Friday, July 3, 2026

Containing Socialism at Home


Last Tuesday, there was a Broadway premiere of sorts. In New York City, elections revealed the Democrat Party’s future. Avowed socialists won with the backing of Zohran Mamdani and dollars from leftist NGOs. There’s no spinning it. Democrat grandees aren’t even trying. Bill Maher claims he’s open to voting for J.D. Vance or Marco Rubio in 2028 if the party is captured by socialists. Whacky James Carville loudly called out his party’s leftward lurch. He’s threatening to walk if socialists take over. Start walking, James, because generational change, in part, will do to your party what President Barack Obama claimed he wanted to do to America: transform it.

Oh, and don’t forget all those migrants who helped elect socialists in New York. Democrats asked for it.

A socialist Democrat Party guarantees continued conflicts at home. As the 250th anniversary of our declaring independence from British tyranny nears, what’s affirmed is that America is preordained to be the battleground between liberty and tyranny -- whatever the stripe. Would our revolutionary generation -- let’s add Abraham Lincoln -- disagree?

At Unheard, Josh Appel wrote (June 24):

The New Democrat position was best summed up by Mamdani ally Brian Romero at a Brooklyn campaign rally: “Abolish ICE, Free Palestine and tax the motherf***ing rich!” Last night’s results are telling of the future direction of New York politics. Democrats are increasingly standing far-Left candidates that are even more radical in their beliefs and policy proposals than progressives. Given the popularity of Zohran Mamdani nationwide, it is reasonable to believe that these candidates who performed so strongly last night may be a bellwether for where the Democrats are moving ideologically.

New York City isn’t a bellwether because Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Boston, and Austin kicked off the party’s march to out-and-out socialism a while back. NYC just occupies a bigger stage. The Democrat Party has long been the party of cities and now, increasingly, close-in suburbs. Without Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is a shade of red. Without Atlanta, Georgia isn’t purple; it’s red. The party shrivels up without cities.

Posted President Trump on Truth Social, June 25:

The Communists are finally making their move. I’ve been waiting and preparing for this for a long time. It’s easy to be a Communist -- All you have to do is say, “I’ll give you everything,” but that means you’re taking it away from others that have earned it. Over thousands of years, that Ideology has not worked once. The game is on. Enjoy watching! President DONALD J. TRUMP

I disagree with the president in one respect. This isn’t a spectator sport. We all have skin in the game. Our mission is to rally voters and contain and defeat yet another run at turning America into a socialist “paradise.”

We can’t just oppose socialist tenets and plans. We must champion common-sense solutions to everyday problems. Most Americans are instinctively pro-freedom, but they aren’t ideologically so. They want fixes. Trump moved in that direction in his 2024 campaign. He’s since signed executive orders to make lives better.

Reported Fox News at X, June 29:

BREAKING: President Trump signs a presidential memo to make it easier for Americans to repair their own cars by protecting the right to fix vehicles and opening up more options for approving aftermarket parts.

"It came to my attention because I noticed they were arresting people for fixing their car."

"We rule by common sense."

Red states need to be made redder via legislation and laws that better secure liberties, bolster economic and educational opportunities, and build legislative and legal firewalls to leftist sabotage. Election integrity is essential.

Socialists, despite having failed across the globe, won’t disappear because they have staying power. They’re impervious to facts. Socialism is a religion substitute. Have you ever tried reasoning a true believer out of his faith? For the cynical and power-hungry, facts are obstacles. Socialism is a route to power. Lies and manipulation are tools. Leftist revolutions, however achieved, always end up run by an elite. As in the old Soviet Union, the Eastern Bloc, large swaths of China, Cambodia, Cuba, Venezuela, etc., people suffer.

Socialism’s pews are filled with the naΓ―ve. From the bored affluent to indoctrinated college kids to the religious who bizarrely claim a nexus between biblical instruction to show charity and mandated wealth transfers and societal leveling. Jesus Christ never advocated kindness and charity through government force -- even under the guise of majority rule.

The Founders were well apprised of majoritarian tyranny. We aren’t a democracy. We’re a nation of inviolate rights under the rule of law. The democratic process -- representative government -- is subordinate to the law, which is supposed to safeguard our rights. The system isn’t perfect. Exploitation, lapses, and deviances occur. Vigilance is mandatory, and counters are necessary to uphold or restore our rights when freedoms are abridged. No more COVID crises -- or whatever “crises” will be manufactured to trample our rights.

Among socialism’s congregation are lots of people nursing grudges. They failed somehow -- or never tried -- and society is to blame. They shake fists at the rich, the talented, the smart, or common folk who accept responsibility for their lives and roll with the punches. This type, consumed by envy and resentment, will always be with us. Sidelining them is essential.

The Democrats' leftward drift is nothing new. It began back at the dawn of the Progressive era. In the early 20th century, progressivism began amalgamating with elements of socialist doctrine. Who remembers names like Victor Berger(a founder of the Socialist Party of America), Upton Sinclair (socialist muckraking journalist), and William “Big Bill” Haywood (labor organizer)? How about Eugene Debs, often a candidate for president, who had a big influence on progressives? Mamdani is only novel in that he’s a wealthy immigrant and a practicing Muslim. The last matters. Socialists are allied with Muslims to upend traditional America. If they prevail, the factions will fight it out for supremacy.

The modern Big Bang happened at the 1968 Democrat National Convention in Chicago. Old Guard Democrats won a pyrrhic victory against a counterculture insurgency. Chicago was roiled by protests and riots. Hubert Humphrey’s presidential nomination marked the beginning of the end of liberal establishment dominance. He lost a tight race to Nixon that year.

By 1972, young antiwar, leftist cohorts -- Hillary and Bill Clinton among them -- maneuvered George McGovern into the nomination. Richard Nixon trounced McGovern. Nixon’s 49-state sweep was historic. It was the impetus for a center-right majority. Watergate briefly interrupted the nation’s political shift. Carter’s failures and Reagan’s successes put the nation back on track.

