Sunday, August 16, 2026

American History Is Too Important for Trigger Warnings


I remember the first time I came across a “trigger warning.”  I was on a university campus in the ‘90s, attending the first lecture of a new history professor.  As I perused her course syllabus, I was impressed with the reading list and organization.  Then I spotted an incongruous “warning” to women and African Americans suggesting that they might find some of the material offensive.  At first, I thought it was an inappropriate joke.  I asked someone about it, and I was informed that “trigger warnings” had become increasingly common in the classrooms of America’s elite boarding schools.  I rolled my eyes because I knew right then and there that it would take decades to remedy the problem.

The idea that a history professor would implicitly warn students to be afraid of the past unnerved me.  I had always believed very much the opposite — that it was important for young minds to face the past with open eyes.  As living members of the human race, we enjoy the great privilege of being able to learn as much from those who came before us as possible.  And a person can never learn too much about the past!  Whether you take the lessons of history with you to the battlefield, boardroom, small office, or kitchen table, understanding the people, events, and ideas that created today’s world is an invaluable tool for navigating the present and building the future.

I don’t want people to be afraid of the past.  I want them to be invigorated by it.  I want them to exercise their imaginations and step into the centuries that came before us.  I want them to understand the points of view of our ancestors and to appreciate everything that we have inherited from them.  Our role as the current custodians of this material world is not to judge previous generations by today’s mores and standards.  Our job is to prevent the great lessons of history from ever slipping through our grasp.  Sometimes, grappling with the past takes courage!

But the “trigger warning” was just the tip of a much bigger and more socially destructive iceberg.  The message on that syllabus was antithetical to personal growth.  It communicated three poisonous ideas: (1) History is terrifying.  (2) It’s okay to look away.  (3) It’s permissible to rewrite history if it makes us “feel” better.  None of these messages is true.  History is treasure.  Understanding the past is the only way of glimpsing the future.  And if a person understands that seeing into the future is priceless, then that person should similarly understand that learning from the past is priceless, too.  

Furthermore, I do not believe that we should be teaching children to be afraid.  Do we want them to learn that a hot stove burns skin?  Of course.  Should we then encourage them never to sit near a fire?  Absolutely not.  Courage is a virtue.  It comes only when we appreciate the dangers before us and move carefully around them anyway.  History is not there to scare us.  It can’t hurt us.  What it can do is inform us.  It can equip us with the wisdom and strength to ably meet the real challenges of this life.

Whether printed on classroom syllabi or repeated as some modern mantra of “political correctness,” “trigger warnings” exude cowardice.  Why must leftist politicians recite “land acknowledgments” before government meetings or solemnly intone, “Black lives matter,” during public speeches?  Why must they patronize the descendants of native tribes who were here before the Pilgrims?  Why do they insist on treating black Americans as if they were children? 

But that’s the point, isn’t it?  At their heart, “trigger warnings” are infantilizing.  Although outwardly respectful, they are outrageously condescending.  They say, “You do not possess the intelligence to process the past or the moral strength to persevere after learning what your ancestors might have experienced.”  Those who provide “trigger warnings” essentially appoint themselves as higher authorities who are ostensibly capable of doing the tough job of deciding what parts of history should be known and which should be buried.

And there’s the rub!  Because as soon as some privileged group of elites decide to become the official “guardians” of history, their efforts to hide the past from the people are never finished.  Bowdlerizing history becomes its own end.  There is always some new collection of people who might be offended about old news from the past.  There is always some old idea from the past that might be newly adjudged as offensive. 

This never-ending cycle of taking offense is a hallmark of “political correctness” and cultural Marxism, more generally.  Leftism’s engine runs on the fuel of social conflict.  The working class must be taught to hate business owners.  Blacks must be encouraged to hate whites.  Women must replace men.  Gays must revolt against the nuclear family.  “Transgenders” must rebel against biological sex.  Islamic supremacists must wage war against Christians.  There must always be “oppressed” groups to support; there must always be “oppressors” to resist.  The “revolution” must continue at all times.  It can never be permitted to end.

