violent of these occurred at a Washington, D.C. Chipotle Grill restaurant, where a group of teens entered the location and began fighting and throwing chairs.  What the report failed to indicate is that all of the teens shown in the video of the event appeared to be black.  Outside the Chipotle, hundreds of teens reportedly brawled in the streets.  None of the commentators noted that the vast majority of these teens were black, despite the fact that footage of the event showed it to be so.

Similar teen takeovers have occurred at a shopping mall in Glendale, Wisconsin; in downtown Detroit; and in Chicago, and at many other locations.  Body cam footage from the Glendale takeover showed police battling black teens and teens striking police officers.  Additional video showed dozens of black teens brawling, but this was only a small number of those participating in a takeover said to have been organized on social media.  It’s important to note that though most of those involved in the so-called Bayshore Mall takeover appear to have been black, the overall black population of Glendale, Wisconsin, is 16 percent.  Whites constitute 65 percent of Glendale’s population, but by and large they are not out there rampaging and causing harm.  What has been causing a disproportionate number of black youths to participate in these violent takeovers?

In another recent takeover, hundreds of teens reportedly flocked to the Chicago Loop and began fighting and looting.  These footage shows that most of the participants were black.  In Charlotte, North Carolina, over 40 teen takeovers have occurred so far this summer, with most of those on the videos I have seen being black.  In Charlotte, blacks constitute 33 percent of the population; whites and Asians constitute over 40 percent.

Chicago’s 57th St. Beach takeover involved an estimate 400 to 500 teens, again largely black, as one can see in video of the event.  Chicago’s population is 28 percent black.  Why are so many of the teen takeovers black events?

The fact that these takeovers involve mostly black teens is rarely if ever mentioned in media accounts.  That fact by itself — the fact that the media refuse to identify black participants by race despite identifying some of those at the Tybee Island, South Carolina, mΓͺlΓ©e as white female teens — may well be one reason blacks feel free to flock to these events: society refuses to face the facts and hold them accountable because they are black.  Likewise, the chance of being arrested and punished is almost nil.

It would be better, for the public at large and for participants in the takeovers themselves, to identify the problem exactly as it is: not a problem with “teen” takeovers, but with “black teen” takeovers, and to move from there toward solutions.  Solutions will never be found if the truth is suppressed and endless excuses are made for exactly those responsible.  There is a problem with a certain segment of blacks youths in America today, and that problem needs to addressed head-on.

In all of the takeovers reviewed above, only a handful — less than a dozen — of the participants were arrested.  There need to be arrests of all of those participating, and there need to be longer sentences along with attempts at re-education.  Along with this, as Florida’s Lt. Governor Jay Collins has it, parents need to take responsibility for educating their children and tracking their whereabouts.

It may also be that current curfews in many cities including Chicago are not early enough and are not strictly enforced.  If young people, both black and white, were kept off the streets to begin with, there would be far fewer takeovers.  Some cities are also attempting to address the problem with after-hours activities for teens.  All of this is well and good, but it has not ended the takeovers.  In our major cities this summer, there have been teen takeovers at multiple locations every weekend.

Conservatives care about the well-being of all persons, and especially about the well-being of our youth.  In every teen takeover, young people are injured and sometimes killed.  Above all, conservatives value human life, and the lives of our young, white and black, are put at risk every time a takeover occurs.  Only a forceful response can save these precious lives.

At its core, there is a problem with the way our society makes excuses for the behavior of black youths.  Too often the story is that offenders have grown up in difficult circumstances.  So did millions of whites, but most of them do not go about breaking curfews and engaging in violence.  There’s also the suggestion that since black Americans have historically suffered from slavery and Jim Crow, the failings of present-day blacks — including lawlessness — should be overlooked, almost as a sort of non-monetary reparations.  But black American teens have never experienced discrimination; if anything, they receive preference in schooling and hiring and can look forward to future promotions ahead of whites.

The problem is not past discrimination.  It is the way black teens, especially males, are being brought up today and the failure of parents and society to correct them when necessary.  At its foundation, that failure is the result of society’s refusal to hold blacks to the same standards as whites.  Until that happens, black teen takeovers, violence, and other lawlessness will continue.


