Thursday, August 6, 2026

Government Propaganda Is a Trojan Horse


If the Trojan War were being fought today, the Greeks would not need to hide inside of a big, wooden horse and hope to be dragged inside Troy’s city gates.  They’d simply disseminate all kinds of lies on social media and wait for the Trojan people to fight each other.  Such is the power of corrosive ideas: They can destroy a civilization before its defenders understand that they are under attack.

Information warfare is the name of the game today.  It exists all around us.  Soundbites attack us from every phone, computer, tablet, and television screen.  Succinct messages ripple through social media platforms until people from opposite sides of the world repeat the same words without knowing why.  

The most powerful bits of information are the ones that sound unquestionably true.  “Believe all women.”  “Black lives matter.”  “Build back better.”  Their simplicity assists their deception.  We certainly shouldn’t distrust women, right?  Who wants to argue that black lives mean nothing?  Surely nobody wishes to build something worse than it was before.  People hear the soundbites, nod their heads, and repeat those words to their friends and neighbors.  Some place signs in their yards with those three-word messages, as if they were brilliant expositions of fundamental truths.

Successful information warfare propagates ideas without triggering in those who receive the message any need for reflection.  Like the Greeks’ wooden horse, the communication is hollow.  It is intended to be just attractive enough that listeners drag the soundbite into their heads but sufficiently harmless in appearance to avoid real scrutiny.  Great propaganda does not conquer by force.  It seduces.  It knocks on the door, smiles, and charms its way into unsuspecting minds.  Then it waits — patiently — until the day arrives when it can do the most damage.

Effective propaganda, however, is inherently fragile.  Should anyone take the time to reflect on those three-word messages above, their magic spells are broken.  Once someone asks, “Don’t some women lie?” people remember that accusations matter less than evidentiary proof.  Once a person is shouted down for saying, “All lives matter,” it becomes clear that “diversity” and “equity” have nothing to do with equality and justice.  When anyone stops to ask, “What are we building, and why are we building it?” the World Economic Forum’s plans for a “new world order” stand naked and exposed.  

In other words, thinking is the enemy of information warfare.  Those who engage in its dark arts see independent thinkers as missile shields that must be eliminated.  Reason and rational debate remain the most effective defenses against propaganda.  People who ask questions build forts for society with their minds.  The entrance to those forts are adorned with this sign: Come let us reason together.

Reasoned debate is not scary; on the contrary, it is the path upon which we walk toward enlightenment.  It is why people who demand compliance should never be trusted.  Anyone who says, “The science is settled,” or, “Trust the experts,” seeks to deprive the listener not only of his capacity to reason but also of his prospect for salvation.  When we forsake the mental gifts that God has given us, we hobble our potential for spiritual growth.  Nobody has ever been redeemed for “just following orders.”  A good life comes from good choices, and good choices come from faithful contemplation.  In this way, attacks on free speech are attacks on our very souls.

When propagandists attack our souls from all directions, it is difficult to know who is waging war against us and why.  But there are telltale signs.  When groups and governments attempt to “cancel” individuals for their personal beliefs, they are waging war against individual conscience.  

Sometimes acts of war are obvious, as when a British communist allegedly bludgeoned well-known conservative Ann Widdecombe to death with a hammer.  Other times, information warfare is more subtle, as when the British government banned Christian and Finnish politician Päivi Räsänen from flying through London’s Heathrow Airport because she boldly defends the Bible’s prohibition against sexual sin, something that both Finland and the United Kingdom have now officially criminalized as “hate speech.”  Along the same lines, the Polish government recently convicted a young, pregnant mother for the “crime” of speaking at a public rally against mass immigration.  Found guilty of “inciting hatred,” Oliwia Olejniczak has received a harsher punishment for expressing her opinion than many illegal immigrants have for committing rape.  

When governments abuse their criminal justice systems to persecute Christians and mothers concerned about their families’ safety, the signs are clear: Those governments are at war with their own people.  When governments “cancel” citizens for their beliefs, politicians and bureaucrats identify for us which independent thinkers they most fear.  As is written in the Gospel of Matthew (5:10), “Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.”  When people stand up for moral truths — while bearing the brunt of their governments’ hatred — pay attention.  Those people are building forts for society with their minds.  Seek the shelter of those forts; then expand those forts to protect others.  This is the way to defeat government propaganda.