This is how we have gotten to this absurd point in history when self-described “intellectuals” redefine their beliefs every few years.  They wanted a color-blind society and an end to segregation; then they wanted race-based affirmative action programs, “diversity” quotas, black-only graduation ceremonies, and awards based on skin color, not merit.  They wanted equal rights for women; then they wanted special rights for women; then they wanted to shove men in women’s locker rooms.  They believed in genetics and biological sex; now they believe in “gender” and that physical differences between men and women are imaginary “social constructs.”  Had I asked a group of university professors twenty-five years ago whether they believed men and women are biologically distinct, every single person would have raised a hand; now those same professors would insist that men can have babies.  Moral and intellectual relativism produces cowards.

The antidote to ever-shifting Marxism is to stop dividing people into groups and to begin treating everyone with respect and dignity.  Doing so requires that we acknowledge that there are good ways and bad ways to live.  There are virtuous ways to behave, and there are sinful ways to behave.  Virtue and vice do not change from one decade to the next.  Courage, prudence, justice, fortitude, temperance, faith, hope, and charity cannot be expunged with “trigger warnings” or “political correctness.”  No matter how often we fail to live honorable lives, the struggle to be moral, honest, and virtuous provides its own eternal rewards.  

These truths echo something President Calvin Coolidge said in a 1926 speech celebrating the one-hundred-fiftieth anniversary of the Declaration of Independence: “If all men are created equal, that is final.  If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final.  If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final.  No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions.”  

In other words, America’s Founding principles require no “trigger warnings.”  They are just as true today as they were two-hundred-fifty years ago.  As Coolidge said so eloquently, “If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people.  Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress.  They are reactionary.  Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers.”

Young minds should not be afraid of history.  They should approach the past with courage and be grateful for their inheritance.  Living virtuously requires the strength to face difficult truths.


Podcast thread for August 16

 


thank goodness it's almost Monday

Dissecting Communism


I have often stated that Marxism is like herpes.  Once a person thinks it’s gone for good, it flares up again.

Marxism has openly surfaced recently, although I have repeatedly argued it has been present for over a decade under the surface.  The communists now call themselves Democratic Socialists of America, but with the old hammer and sickle being visible.  I strongly suspect that the adherents have not read one word of Marx, Trotsky, or Lenin, they just know that communism is destructive and thus useful in their hatred of their country.

But, let us examine Marxism from a historical perspective.

The core proposition of Marxism is that the imposition of Marxism on society improves the lives of human beings.  Now let us look at the record.

Communist dominion was established in Russia, China, Mongolia, North Korea, Vietnam, Hungary, Laos, Cambodia, Cuba, Estonia, Poland, Ukraine, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Albania, Germany, Lithuania, Romania, Czechoslovakia, Poland, Latvia, Armenia, Uzbekistan, Tadzhikistan, Tibet, Kazakhstan, Grenada, Turkmenistan, Ethiopia, and Kyrgyzstan.  That’s twenty-eight countries, twenty-eight case studies, twenty-eight experiments.

Each location had its own customs, history, languages, geography — none of which is supposed to matter, anyway, according to the doctrine.

In all 28 of its manifestations and implementations, the results have been dismal.  For example:

In every single instance, the standard of living — in every level of society — plummeted.  Communism did not improve the lives of the people.

In every single instance, while proclaiming itself to be truly egalitarian, a privileged aristocracy — what in Yugoslavia Djilas called the New Class and in Russia was called the Nomenklatura — came into being, composed entirely of members of the Communist Party.  While many Ukrainians and Chinese and Cambodians and Ethiopians and North Koreans starved to death with their skin barely covering their skeletons, the new class feasted on fish, fruit, meats and all sorts of imported delicacies.  So much for equality.

In every single instance, Marxists wrecked the economy, and the production of consumer goods plummeted in both quantity and quality.  Long lines of people, stretching for several street blocks, waited for their turn to purchase a shirt, or a pair of shoes, or rolls of toilet paper, or a can of powdered milk.  This was a daily occurrence.

The communist aristocracy, mind you, never waited in lines, but obtained as many items as they wanted from stores that catered exclusively to the Marxist aristocracy.  In the particular case of Cuba, the scarcity of consumer goods has always been blamed on the American embargo, but this is simply an excuse given by the government and its foreign sycophants.  The communists were directly responsible (as they were directly responsible in every single instance).  In the case of Cuba, it is conveniently forgotten by their apologists that although one country has an embargo with Cuba, every other country in the world does not.