Whatever the opposition, as President Trump declared, the fight is on. It’s really the newest round in a century-plus prizefight. Today, it’s Mamdani and socialist minions versus Trump -- and, later, J.D. Vance or Marco Rubio, let’s suppose -- and common-sense folk, who believe in the nation as founded… who don’t need religion substitutes. And are far too practical to chase chimeras.

Containing socialism in blue states and cities is a start. Jefferson said that the states are laboratories of democracy, meaning testing grounds for good and bad ideas and governance. Blue states are already failing. The proof: people are leaving. Unrestricted socialist schemes will implode New York, California, and other blue states.

Perhaps people can’t be saved from themselves? Perhaps socialism is a cancer of the soul? If so, it’s a communicable cancer; it can’t be allowed to metastasize. Common sense and good, old-fashioned patriotism are the means of stopping it.


Podcast thread for July 3rd

 


Fireworks!

Congress Can Still Ban Birthright Citizenship. Here's How.


The Supreme Court has committed a grievous moral and legal error in Trump v. Barbara, the landmark case on birthright citizenship. In holding that the 14th Amendment confers automatic citizenship on virtually all children born on American soil, the court has severely vitiated the sanctity of American citizenship — in this "America 250" celebration year, no less. Moreover, on a prosaic level, the court's majority botched the basic constitutional question.

As this column has explained, the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause was, per its principal author, Sen. Jacob Howard (R-Mich.), "simply declaratory of ... the law of the land already." As for "the law of the land already," that was the Civil Rights Act of 1866, ratified by Congress two years prior to the 14th Amendment. That statute deliberately withheld blanket birthright citizenship for the children of those who are "subject to any foreign power."

Thus, the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman at the time, Sen. Lyman Trumbull (R-Ill.), confidently stated during the amendment's ratification debate that "subject to the jurisdiction," the legally relevant 14th Amendment Citizenship Clause language, meant those "not owing allegiance to anybody else." This is why American Indians, whose allegiances in the 19th century were to their tribes, were not covered; it was not until the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 that these children were granted blanket birthright citizenship. And if American Indians' children were not automatically covered, then illegal aliens' children certainly were not.

This is consistent with the prevailing 19th-century definition of citizenship, which was, as law professor Richard A. Epstein wrote recently for The Wall Street Journal, "an exchange of protection by the sovereign for loyalty of the citizens." Justice Samuel Alito's Barbara dissent cogently explicates this allegiance-based conception of citizenship, and Justice Clarence Thomas's separate dissent is a masterclass in history.

It is shameful that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett constitutionalized this fraught issue, rejecting Justice Brett Kavanaugh's middle-ground statutory overture and thus removing the question of birthright citizenship — and all that it now entails, such as the execrable practice of "birth tourism" — from our normal democratic politics. To that extent, Roberts and Barrett have indeed given us a new Roe v. Wade. Under a standard reading of Barbara, the case must be overturned, or a new constitutional amendment passed, in order to preserve the sanctity of citizenship.

But what if the standard reading of Barbara is wrong? President Donald Trump responded to the court's decision by calling on Congress to act. Most commentators dismissed this out of hand as a paroxysm of rage from an aggrieved party. But the president, it turns out, is actually grasping at an important point. Congress can, and should, act by declaring both illegal aliens and so-called birth tourists to be the functional legal equivalent of modern-day foreign army invaders.

There are four distinct clauses of the Constitution that reference invasion. And while the Supreme Court has never legally defined an "invasion," law professor Josh Blackman has explained, in surveying the four clauses, that the "Constitution affords Congress, the president, and the states the power to declare an invasion — every branch except the judiciary." Indeed, in recent years, the state of Texas under Gov. Greg Abbott has done exactly this.

Congress can do the same thing: It can stipulate, under its Article I, Section 8 power to "establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization," that it is the sense of Congress that the United States has faced, and still does face, an "invasion," and that the children of the invaders shall not receive automatic citizenship at birth. Instead, Congress can clarify that those children can apply for naturalization using all extant, generally available means.

How does this square with Barbara? Simple: No serious person claims the children of foreign invaders are entitled to automatic birthright citizenship. Wong Kim Ark, the 1898 Supreme Court decision frequently invoked (if erroneously) by the Barbara majority and by birthright citizenship defenders everywhere, actually confirmed as much: Justice Horace Gray noted that the "children of aliens within territory in hostile occupation" are not "subject to the jurisdiction," to use the relevant 14th Amendment language, of "the sovereign whose domains are invaded."

Put simply, under Wong Kim Ark — and thus under Barbara as well — the children of invaders are not automatic birthright citizens.

Are illegal aliens and/or birth tourists really "invaders"? Reasonable minds will differ. But recall that the Supreme Court has never defined the term — and for good reason, as such a determination is an inherently political question that is, per the 2019 Supreme Court case Rucho v. Common Cause, "outside the courts' competence and therefore beyond the courts' jurisdiction." It would seem that Congress can classify invasion as it reasonably deems fit and, if the president signs the bill, the courts would stay out of the way. Indeed, it is not inconceivable that all nine Supreme Court justices would duck on such "political question doctrine" grounds.

All of this is perfectly consistent with both Wong Kim Ark and Barbara.

The Supreme Court has made a profound error in a case of immense importance. Barbara can, and at some point likely will, be overturned on 14th Amendment grounds. And the passing of a constitutional amendment to overturn Barbara, though perhaps far-fetched, is a worthwhile effort even if it amounts to nothing more than a collective flexing of the sinews of self-governance in this milestone 250th anniversary year. But We the People are not otherwise helpless. Our representatives in Congress can act. They should do so posthaste.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


SCOTUS Pasting Birth Tourism Into The Constitution Demands A Legal System Rebuild


That a court with six Republican-appointed justices could hand down such a patently un-American decision is an indictment of America’s rogue legal system.



The Roberts Court just handed down a majority birthplace citizenship decision on the legal level of Dred Scott and Roe v. Wade. No judge who calls himself an originalist, textualist, or in any way claims dedication to American rule of law could support the 5-4 majority in Trump v. Barbara.