Those who engage in information warfare have a propensity for projecting their crimes onto the innocent.  This is why leftwing groups and governments accuse Christians of “hate speech,” while saying the most hateful things about Christians.  It is also why governments and NGOs insist on categorizing citizens’ dissenting speech as “disinformation” or “misinformation,” when governments and NGOs manufacture false information on an industrial scale.  

There has never been a time in human history when self-appointed public censors turned out to be the “good guys.”  Communists, fascists, Nazis, and military dictators all believe in censoring public speech and rigging public debate.  The globalists, socialists, collectivists, and other Big Government parasites that have infiltrated and seized most national governments today likewise believe in censorship and the criminalization of dissent.  Information — whether true or false — does not belong to any one group of people.  Oligarchies are not filled with angels; they are filled with sinful human beings.

We saw how evil oligarchies can be during the COVID lockdowns.  Government bureaucrats and self-described “experts” told us explicitly, “Now is the time to do what you’re told.”  Western governments committed unforgivable crimes against their citizens in the name of “science.”  Australia rounded up people into “quarantine camps,” and we now know that pretend-President Joe Biden’s CDC was planning to do the same thing in the United States.  

For eighty years, American schoolchildren have been taught that President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese-Americans during WWII was an unconscionable violation of Americans’ constitutional rights that could never be permitted to happen again.  Yet it almost did happen again.  The U.S. government was preparing to imprison Americans who refused experimental pharmaceutical injections or expressed unapproved speech.  In January 2022, majorities of Democrats believed that “unvaccinated” Americans should be fined, locked in their homes, sent to quarantine camps, and imprisoned for questioning the effectiveness of the experimental injections.  A third of Democrats believed that the government should remove children from homes with “unvaccinated” parents.  

How did we get so close to completely destroying the Bill of Rights?  Health bureaucrats and government authorities engaged in an all-out information war against the American people.  They pushed lies into American homes just as the Greeks pushed a wooden horse into Troy.  And their attack on the American people almost worked.  Americans hated each other more than ever before and nearly tore each other to shreds.  COVID was weaponized into the kind of irrational fear that destroys civilizations.

In the end, it was not the “experts” or government ministers who prevented Western civilization’s collapse.  It was the people who saw through the propaganda and refused to submit to tyranny.  The next time governments send a Trojan Horse, just light it on fire.


Podcast thread for August 6

 



'sighs'. :((((

Win the War Already


I have a solution to President Trump’s Iran war problem. It’s pretty simple. Hear me out.

Win the war.

Let me use a sportsball analogy. As Las Vegas Raiders owner Al Davis famously commanded, “Just win, baby.

We’re doing the on-again/off-again thing again, and it’s getting old. Of course, we have largely achieved our core military objectives. Iran’s ability to generate combat power has been substantially degraded. Their air defenses have been shredded. Their nuclear program has been set back a decade or more. They cannot shut the Strait of Hormuz — they can only make threats and launch the occasional drone or missile. These are impressive results, achieved with relatively low American losses. And for those of you now screaming that we did in fact suffer casualties, stop acting like children. There are 50-square-yard chunks of Omaha Beach where we took multiples of the total U.S. casualties suffered in this entire campaign.

So, to claim we’ve “lost” the war raises that classic “Is he stupid or does he think we’re stupid?” question that we face so often in the current discourse. But while we’ve hit many of our operational goals, we haven’t achieved the main strategic one: removing the regime. That’s winning. And it’s undeniable.

So, let’s win this. Let’s finish it.

Look at the benefits of winning the war. The primary benefit is winning it. Finally taking out the mullahs and their ridiculous 7th-century regime solves a problem that has plagued the region for nearly half a century. Imagine the Middle East without these Persian pissants stirring the pot. Wouldn’t you like to turn on the news and not hear new outrages or atrocities from that part of the world? I’ve never been able to do that during my entire life. I want to start. And the starting point is making Iran’s current rulers ex-mullahs.