Podcast thread for August 30

 


thank goodness it's Sunday

The Trump Revolution is Real


We are living through such an arrogant era in which too many people “know” preposterous things: Biological sex isn’t real.  Muslims built America.  Math is racist.  Iran is defeating the United States.  Joe Biden is “sharp as a tack.”  President Trump is a Russian spy.  People are certain that “their” side is right and the “other” side is wrong.  There is not a lot of humility in the world today.  But, as we see during the LGBTQIA+ community’s various bacchanalia each year, there is a glut of personal pride.  

When I encounter people who “know everything,” I like to remind them how wrong some of the smartest people over the last century have proved to be.  During a guest lecture at the University of Munich in 1924, theoretical physicist Max Planck recounted a conversation he had with his mentor, Philipp von Jolly, fifty years earlier.  After Planck inquired about pursuing a career in physics, Jolly discouraged his young student from doing so, telling him that nearly everything in the field of physics had already been discovered, with little left to do aside from a few final measurements.  Planck went on to win a Nobel Prize for discovering energy quanta — revolutionizing theoretical physics and our understanding of atomic particles, while setting the stage for Albert Einstein’s special theory of relativity regarding space and time.  At the turn of the twentieth century, plenty of physicists believed they knew almost everything; quantum mechanics and general relativity proved they knew almost nothing.

In 1919, most astronomers believed that our Milky Way Galaxy comprised the whole universe, that the size of the universe was roughly 300,000 light years across, and that the universe was infinitely old and unchanging.  A hundred years later, astronomers estimate the observable universe to be ninety-four billion light years across and 13.7 billion years old.  Ten years ago, astronomers adjusted the estimated number of galaxies in the universe from a hundred billion to at least two trillion.  And the James Webb Space Telescope has pushed this number to as high as twenty trillion.  Even that number is likely to rise.  When our understanding of the size of the universe has gone from one galaxy to tens of trillions in a single century, should we not approach competing points of view with a little more open-mindedness?  Does it not seem foolishly arrogant of people such as Barack Obama, Al Gore, John Kerry, and Mark Carney to claim that the “science” of “global warming” is “settled”?

It is important to acknowledge just how little we know about our world.  It is important to remember that we have redefined fundamental parts of our physical reality within our own lifetimes.  It is important to recognize that even the most universally accepted paradigms have been toppled and replaced.  

If our understanding of physics and cosmology can be upended in a few decades, why would we expect the social sciences of politics, economics, and sociology to be more constant?  Why would we expect political pundits to have an accurate grasp of the future?  Why would we assume that population growth is an existential threat, that sentient robots will replace humans, that debt bombs will impoverish us, or that nuclear bombs will end us?  In other words, why do we always assume the end is near?

Our generation is not the first to fear the future nor will it be the last.  A thousand years ago, at the turn of the first millennium, there were plenty of people who expected the apocalypse.  Instead, their descendants experienced the Renaissance, the Scientific Revolution, the Enlightenment, and the Industrial Revolution.  The second millennium started with the fake threat of Y2K and the real threat of 9/11 and has continued lurching toward economic, military, technological, and political powder kegs ever since.  Twenty-six years of impending doom have had an effect on the world’s collective psyche.  Right now there is a dearth of optimism.  Although standards of living, lifespans, and the proliferation of luxury comforts have never been higher, people talk about today as if it were the Great Depression. 

Almost all of America’s leaders have failed to live up to this century’s challenges.  George Bush encouraged us to fight Islamic terrorists “over there” so that we wouldn’t have to fight them “over here”; now we’ve got super-mosques, loudspeakers in major towns calling Muslims to prayer, and apologists for Islamic rapists and murderers running for high office or already serving in Congress.  Barack Obama may have sold “hope and change” to the public in his run for the presidency, but then he went on a worldwide America-bashing apology tour, dismissed the idea that there was anything “exceptional” about our country, pitted black and white Americans against each other, destroyed healthcare with government mandates, and used the USA PATRIOT Act to spy on his political enemies.  

Most other prominent political leaders have used the first quarter of the new century to break bad news to the American people.  “The borders can’t be properly secured,” they say.  “Blue-collar jobs are never coming back home,” they insist.  “Global warming is killing the planet,” they claim.  “Racist cops are killing black people,” they argue.  Bad news rains down on us every day (especially if you watch CNN or read The New York Times).  On the Democrat side of the aisle, patriotism has been wholly rejected and replaced with a litany of anti-American refrains: America is imperialist, colonialist, racist, white supremacist, Islamophobic, transphobic, patriarchal, and whatever new insults Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer’s America-hating, communist party devises next.

