Friday, August 21, 2026

Iran's Mullahs Are a Gangster Regime With a Gun to the World's Head


There are moments when a regime strips away the last pretence of civilization and reveals itself for what it truly is. Iran’s latest announcement is one such moment. On August 16, Iranian Army Commander-in-Chief Major General Amir Hatami announced a $30,000 bounty for anyone who kills or captures a US soldier and hands him over to the Iranian authorities. In a grotesque embellishment, Hatami said the reward would be doubled if the perpetrator were an Iranian woman. The regime even offered to purchase the weapon used in the killing and place it in a museum. The announcement has been widely reported, including by The Times.

This is hardly the language of a responsible government. It is the language of a gangster organization. Imagine the reaction if a Western government offered money to criminals for the kidnapping or murder of foreign soldiers. There would be universal condemnation, diplomatic expulsions and demands for accountability. Yet Tehran apparently believes it can place a price on the heads of American servicemen while still expecting the privileges of international diplomacy. The Iranian regime has spent decades perfecting this peculiar form of statecraft: threaten directly, attack indirectly, employ proxies, hire criminals, take hostages and then sit down at the negotiating table demanding concessions.

The bounty is merely the latest manifestation. Iran has constructed a vast network of armed proxies across the Middle East. Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, together with numerous Shi’ite militias in Iraq and Syria, have received Iranian weapons, financing, training or logistical support. The US Congressional Research Service has documented the breadth of this network, while US counterterrorism authorities continue to identify Iranian support for armed groups attacking American, Israeli and Western interests.

Tehran’s favorite trick is to subcontract the violence. The mullahs can send missiles and drones, yet when convenient they can claim that some supposedly independent militia acted on its own initiative. They can arm terrorists while pretending to be diplomats. They can threaten dissidents overseas while insisting that Iran respects the sovereignty of other nations. The evidence of this criminal outsourcing has become impossible to ignore. In July 2025, Britain joined the United States, Canada and European allies in condemning Iranian intelligence operations aimed at killing, kidnapping and harassing people in Europe and North America. The joint statement specifically warned that Iranian intelligence services were increasingly collaborating with international criminal organizations to target journalists, dissidents, Jewish citizens and former officials.

The European Union has gone further. In 2025, it sanctioned the Zindashti Network, identifying it as a criminal organization connected to Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security and accusing it of assassinations and other acts of transnational repression. Britain subsequently sanctioned the Iranian-linked Foxtrot criminal network, citing the regime’s use of criminal gangs to threaten people across Europe. In July 2026, the UK went further again, designating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) under new state-threat powers and sanctioning the Islamic Movement of Companions of the Right, an Iran-linked organization accused of attacks in Britain. This is the hallmark of a gangster state: when its own operatives are too conspicuous, it reaches into the criminal underworld and hires the services of thugs, smugglers, drug traffickers and hitmen.

Then there is the hostage business. For Tehran, imprisonment has repeatedly become a bargaining chip. Foreign nationals and dual nationals have been arrested on dubious charges, subjected to arbitrary detention and then transformed into human currency for diplomatic negotiations. The British Parliament has explicitly recorded its concerns over Iran’s arbitrary detention of dual nationals and the denial of normal consular access. The message is chillingly simple: come to Iran at your own risk, challenge the regime anywhere in the world and you may become a target; oppose it and your relatives may become leverage.

Now the regime has added an open cash incentive for the murder or abduction of American soldiers. And this comes as Tehran continues its confrontation over the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has insisted that it alone will decide when the strategic waterway opens, while the United Arab Emirates has accused Iranian forces of attacking commercial vessels associated with ADNOC, the Abu Dhabi-based energy group. The Strait carried roughly one-fifth of the world's tradable oil before the conflict, making Tehran's attempt to weaponize the waterway a threat extending far beyond the United States.