As the dissents and much other scholarly work show plainly and definitively, the 14th Amendment simply does not say that anyone who happens to be born on U.S. soil thereby magically becomes a U.S. citizen. “Subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” It’s not legally or verbally complicated.

It’s also not philosophically complicated. The American founders and the 14th Amendment framers’ understanding of citizenship has always been rooted in the consent of the governed, in an explicit rejection of the medieval subjectship Chief Justice John Roberts employed as the basis for his anti-American ruling. While Kavanaugh’s compromise position has legal and prudential merit, there is simply no legal, cultural, practical, or philosophical justification in legitimately American jurisprudence for Roberts’ majority.

The simplest way to know that’s true, for judges who can’t think their way out of a Washington Post editorial-lashing, is if you’re ruling with Ketanji “I don’t understand” Brown Jackson and against Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, you’re wrong.

That a court with six Republican-appointed justices could hand down such a patently un-American, anti-Constitutional decision is an indictment of America’s rogue legal system. It only accents the scores of horrific decisions coming daily out of the federal judiciary in the age of Trump that Roberts has abandoned his duty, as chief magistrate, to curb.

It’s past time that elected officials of the party that claims to love the Constitution and its principles made substantive reforms to a legal system that seems incapable of producing three or four other justices — let alone a federal bench — worthy of Thomas’ and Alito’s legacies out of the 350 million people in the greatest country in the world.

The second Trump administration has made some small progress in this direction by pushing big law firms to dollop a soupΓ§on of pro bono work on non-leftist causes, and canceling federal contracts with firms that helped foment the Spygate coup. Both of these, however, have been under inevitable litigation. They also don’t go anywhere near far enough.

Many other things can and must be done to redress the existential crisis that is an American legal profession increasingly dedicated to anti-Constitution law. Like many problems with domestic communism, many of the legal profession’s evils germinate in publicly subsidized educational institutions. Luckily, those are controlled by elected officials.

Here, Republican-run states that wish to demonstrate seriousness about Republican officeholders’ professed love for American principles can take big action. So can the Trump administration, for it can — and should — ditch the leftist monopoly that currently controls virtually all of U.S. legal education, the American Bar Association.

In concert, Republican states and the Trump administration must stand up one or several competing, federally approved law school accreditors and post-graduation professional associations. The Federalist Society should be able to field at least one of these new accreditors, and Republican states, perhaps through the Republican Attorneys General Association, should field another. Monopolies drive up costs and drive down quality, so the ABA shouldn’t be replaced by another single entity.

Once the ABA has replacements, those replacements should begin threatening the ability of law schools to accept federal student loans if the schools’ curriculum or teachers push unconstitutional race and sex discrimination (commonly known as “DEI”). They should do a reverse “march through the institutions” to eradicate and punish race and sex Marxism in any and all taxpayer-funded “education” institutions. Put Chris Rufo on the accreditation board; he’ll know what to do.

A component of dethroning the ABA needs to be replacing it and state licensing boards’ control of the legal profession. Both work to make the profession more leftist while often failing to uphold their supposed reason for existing, which is to disbar criminal and immoral lawyers. Their corruption is why leftist pressure campaigns can use these entities to bankrupt any lawyers who dare defend a conservative, from John Eastman to Ed Martin to Jeff Clark to garden-variety lawyers in Wisconsin. This Stalinist show-trial-enabling ecosystem needs to be erased. Just pretend it’s two weeks from getting a nuke!

Many Republican-run states also allow bureaucrats to create lists of judges for officeholders to pick from when nominating, which obviously tends to reward and promote cowardly and weak judges rather than judges who courageously defend traditional American rule of law. That practice needs to end, yesterday. Judges like the 9th Circuit’s Lawrence VanDyke need to be promoted, given law school fetes and visiting professorships, and all the other honors currently purposefully denied to effective constitutionalists in law.

Republican-run states also need to raze and replace state law schools. Law school faculty trend communist. It is completely unacceptable and un-American to keep any communists on public payroll. If they have to dissolve their law schools to get rid of tenured communists, state lawmakers should be prepared to do so. They can simply revoke the charter of the current school and immediately institute a charter for a replacement that obtains its appropriations, buildings, and other assets but not liabilities such as law professors who teach future judges and lawyers to hate America.

Conservative lawyers, judges, and legal organizations also need to step up their vetting game. Numerous Federalist Society law student members have told me the organization regularly elevates people not dedicated to constitutional law who pretend to be such to obtain the Society’s professional opportunities. The same is true of judicial clerkships and fellowships within the conservative legal movement. Obviously that needs to end.

Judges and those in a position to promote any lawyer also need to follow Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito’s lead in diversifying their legal staffs beyond Ivy League law graduates. Those schools still do graduate a sprinkling of quality people each year, but enrolling in majority-anti-American legal training should be disincentivized as strongly as possible. Young people go to those schools because the name brand gives them career opportunities, not because those schools offer the best legal education.

Ivies and other top law schools such as Chicago and Notre Dame need to also be put on notice that their practice of hiring and promoting overwhelmingly leftist professors puts them at risk of losing federal funds. The grounds? Diminishing the quality of the legal education they give their students.

It’s legal education malpractice to refuse to expose law students to the legal traditions and philosophy that a) created our country’s legal system and b) more often than not win in today’s Supreme Court. No school that does this deserves accreditation, and the accreditors and the federal government backing them need to make that expectation known.

These individuals and institutions need to follow 5th Circuit Judge James Ho’s test of whether an applicant has personally suffered in defense of a classic understanding of American law. Everyone vetting lawyers and judges for jobs and promotions should be looking for concrete evidence of what it has cost an applicant to stand for his country’s historic way of life.

In a profession as Marxist as law, any genuinely constitutionally minded applicants should have ready answers. Those who just know keywords like “textualism” to drop in interviews should be filtered out, and those who have fought faithfully in the arena should be promoted. This is how republic-loving lawmakers and their staff should evaluate judicial applicants, the lawyers they hire as counsel, and frankly anyone they hire at all.

Yes, these are strong measures. Those are required at this late hour.

