Monday, August 10, 2026

All of the Worst People Are Democrats



Most people add something to the lives of the people around them and to human existence in general, and others simply exist while bringing nothing to the table. Then there are the few, the radicals, whose existence not only adds nothing, it actually takes things away from the lives of others. It’s one thing to say the world became a better place when some despot or degenerate passes away; it’s another thing completely to admit that the world would be better off without the worst among our species, but that’s how it is. And the reality of that situation is that literally all of the worst people in this country are Democrats.

It's almost impossible to be completely one thing, as human beings are complex creatures. But a lot of these people are things – mostly post-digested food – that defy logic. You almost have to try to be as worthless as these leftists are.

After degenerate narcissist Abdul El-Sayed barely won the Democrat primary for Senate in Michigan, wealthy liberals celebrated like they hadn’t just signed their own death warrant. In letters to the editor (yes, people still write them), many lamented that the Democrat establishment has yet to completely embrace the terrorist sympathizing phony doctor.

“I continue to be astonished by the inability of many voters to think strategically and see the big picture. Preventing the Trump regime from having two more years to unobstructedly tamper with the federal government was job one. Trump and his allies are entrenching themselves, using obscure, forgotten laws and extra-legal means as required. The more time that they have to dig, the less chance there is that they can be pried from power,” wrote one whiny leftist.

I love the idea of “obscure” laws. They’re on the books. If you don’t want them on the books anymore, vote to remove them from the books. But there is nothing “obscure” about them.

Another nutjob leftist demanded every elected Democrat support El-Sayed. “Where is the endorsement now for Dr. Abdul El-Sayed from Gov. Gretchen Whitmer? Or from former senators Debbie Stabenow and departing U.S. Sen. Gary Peters? Or Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer?” this boob asks. “It's time for the most important leaders of the Democratic Party to get vocal, and get active. Leadership, action, money and support are needed from the very top, starting now, to win this Senate election and show that the Democratic Party is fighting to improve the lives of millions of us who struggle in an economy that is leaving behind 90% or more of Michiganders, while the wealthiest households and corporations get richer and richer.”

This man (I assume, as the name is “Larry,” but you can never tell with Democrats) cares very deeply about the poor—like a normal person would care about a pet. He lives in Bloomfield Township, which is a very nice northern suburb of Detroit and has a median income of $162,788. Does your city have a median income anywhere near $162,788? Probably not, as that’s about twice the national median income.

People like “Larry” are the worst – they scream “somebody needs to do something!” without ever doing anything meaningful themselves. I’d bet he’s retired and has a high net worth and low taxable income, because that’s how these people always are. 

Then there is the rich kid, garbage human named Tracy Rosenthal. She’s a “rent strike activist,” which means she’s a freeloading bucket of trash people would pay good money to watch get pummeled by Ronda Rousey on a pay-per-view so expensive only people like her rich parents could afford.

People like this add zero value to existence and are essentially just oxygen thieves. The world would not miss their exit.

Yet, people like this are the backbone of the coalition Democrats are building. They’ve gone from blue-collar workers to popped-collar poverty cosplayers who now view the people who used to be their base as their pets.

There is not a single communist on the planet who adds value to our species; human existence would be better off without them. All of them are now Democrats, and soon Democrats will be all of them. They are coming for you and your way of life, whether you realize it or not. Vote, live, and act accordingly.


Podcast thread for August 10

 


Ugh, what a day.

Prepare for the DSA Revolution


Here’s a taste:

Esther Cheo [Chinese woman during Mao’s revolution]: ‘We were taken in a lorry to the place of execution, near the famous tourist spot, the Temple of Heaven. The victims were kneeling down beside cheap coffins, their hands tied behind their backs with wire. About six security police moved nonchalantly along, shooting them in the back of the head. As they fell, some of their heads split open, some just fell with a neat little hole, while others had their brains splattered all over the dusty ground and onto the clothes of the next victims.’ As she turned away in revulsion, a cadre grabbed her by the shoulders. ‘Take a good look!’ he shouted. ‘This is what the revolution is all about!’