The West should finally recognize the pattern. Iran's rulers behave less like a conventional government and more like the heads of an enormous criminal enterprise. The IRGC functions as the muscle. The Quds Force operates abroad. Proxy militias provide disposable foot soldiers. Criminal networks provide deniable assassins. Hostages provide bargaining currency. Terrorist organizations provide strategic depth. Diplomats provide a respectable faΓ§ade. And Western governments continue to treat the faΓ§ade as though it were the reality. Enough. A government that places a bounty on American soldiers, sponsors terrorist organizations, employs criminal gangs to murder and kidnap opponents, takes foreign nationals hostage and threatens international shipping has forfeited any claim to normal diplomatic treatment. Diplomatic relations are supposed to facilitate peaceful coexistence between civilized states. They should never become a protective cloak for state-sponsored gangsterism.

The answer should therefore be clear. Western democracies should sever diplomatic relations with Tehran, expel intelligence operatives masquerading as diplomats, close the regime’s centers of influence, intensify sanctions against the IRGC and MOIS, and pursue every criminal responsible for transnational repression. Above all, governments should stop rewarding hostage-taking and stop pretending that another round of polite negotiations will somehow transform the Islamic Republic into a normal state. The $30,000 bounty has ripped away the mask. The Iranian regime has declared open season on American soldiers. The civilized world should respond by declaring the mullahs’ diplomatic immunity from consequences over.


Podcast thread for August 21

 


summer is way too quiet

Meanwhile, at Commie Con ...

Blue and orange hair. Facial piercings. Ink enough to qualify as cartography. Political buttons, tote bags, and protest signs everywhere.

It was the sort of gathering where the certainty of the attendees seemed inversely proportional to their experience with the consequences of their ideas.

No, this was not the premiere of a Japanese manga film; this was Chicago, where the Democratic Socialists of America gathered for its 2026 Democratic Socialists Summit and National Organizing Conference. The organization invited members to spend four days on political education, organizer development, skills training, and social activities. There were five principal tracks: Palestine Solidarity and Anti-War, Abolish ICE, Electoral, Labor, and General Organizing.

Welcome to Commie-Con, where the agenda was magnificent.

The DSA's national program, Workers Deserve More, calls for public ownership of major corporations and essential industries, abolition of the Electoral College and Senate, a multiparty political system, major changes to the executive and judicial branches, abolition of ICE, and, ultimately, the replacement of capitalism. That is a remarkable amount of civilization to redesign over a weekend, and one almost expects a vendor's booth selling commemorative hammers.

To be fair, the DSA does not hide the basic proposition. Its political language has been polished for contemporary ears, but the underlying idea remains recognizable: capitalism concentrates power in private hands, workers should control the economy, and the political system must be transformed accordingly.

It is, in short, Marxism with better branding.

There is nothing particularly mysterious about that. If you want socialism, say 'socialism.' If you want to abolish the Senate, say 'abolish the Senate.' If ICE must disappear, explain why. If major industries belong under public ownership, tell the voters what you intend to do with them. Political honesty has one enormous advantage: nobody has to guess.

Then the revolutionary becomes a candidate, and the candidate discovers the focus group.

Francesca Hong was one of the DSA's more prominent electoral experiments. In November 2020, shortly after winning election to the state Assembly, the Wisconsin state representative posted on social media, "Cancel Thanksgiving. Should have done this in 1621," and went on to describe the holiday as a celebration of colonialism. The post sat forgotten for six years.

Hong entered this year's Democratic gubernatorial primary with considerable momentum, reportedly leading the field by roughly twenty points. Then the old post resurfaced, and the resulting media circus treated it as what it was: an extraordinary political statement with an extraordinarily easy punchline. Her lead evaporated. Hong lost to Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley by 3,200 votes, 39.8 percent to 39.4 percent, not exactly the socialist tsunami.

There is nothing wrong with changing one's mind. People do it. Sometimes they should. But there is a difference between intellectual growth and discovering, shortly before an election, that Wisconsin has a sentimental attachment to turkey. One can almost imagine the campaign meeting.

"We have a problem."

"What problem?"

"Wisconsin likes Thanksgiving."

"How much?"

"Very much."

"Then I have always loved Thanksgiving."