When was the last time you heard any global prognosticator speak of America’s future as anything other than one of certain decline? 

Perhaps that’s why President Trump appeals to so many Americans.  He has been the only consistently positive leader declaring this “America’s century.”  While other political leaders — Democrats and Republicans — have spent the first twenty-six years of the new millennium making excuses for why our borders can’t be secured, why our industrial towns can’t be rebuilt, and why violent crime is the “new normal,” President Trump has secured the border, brought American manufacturing back to life, and cut murder and other violent crime rates across the country more sharply than any time since 1900.  Those are astounding accomplishments in a short amount of time, but you won’t hear them being discussed on CNN or NPR.  Nor will you hear about all the different ways President Trump has strengthened the security and economic future of the Western Hemisphere by waging war against international drug cartels, promoting hemispheric self-sufficiency, and methodically eliminating the influences of China, Russia, and Iran.  Nor will you hear about the ways President Trump is deconstructing Islamic terrorism’s chokehold over energy resources in the Middle East.  You certainly won’t hear how tariffs are forcing once-offshored companies to reinvest in the United States.  Nor will you hear that inflation continues to sink, while wages continue to rise — exactly the opposite of Wall Street pundits’ predictions.  

You won’t hear any of this positive news because the whole globalist Establishment — the bought-and-paid-for politicians, the multinational investment firm behemoths, the Wall Street and City of London make-nothing vultures, and the corporate news propaganda syndicate — are invested in a future of World Economic Forum oligarchy, Chinese communism, “climate change” totalitarianism, and steady American decline.  These parasites intend to discourage you.  They intend to exacerbate social conflicts, undermine American influence, disparage American history, mock American greatness, and make you feel weak.

President Trump is leading America back to the moon.  We’re going to Mars.  Whatever else AI turns out to be, it will have an American accent.  The White House has spent all year celebrating Freedom 250 because it wishes for Americans to remember and embrace their history.  The loudest pundits know nothing.  The revolution is here.  This is the American century.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


This Is the Most Disgusting Federal Court Ruling of the Year

A federal appears court has ruled that AI-generated child sexual abuse material is protected under the First Amendment, blaming a 2002 Supreme Court decision for the disturbing result.

The panel of three judges, all appointed by President Joe Biden, ruled that, when AI generated display the sexual abuse of fictional children when no actual child is involved in the creation, the content is protected under the First Amendment.

The basis comes from Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, where, in his dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas argued in 2002 that rapidly advancing technology could lead to fictional images becoming indistinguishable from real life, according to a report from Fox News.

Judges on the panel echoed the sentiment from Thomas, but claimed that their hands were bound and that it was a matter for the Supreme Court to decide.

"Indeed, in Free Speech Coalition, the Supreme Court addressed the scope of First Amendment protections for virtual CSAM, but that was nearly twenty-five years ago, and the image-generation technology available today was likely unimaginable back then," Lee wrote in his decision. "Given the relentless advancement in artificial intelligence models, we have some concerns about the lines these cases draw, but we are not free to redraw them ourselves."

The ruling stems from a case involving Steven Anderegg, who Wisconsin prosecutors say produced hundreds of AI-generated images depicting child sex abuse and then distributed it to a minor. The appellate court upheld a lower court decision to dismiss a charge of possession of child sex abuse material on the basis of the Free Speech Coalition decision.


New Report Reveals That the Biden DOJ Targeted Traditional Catholics

A new report released by the Department of Justice revealed that, under the leadership of President Joe Biden, the FBI’s Richmond Field Office “associated beliefs held by many Catholics with domestic extremism and investigated two priests as a result.”

DOJ officials claim that the Richmond Field Office produced and circulated an assessment entitled the “Richmond Domain Perspective.”

“This assessment documented the purported rise of domestic extremism among those who hold conservative beliefs associated with a wide variety of Catholics,” the Justice Department said in a release. “It also documented the investigation into two priests and the FBI’s surveillance of one of them.”