Winning the fight also solves the political problem. Let’s be very clear: President Donald Trump is a hero for finally fighting back against Iran. He didn’t have to. He could have kicked the can down the road. He could have spent 2026 basking in economic growth. His policies would have continued delivering results. He could have waltzed into the midterms, dragging Republicans behind him toward success. But he had the courage to do what was necessary to stop these bastards before they made it impossible to prevent them from getting a bomb. However this war ends, he deserves our thanks.

But he’s paid a political price, and Republicans in general have paid it, too. Oh, I don’t want to let them off the hook. They’re not in trouble solely because Donald Trump is fighting the war with Iran. They’re in trouble because they suck — because too many have been weak and useless, and far too many are preening, posturing, perfumed princesses with delusions of adequacy. But enough about John Cornyn and Thom Tillis.

The continuing war presents a political problem for Donald Trump, but the good news is there’s a solution. The political problem with a war in Iran is not that we are making war on Iran. Everybody except the Democrats — who seem to love anyone who hates America — wants to see the mullahs go. Americans don’t mind the war so much as us not winning it. Americans aren’t pacifists. When they need to go to war, they’re fine with it — but they want it done so they can get back to other things.

And here, that hasn’t happened. This has dragged out. Yes, Donald Trump gave them multiple chances to negotiate and, as usual, the enemy has consistently chosen the most obnoxious possible course — as anyone watching Iran for the last half-century knew they would. He gave it the old college try. And another try. And another. The other side isn’t interested in pushing for a deal, so how about we help them push up some daisies?

As Maximus Decimus Meridius ordered, “At my signal, unleash hell.

President Trump, give the signal.

What am I talking about? A comprehensive, multilateral, multi-domain campaign leveraging every element of national power — starting with, but not ending with, military power. Hold nothing back except the hot rocks that make mushroom clouds.

Multilaterally, it’s time to tell the Israelis “game on” and for our Arab allies from Jordan to Oman to get in the fight. Everybody fights; nobody quits. If we don’t finish this, the Iranians will come back and finish our friends. Time to put on the big-boy robes and put all those expensive toys they bought to work. Will the Iranians hit back? Yeah, a little. Oh, well. Take the hit and hit back harder. And keep hitting.

Multi-domain: land, sea, air, space, cyber — hit them everywhere at once. Seize Kharg Island. Strike from the sea, from the air, and through the wires. Target anything tied to the regime, especially the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. It owns a bunch of so-called legitimate businesses, just like the mafia used to. Flatten them. Whether it’s a construction company, a gas refinery, or a massage parlor, put a bomb on it. At the same time, unleash the Israelis to do what they do best: find the leaders and kill them. Whether it’s a bomb through the window, a bullet through the brain, or a little drone hunting them down, if they’re a regime leader, it’s 72-virgins time.

Israel has thoroughly infiltrated Iranian society — time to use that to push for revolution. And when the Iranian people finally stand up — because only they can do that part of the job — we need to be flying air support and giving them all the guns they want. Hell, maybe we can buy some of our own back from the Afghans that Joe Biden left behind. But no more screwing around. Keep the pressure on. If there are to be negotiations, let them be over the terms of unconditional surrender, so there’s nothing to negotiate. Of course, they won’t surrender, which only makes our mission clearer. Finish the enemy. Comprehensively.

Will this work? If we have the courage and the commitment. The only way our enemies ever stop us is if we stop ourselves. So, let’s not stop. Look at Iraq: for years we allowed a stalemate until George W. Bush surged our forces and they broke the back of the resistance. The mullahs are not going to go easy. They’re religious fanatics convinced of ultimate victory. Let’s disabuse them of that notion the hard way.

Of course, people like me who support actively winning the war — instead of abandoning it or letting it fester like a suppurating wound — will get called “neocons” or “warmongers” by idiots. Oh no, mean names — we should totally give up lest they taunt us a second time. But this isn’t about personalities. It’s about our country. We need to win this. And the way to win this war is to win it. That means leveraging our military capability to the maximum and denying the enemy any respite or sanctuary to rebuild.