And so the revolutionary apparatus begins its metamorphosis. Yesterday's radical proposition becomes today's unfortunate misunderstanding. Abolition becomes reform. Socialism becomes affordability. Anti-capitalism becomes economic justice. The candidate evolves; the organization does not.

It would be easy to leave it there.

Another strange weekend in American politics. Another convention full of young revolutionaries who have discovered that the existing system is fundamentally defective and have arrived to discuss how best to replace it. But I cannot quite leave it there, because I have seen what happens when cultural cancellation stops being a joke.

I was six months old when the Granma landed. I did not watch the revolution arrive; I inherited its consequences.

The Granma was not a warship. It was an old American pleasure yacht, a vessel meant for leisure rather than revolution. Castro and 81 other men nevertheless crammed aboard it in Mexico in 1956 and sailed for Cuba. They arrived late, badly equipped, and exhausted, yet they eventually took the country.

That is the part of the story that ought to trouble anyone who believes political movements can be dismissed simply because their ambitions appear ridiculous. The revolution looked ridiculous; the consequences were not.

Fidel Castro entered Havana on Jan. 1, 1959.

The transformation of Cuba did not happen in one cinematic stroke.

Power accumulated. Institutions were neutralized. Property was confiscated. Political opponents were executed, imprisoned, or driven into exile. Schools, newspapers, professional organizations, and churches that had existed independently of the state were progressively brought under revolutionary authority.

The assault on the Church accelerated in 1960 and 1961. Private and religious schools were nationalized. Religious leaders were expelled. Religious processions were restricted. The government increasingly treated independent religious institutions as competitors to revolutionary authority.

By 1962, Cuba had formally embraced atheism.

Then came the calendar: In 1969, Christmas disappeared as an official holiday. The explanation was practical enough: the coming sugar harvest required the labor. For nearly three decades, Dec. 25 was simply another working day in Cuba. Christmas returned as an official holiday in 1997, ahead of Pope John Paul II's visit.

Think about that.

Hong's Thanksgiving remark was funny because it was powerless. It was a politician with a social-media account proposing to cancel a holiday she did not possess the authority to cancel. Castro's government had the authority, and that is the difference between cultural politics as theater and cultural politics backed by the machinery of the state.

Nobody had to agree with the revolution's decision. Nobody had to believe Christmas was actually a threat to the sugar harvest. The government possessed the power to make the argument unnecessary. And that is where the joke ends.

Let me be clear about what I am not saying. I am not saying the DSA is Fidel Castro. It isn't. I am not saying America is Cuba. It isn't, either.

America has a Constitution, federalism, courts, elections, private property, a free press, and a civil society vastly more resilient than anything Castro inherited. Those institutions have survived presidents, wars, depressions, riots, and political movements considerably more powerful than the DSA. Thank God.

But none of that makes political intentions irrelevant. The question is not whether the DSA can abolish the Senate next Tuesday. It cannot. The question is whether we should listen when an organization tells us that it wants to abolish the Senate, replace capitalism, restructure the political system, and put major portions of the economy under public control. Of course we should.

We should also listen when its candidates tell us they no longer believe what they once said they believed. Perhaps they have genuinely changed their minds. If so, fine. Tell us plainly. Political conversion is not a crime.

But voters should not be expected to forget the political movement that produced the candidate simply because the candidate has discovered that some of its ideas are less popular outside the convention hall.

That is the serious question hiding inside Commie-Con. It is not whether these people look ridiculous, though they do, or whether their ambitions are improbable, though some of them certainly are. The question is what happens when an improbable political movement acquires organization, candidates, money, institutions, and eventually power. I know what happened once.

I was six months old when that old pleasure yacht came ashore. I did not see the men climb out of it, but I grew up in the country they built.

So yes, let us laugh at Commie-Con. Laugh at the hair. Laugh at the piercings. Laugh at the revolutionary tote bags and the candidate who discovered her affection for Thanksgiving just in time for the Wisconsin primary. But do not confuse ridicule with dismissal.