This nation has tens of millions of anchor babies and their descendants, up to one-quarter of the next generation. Millions more could be created tomorrow given how many foreigners are here illegally and legally. Under birthplace citizenship, all fraudulently obtain not just lifetime welfare but also voting abilities. That’s well more than enough to tip elections not just into the future but going back decades.

Those in leadership positions who are not ready to defend the country in response to this reality should resign, or be forced to.


New Poll Shows Some Good News for Senate Republicans

New Poll Shows Some Good News for Senate Republicans


A new poll shows that Republicans might have a decent shot at keeping control of the Senate in the midterm elections.

Democrats are hoping to win back control of at least one chamber of Congress after their humiliating losses in 2024.

From The Hill:

Democrats are competitive in six key Senate battlegrounds, but Republicans still hold the edge in the fight for the upper chamber, according to new polling from The New York Times and Siena.  

The New York Times/Siena Polls found Democrats leading the Senate races in North Carolina, where Democrat Roy Cooper is battling Republican Michael Whatley to replace retiring Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), and in Maine, where progressive Graham Platner hopes to oust Sen. Susan Collins (R).

Cooper boasts the biggest lead among the six battlegrounds surveyed, with 50 percent to Whatley’s 43 percent. Platner, at 49 percent, was up 2 points over Collins. 

Democrat James Talarico and state Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) are tied at 47 percent each in Texas, where Democrats are relishing the fact that the controversial prosecutor got the GOP nod over incumbent Sen. John Cornyn (R).

Democrats were competitive in three more states, but trailed Republicans by slim margins. 

In Iowa, Democratic state Rep. Josh Turek is 2 points behind President Trump-backed Rep. Ashley Hinson (R) for retiring Sen. Joni Ernst’s (R) seat, with 46 percent and 48 percent, respectively. 

Alaska Democrat Mary Peltola is just 2 points behind incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan (R) in a hypothetical Senate showdown, with 45 percent and 47 percent, respectively. The Last Frontier’s primary is in mid-August.

And in Ohio, Democratic former Sen. Sherrod Brown is 3 points behind Sen. Jon Husted (R), with 47 percent and 50 percent, respectively. Along with Alaska and Maine, it’s one of just a few true toss-ups in the high-stakes fight for Senate control.

Democrats have a few main paths they could follow to regain control of the Senate. The GOP holds a 53-47 majority, which means Democrats need a net gain of four seats to dominate the upper chamber.

In North Carolina, former Gov. Roy Cooper is leading in the early polls against his Republican opponent. Graham Platner in Maine is running even with incumbent Sen. Susan Collins despite the fact that his scandals outnumber the grains of sand in the Sahara.

Democrats would also have to hold their competitive seats in Georgia and the open seat in Michigan. If they can also pull off upsets in Ohio with Sherrod Brown and Alaska with Mary Peltola, there is a path to victory.

In the House, Democrats have a better chance. They need only a net gain of at least three seats to win the majority. In almost every midterm election, the president’s party has lost seats in the House and this pattern could hold again in 2026.

Democrats are focusing hard on swing districts that were decided by just a few thousand votes in 2024 as they seek to connect with voters frustrated by economic concerns, healthcare, and other issues.


Marco Rubio Just Terminated the Legal Status of the Communist Behind Hasan Piker's Cuba Trip

Marco Rubio Just Terminated the Legal Status of the Communist Behind Hasan Piker's Cuba Trip


Secretary of State Marco Rubio has revoked the legal status of Carlos Antonio Lloga Dominguez, a Cuban national identified as a communist operative tied to a propaganda effort targeting U.S. audiences. Dominguez was reportedly involved in organizing progressive commentator Hasan Piker’s trip to Cuba, an effort that was designed to promote the regime and influence American opinion on communism. 

Rubio announced the move on X, noting that Dominguez was formerly affiliated and maintained ties with the Cuban Institute of Friendship with the Peoples (ICAP), a state-backed organization known for conducting foreign influence campaigns in the United States. Dominguez, along with his wife and son, is currently in federal custody pending deportation.

"For decades, the Cuban Institute of Friendship with the People – or 'ICAP' – has been a vehicle for radical left-wing extremism and subversive foreign influence in the United States and across our hemisphere. ICAP is the Cuban regime’s premier influence and intelligence front group, exploiting its vast global network to spy on Americans, promote anti-Western propaganda, coordinate foreign influence operations, and organize revolutionary leftist movements around the world," Secretary Rubio wrote on X.

This week, I terminated the legal status of Carlos Antonio Lloga Dominguez, a former ICAP official who maintains ties with the organization. Lloga Dominguez and his wife and son are now in federal custody pending removal from the United States.

"America will never become home for foreign communists who peddle propaganda, run subversive influence operations, or support radical anti-American movements within the United States," he added. "Transact with ICAP and you will be sanctioned, prosecuted or deported from our country."

This comes just months after Hasan Piker, a now-prominent voice on the progressive left, toured communist Cuba in a propaganda effort, where he attributed the country’s dire conditions to the U.S. embargo and sanctions rather than the failures of its communist government.


USA turns 250: For true believers, America is 'the last best hope on Earth'

WASHINGTON — About 40 of us commoners are hanging around Statuary Hall at the United States Capitol, waiting for the King of Canada.

It is April 2026, and Charles III — finally a sovereign after all those decades in the bullpen — has come to the Capitol to put the best possible spin on the worst road defeat his ball club ever suffered — the loss of 13 prideful and persecuted colonies in the American Revolution 250 years ago this summer.

In that seven-year, savage, earth-shaking and probably unnecessary conflict, the United States of America came to be a country, but Canada didn’t. It was a war invoked by philosophers in powdered hairpieces but fought by peasants who desired to be governed not by a hereditary monarch — as was the case everywhere else in the world at the time — but by each other.

Every nation is a myth of its own making, and the United States is no exception. For decades, schoolchildren here were taught to sing of a “sweet land of liberty” favoured by God and protected by His terrible swift sword — a still-young republic cleansed in blood of its original sin of human bondage, extending from sea to shining sea, welcoming and tolerant with liberty and justice for all, dominant in trade, victorious in war, but covetous of no further land or Greenland.