But it’s not all military. We must fully leverage the other elements of national power. Use diplomatic power to force our allies — including the NATO freeloaders who’ve been shirking responsibility for keeping the sea lanes open — to do what’s necessary. Focus information warfare on showing the Iranian people there is hope and their leaders that there is none. Economic power? Cut off every stream of income into Iran and force countries holding the mullahs’ ill-gotten gains to turn those dollars over. Bankrupt this corrupt regime. Leave their thugs unpaid. And make it clear that the random general who throws them out and then befriends us will be rich beyond the dreams of any previous Persian pasha.

Is victory certain? Nothing is certain, but it is overwhelmingly likely if we simply do it. We are the United States of America. We can do this. All we have to do is decide we want to win — and then act accordingly. Ruthlessly. Ferociously. Relentlessly.

It bears repeating: “Just win, baby.”


🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


If The West Won’t Defend Itself, Third World Hordes Will Destroy Us


We can defeat those who want to kill our civilization. 
Or we can weep when the hordes have robbed us of children, spouses, and homes. 



It’s become cliché to roll out Mark Twain’s supposed line about history rhyming. But the videos of the invasion of Ceuta, the autonomous Spanish city bordering Morocco, remind you why cliches exist — they’re based on truth.  

The “Allahu Akbar!” screaming invaders — some 60,000 military-aged Moroccans with nothing but the clothes on their backs — were dumped into Ceuta to destroy it. The laxer ones did their part by turning the streets into toilets and the fountains into bathtubs (two ways of killing beauty fast). The friskier ones waged war against the city and its people. They set cars afire. They cracked open and looted homes and businesses.

These invaders “clashed” with hopelessly outnumbered police while people barricaded their doors with furniture to try and defend themselves. “There are no measures in place. It’s every man for himself,” one anonymous restaurant owner said. It was a tribe flexing and celebrating the atrophy, weakness, and compliance of its enemy.

While the invasion of Ceuta was not the bloodbath that Constantinople’s demise was, there is a parallel and a stark warning. Michael Doukas, the late Byzantine Greek historian, described the fall of Constantinople to the Muslims in 1453 as an apocalypse.

The invading Ottoman Turks slaughtered people — soldiers and civilians — wantonly; they killed 2,000 soldiers in a single instance. They cut sacred icons to pieces and pulled men, women, and children from the churches where they had sought sanctuary and made slaves. Homes were “robbed of children, wife, and belongings.”

Before “Islamophobe!” can be deployed like a backpack at an Ariana Grande concert, Doukas is not the only writer to describe these atrocities. Michael Kritovoulos, a contemporary of Doukas and a pro-Turk Greek, said the same thing. In his History of Mehmed the Conqueror, Kritovoulos wrote that after the Turks breached Constantinople’s walls: 

Then a great slaughter occurred of those who happened to be there: some of them were on the streets … others were in their own homes and fell victims to the violence of the Janissaries and other soldiers, without any rhyme or reason; others were resisting, relying on their own courage; still others were fleeing to the churches and making supplication — men, women, and children, everyone, for there was no quarter given.

After the Turks, “had had enough of murder,” Kritovoulos observed, some of the invaders went to loot the “mansions” of the nobles; others looted the churches and monasteries; and others “dispersed to the simple homes of the common people, stealing, robbing, plundering, killing, insulting, taking and enslaving men, women, and children, old and young, priests, monks — in short, every age and class.”

Doukas gave perhaps the most chilling description of fallen Constantinople when he wrote, “And the City was desolate, lying dead, naked, soundless, having neither form nor beauty.” That is not the description of a city that has only been conquered; it presents a picture of a civilization that has been snuffed out. For a thousand years, the Byzantine Empire had been the dominant power in the East, at its height reaching from Spain to Jerusalem, the Italian Alps to North Africa.

Its destruction was not just about territory or power: It was about civilizational death. Mehmed II and his Muslims wanted to stake the last civilizational remnant of Eastern Christianity and the polity which housed it out of existence. By enslaving the people, looting it of its treasures and art, and attacking its churches, they shredded the city’s soul. They bleached Constantinople out of existence.