In every single instance, the communists wrecked agriculture to the point that a rationing system had to be introduced (for the people, not for the communist aristocracy).  In Russia, China, North Korea, and Cambodia, the famines became so intense that some of the people resorted to cannibalism.  Neither the cannibals nor his food thought that communism had improved his life.

In every single instance, the rule of law vanished as the Party members murdered thousands, and tens of thousands, sometimes simply on a rumor.  Property was stolen or destroyed.  As Che Guevara stated, “To kill a man, we don’t need proof of his guilt.”

In every single instance, with the exception of Yugoslavia, citizens were forbidden to travel — not only outside the country, but inside the country as well.  Previously, and significantly, only serfs had had this restriction.

In every single instance, a pervasive militarism became the order of the day, so that even children were prepared to be thrown into battle as cannon fodder in order to protect the communist aristocracy.  Slavenka DraculiΔ‡ pointed out that women in communist countries were in a humiliating situation because the government demanded the production of more and more tanks but never even gave a thought to sanitary napkins for women.

In every single instance, a cult of personality sprang up (Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Che, Tito, Castro, Hoxha, Kim, CeauΘ™escu, etc.), so that the psychotic dictator was deified to absurd lengths.

In every single instance, a vicious, repressive secret police force was created to suppress and control  the people.

In every single instance, the people were spied upon constantly by the communist government.

In every single instance, history and historical facts were deliberately falsified, often to an absurd degree.

In every single instance, film, art, and literature were grotesquely warped as fanatical mediocrities dictated both style and content, the non-adherence of which resulted in executions.

In every single instance, science was mutilated as mediocrities imposed their quackery and put forth a “Marxist biology,” a “Marxist psychology,” a “Marxist astronomy,” a “Marxist medicine,” a “Marxist chemistry,” etc., based on the sacred writings of Lenin, Marx, Stalin, Lysenko, etc.  Similar happened in Nazi Germany with “German medicine,” “German physics,” “German psychology,” etc.

In every single instance, workers were ordered to “volunteer” to work extra hours, usually at no pay, or face execution while being told that workers had never had it so good.

In every single instance, theft and corruption were endemic as the people learned that since the government owned everything, the only way to survive was to steal from the government.  Prostitution skyrocketed for the same reason.  This increase in prostitution and theft is particularly significant because Marxist orthodoxy decreed that the only reason that theft and prostitution existed in capitalist countries was the inequality between social classes.

In several countries, specifically Russia, Latvia, Estonia, Tibet, Lithuania, and Cambodia, a horrific genocide took place at the behest of the Communist Party.  The victims of this genocide did not think of themselves as better off under communism.

In several countries, specifically East Germany, Poland, Hungary, Tibet, Cuba, and Czechoslovakia, popular uprisings against the repressive communist regime took place, which were put down through military means by the new aristocracy.

In East Germany and Romania, the governments revived the policy of slavery in that it literally sold individuals to the West.

Now let us look at how Marxists have approached basic human rights.

Freedom of speech — abolished.  Freedom of the press — abolished.  Freedom of religion — abolished.  Freedom to own a home — abolished.  Freedom to own property — abolished. Freedom to travel — abolished.  Freedom of assembly — abolished. Freedom to criticize the government — abolished.  Freedom to read books and view films of one’s choosing — abolished.  Freedom to grow food for oneself — abolished.  Freedom to have privacy — abolished.  Freedom to own a weapon — abolished.  Freedom to have free elections — abolished.  Freedom to educate one’s children without indoctrination — abolished.

Freedom to maintain one’s family — abolished.  Freedom of workers to unionize — abolished.

In reviewing all of the above, we see then, that historically, far from improving the lives of the people, Marxism actually has had a catastrophic effect on the lives of human beings.  Further proof is the indisputable fact that in every Marxist country, the ruling class restricted emigration of the population.  The Berlin Wall was, in fact, erected to prevent this mass exodus of the people, which was referred to as the “people voting with their feet.”  Those who tried to escape but failed usually paid with their lives.