The above is a sample of what socialism (communism) did in the 20th century wherever it gained power (and examples could be multiplied endlessly). The ideologically naΓ―ve, if they even know the above happened, always think it will be “different” the next time. “We’ll correct the mistakes, we’ll get it right, the error is not in Marxism, it’s only in improper application.” Again, that’s naivety to the nth degree, but it’s the only hope they’ve got.

Karl Marx taught that at some point in the future there would be a “Golden Age” of freedom and equality for everyone, called “communism.” He has countless disciples who have believed it, and hundreds of millions of innocent people have died because of it. And most of them never even knew why they were dying, or in whose name, or what the “revolution is all about.” Except it was “all about” massive death.

But, nooooo, that won’t happen in America.

I beg to differ. Marxists won’t get it right in America, either, because Marxism is simply wrong, contrary to history and human nature. So, in frustration and hate, they’ll do the same things they’ve done everywhere they’ve gained power.

What do these people — the DSA — really want? They want power, they want money, they want you dead, or at least cowed to where you will keep your head down and your mouth shut. And that’s all they want.

Even if Zohran Mamdani et al, really believe this Marxist nonsense, all they truly want is the control that comes with it. Now, the ignorant, the “true believers,” among the masses might actually believe in a glorious earthly Marxist utopia. They’ve rejected the hope of an afterlife that religion promises, so they must yearn for something. But the leadership knows better and couldn't care less about some wonderful future; they want power now. And they know a Marxist utopia is a pipe dream that will never happen anyway.

However many deaths it requires to remain in power is wholly irrelevant. That’s what “the revolution is all about.” Power for them, not freedom and equality for the masses.

Eventually, what has happened in Marxist states is that the leadership ends up killing their own ideologues, too, the “true believers” who keep shouting “utopia!” and reminding the world that the promises haven't been fulfilled yet. That’s dangerous talk and needs to be eradicated. The promises never will be fulfilled and the leaders know it. So, more deaths. The revolution always eats its own children.

And, again, the Stalins and Maos (and Democrats) don't care how many die as long as they keep their grip on power.

Xi Jinping has what he wants — power. And that's all he wants. He has zero concern for his people (I lived there for 10 years and saw it). Nor do the current Democrat Party socialists care about the American people, either. They always shout "more money!" though the endless trillions they've already been given have not produced the Great Society they promised it would. But money means power, and they know it. And they are able to convince the ignorant, unwashed masses that “all we must do is take more money from billionaires and all will be well. But the Republicans won’t let us.” It sells, obviously, because they keep preaching it.

And it requires massive lies. Zohran Mamdani claims to be a “democratic socialist,” and specifically rejects the label of “communist.” Yet, he said that he would be in favor of “the abolition of private property,” and, to quote Karl Marx, “The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property.” But Mamdani knows Americans, in general, aren’t ready for “communism,” so he must veil his beliefs in some nebulous “democratic socialist” faΓ§ade. But a thing that quacks is still a duck.

But I highly suspect that Mamdani is a Mamdani-ist, which means he's in it for himself and cares little or nothing about either his religion or his ideology. Like every leftist politician, he only craves power. 

The sad thing is there are so many ignorant, naive Democrats who believe in this murderous rot. And I say ignorant because they don't know anything about history. But there are also a lot of Democrat voters who simply don't care as long as they get their welfare check. That's all they're interested in, and that, of course, means dependence on the Democrat Party.

Democrat leaders want totalitarian power. They want people to believe they really care about them, and the true believers think they do. But if the Democrat Party truly cared about people, they’d do something about the horrible conditions in the inner cities that they run — conditions that have existed for decades, and are only getting worse. Why? Because Democrats have what they want and the people be damned.

One of history's greatest lessons is the gullible masses have always been easy to fool, to lead around by the nose, especially if politicians give them money. Just about everybody has their price. And their vote can be bought.

Adolf Hitler said, “We are socialists!” As is the Democrat Party now.