Officials say that cause for the investigations was based on “biased and unverified materials” published by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Internal documents distributed amongst the Richmond Field Office looked into the dangers of “traditionalist Catholicism,” and raised concerns about commonly-held Catholic practices and beliefs, such as Latin Mass attendance, “conservative family values/roles,” and a “rejection of modernity.”

The documents also raised attention to groups entirely approved by the Catholic Church, including the Priestly Society of St. Peter and the Institute of the Good Shepherd.

The documents were originally leaked in February of 2023, which raised numerous concerns about First Amendment violations.

“After the leak, internal reviews concluded that the Richmond Catholic Memo did not meet FBI standards, including by improperly suggesting that certain domestic terrorist and religious viewpoints aligned without supporting evidence and by creating the impression that the FBI conducts investigative activity based on religious affiliation,” the new report on the matter read.

Attorney General Todd Blanche has indicated that the individuals involved with producing the documents are no longer employed by the Department of Justice.


Tucker Carlson Spends 380th Consecutive Episode Criticizing Country Nobody Is Allowed To Criticize

 


Celebs·Aug 29, 2026 · BabylonBee.com
Image for article: Tucker Carlson Spends 380th Consecutive Episode Criticizing Country Nobody Is Allowed To Criticize

U.S. — Former Fox News host turned podcaster Tucker Carlson released a groundbreaking 380th consecutive episode criticizing the one country that Carlson says no one is allowed to criticize.

The episode, entitled "Why Can't Anyone Talk About How Israel Murders Babies?", is now among his most popular to date.

"No one is allowed to do it. I'm not even allowed to do it," Carlson said in hour three of his monologue. "Criticizing Israel is literally impossible. Period. This podcast can't even happen, and, in fact, doesn't exist. We're not even here right now, we are actually ghosts. And it's all because of Israel."

According to Carlson, his 379 previous episodes criticizing Israel do not serve as evidence that people are actually allowed to criticize Israel. "Nuh-uh," said Carlson. "I don't believe that happened. The people that are orchestrating all of this - and I think you know who I mean - they invented all of those episodes. It's all fake, and we all know where it comes from. Israel, the source of all lies, that no one can speak evil of, lest they be turned into a ghost like me."

At publishing time, after receiving some pushback to his statements, Tucker Carlson had denied ever recording a podcast episode or even knowing someone named "Tucker Carlson."

Trump Administration Seeks SCOTUS Weigh-In on Enforcing Its Ban on Transgenders in the Military

On Friday, the Trump administration filed a 300-page emergency petition with the United States Supreme Court to allow the Department of War's ban on transgenders serving in the military to take immediate effect, despite pending litigation.

The Justice Department petitioned the Supreme Court to allow the Pentagon's ban on transgender people serving in the military to take effect immediately. The petition asks the nation's highest court to lift a preliminary court injunction that protects active-duty transgender troops while the case is litigated, and allow their discharge to proceed. 

Details on the DOJ's petition:

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to uphold the president’s ban on transgender troops in the military.

The administration is appealing a June ruling by a lower court that the ban probably violated the troops’ constitutional rights and cannot be enforced against those currently serving while the litigation continues.

The ability of the Pentagon to decide who can serve is a “matter of exceptional importance,” the Justice Department said in its filing.

Shannon Minter, a lawyer with the National Cetner for LGBTQ Rights, said the administration “wants the Supreme Court to rush in and bless the expulsion of proven, decorated soldiers before a single court has issued a final judgment.”

In January 2025, the National Center for LGBTQ Rights along with GLAD Law filed Talbott v. United States in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenging the DOW policy against transgender troops as unconstitutional and discriminatory. While a trial has been set for January 2027, the DOW wants enforcement of the ban to remain in place,

White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales said in a statement that “Joe Biden allowed trans insanity to run rampant in our military. President Trump restored lethality and readiness to our warfighters."

She continued, "The United States military is the greatest in the world, and President Trump is keeping it that way by focusing on elite readiness standards — not DEI or woke gender ideology." 

This is a developing story. Check back with RedState for further updates on it.


President Trump's New Order on H-1B Visas Sends Shockwaves Through Immigrant Communities

The Trump administration is widening its crackdown on the H-1B system, targeting two major benefits tied to the program: work permits for certain visa holders’ spouses and the grace period that allows laid-off foreign workers to remain in the country while seeking another job.