One of the modern mantras regarding the ideology is that Marxism has not been correctly implemented and, if carried out correctly, would result in utopia.  However, Trotsky said Stalin was doing it wrong.  Stalin said Tito was doing it wrong.  Khrushchev said Stalin was doing it wrong.  Mao said Khrushchev was doing it wrong.  Hoxha said they were all doing it wrong.  Brezhnev said Khrushchev was doing it wrong.  Pol Pot said they were all doing it wrong.

Each time, the same results.

Because I lived in a communist regime and because of my study of history, I have delved into both the history and the writings of the famous communists, like Lenin, Castro, Che, Trotsky, and Mao.  For decades, their writings were proclaimed to be works of genius.  But on reading them, I concluded they were mediocrities, adored by the lesser communists simply because of their shared hatred for their societies and their peoples.

And because I lived in a communist regime and because of my study of history, I have been able to distill Marxism into its essence: Steal Everything and Kill Everyone.  Or, to put it another way, communists are like the Mafia, but with politics.

If you meet anyone who parrots that communism hasn’t been properly implemented, you might want to throw some of the above facts at her face.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Nevada Man Pleads Guilty to Trafficking 140 Firearms to Mexican Cartels

A Nevada man pleaded guilty earlier this week to purchasing 140 firearms for drug trafficking organizations in Mexico, laundering proceeds from the firearms sales, and employing illegal aliens at a mining company in Nevada. 

According to court documents, from April 1, 2020, to September 17, 2025, Luis Alberto Osorio conspired with his co-defendants to purchase firearms, magazines, and ammunition on behalf of and at the request of others affiliated with drug trafficking organizations operating in Mexico, and to sell these items in Mexico for profit. 

Osorio and others purchased ammunition and 140 firearms, including multiples of large-caliber and long-range firearms such as the Ohio Ordnance Works M2-SLR .50 BMG, the Barrett M82A1 and M107A1 .50 BMG anti-materiel rifles, the FN Herstal M249S 5.56x45mm and the FH Herstal SCAR 17S 7.62x51mm rifles. 

“Firearms trafficking networks feed the violent cartels that terrorize border communities and pump illicit drugs into our neighborhoods,” said First Assistant United States Attorney Sigal Chattah for the District of Nevada. “By cutting off this supply chain and holding this defendant accountable, we are directly disrupting the operational capabilities of these dangerous criminal organizations.”

Additionally, Osorio admitted that he harbored persons unlawfully residing in the United States. 

“Trafficking military-style firearms and ammunition to drug trafficking organizations in Mexico fuels violence, strengthens criminal networks and threatens communities on both sides of the border,” said Jonathan Sherwin, Deputy Special Agent in Charge for HSI Las Vegas. “This guilty plea is the result of relentless work by HSI and the Homeland Security Task Force and our federal, state and local partners to disrupt the flow of weapons, money and criminal support that allows these organizations to operate.”

Osorio pleaded guilty to one count of straw purchasing of firearms; one count of trafficking in firearms; one count of harboring certain aliens; and one count of conspiracy to money launder.

“This case serves as an example of the effectiveness of the Homeland Security Task Force’s (HSTF) coordinated efforts in the region,” said Special Agent in Charge John Wester, San Francisco Field Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). “Through our participation in HSTF, ATF is working to disrupt major gun and drug trafficking organizations alongside DEA, FBI, HSI, and local partners. We are removing a significant cache of firearms, dangerous narcotics, and illicit proceeds from our neighborhoods. We are dedicated to our commitment of ensuring public safety. ATF and our partners will continue to honor our pledge by targeting violent offenders, trafficking organizations, and the criminal infrastructure that is the foundation for violence in the region.”

The total statutory maximum penalty is 70 years in prison. 

“In the world of organized crime and drug trafficking, guns and drugs go hand-in-hand,” said David S. Olesky, Special Agent in Charge of the Drug Enforcement Administration Los Angeles Field Division, which covers Nevada. “As a member of the Homeland Security Task Force, DEA and our partners will bring to bear all resources and draw on the full scope of our agencies’ expertise to hold accountable those individuals and organizations which pose a public health and safety threat to our communities through the trafficking of drugs and firearms.”