Why is all this important? Because Ceuta is the latest reminder of what the stakes are. It’s not just about borders, or even sovereignty; it’s about civilization. “Civilization” gets thrown around a lot, and people have spilled good gallons of ink defining it. The simplest and truest definition is that civilization is the bedrock of who we are as a people.

Being part of a civilization means that the world is divided between “us”— we who see the world this way, we who believe this, and do things this way — and “them” — everyone else. Greeks are not Romans; Romans are not Frenchmen; and Frenchmen are not Americans.

You can lose a lot of things — influence, power, even territory — but if you can keep your civilization, you’re still in the game. It’s why the Jews are still a people (in the religious sense) and the Carthaginians are not. Lose that, and you lose yourself.

Leftists, in Europe and here at home, are the enemies of civilization. Their oikophobia — hatred of home — has made them not just take the side of foreigners against their own people but now drives them to help physically burn their homes. There is a reason Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchaz dragged his feet in activating the Spanish military to deal with the invasion, and why local police opened the doors to Ceuta to the invaders.

It’s the same reason the British government continues to plug its ears against the estimated quarter-million English girls groomed and raped primarily by Pakistani Muslims, Biden and Harris blew up our southern border (complete with frontloaders that physically lifted up barbwire fences to let in the hordes), their administration flew secret planes filled with unknown aliens to undisclosed locations in America in the dead of night, Democrats deliberately flooded towns like Charleroi, Pennsylvania, with foreigners, no one on the left bats an eye when an Islamist mayor tells a pastor that he has “not welcome” in his town, and “Death to America!” is chanted by mobs in America.

The reason is hate. It sounds overly simplistic, and the devoted leftist believer will gussy it up under pounds of academic jargon. But the makeup cannot change the face. One of the best tells came right after the Oct. 7 terror attacks when Teen Vogue writer Najma Sharif posted, “What did y’all think decolonization meant?”

This is why we have to fight. Come out en masse this Nov. 3 to keep the oikophobic Democrats away from the power they crave to burn our country. Fight the alliance of communists and Islamists that’s happening in our own backyards and with our tax money.

We can defeat the people who want to kill our civilization. Or we can complain we haven’t gotten a hundred percent of what we want, do nothing, and then, like Jeremiah, weep when the hordes have robbed us of children, spouses, and homes. 


America’s Most Rat-Infested City Now Battles Medieval Disease


RedState 

Los Angeles has any number of problems: crime, homelessness, and productive people are leaving due to the idiot policies of the city and the state of California. Now, we can again add that ancient curse of big cities: Disease.

The other thing Los Angeles shares with so many other large cities throughout human history is rats. Rats have accompanied humans almost everywhere, and they bring disease with them. That, too, is happening right now in Los Angeles.

In Los Angeles County (L.A.), rats abound. You may see only an occasional rat dart across an alley or root through a restaurant dumpster, but make no mistake: they are everywhere, from Skid Row to Koreatown, from Boyle Heights to Santa Monica. They are always nearby, even if sometimes out of sight: scurrying in storm drains, walls, crawl spaces, and alleyways.

Rats, and the fleas that live on them, can be carriers of deadly diseases—including, most notably, the plague, which, in bubonic form, killed tens of millions of people and laid waste to cities in the Middle Ages. In L.A., however, the main concern is a different medieval disease: typhus.

Since 2009, the number of flea-borne typhus cases in L.A. has increased by a staggering 2,300 percent. Last year, the county recorded more cases than at any point in its history. Some patients have died. Behind the scenes, the authorities responsible for protecting the public admit that they lack the resources they need to get the situation under control.

The city is providing a nearly-perfect habitat for rats. The sprawling homeless enclaves and the rampant drug use, with all the trash and waste that surrounds those encampments, are giving rats a paradise they haven't seen since the Dark Ages. And here's the really stupid part of all this: the state of California has placed tight controls on the very materials that are most effective against rats.

To make matters worse, more and more tools are being removed from the pest-control toolbox. In 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed A.B. 1788 into law, sharply restricting the use of potent anticoagulant rat poisons in hopes of protecting “mountain lions and other wildlife.” Four years later, Newsom signed A.B. 2552, further expanding those restrictions.