The Department of Homeland Security has revived a plan to eliminate employment authorization for certain spouses of H-1B workers who are in the United States on H-4 dependent visas.

At the same time, a separate DHS proposal to eliminate the current 60-day grace period for H-1B workers after they lose their jobs has cleared review at the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, putting that rule on track for public release.

Together with the administration’s newly proposed $103,265 fee for cap-subject H-1B petitions, the moves represent a broader effort to reshape a visa program that critics have long accused corporations of using to import cheaper labor while American workers compete for the same jobs.

Under a rule adopted during the Obama administration in 2015, certain spouses of H-1B workers became eligible to apply for employment authorization while their families waited through the employment-based green card process.

Not every H-4 spouse qualifies. The benefit generally applies when the H-1B worker is the beneficiary of an approved Form I-140 immigrant petition or has received certain extensions beyond the ordinary six-year H-1B limit.

For those who do qualify, however, the Employment Authorization Document allows the spouse to work independently in the United States. Trump’s DHS is now considering taking that authorization away.

The proposal appears on the department’s regulatory agenda under the title, “Removing H-4 Dependent Spouses From the Classes of Noncitizens Eligible for Employment Authorization.”

That does not mean current H-4 work permits have been canceled. The proposal remains a long-term regulatory action, and DHS has not provided a target date for its release. Before any change could take effect, the administration would have to go through the formal rulemaking process. 

As mentioned earlier, the White House has also cleared a DHS proposal eliminating the 60-day grace period that currently protects H-1B workers after an employer terminates them.

Since 2017, H-1B workers who lose their jobs have generally been given up to 60 days to find another sponsor, change immigration status or leave the United States.

Under the Trump proposal, that automatic cushion would disappear. The change would make the visa even more dependent on continued employment and potentially reduce the ability of foreign workers to move between companies after a layoff.

The two proposals arrive only days after DHS unveiled an even more dramatic H-1B change: a proposed $103,265 additional fee on every cap-subject petition. 

The fee would apply to the regular 65,000 H-1B slots and the additional 20,000 visas reserved for workers with advanced degrees from American universities.

DHS says the figure is based on approximately $8.8 billion in federal costs associated with administering and supporting immigration programs, divided across the 85,000 annual cap-subject petitions. The administration’s argument is straightforward: Employers that want foreign workers should bear more of the cost of the system that supplies them.

DHS cited research finding that H-1B workers are paid substantially less than similarly situated American workers after accounting for factors such as education, occupation and geography.

That goes to the central controversy surrounding H-1B. The program was designed to provide access to specialized foreign talent, not simply to enlarge the labor supply and suppress professional wages.

Yet demand remains enormous. USCIS received nearly 344,000 registrations for fiscal year 2026 despite the statutory cap of 85,000.

The Trump administration is now attacking H-1B visa loopholes from several directions at once: making H-1B sponsorship more expensive, eliminating the two-month cushion after job loss and potentially removing work authorization for certain dependent spouses.

Neither of the changes involving H-4 spouses or the grace period is final yet, and both could face legal challenges before implementation.

But this is a real wake-up call for foreigners who have been exploiting America's overly lenient immigration system. The administration is making the H-1B program more expensive for employers, less flexible for visa workers and less economically advantageous for their families.

For companies accustomed to treating H-1B hiring as a routine part of their labor strategy, that era may be coming to an end.


Sunday Scripture


 .


https://christianitypath.com/psalms-19-1/


This verse emphasizes that creation itself—everything surrounding us—holds messages about the nature of God. In nature, we can see things like order, beauty, and complexity, all of which reflect the elegance of God’s mind. As we marvel at the beauty of a sunset, a mountain range, or even the intricacies of a leaf, we are witnessing God’s glory revealed to us. The firmament, or the sky, demonstrates His incredible work. Each star in the sky, each cloud floating above us, all serve as reminders that we are part of an extraordinary creation.




♦️𝐖³π πƒπšπ’π₯𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 π“π‘π«πžπšπ


 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time. 

 

Moscow and Kiev Exchange Warehouse and Distribution Attacks, But Only One Side Feels Impact


I mentioned this last night, and now more solid reports have emerged. Basically, Ukraine and Russia are taking turns striking each other’s warehouses and distribution centers with missiles and drones. However, the brunt of the damage and chaos is being felt only by one side—Ukraine.