Sentencing is scheduled for February 11, 2027. Any sentence would be determined at the discretion of the court after consideration of any applicable statutory factors and the federal Sentencing Guidelines, which take into account a number of variables.

This case was investigated by the Homeland Security Task Force consisting of special agents with the FBI, HSI, DEA, ATF, IRS-CI, the Las Vegas Metro Police Department, the United States Marshals Service, and the Nevada Gaming Commission. 

The case is being prosecuted by the District of Nevada.

This case is part of the Homeland Security Task Force (HSTF) initiative established by Executive Order 14159, Protecting the American People Against Invasion. The HSTF is a whole-of-government partnership dedicated to eliminating criminal cartels, foreign gangs, transnational criminal organizations, and human smuggling and trafficking rings operating in the United States and abroad. 

Through historic interagency collaboration, the HSTF directs the full might of U.S. law enforcement towards identifying, investigating, and prosecuting the full spectrum of crimes committed by these organizations, which have long fueled violence and instability within our borders. In performing this work, the HSTF places special emphasis on investigating and prosecuting those engaged in child trafficking or other crimes involving children. The HSTF further utilizes all available tools to prosecute and remove the most violent criminal aliens from the United States. The Las Vegas HSTF comprises agents and officers from federal, state, and local law enforcement, with the prosecution being led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada.


Four 'extraordinary' Renaissance paintings stolen from Italian museum

 

Four Renaissance paintings of "extraordinary value" have been stolen from a museum in Sicily, Italy's culture minister has said.

Alessandro Giuli confirmed that three panels of the Polyptych of San Gregorio and a double-sided panel of the Madonna with Child and Christ in PietΓ , all attributed to Antonello da Messina, were taken from the Regional Interdisciplinary Museum of Messina on Saturday night.

Police are now probing how the thieves were able to enter the museum without triggering its alarms and who may have been responsible. 

 

The incident is the latest in a string of museum heists across Europe that have led to a growing number of priceless works disappearing from public view.

Investigators are working on the initial suspicion that the paintings were stolen to order by black market art thieves, according to Italian news agency Ansa.

It reported that the Madonna and Christ in PietΓ  was removed directly from inside a secure display case, while all the paintings taken were on wooden panels, preventing them from easily being rolled up. 

 

 

The museum's director Marisa Mercurio said the theft was thought to have occurred around 21:50 local time (19:50 GMT) on Saturday.

"We are shocked by what happened," she told Ansa, describing it as "a great loss for the museum, for the city, the community and the art world".

Antonello da Messina was a 15th Century painter born and raised on Sicily, who would go on to become one of the early Renaissance period's master painters.

His San Gregorio Polyptych, painted in 1473, depicts the Virgin Mary holding an infant Jesus Christ, flanked by St Gregory and St Benedict as well as several angels. 

 

 

The artwork, of which five panels survive, was commissioned for the monastery of Santa Maria. 

 

 

Meanwhile, his double-panel showing an infant Christ blessing a follower while being held by the Virgin Mary on one side and an adult Christ in death on the other was painted around the same time, though exactly when is unclear.

Its small size suggests it was originally used for private worship.

Federico Basile, the mayor of Messina, said he was "deeply outraged" by the "heinous criminal act". 

 

 

"A heritage belonging to all the people of Messina has been violated," he said. "Messina will not let its history be stolen."

The theft comes just days after Italy's specialist art crime unit announced it had recovered three artworks stolen from a museum near Parma earlier this year.

The paintings by CΓ©zanne, Renoir and Matisse had a combined worth of €9m (£7.8m) and were taken by a gang in a matter of minutes, with the museum's alarm system preventing them from taking more.

The security of priceless artworks and artefacts in European museums was thrown into question late last year when a gang of thieves broke into the Louvre in Paris in broad daylight, making off with €88m worth of historic jewellery. 

 

 A double-sided panel of the Madonna with Child and Christ in PietΓ  was also stolen 

 

 

 https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cqjxx2gzd9qo

Marco Rubio Describes His 'Perfect Weekend' — and It's the Democrats' Worst Nightmare


RedState 

We have a pretty good idea where Secretary of State Marco Rubio stands on policy, but what is he really like behind the scenes?