The people aboard the Granma looked ridiculous, too; they were not.

The mistake is not believing that America is Cuba.

The mistake is believing that Cuba became Cuba overnight.



🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


James Talarico’s ‘World Without Prisons’ Dream Would Be A Nightmare


Perhaps the leftist Texas Senate candidate has such a soft spot in his heart for criminals because he himself has had some trouble with the law. 



In 2022, leftist Texas Senate candidate James Talarico jumped on board the defund-the-police train, arguing for diverting law enforcement funding to social programs. He told inmates at a behind-bars High School graduation ceremony that he wanted to see a “world without prisons,” and that he would work to “make prisons obsolete.” 

“My experience as a teacher, as a legislator, and as a Christian tells me that birds don’t belong in cages. Children don’t belong in cages. People don’t belong in cages,” Talarico said in his Ferguson Prison graduation speech. 

In the same speech the Democrat argued that, “Poverty is violence. Pollution is violence. And, yes, prison is violence.” 

‘Immersed In A Hot Liquid’

You know what is real violence? Violence. Violence committed by many of the violent criminals serving time at the men’s prison in Midway, Texas, where a rising star in far-left Lone Star State politics gave his talk on how unfair the “system” is. 

Prisoners like Carlnelus Delaney Simmons, a very violent man serving a 99-year sentence for murdering his girlfriend’s 16-month-old boy. According to prison records and the website Abuse Angels, Simmons “deliberately dipped” Jabraylon Quintez Bables “into a pot of boiling water.”

“Jabraylon survived the initial burning. But his suffering did not end that day. He spent the following 36 days fighting for his life. The burns caused catastrophic damage to his tiny body,” Abuse Angels notes on its website. 

According to the case file, doctors reported that the nature of the burns indicated that the toddler had been “immersed in a hot liquid and that the burns were not accidental.”

“In the doctors’ opinion, it appeared the toddler had been immersed in the liquid wearing a diaper, which leaked a little causing the burn to his buttock, and had folded his body into a fetal position to protect himself,” court documents state. The physician who performed the autopsy agreed. 

Would it surprise you to learn that Simmons had a long rap sheet filled with violent crimes and serious drug offenses before he landed at Ferguson for his century sentence? The inmate’s record included a homicide conviction for killing a man in a bar fight in 1994. 

A ‘Really Exciting’ Opportunity

Simmons and monsters like him have an advocate in the 37-year-old “progressive” politician who wants to be Texas’ next U.S. senator. This is, after all, the guy who, drunk on BLM madness in 2020, said the times presented a “really exciting” opportunity to “end the current situation of over-policing communities of color which has been in place in this country since its founding.” The same guy who conveniently missed a vote on a state bill that would have denied bail to illegal immigrants charged with violent crimes. “Jocelyn’s Law” was named in honor of Jocelyn Nungaray, a pre-teen girl allegedly abducted, sexually assaulted and strangled to death by illegal aliens. 

Talarico, too, voted against the Damon Allen Act, legislation named in honor of Texas Department of Public Safety Trooper Damon Allen murdered by a a suspect out on bail. And he “proudly” chipped in campaign donations to an activist group urging the defunding of the Austin police department. 

Perhaps Talarico has such a soft spot in his heart for criminals and antipathy for prisons and cops because he himself has had some trouble with the law. 

As Fox News Digital reported earlier this month, Talarico was caught on tape chuckling about his church housing illegal aliens. The Senate candidate boasted about his church’s leftist credentials, including early activism for “LGBTQ rights.” 

“We caught some attention by letting an atheist join our church in the 2000s, and then in the 2010s, again stirred some controversy by housing an undocumented family, a mother and son, who were close to being deported by ICE,” he says in the video.

The giddy admission may not sit well with a lot of Texans still dealing with the damage of four years of an open Southwest border under President Joe Biden’s term in office. 

Harboring illegal aliens, “encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and abetting any of the preceding acts,” is a federal offense.

The Senate candidate also posted a guide to help criminal illegal immigrants “fight back” against federal immigration law enforcement.