So, get ready for what the revolution is really all about.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Rolling Stone Fawns Over Hasan Piker, Who Said America 'Deserved' 9/11

[Editor’s note: This story contains explicit language.]

Rolling Stone Magazine is fawning over socialist Hasan Piker, who said that “America deserved 9/11.” 

The magazine ran a cover piece on Piker, who has campaigned with Michigan U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed and Democrat Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14). 

When asked about his remarks about America and 9/11, Piker told Rolling Stone: 

“I stream for eight hours a day, seven days a week,” Piker said. “I’m gonna say some dumb s**t."

Over the weekend, El-Sayed told Meet the Press that Piker’s comment about 9/11 was some “dumb thing that someone said out of context.” 

Piker makes money by streaming for hours a day and saying inflammatory things to his millions of followers. Piker has called on his followers to kill capitalists, among other things. 

Democrat politicians hope to gain the support of Piker's followers after many young men have stopped supporting Democrat candidates.


Resurfaced: Talarico Brags About Hiding Illegal Aliens, Calls Texas Christians ‘Christo-Fascists’

Video of a 2023 interview acquired by Fox News shows Democrat Senate candidate James Talarico bragging about how his church sheltered illegal aliens from deportation, fought for “LGBTQ rights in the ‘90s,” and allowed an atheist to join the congregation in the 2000s.

Talarico summarized their hyper-progressive actions by claiming that “Christianity is just another word for causing trouble” in reference to his church's progressive actions.

Talarico also expressed his belief that conservative Christians were “Christo-facists” for advancing policies like bans on abortion and sex change surgeries for minors, school choice voucher programs, and displaying the Ten Commandments.

"All these ideologies stem from this Christo-fascism movement, which, essentially, like I said, is just using faith to exercise raw political, social and economic power," Talarico told the interviewer. "I think it's dangerous to all of us, but particularly to those who are marginalized and oppressed in our state."

The Talarico campaign has attempted to backpedal from these shocking statements, claiming that Talarico is a moderate Christian who believes in border security and supports law enforcement. A spokesman for the Talarico campaign called criticism from Republicans over the candidate's progressive beliefs “flat out lies.”

"James is a Christian seminarian who’s dedicated his life to the teachings of Jesus Christ — fighting religious and political corruption when he sees it because there’s nothing Christ-like about powerful people twisting the teachings of Jesus to justify hate, violence, and greed,” the spokesman told Fox News. “While billionaire-bought politicians like Ken Paxton attack James for his faith — he will continue encouraging Texans across the political spectrum to come together by loving their neighbors as themselves."

Talarico’s past statements on Christianity have caused controversy throughout the length of the campaign, such as when he stated that the Annunciation of Our Lord was justification for abortion, that God is non-binary, and that prohibiting sex changes for minors was sinful.

Talarico’s progressive past will take on key Trump-ally Ken Paxton for control of the Texas Senate seat in November’s midterm elections.


'We are low-keying it': U.S. to let Iran's economic stress do the work, Trump hints

 Tehran says it’s nearing a deal on the Strait of Hormuz while laying out a long list of demands for Washington before shipping can resume

President Donald Trump signalled he’s prepared to let economic pressure on Iran build rather than launch fresh military strikes, saying the U.S. was only “semi-negotiating” with Tehran on the Strait of Hormuz.

“We are just watching Iran with its huge inflation and the fact they have no money,” Trump told Axios in an interview on Sunday, saying that a U.S. naval blockade of the country was deepening its financial woes. “We are low-keying it.”

The president’s comments mark a shift from his repeated threats to escalate the bombing campaign against Iran and come amid lingering talks between the Islamic Republic and Oman to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to maritime shipping. Tehran has said it’s nearing a deal on the waterway while laying out a long list of demands for Washington before shipping can resume, including the lifting of sanctions and an end to attacks on Iran-backed groups across the Middle East. Tehran also elevated a hard-line former commander to its top security post over the weekend.

Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei’s military adviser Mohsen Rezaee, a former commander-in-chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, was named the new leader of the Supreme National Security Council, the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency reported late Sunday. He replaces Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, a fellow hard-liner who accepted a new position as political adviser to the supreme leader.