“This country and this people seem to have been made for each other,” said John Jay, a Founding Father who negotiated the treaty of peace with the British after the war was over.

In Washington, the glorious Fourth of July will feature the BIGGEST TRUMP RALLY of all time (caps not mine) and the largest ignition of fireworks ever attempted, but not performances by Martina McBride or Bret Michaels, who signed up to sing and then turned tail as soon as it became clear that the event would be a tribute to the 47th president himself.

Leroy Anderson Keller Jr, president of the Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, with a portrait of his ancestor, Thomas Nelson Jr., of Yorktown, Va. Photo by Allen Abel/National Post

To one part of a fractured polity of 350 million Americans in the Donald J. Trump era, celebration equals collaboration, flag-waving is for fascists, and five years of chaos blot out the other 245 years. Not only will these folks not be picnicking on July Fourth, some are organizing protests.

But to tens of millions of other Americans, this anniversary is a perfect excuse for the displays of patriotism that Americans do best, and the reiteration of the airy principles of the long-dead, imperfect men — some of them the owners and ravishers of human property — who, in 1776, pledged “their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honour.”

Some of this year’s most enthusiastic celebrants are the direct descendants of the patriots who autographed the Declaration of Independence on a hot Philadelphia day. Others are the beneficiaries of two and a half centuries of personal liberty, capitalist wealth-creation, the welcoming of newcomers and perpetual cultural reinvention that continue to define the United States as a society without equal.

We will follow the campaign for governor of Maryland by a woman named Taylor Swift who died two weeks before Primary Day, who has been succeeded on the ballot by her daughter MoHawk, because Life.

We will hear from a member of the United States Congress who avows that gun-free school zones must be outlawed, because Liberty.

We will meet a man who is cycling across all 13 breakaway colonies, because the Pursuit of Happiness.

And we will kneel among the believers who aver that this nation’s true and only founder was Jesus Christ Himself — men and women who agree that, as Woodrow Wilson proclaimed in 1915: “Think first of humanity. America was created to unite mankind.”

But it may surprise you to learn that there are Canadians who hold that the American Revolution of 1776 was Canada’s formative rebellion, too.

A British King at the Capitol

Back to Statuary Hall.

Behind King Charles III, as he exits the Rotunda on his way to address the United States Congress, are sculptures and paintings that celebrate the humiliation of his own royal ancestors and the annihilation of their red-coated troops. He walks past effigies of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, and giant canvases depicting Britain’s surrender at Saratoga, N.Y., in 1777, and the decisive checkmate at Yorktown, Va., four years later.

Further along the corridors are astronauts, inventors, evangelizers, integrationists, governors, commanders, cowboys and Johnny Cash — two and a half centuries of conquest and passion and genius moulded into monuments to what could have been Great Britain’s greatest and most loyal protectorate, had it not all been squandered by a stubborn young 18th-century monarch who never in his lifetime crossed the sea.

The King addressed Congress at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on April 28, 2026. Photo by KYLIE COOPER/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

“The Founding Fathers,” Charles III tells the gridlocked Congress, “were bold and imaginative rebels with a cause. Two hundred and fifty years ago — or, as we say in the United Kingdom, ‘just the other day’ — they declared independence.”

The royal address is boycotted by Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar and other sisters of the Far Left, who may take their turn at the helm of the American state in the next election, and who someday may welcome King William V.

“Standing here today, it is hard not to feel the weight of history on my shoulders,” says the noble Charles III, and by “history” he means Britain’s surrender. At the United States Capitol, there are no statues of the 948 Loyalists who signed a Declaration of Dependence in New York in November 1776, declaring, “That we bear true allegiance to our rightful sovereign George the Third, as well as warm affection to his sacred person, crown and dignity.”

Talk about the world turned upside down: 250 years ago, it was the British king whom Americans reviled. Today, the British king is warmly welcomed in his erstwhile colonies, while millions renounce their own president elected by popular vote.

Descendants of the Founding Fathers gather

The audacious rupture with the Crown, whose 250th anniversary is being marked this summer, was made by men of means and comfort. Look at the palaces they lived in and the broad fields they owned and the human beings they forced by whip to tend their lands and their persons for more than 200 years.

On the James River in Virginia is one of those magnificent domains, a mansion and farm called Berkeley Plantation that must have been even more idyllic before they built the gas-fired Hopewell Power Plant across the mile-wide stream.

It was by a window in this house in July of 1745 that a squire named Benjamin Harrison, the fourth of that name in his line, was killed along with two of his little daughters by the fateful lightning of a summer storm.

Now a brighter occasion brings a few dozen of us here on a cloudless spring Saturday. We are going to sing Happy Birthday to the thunderstruck squire’s successor, Benjamin Harrison V, whose portrait on the program handout makes him look pretty good for 300 years old. Harrison V lived to the ripe age of 65, fathered eight children, and both his youngest son William Henry and his great-grandson Benjamin were elected president of the United States.

The irony of the American Revolution is that Louis XVI paid a fortune to save America, and then he lost his head anyway.

by Leroy Anderson Keller Jr.

It was this particular Harrison who would become the governor of Virginia, a delegate to the Continental Congress in Philadelphia, and a signer of the Declaration that placed in jeopardy everything he cherished and everyone he owned.

“You don’t know how it ends and you step over the edge anyway,” a woman says in a fine speech to the attendees, encapsulating the story of 1776, and the mortal risks these rich men took for paper ideas.

In attendance are members of the Society of Descendants of the Signers of the Declaration of Independence, the Sons of the American Revolution, the Daughters of the American Revolution, the Virginia Society of the Dames of the Court of Honor, and sundry other groups. Talk about pure Americana — a bald eagle is turning circles high above the river and our heads.

“Is America a success?” I ask Leroy Anderson Keller Jr., president of the Descendants of the Signers, who currently number about a thousand members with verifiable patriotic pedigrees.

“Yes,” he answers.

“Is it a greater success than it would have been had it remained in the Empire?”

“No.”

“The irony of the American Revolution,” Keller says, “is that Louis XVI paid a fortune to save America, and then he lost his head anyway.”