Talarico has also faced scrutiny over his campaign’s financial filings. Earlier this week NOTUS reported that the Democrat’s campaign has had to return north of $1 million in contributions that exceeded federal donation limits. 

And, as The Federalist first reported, Talarico’s living arrangements stank of voter fraud — after he accused his Republican opponent, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, of the same election law violations. 

‘Dreaming is the First Step’

In his 2022 speech to his prison pals, Talarico said it may be hard to imagine a world without prisons. But then again, he said, it was once difficult to imagine a world without “telegrams and cassette tapes.”

“Dreaming is the first step,” he mused.

The dream for Talarico and his fellow leftist friends — defund the police, abolish ICE, close prisons — would be a nightmare for communities across the country. Ask the family of little Jabraylon Quintez Bables what setting murderers and drug dealers free would mean for a society immersed in violent crime. 

But shutting down jails might just work out fine for a Senate candidate with a growing list legal troubles.


The DSA Is Fully Aware Of The Horrors Of Socialism, But They Don’t Care As Long As They Get Power


No, Boris Sanchez, it won’t matter if the DSA talks to a million survivors of socialism and communism. They know the history and the implications of that political ideology — and it doesn’t bother them.



During a heated interview with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) co-chair Ashik Siddique over the party’s statement honoring Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, CNN’s Boris Sanchez suggested Siddique “have more conversations with folks who have fled that regime and what they think about these statements and the position of the DSA.”

It was an earnest ask, especially considering Sanchez’s own grandfather suffered political persecution under Castro. But it also underscored the one mistaken assumption that so many — on both the left and right — make, that is: if the DSA just knew a little bit more about Castro, or Karl Marx, or Marxism, or Maoism, so on and so forth then they’d become some variation of a capitalist, freedom-loving patriot.

But the socialists’ admiration for figures like Castro isn’t because they are ignorant of the death, repression, and political tyranny that results from socialism. Nor are they oblivious of the fact that hundreds have drowned while trying to flee Cuba on a raft to Florida. Socialists know of all these things — they just don’t mind them if they are the cost in order to amass political power.

In fact, we know for certain that DSA activists understand Castro’s record and simply don’t care since they are in pursuit of power.

Co-chair of the DSA’s Cuba Solidarity Working Group Danny Valdes wrote an op-ed in 2024 explaining his own grandfather was imprisoned for “anti-revolutionary activities” by Castro’s Committees for the Defense of the Revolution. Valdes acknowledges the pain and suffering his family endured and the “personal cost of Cuba’s history.” But rather than commit himself to fighting the political ideology that is responsible for his family’s suffering and the suffering of so many others, he said its important to look “beyond that grief” and then urged Cubans to join the DSA.

In other words, Valdes’ op-ed was the clearest answer to Sanchez’s request that the DSA speak to more survivors of Castro’s brutality. Valdes was raised by a survivor of Castro’s regime and yet he still pushes for socialism right here in the United States (in part because he claims that the reason Cuba is suffering today isn’t because of socialism, but because of America).

“There is no denying that the Cuban government has its shortcomings. Many Cubans are frustrated by over-bureaucratization and inefficient central planning, especially in agriculture. Recent protests have highlighted a growing impatience with these issues,” Valdes writes, before trying to claim that most of these problems are because of the U.S. embargo.

“During its over 60 years of operating as essentially a wartime government, Cuba has had to make decisions that might not have been made under less fraught circumstances. While we don’t have to agree with all of those decisions, it’s critical to understand them in context,” he continued.

Valdes acknowledges that Cuba is basically a hellscape before trying to “contextualize” it as merely a product of some other cause than socialism and that ultimately regardless of the cause, we “don’t have to agree with all of those decisions” and people should therefore support socialism.

It’s the same thing Siddique did in his interview with Sanchez. When Sanchez asked whether Cuba was a “beacon of democracy,” Siddique said he “wouldn’t say that” before pivoting to Cuba’s health care system. He didn’t dispute the dictatorship, he just said their health care system is the reward for the dictatorship and apparently that’s satisfactory for him.