And this guy wants to be president?

Humans have fought rats for thousands of years, and the best we've ever been able to do is to fight them to a holding action. Rats have too many advantages. A female rat can throw litters of from six to 12 pups, after a gestation period of only about three weeks. The pups can breed at five to six weeks of age. They can have four to seven litters a year. Female rats can come into season and mate again while still nursing the last litter. 

And every one of those rats will grow up to harbor its own complement of fleas, which are primary vectors of diseases like the bubonic plague. Rat droppings can spread typhus. Every rat carries its own helping of sickness, and the state of California has regulated the single best weapon humans have against them, that being the various anticoagulant poisons.

Of course, cleaning up the homeless enclaves and cleaning up the garbage would help, too.

Los Angeles is, in this matter, slipping back into the Dark Ages, and it even has, in Mayor Karen Bass, its very own Typhoid Mary.


NYT Writer Pearl-Clutching About Self-Defense Laws Reveals His Contempt For The Constitution


The ‘right to kill’ a threat isn’t growing, as The New York Times purports. It’s always been there thanks to the Second Amendment.



The right to self-defense, most prominent in the legal doctrine of “standing your ground,” is an indisputable constitutional right. This fact, no matter how longstanding and essential to American exceptionalism, elicits much chagrin from The New York Times’ Mike McIntire, who recently argued that laws making it legally easier to protect yourself and your property are a concerning deviation from history.

“Using a Gun to Defend Yourself? The Right to Kill Is Growing,” McIntire snivels in his headline.

Corporate media are infamous for clutching pearls over Americans’ right to bear arms. The reporters who aren’t painfully ignorant about gun laws and culture work hard to shame firearm makers and mock gun freedom laws. McIntire, it appears, is no different.

Defending oneself and passing laws affirming that right, according to the reporter’s subhead, is a “distinctly American tradition.” More specifically, he asserts that “across American history, the justifications for using a gun seem to multiply, an ever-expanding terrain for legally sanctioned violence.”

McIntire, whose journalistic claim to fame is being “part of a team that obtained and published” Donald Trump’s tax returns, attempts to make his case using a recently enacted Tennessee law that recognizes threatening or responding with lethal violence to protect property from trespass, arson, burglary, robbery, and aggravated cruelty to animals can constitute reasonable deadly force. The provision also affirms protections for anyone who uses deadly force to defend “a third person” from “death, serious bodily injury, or grave sexual abuse.”

The statute includes several caveats of actions that would not be justified, including “using deadly force against another individual under this bill if the individual is facing away from the person.” McIntire does not get around to mentioning that key fact until the literal last line of his nearly 2,000-word article.

Instead, McIntire spends the majority of his ink on lamenting “a new era of defensible homicides.”

“People do not merely own more guns in America,” McIntire observes. “They now have more ways to justify using one to kill another person, simply by invoking an often inchoate sense of fear.”

He stops short of recognizing that the alternative to defending oneself in the face of a threat of serious bodily injury or death — simply staying put or fleeing — could mean just that: serious injury or death.

There’s nothing wrong and certainly nothing illegal about believing that you have a right to safeguard yourself, your family, and your castle. Guns are and will always be the great equalizer. Stewarding this right to defense well means taking gun safety and carry courses, properly storing firearms to prevent negligence-induced accidents, practicing draw and aim at a range, and learning states’ specific self-defense laws.

Contrary to what McIntire implies in his criticism of the Tennessee law, however, the lack of these best practices does not negate someone’s right to defend himself when his body, his castle, and in Tennessee, his property are under threat.

McIntire does acknowledge the principle behind stand your ground laws “is intuitive.” He takes issue, however, with states’ attempts to fine-tune those statutes to offer more legal protection to good guys with guns and even repeats the lie that self-defense laws have contributed to “homicide rates and reckless conduct” to emphasize it.

This is where McIntire’s mask slips. His problem with Tennessee’s new law might not be resistance to expanded self-defense protections or even the growing number of firearms in the U.S., which he mentions in every section of the article, but disagreement with America’s core founding principles.