“What do you say to people who hold that there is nothing worth celebrating in this country this year?” I pose.

“I can understand why some people would feel that way,” the president answers, “but in 1776 we created a republic that has lasted for 250 years, and that has evolved from one that was a very narrowly based republic to a much broader one, and that evolution never stops,” says the president.

“This is a serious situation we are in, but it is self-correcting,” he continues. “Anytime you have a pendulum that swings so far in one direction, it is eventually going to swing in the other direction. But right now, it is proving difficult to get back to somewhere in the middle.”

Article content

Keller’s own ancestor was a wealthy Virginian named Thomas Nelson Jr., who not only financed many of the regiments that, with French help, won the ultimate battle of the Revolution at nearby Yorktown, but who took personal command of his troops and even ordered the bombardment of his own house.

“Have you ever risked your life for anything?” I ask Keller.

“Crossing the street,” he replies.

The ceremony at Berkeley Plantation comes with a colour guard in period costume. One of the marchers is a Black man named William Tugman, a U.S. Army veteran who recently learned from a website called Family Search that he is a distant cousin of Gen. Washington himself.

William Tugman — in white, as part of the colour guard at Virginia’s Berkeley Plantation is a distant cousin of George Washington. Photo by Allen Abel/National Post

The vainglorious but childless Washington was the Father of his country but not of anyone else. Tugman says that his connection was established through Washington’s mother’s side, then sideways and downward. He also learned that he is connected to Abraham Lincoln, Charles III and Babe Ruth.

The American pot began melting long before they put up the Statue of Liberty and invited Europe’s tired, poor and huddled masses to sail west and breathe free. In Connecticut, an insurance executive named Scott Lewis, a member of the Descendants of the Signers through signer Josiah Bartlett, was researching his biochemistry when he discovered that he is in fact three per cent African-American, probably via the daughter of a Revolutionary War fife player who hooked up with one of Bartlett’s great-grandkids. “There was always a mystery about that side of the family, as my grandfather never wanted to talk about it,” Lewis says.


In his first draft of the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson included a paragraph that called for the abolition of the “execrable” slave trade, writing of George III that, “he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere.” That sentence never made it into the final version.

“They took it out because they couldn’t get anybody to sign it,” says Tugman.

This is true; witness the admission by Patrick “Give me liberty or give me death!” Henry, one of the most famous of the early firebrands, who refused to free his own slaves, explaining that, “I am drawn along by the general Inconveniancy of living without them.”

Freedom-loving Jefferson’s legacy

A similar scene unfolds the next noon a few miles from Berkeley at Jefferson’s own manse at Monticello, in Charlottesville, Va., where the principal author of the Declaration bunked when he wasn’t in Paris or Philadelphia.

If not for Jefferson and his propaganda about King George’s “long train of abuses,” and how “these United Colonies are and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States,” the Revolution might not have happened at all, and the U.S. and Canada would be one big, happy Dominion today.\

We gather at the Monticello cemetery for speeches in honour of the freedom-loving slaveholder’s 283rd birth anniversary.

“Without teaching what we belong to, we don’t belong,” the keynote speaker notes. This is a Harvard professor emerita of history named Jane Kamensky, the Monticello CEO.

“America,” she tells me, “remains the last best hope on Earth.”

Yet in this same celebratory springtime, on the campus of the University of Virginia that Jefferson himself founded in 1819, a commencement speaker is telling graduates that Jefferson’s “ethically corrosive claims about human capacity reflected his ignorance and his hubris.” And then there are the children he spawned with his slave Sally Hemings, reflecting the humanity and the hypocrisy of the most eloquent of the Founding Fathers and making him a sitting duck for the latter-day Left.

“My son liked to call himself ‘the most woke person on the planet,’’’ Kamensky says. “Then he came to one of our naturalization ceremonies for new American citizens on the Fourth of July.

“By the time it was over, tears were streaming down his face and he was stuffing American flags in his pocket.”

Canadian descendants of the Founding Fathers

“I actually believe that Canada wouldn’t have developed the way it did if it hadn’t been for the American Revolution,” Brent Cameron tells me from Central Frontenac Township, north of Kingston, Ont. Cameron is another United Empire Loyalist related to an American Founding Father; in his case, both Washington and his presidential successor, John Adams.

“I am one of those people who is very proud of my Loyalist heritage and regret nothing,” he says. “I think the American Revolution was something that was bound to happen. I understand the ideological underpinnings of it. In the U.S. context, the Loyalists who stuck around had to be dealt with. My family didn’t stick around.

“Revolutions come from people saying ‘no more — this has gone far enough.’ What’s the breaking point for people? For the monarchy? I respect the high-handed aspects of the American Revolution — life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness.”

“I am one of those people who is very proud of my Loyalist heritage and regret nothing,” says Brent Cameron from Central Frontenac Township, north of Kingston, Ont. He can trace his heritage to Founding Fathers George Washington and John Adams. Photo by James Paddle-Grant/Postmedia News

Cameron served for eight years on the Township of Central Frontenac council before losing a bid for re-election by 20 votes. He is trying again this year.

“I think the American system is more libertarian, and by that measure we are always going to seem less so,” he tells me by phone, “but if we measure by outcome, by what the machine puts out, I don’t think life in Canada is diminished compared to the United States. We tend to be less dynamic and less innovative. But we’re like Mac and Windows — different operating systems that get to the same result.”

“Are you excited to be George Washington’s and John Adams’s cousin?”

“Not really,” Cameron replies. “I have respect for them, and it’s kind of neat to have that connection. But one thing that bothers me is that so many people will take a connection like that and think it says something about them as individuals. It’s not anything that I did personally. It’s an accident of birth.”

Brian Hayes is a retired stockbroker in Comox, B.C., and another United Empire Loyalist with proven ties to two of the signers and a more roundabout link to John Adams. “I would say the United States has been an unqualified success,” says Hayes. “It hasn’t been what I would call an even ride. They’ve always faced issues, and I believe that’s a function of a democracy. But I think it has been a beacon of ambition, ingenuity and results.”