Rubio and his wife recently sat down for an interview on Katie Miller's podcast (Katie is the wife of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller). The show put aside politics for a bit and veered into the personal.

We know he thinks the couch memes are funny and doesn't like to eat keto. He likes to roast his administration colleagues over things like their cats being jerks (Pete Hegseth) and coolers full of sauerkraut (RFK, Jr.).

And, now we know how his perfect weekend would unfold. It's something that millions of red-blooded American men (and women!) will instantly recognize – and wholeheartedly endorse.

Here's another hint: Rubio's probably very happy with what's starting to pop up on TV this weekend.

The perfect weekend, revealed the secretary, starts with college football.

"The day would actually start much earlier. The greatest show on television today in America is 'College GameDay.' Great show. Starts around 10 or 11, and that leads you to noon, and then the noon game, and then there’s a 3:30 game," he said.

It's more of the same on Sunday.

"You could start at 10:00 AM on Saturday, you know, run the whole college football day, sleep for a few hours, then you wake up and then you’re into NFL Gameday. Then you’ve got the 1:00 game, the 4:00 game, the NBC game that night.

"That is an incredible weekend, in my opinion, in my view."

Marco Rubio may have just found the one thing that can unite Americans across the country.

The secretary of state describes his ideal weekend and outlines exactly how it would go, with his entire Saturday devoted to college football and then waking up on Sunday for a full lineup of NFL games.

"That is an incredible weekend, in my opinion, in my view," he said.

This isn't just some manufactured hype to make a politician look more relatable to everyday Americans. Marco Rubio's football fandom is the real deal, as he proved when he visited the practice facilities of the Washington Redskins (sigh, Commanders) last week to observe his team, the Miami Dolphins, participate in a preseason scrimmage.

Marco Rubio's authenticity is something that can't be manufactured by some DC spin doctor or focus-tested into existence. The man really does love his football, as he really enjoys poking fun at his colleagues and seems perfectly content being himself.

That kind of authenticity matters in the world of politics, especially at a time when Democrats are struggling badly with white male voters and seem increasingly disconnected from the culture and interests of a huge swath of American men. 

Meanwhile, Rubio is over here planning the perfect weekend around 15 hours of college football and a full Sunday of NFL games. Mrs. Rubio was unavailable for comment on that one. 

But, hey, it's no wonder people like the guy.


Bill Maher's Take on Trump's Secret Turkey Flight Will Not Please the Lib Press Corps

If Bill Maher can understand the dynamics behind why President Trump had to secretly switch plans to avoid a credible assassination threat in Turkey, then you know the media is a bunch of babies. We already know that they are, but this manufactured drama over that July flight remains a point of contention among this cadre of entitled clowns. 

Backstory: Following the NATO meeting, Trump faced a credible Iranian assassination plot. He hid in a catering truck and left the country on a secret jet. The press corps was unaware and is now incensed to have been used as a decoy. Too bad. You’re expendable; the president is not. End of lecture. Also, Maher wondered if other presidents, Democrats and Republicans, would’ve done this — yes, they would:

MAHER: “President Trump foiled the assassins again this week. He jumped on the plane that wasn’t the plane, but he left everybody else on the other plane. If the Iranians were going to shoot down that plane, goodbye, Marco Rubio and a lot of other people. No, I’m not judging here. I’m sure that’s what the Secret Service told him to do."

“My question is, because I’ve heard it is the president’s discretion whether he could do that or not. Do you think any other president would have done it differently? Like, say, Jimmy Carter. He was like Mr. Christian Guy. Would he have left his friends on that other plane? What about Obama? What about Reagan?”

ANDERSON: “Donald Trump has had a number of credible threats on his life, traced back to the Iranian government. He got his ear shot. So I kind of think if you’re Donald Trump, you do what the Secret Service tells you.”

MAHER: “Yeah, I would."

CUOMO: "I think they all would.”

MAHER: “You think they all would?”

CUOMO: “Yeah, I think they would do what the Secret Service said to do. Yes, it’s his decision, but you rarely go against what the Secret Service is advising.”