“It follows a distinctly American strain of thinking in which a person’s honor and autonomy are sacrosanct. Throughout the country’s history, defendants claiming self-defense have argued that their sovereignty is inviolable and must be protected, even to the point of violence,” McIntire wrote.

McIntire goes so far as to pretend that the Second Amendment “says nothing explicitly about an individual right to have a gun for everyday self-defense.”

“Locating that right in the Constitution became the grand project of the modern gun lobby,” McIntire confidently declares.

On the contrary, advocates of the Second Amendment have faced uphill battles at the Supreme Court and elsewhere to ensure the right to self-defense is not eradicated at the whim of gun-grabbers.

McIntire knows this. In fact, he spends paragraphs documenting the centuries-long history of American courts ditching the English concept that you must run from aggression in an effort to de-escalate. He even quotes one Indiana Supreme Court justice who said in 1877 that, “the tendency of the American mind seems to be very strongly against the enforcement of any rule which requires a person to flee when assailed, to avoid chastisement or even to save human life.”

McIntire labels this concept “personal honor” and even suggests that courts’ endorsement of it communicated that “standing your ground was a crucial aspect — maybe a necessary condition — of manhood.”

Anyone who has studied American history knows that principle is not simply “honor” but personal freedom. The founders believed the right to bear arms is an essential part of the right to revolution, so much so that they were willing to die for it. Infringing on or downplaying the Second Amendment threatens the rest of our constitutional system and undermines America — ideals and people. 

The “right to kill” isn’t growing, as McIntire purports in his headline. It’s always been there thanks to the Second Amendment. What is growing is the number of states that are finally taking their constitutional duty to respect, protect, and reinforce constitutional rights like the Second Amendment seriously enough to pass laws that protect law-abiding Americans from unfair prosecution if they have to defend themselves and their property.


Federal Judge Deals Crushing Blow to NFA Rules on Short-Barreled Shotguns and Suppressors


RedState 

Lovers of the Second Amendment got some good news Wednesday after a federal judge out of the Northern District of Texas ruled that large portions of the National Firearms Act (NFA) were rendered unconstitutional after Congress eliminated the transfer tax that had historically provided the constitutional basis for registration and recordkeeping requirements governing suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns.

U.S. District Court Judge James Wesley Hendrix ruled in the case Jensen v. ATF that “[b]y zeroing out the transfer and making taxes for most NFA firearms, Congress eliminated the constitutional basis for the regulations that formerly supported the taxes for those firearms.”

The Court’s injunction applies to “the plaintiffs and, where applicable, the plaintiffs’ agencies, political subdivisions, members, and customers—both current and future,” but does not take effect for seven days “to allow the defendants to seek relief, if any, at the appellate level.”

Pro-Second Amendment advocates are celebrating. 

“The basis for each lawsuit challenging the NFA registration scheme is the same – without the tax, the remaining requirements for the affected arms under the NFA have no constitutional basis,” said Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) Executive Director Adam Kraut. “And today the first court to rule on the issue has agreed with us. We’re eager to continue this fight and leave major portions of the NFA in the dustbin of history. A big win is a great way to kick things off.”

SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb added, "The removal of the $200 tax in the One Big Beautiful Bill offers the best opportunity to remove the NFA registration requirements that we’ve had in almost a century. We are thrilled the court ruled in our favor and look forward to other jurisdictions following suit in our remaining NFA cases. This ruling will set a precedent we can now argue in courts across the country to allow Americans to exercise their Second Amendment rights without fear of being placed on some government registry."

According to Philip Van Cleave of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, "suppressors, short-barrel rifles, and short-barrel shotguns will no longer be NFA items and can be bought using a Form 4473 like a regular firearm" if the government fails to obtain further appellate relief from Judge Hendrix's decision.

Brandon Combs, president of the Firearms Policy Coalition, praised the judge's decision, saying, "This is a massive win and an important step forward in our strategic plan to end the NFA. We cannot wait to fully and finally eliminate this unconstitutional scheme so people can exercise their rights when, where, and how they choose."


♦️𝐖³𝐏 𝐃𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝


 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time.