Zero Hedge has a solid article explaining the dynamics:

A Russian drone struck a Ukrainian Defense Forces ammunition storage site in the village of Myla Friday evening, just west of Kiev. The resulting fire and hours of secondary detonations killed at least 37 people, injured dozens more, damaged around 50 residential buildings and a care home for the elderly and disabled, and forced the evacuation of hundreds. Among the dead was the local community head who had gone to help.

In response, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said ¹the placement of a weapons depot next to civilians was “terrible negligence.” The first impact, he said, hit a depot storing shells, mines, other munitions, and drones that “definitely shouldn’t have been there” – while prosecutors in Kiev opened a criminal investigation into the legality of storing explosives next to civilian housing. This is the second such incident in two months. A July strike on a depot in nearby Vyshneve produced similar secondary blasts, deaths, and later detentions of state defense-company executives.

Russia’s Defense Ministry said the Myla site held components and launch boosters for long-range drones. It also claimed strikes on Flamingo cruise-missile related facilities in the Kiev region and on the ports of Mykolaiv and Izmail. Social-media claims that Patriots were stored there remain unconfirmed by official Ukrainian statements.

Here comes the fact that few in the west understand:

Friday night’s blast came amid a multi-day Russian campaign of jet-powered drones and missiles that has produced near-continuous air-raid alerts over Kiev and hit warehouses belonging to supermarket chains, postal operators, retailers, and logistics firms. Ukraine Agriculture Minister Taras Vysotskyi told reporters that, “roughly speaking,” about 90% of the food-logistics infrastructure used by major retail chains (large distribution centers serving networks such as Fora, Silpo, NOVUS, and Varus) has been destroyed.

[…] Both sides have been systematically striking each other’s logistics and dual-use commercial infrastructure. […] Zelensky’s government has framed its own long-range strikes as a way to force Russia to negotiate. (more)

You can hit centralized Russian distribution centers and not accomplish any material impact to the people of Russia.  However, if you hit centralized Ukraine distribution centers, chaos and crisis quickly surfaces for Kiev residents.

The why is not complicated.

Metropolitan Russia, home to more than 75% of the population, was set up around the concept of govt planned precincts.

Each few buildings you will find a generally useful grocery store, a bakery, a coffee shop, a pharmacy, a utility store, tobacco, produce shop etc. all within immediate walking distance.

EX. Bread is made in each bakery; made, not just taken out of a box. Actually made.

They set it up that way a long time ago during the Soviet era.  Now, over time stores are different, but the planning never changed.  The people of Russia also operate Dacha Gardens all over the urban sprawl and suburban areas.

“Gardening as provided food for the people of Russia for over 1,000 years, starting as mainly subsistence or survival gardening and evolving into an independent, self-provisioning model between the Bolshevik Revolution and World War II and continues into today.”

Ukraine, we are told – even by former Defense Minister Fedorov, was convinced by western intelligence analysis that destroying the roughly 200 online Wildberries distribution centers it would cripple the Russian consumer economy.

Increased strikes did not yield the desired results.

Who in their right mind thought destroying regional Russian online warehouses would have some great impact? Russia is analog in a digital world.

However, conversely in our westernized, centralized, corporate consumer structures and logistics, we built distribution economies on centralized production and cost-efficient distribution, vis-a-vis Kyiv or Brussels etc.

Ex. The western bread for a hundred locations is made in one centralized or regional facility. Boxed, shipped and distributed for maximum efficiency and profit.

Bombing Russian distribution centers doesn’t have any impact on the precinct level operation. But taking out westernized regional hubs and distribution centers in Kiev can create immediate chaos.

That’s what we are seeing now.

Honestly, this is not complicated to analyze.  These are two completely different economic and logistic models.  One is centralized (Ukraine) and one is decentralized (Russia).  Attacking the logistics of a decentralized system creates no substantive impact.  Attacking the logistics of a centralized system creates major impact.

I think part of the reason the western news doesn’t make sense is because western media doesn’t understand Russia or pretend not to know things.

Apparently, the same applies to Western intelligence.

[¹People are starting to suspect that Director Ratcliffe told his Russian counterpart Sergey Naryshkin where the ammo was stored.]