The media is mad they weren’t told. Get over it—your lives will never be above that of the president of the United States. The White House’s credibility is not on the line; can we please move on? No one cares except the press corps. 

His commentary veered into some immigration talk, where he said that the melting-pot ethos essentially must die, assimilate, and accept Western civilization. Also, no sharia law — ever: 

MAHER: “Democracy, not theocracy.”

“Free speech, even about religion.”

“Equal rights for women.”

“LGBT. That’s America!”

“And none of it…none of this is available in sharia law…”

“Which a third of British Muslims want to see be THE law in England.”

“And you can’t have both. You can’t have England and sharia law.”

“The left’s reaction to islamification is, the worst thing that could come from that is it will get right wingers elected.”

“Maybe…or maybe the worst thing that could come from it is in 20 years the U.K. is turning away gay cruise ships.”

“Now, you can—and I’m sure some of you are—screaming ‘Islamophobia,’ but that’s just a bullsh*t word to cow people into not talking about this!”

“This has nothing to do with ‘non-Whites’ becoming the majority. I don’t give a shit about that. I don’t give a shit about colors.”

“I care about liberal values being replaced by ILLIBERAL ones.”

Also, Maher’s advice to the migrants who invaded Spain’s African territories will also trigger liberals:

MAHER: “Last month, more than 70,000 Moroccan migrants breached the border and poured into a part of Spain called Ceuta.”

“I feel for them, but I also understand why a lot of Europe freaked out about it.”

“I sympathize with refugees. But when I see them interviewed, it’s always: there’s nothing for me here, the economy sucks, I don’t see a future.”

“I sympathize. But what you need is not asylum. What you need is LinkedIn!”

“Build something in the country you live in.”

“You got a bad economy? You know that cruise ship you couldn’t dock? Do you have any idea how much money 2,000 drunk, gay men would have spent in your beach town?!”

I can see how hardcore progressives now call Bill a Nazi. He couldn’t care less. He’s a liberal who isn’t nuts. I’ll take it. 


Dept. of War Embarrasses WaPo Reporter Who Missed Key Detail About Media's USS Lincoln Hysteria


RedState 

As we’ve been reporting, the media have gone into overdrive with their hysterical coverage of the supposedly miserable conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier.

It's been deployed with few port stops for over 260 days, much of it in dangerous Middle Eastern waters as the U.S.-Iran conflict continues.

Granted, that’s a long time, but many outlets have been frothing about sailors jumping off ships, massive food shortages, and deadly fights on the decks. While the Pentagon has acknowledged that the deployment has been arduous and there have been challenges, they forcefully pushed back on the narrative, with Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell calling the coverage “shameful” on Friday:

I deployed for 485 days in Afghanistan with an 80 percent-plus casualty rate. We came under fire nearly every day. Combat deployments bring real hardship. That is simply the truth.

We endured it. We held together. We finished the mission.

The media treatment of the USS Abraham Lincoln is something different. Legitimate challenges of a long combat deployment are being twisted into a false narrative, while the genuine difficulties faced by military families are being used for headlines.

That is shameful.

The Sailors aboard the Lincoln are doing what American warriors have always done: remaining resilient, focused on the mission, and proud of their service on this historic deployment.

We stand with them.

A Washington Post reporter named Dan Lamothe didn’t like that he and his brethren had been called out, so he thought he’d try to be cute and respond to Parnell with a challenge:

Ooh, good one, Dan, you got him. Checkmate.

Except wait, no, you didn’t, because apparently you weren’t paying attention or you memory-holed that this in-depth, behind-the-scenes video aboard the USS Lincoln aired in July. And it wasn’t a Fox News story; in fact, it was televised by… CNN.

I didn’t see a single clip of sailors jumping overboard:

Your move, Dan.

If I were near Lamothe, I’d be happy to provide a towel so he could wipe the egg off his face.

He tried a comeback, but frankly, it was pretty lame:

It's appreciated. It's also more rare than it used to be.

One example: I was at the border early in this administration. Story seemed appreciated and got no pushback.

Sought to go back again this spring for a follow-on story. Efforts were worked ... and then denied at the Pentagon.

Hey Dan — a simple “I’m sorry” would have sufficed.