Rezaee has been an advocate for full Iranian control over Hormuz. The council he’ll be heading is where Iran’s leaders coordinate decisions on the war and negotiations to end it.

Over the weekend, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said a pact with Oman to establish a shipping route through the strait was “very close,” without providing details on the substance. He ruled out direct talks with the U.S. for now, citing what he described as repeated violations of a short-lived interim peace agreement signed in June, and adding that the two sides are exchanging messages through intermediaries.

he Strait of Hormuz, through which one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas transited before the war, has become a key factor in the war the U.S. and Israel started on Feb. 28. Trump has demanded the resumption of open navigation for months.

Oil was little changed on Monday, with global benchmark Brent crude trading at US$83.61 after a rally of more than five per cent over the previous three sessions.

Tehran on Saturday published a list of demands for Washington as conditions for fully reopening Hormuz, indicating any immediate respite for energy supplies may be limited. It wants the U.S. to lift its naval blockade on Iranian ports, withdraw forces from around Iran, remove sanctions, release frozen assets and pay compensation for war damage.

It also demanded a permanent end to attacks on groups it backs in Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen and Gaza.

Some of those demands will be difficult for the U.S. to meet alone. In Gaza, a proposal by U.S.-backed mediators to disarm Iran-backed Hamas and push the Israeli army out of the Palestinian enclave was rejected by Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday.

Netanyahu’s defiance challenges his complex relationship with Trump not just because the president championed the plan but because Israeli withdrawal from Gaza is an Iranian demand before Hormuz can be reopened.

Axios quoted a White House official as saying Trump isn’t bothered by the rejection because he understands Netanyahu’s political needs ahead of an October election, in which the right is pressuring him not to yield on his original vow for complete victory over Hamas.

The official added that Israel is, meanwhile, restraining its attacks

In Yemen, Iran-backed Houthi rebels have been escalating fighting with forces supported by neighbouring Saudi Arabia, another key American ally. The Houthis claimed they struck Saudi Aramco’s Jazan refinery on Sunday, while Saudi authorities reported a fire that was quickly extinguished, with no injuries.

The incident would mark at least the second blaze at the 400,000 barrel-a-day complex in a month. Satellite images in late July showed a tank fire following another claimed Houthi attack.

https://nationalpost.com/news/world/trump-iran-economic-pressure-low-keying-it

 



AOC Is Trending Again, but Not for What You'd Expect

Democratic socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez made headlines twice over the weekend after she refused to denounce the overtly radical communist streamer Hasan Piker and then rounded out her day by...freezing her eggs on social media.

As the relationship between Piker and the terror-tied Democrat Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed continues to flourish, Ocasio-Cortez says that she refuses to turn on communism’s biggest social media star.

“Many of the same consultants that are wringing their hands today were the same ones talking about how we need to go on Joe Rogan and we need to be not so willing to engage in cancel culture,” Ocasio-Cortez told ABC. “Democrats have a responsibility to build a winning coalition, and young people are engaging in mediums and conversations that we have a responsibility to attend to and be responsive to.”

Hasan has become a focal point of the El-Sayed campaign for his blatantly anti-American comments and beliefs. El-Sayed has refused to distance himself from Piker, and claims that Piker’s comments about America deserving 9/11 are “out of context.” 

Shortly after she launched a defense of Democrats allying themselves with Piker, Ocasio-Cortez announced that she was beginning the process of freezing her eggs while injecting medication in a social media vlog.

“This is a choice that I am making to feel more in control of my life,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “And if people want to make assumptions about my decision, let them make those assumptions. I feel empowered to make this choice.”

The “empowered” Ocasio-Cortez is 36 years old and has been engaged to her long-time fiance since 2022, after the couple had been dating for a number of years. The choice comes amid speculation that Ocasio-Cortez will launch a bid for the presidency in 2028.


Watch: AOC for President in 2028? Disastrous Far-Left Trainwreck.