Hayes tells me that two of his ancestors fought against each other at the Battle of White Plains, N.Y., in 1776.

“If you had to pick a side back then, which one would you choose?” I ask.

“I would have picked the patriot side. The patriots weren’t bad people. It is often portrayed, certainly in Canada, that the big problem was obviously slavery, which runs right in the face of the first page of just about every constitutional document.

“That said, in my family anyway, all the abolitionists were the patriots. It was my great-great-great-grandfather who actually was a slave owner, and he was the Loyalist.”

In 2026, Comox is not the sort of place where one would profit reputationally by waving the Stars and Stripes.

“The ‘elbows up’ concept of everything’s bad in America, that’s about 80 or 90 per cent of the people around here,” Hayes says. “They’re all boycotting the liquor store. But I have a cousin who owns a winery in California.

“And, you know, I’ll still drink his wine regardless.”

Taylor-Swift for governor

In 1963, a woman from Delaware named Nancy Taylor who sometimes told people that she was the Queen of France married a bricklayer named Robert Swift — thus, Nancy Taylor Swift — and, although he was a violent and abusive man, she gave him 13 children.

In 2024, one of those offspring, a big-rig truck driver and fanatic Pittsburgh Penguins supporter named Rachel, who goes by MoHawk, decided that she needed to run for the presidency of the United States of America against Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

MoHawk spent $10,000 that she didn’t have to place her name on the primary ballot in five states. The result was that Rachel Hannah MoHawk Swift garnered 2,326 votes — more than one per cent of the total number cast — in enlightened West Virginia and decided to try it again.

“I make politics sound so fun,” she says.

Last winter, Swift convinced her mother to contest the Republican Party nomination to become the next governor of the state of Maryland, with MoHawk to be her running mate as lieutenant — “the Taylor-Swift ticket!” the daughter exults. After all, this was their constitutional right and duty as heirs to the Founding Fathers and the mad proposition that ordinary citizens should elevate each other to be their chiefs.

“In America, it feels like you can just propel forward and have success,” says Rachel Hannah MoHawk Swift, who is on the ballot to be governor of Maryland. Photo by Allen Abel/National Post

Voting in Maryland commenced on June 11. By then, Nancy Jane Taylor, 82, was dead.

It was too late to reprint the ballots, so now I am sitting in a McDonald’s in Hagerstown, Md., with MoHawk, who is wearing a blond fright wig and a Penguins cape and carrying a red umbrella in case it begins to rain indoors. I show her a copy of the Sample Ballot that is mailed to registered voters, and which still lists mother Taylor and daughter Swift along with eight other pairings.

“Everybody always says, ‘You’re just delusional, it’s not going to work,’” Smith reports. “But honey, we’re actually printed on there, indicating that it’s official.”

This is a woman who says that she grew up in foster homes and attended 15 schools, who worked as a janitor, drove 16-wheelers, has been in and out of mental-health facilities and assorted jails for misdemeanours that included trespassing in Joe Biden’s yard. Yet come November, she could be the governor-elect of one of the original 13 states.

“In America,” says MoHawk Taylor Swift, “it feels like you can just propel forward and have success. You might have a hard day, or you fall behind on a few payments or whatever, but it always feels like you could go forward.”

“What do you say to people who hate this country because of Trump?”

‘Oh, my golly! Trust me, I tried to stop him. I did everything.

“I would tell them that we still have a lot of plus. We still have a lot of plus. We could rebuild again. You know, like the New Deal and the Great Depression.”

“Could you be gubernatorial if you wanted to?” I ask MoHawk Taylor Swift.

“I’d rather be a clown,” the candidate replies. “People take you more seriously.”

Guns and unalienable rights

Back in Washington, the Committee on Homeland Security & Government Affairs of the United States Senate convenes a hearing “to examine threats to the Second Amendment” and almost nobody shows up. Eleven of the committee’s 15 members skip altogether.

The Second Amendment, of course, is the one that guarantees all Americans “the right to keep and bear arms.”

Chairing is Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, who opens the session by heralding the Semiquincentennial and recalling the depredations of what he calls “the tyrannical British Crown.”

One of the guest “witnesses” is a member of the House of Representatives named Thomas Massie — soon to be deposed in a primary election for insufficiently supporting Trump — who announces that he favours the abolition of “gun-free school zones,” because they restrict the ability of law-abiding citizens to shoot back at the marauders who, on average, kill at least one person in an American schoolhouse about 24 times a year, most commonly on a Tuesday or a Friday.

Albertans Dennis Dueck, left, and Leonardo Sirait at a Christian rally in Washington, D.C. Photo by Allen Abel/National Post

Massie quotes good old Patrick Henry — “The great object is that every man be armed” — and confesses, “I carry virtually every waking moment.”

Erich Pratt, senior vice-president of the Gun Owners of America, wearing a lapel pin in the shape of a semi-automatic rifle, tells the room that “the Second Amendment is the right that protects all other rights,” taking us right back to Thomas Jefferson and 1776.

“Is owning a gun the pursuit of happiness?” I ask Pratt when the performance ends.

“Well, it’s certainly a right of self-defence,” he replies. “And I like that you asked it from the standpoint of the Declaration of Independence. The Constitution does not give us the right to keep and bear arms. Our rights come from God, and that’s why they’re unalienable.”

‘America is a Christian nation’

About 40,000 of us sinners — including a few lost Hindus and Jews — are lining up for a security check on the National Mall so that we may reconsecrate the nation to the “shared Christian faith” that the King invoked on Capitol Hill.

Officially, the mid-May event is called “Rededicate 250: A National Jubilee of Prayer, Praise & Thanksgiving.” I arrive just in time to watch seven police officers zip-tie a pair of unlicensed souvenir vendors and confiscate their wares, which include T-shirts featuring Trump’s mug imposed on an image of the White House and the warning DADDY’S HOME.

On a bench nearby is a woman in an “I (heart) Jesus” cap who gives her age as 69 and describes herself as “a punk from Boston who aged out of foster care.”

She rises and proclaims that “America is a Christian nation!”

“Don’t you believe in the separation of church and state?” I ask her.