These socialists know about the problems and failures of socialism. They know Castro was evil and a dictator. It just doesn’t matter enough to them because they have never cared about the “working people.” They care about exploiting workers to help them accrue power.

Socialists make their pursuit of power feel palatable by hiding behind promises of free health care, housing, or whatever other thing sounds good. Those promises are then used to justify any means to obtain them. If you have to jail opponents in pursuit of those things, or starve opponents, or even kill opponents in pursuit of a greater good, it’s justified.

So no, Boris Sanchez, it won’t matter if the DSA talks to a million survivors of socialism and communism. They know the history and the implications of that political ideology — and it doesn’t bother them.

What the DSA needs is a crushing defeat. There is no sharing a country with communists. Everything they believe in is antithetical to natural rights, to our Constitution, and to this republic. The longer Sanchez and people on the left and the right think we can ‘hear’ our way out of a socialist revolution, the more our chances diminish.


UK's Advice to Asylum Seekers Gets Even Worse, With Poster About Children


RedState 

We have known for a while that our cousins across the pond in the U.K. are practically on the brink of total societal collapse, especially when it comes to out of control illegal immigration. In recent weeks, they swapped one Labour prime minister for another, so nothing has improved in that regard.

As you may have seen earlier, the government thought it hit on a genius solution to the staggering rise in criminal activity, including rapes, that has happened as hundreds of thousands of foreigners have swamped them.

RedState's Jennifer Oliver O'Connell wrote that they have started handing out "Understanding Behaviours and Expectations in the UK: A Guide for Asylum Seekers," a nine-page pamphlet advising illegal immigrants that they shouldn't expect to be able to treat women the way they did in their home countries - because it's against the law:

Much of the guide focuses on the concept of gender equality and treatment of the opposite sex. That would be women...

Here's another concept that should not be novel. Consent is required when interacting with women sexually. 

And remarkably, the consequences of raping someone have to be spelled out:

If you have sex with someone without their consent, this is called rape. Rape is a serious crime in the UK. You could go to prison, lose your support and accommodation, and it will affect your asylum claim.

As O'Connell wrote, much of the guide is about "public behavior and how to treat women." But it appears the illegal immigrants have a problem interacting with many kinds of people. You can't harass others, the U.K. Home Office tells them:

But it gets even worse. Something that's getting less attention is a poster being handed out to the asylum seekers.

It lets them know that abusing children is illegal, a term that covers more than people might realize: [emphasis added]

You must never:

  • physically hurt a child
  • shout at or threaten a child
  • have sex or sexual contact with a child under 16
  • leave a child alone without an adult
  • deny a child food, clothes, shelter or care
  • cut or harm a girl's genitals (known as female genital mutilation)

It goes on to warn the illegal that these actions could lead to arrest and imprisonment. It could also affect his/her asylum claim.

This London resident did not mince words about what she sees happening to her country:

WHY ARE THEY HERE? 😑

When the Home Office is printing posters to remind asylum seekers that having sex with under 16's and female genital mutilation are serious crimes, then the message is clear....

They know the risk. They know the cultural gap. And they're STILL letting them in

If you need a poster for this, you shouldn’t be in the country. DEPORT 😑

Reform UK Party leader Nigel Farage reminded people that they are paying for this:

The Restore Britain Party's director of investigations is demanding that the government reveal just how much of taxpayers' money they've spent:

What a country we’ve become.

I’ve just submitted a request to the Home Office asking for the full cost of these posters and booklets.

The British state is now spending public money explaining to foreign men that child sexual abuse and female genital mutilation are illegal.

And what does Prime Minister Andy Burnham have to say about the guide/posters? (start clip at 1:22)

Watch:

This person was not convinced:

Britons are right to be angry about their leaders sending what amounts to a strongly worded letter to criminals. Recall when then-President Joe Biden thought he could prevent Iran from attacking Israel simply by saying, "Don't"? Same vibe.