RedState 

Earlier on Sunday, I related the tale of a conversation with a progressive friend, in which I described the 2024 Democratic presidential candidate, Kamala Harris, thusly: "...she is abrasive, she is inarticulate, and honestly, she's not very bright." She wasn't the first candidate that the Democrats have put forth that was not very bright (John Kerry, I'm looking at you) but that leaves the Dem's 2028 presidential ticket wide open. 

Into the breach may be stepping the one candidate who may be even more abrasive, less articulate, and, frankly, dumber, than Kamala Harris: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) better known as AOC. On Sunday, on ABC's This Week, she had a conversation with host Jonathan Karl wherein she admitted she's thinking about a run for the big chair.

KARL: So, I want to -- we're almost out of time, but get to your future. I'm sure you saw the poll in New Hampshire that had you as the leading candidate, leading choice for Democrats. First, are you going to run for president?

OCASIO-CORTEZ: I mean, I'm focused on winning the midterms. I'm running for Congress right now.

KARL: But, I mean, do you see this as something --

OCASIO-CORTEZ: You know --

KARL: I mean, I know you said you're open to it.

OCASIO-CORTEZ: Yes, I --

KARL: Is it a realistic possibility for you?

OCASIO-CORTEZ: I haven't -- well, I haven't ruled out the possibility. And I'm very humbled to the tremendous amount of support out there. I think that we have a responsibility to remain focused on the midterms and not on our individual aspirations or plans.

Here, watch:

Yeah, if the American people still retain an average complement of six or more active brain cells, the possibility will be ruled out for her. But then, nobody ever went broke betting on the fecklessness of the American electorate, who in the past has done some truly gob smacking things, like elect a president with a resume so thin you can read the nutritional information label of a chewing gum stick through it (I'm looking at you, Barack Obama). But the possibility of an AOC presidency should send chills down every American spine. Why? Well, here's why and I'm going to tell you.

First, the woman has all the economic expertise of a Ritz cracker. Oh, I know, she graduated from Boston University in 2011 with degrees in Economics and International Relations, but she should ask for her money back, because the economic portion in particular doesn't seem to have stuck. She's still subscribing to Marxist economics, after all, and Marx's labor theory of value was debunked almost within moments of Das Kapital being printed, most notably by Austrian School economists like Carl Menger, Alfred Marshall, Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan Nitzan. But the problem is this: Very few people are this down in the weeds with economic theory, and socialists/communists are awfully good at promising the voters a never-ending gravy train of free stuff. It's hard to run against Santa Claus.

Second, when Joe Biden was president, the other nations of the world, especially those who were not friendly to the United States, looked on the American government with, as Shakespeare might have put it, slight regard. But a President Ocasio-Cortez? Russia, China, North Korea and Iran would look on her with gales of laughter followed by derision. She's not a serious person, and she wouldn't be a serious president. It would be a dream come true for every dictator and despot hostile to the United States.

Third and finally, the country under an AOC presidency would be divided as never before. The far-left would feel emboldened to do anything they please, including chucking the Constitution into a trash can and setting it on fire. The Great Sorting would be kicked into overdrive. Energy prices, under President AOC's turbocharged Green New Deal, would skyrocket. The economy would crash.

Fortunately, it's pretty certain that an AOC candidacy is a long shot, and if she managed to win the nomination, she'd probably go down in flames. Imagine any Republican, be it JD Vance, Marco Rubio, Ron DeSantis, or parties as yet unknown, in a televised debate against this midwit.

The problem is that, for the past few years, American politics have been anything but predictable. In 2015, when Donald Trump came down the golden escalator and announced his first presidential bid, I thought it was a publicity stunt. It wasn't - and he has changed everything. And, in politics as in physics, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Jimmy Carter's failed presidency gave us the successes of Ronald Reagan. Could Trump's successes give us the failure of a Democratic Socialist - a commie president?

If I were a betting man, I'd bet against any chance of that. But I wouldn't bet very much.


♦️𝐖³π πƒπšπ’π₯𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 π“π‘π«πžπšπ


 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time.