“That’s not in the constitution,” the Bostonian replies. (Technically, she’s right — the Bill of Rights mandates that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” meaning that the president is not officially the Defender of the Faith.)

Into the field of vision now comes a real-estate broker from Michigan who is shouldering a 65-pound cedar crucifix. This is Dan Beazley, who says that the Lord has called him to load this symbol of Christian compassion into his Ford F-150 and travel to the scenes of mass shootings, stabbings and massacres, and to happier occasions like Rededicate 250.

“Is there any place in the United States for people who are not Christians?” I ask him.

”When Jesus walked the Earth, he knew that not everybody was going to believe,” responds Beazley, who is wearing a white ball cap with the number 47 — Trump’s the 47th president — stitched in gold. “He said, ‘You have eyes to see and you can’t see, and you have ears and you don’t hear.’

Michigan’s Dan Beazley carries a 65-pound cedar crucifix to the scenes of mass shootings, stabbings and massacres, and less fraught places such as a recent Christian rally in Washington. Photo by Allen Abel/National Post

“I’m not going to say that they don’t belong, because eventually our prayer is that their eyes will be open, and then they will see. But that’s between them and God.”

My conversation with Beazley is going well when my attention is captured by a man in the security line who is wrapped in the flag of the province — and possible future Republic — of Alberta.

This is Leo Sirait, an Indonesian-American-Canadian from Calgary who was raised in Jakarta and lived in Denver, where he worked in the catering department of United Airlines.

“What is there to celebrate here?” I ask Sirait, who is accompanied by his friend Dennis Dueck, who sells irrigation supplies out of Airdrie, Alta.

“Celebrating God’s work in this land,” Sirait replies. “I lived in this country a third of my life, you know, and my daughter is a dual citizen with an American passport.

“I think the U.S. doesn’t have everything right. We get that. However, the basis of what the U.S. has been based on is dedication to God. I don’t know if you believe in God or not, but that’s the truth. And we embrace that part, one hundred per cent,” says Sirait.

“That dedication can be found in Canada as well, but Canada has gone so far south on moral values that any citizen should be concerned,” the Albertan says.

“Is there a place in this country for people who are not Christian, or who don’t believe in God at all?” I ask.

“God will never force you,” Dueck answers. “The enemy of God would, but God does not. He gives you a free choice. That’s called love.”

“Is America getting it right now, better than it has been in recent years?”

“I don’t believe Trump gets it right every turn he takes. However, he’s not confused if women should play in men’s sports or vice versa. He doesn’t get that confused.”

Flag-waving in Philadelphia

Finally, Philadelphia, on Flag Day, June 14, 80 years to the day after Donald J. Trump was born in Queens, N.Y.

In the colonial quadrant of the City of Brotherly Love, cobbled streets once trod by statesmen and slaves are thronged with tourists, many of them proudly garbed in red stripes and white stars on a field of blue. They are joined by half the population of Ecuador, blowing vuvuzelas — there’s a World Cup match here tonight.

In front of Independence Hall, where the break with Britain was formalized on the Fourth of July, 1776, young Army cadets are raising the 50-starred banner and a soldier is singing the national anthem with power and purpose. We remove our caps and pause in reverence, then go back to our phones.

“I knew at a young age that I was related to Betsy Ross,” says Maryland’s Eric Conrad, 70. He was in Philadelphia on Flag Day, June 14, 2026, to donate a sewing table from his family’s farm to the Betsy Ross House museum there. Photo by Allen Abel/National Post

Behind the building, a man is holding up a sign that reads “F**K the Orange Fascist Felon,” and there is your USA250 in a nutshell.

One of the most endearing, enduring, and almost certainly untrue legends of the American infancy is that Gen. Washington personally asked a Philadelphia upholsterer named Betsy Ross to stitch a new flag for the new republic and that her handiwork was adopted by the Continental Congress on June 14, 1777.

It is likely that this yarn was sewn in the 1870s by Ross’s great-grandson, but that is no reason to let facts fracture a fairy tale, and so dozens of us, including the Ecuadoreans and a battalion of kilted bagpipers, are gathering in the courtyard of the Betsy Ross House on Arch Street to proudly hail. And there is no disputing that Betsy Ross was a real person, or that her first two patriot-husbands were killed in the Revolutionary War.

One of Ross’s descendants, a 70-year-old Marylander named Eric Conrad, has come to donate to the museum a sewing table from his family’s farmhouse that may well have been his great-great-great-great-grandma Betsy’s. Conrad is dressed in cycling tights — he has been pedalling his way through all 13 of the colonies that broke with George III, replicating a Bicentennial journey he accomplished back in 1976.

Article content

“I knew at a young age that I was related to Betsy Ross,” Conrad tells me, “probably by the time I was four or five years old. I remember going down to the family farm and seeing a table in the great dining room and as a curious kid, I would open the drawers and there were bobbins and pins and thread in the drawers.”

“What is there to celebrate in 2026?” I ask him.

“We’re celebrating the founding of a nation, a republic that became the United States of America, that had freedom and liberty for the people who fought for it.”

“Does Trump obscure all that, or does Trump amplify it?” I wonder.

“I go back to history,” Conrad answers, “and there have always been disruptions in politics. If you look at some of the first presidential battles, like Adams versus Jefferson in 1800, it was some of the most terrible slander ever in politics.

“It’s always going to change in four years or eight years or whatever,” Conrad assures me. “It will change because our structure still allows the people to get what the people want.

“That’s what our government’s all about. It’s for the people. If we don’t get involved in the elections, it’s our own fault.

“All around the world, the U.S. is known as a place of opportunity, and I think we’re still seeing that,” says Conrad. “If people are not happy with their current country, they still want to get here, or they want to come here to learn in our universities and take their knowledge back to their country.

“I think we’re still seen as that.”

“Even now?” I ask the flag-maker’s descendant.

“Even now,” he replies.

 https://nationalpost.com/feature/us-turns-250-july-fourth?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=NP%20eblast%20America250%20July%203%20-%20SUBS&utm_term=NP%20Subscribed%20%26%20Newsletters