Canadian Provinces Have Agreed to Restock US Alcohol, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Says

 

Canada’s premiers have agreed to Prime Minister Mark Carney’s request to put U.S. alcohol back on their store shelves, as part of the trade deal with the United States.

Speaking to reporters on Aug. 20, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Tony Wakeham said Carney is “confident” that Washington and Ottawa will reach a trade agreement.

“As part of this agreement, he asked all of the provinces—as a sign of good faith—to put U.S. liquor back on the shelves, and we all agreed,” he said.

Following a series of U.S. tariffs being placed on Canada in 2025, the provinces and territories took steps to limit the purchase or sale of U.S. alcohol products in March.

Alberta and Saskatchewan resumed accepting new U.S. alcohol shipments in June 2025, while various import restrictions and sales bans remained in other provinces and territories.

According to the White House, Canadian imports of U.S. alcoholic products fell by around 81 percent between March 2025 and February 2026 on a year-over-year basis.

Washington has cited the ban on U.S. alcohol as a trade irritant, in addition to Canada’s supply management system for dairy products, and Canadian counter-tariffs on the United States.

Trump had threatened to impose additional 50 percent tariffs on certain Canadian goods beginning Aug. 19, but announced a three-day pause shortly before the deadline, saying the two countries had reached a deal that still required finalization. Canadian officials have said substantial progress has been made but that negotiations remain ongoing

Trump suggested on Aug. 19 that some tariffs on Canadian goods could be reduced “a little bit,” while tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum could be lowered to levels comparable to those imposed by the United States on other countries. He also said that some Canadian tariffs on the United States would be brought “down to zero.”

Premiers Respond

Carney held a virtual meeting with the premiers on Aug. 19 to update them on the trade negotiations and asked the provinces to return U.S. alcohol to store shelves as part of the emerging agreement.

Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe told reporters following the meeting that restocking U.S. alcohol would not be an issue for Alberta or Saskatchewan as “we’ve allowed consumers to make their own choice all along.”

Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston also said his province would comply with the request, but said, “whether Nova Scotians, or whether Canadians, will actually buy it when it gets back on the shelves—that’s a whole other discussion.”

Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew told reporters on Aug. 20 that he expects the eventual deal with the United States “will not be right for me,” but stressed that “it’s not about me, it’s about Team Canada.” He also urged Canadians to continue buying Canadian alcohol and to “keep browsing” if they encounter American products on store shelves.

Kinew also said the prime minister had essentially told the premiers that Canada would not reach a deal with the United States unless U.S. alcohol was returned to the shelves.

Quebec Premier Christine FrΓ©chette had said lifting the ban on U.S. alcohol was “possible” for her province, and depended on how the deal would impact the province’s economy.

B.C. Premier David Eby said in a statement that his province “stands with Team Canada,” and that given the fact that Ottawa had made progress on reducing tariffs, “we are hopeful about the possibility of an agreement.”

Ontario Premier Doug Ford has not commented on returning U.S. alcohol to shelves since Trump paused his 50 percent tariffs, but said on Aug. 13 that he was open to doing so as part of a deal if it protected Canadian industries from U.S. tariffs.

“If we get a fair deal that will protect our steel sector, our auto sector, our forestry sector, agriculture sector, manufacturing sector, then we’d be more than happy to bring booze back on the shelves earlier,” Ford told reporters.

Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc told reporters in Washington on Aug. 20 that he had a “long, detailed meeting” with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer.

“We’re very close. We continue to make progress, and we’re going to stay here and do the work that is necessary until we get to that point,” he said.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/provinces-have-agreed-to-restock-us-alcohol-newfoundland-and-labrador-premier-says-6077737?&utm_source=MB_article_paid_f&utm_campaign=MB_article_2026-08-21-ca&utm_medium=email&est=zGGpU2yHYCQR%2FWSGMHKJtRRgDhi17UamqLs6ZS%2BZByshWSy9FDx%2Bq%2BVRobFC%2BXLv7jKo&utm_content=highlight-news-2