Thursday, June 18, 2026

The Brits Should Declare Their Independence, Too


British tyranny is so repulsive that the British people owe it to themselves to overthrow their government masters.  It has been two-hundred-fifty years since America’s Declaration of Independence recognized the Crown system as a threat to Americans’ lives and liberties.  English-speaking peoples still suffering under the British yoke should follow suit. 

Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a near-total ban on social media for children under sixteen years old.  Ten of the most popular social media platforms are now age-restricted, with the toxic-leftist Bluesky platform a notable exception.  The government claims to be “protecting children” from online harm.  That’s a lie.  If the British government cared about protecting British children, government ministers and police forces would not have covered up Islamic rape gangs targeting children for three-plus decades.  The British government would not censor online reporting of foreigners murdering young Brits.  The British government has systematically chosen to sacrifice the United Kingdom’s children.  

This online “safety” measure must be understood, then, as a ruse meant to expand the government’s control over online information.  Australia, New Zealand, and Canada have similar surveillance systems in place — all ostensibly erected to “protect the children” but designed, in reality, to control the speech of citizens.  In these countries, the only way to communicate with other citizens on social media platforms is to prove your age by proving your identity.  Mandatory digital identification systems are disguised as child welfare checks.  The Brits and their Commonwealth vassals have built a surveillance system to monitor citizens’ thoughts, censor unapproved speech, and promote official propaganda.   

Tyrant Starmer is pushing this online surveillance infrastructure while citizens in the U.K. are protesting and rioting against the British government’s murderous mass immigration policies — which have invited foreign rapists and killers to overrun the kingdom and slaughter citizens.  

Third-world barbarism is exploding across Europe.  Official Eurostat numbers show that sexual violence offenses in the European Union have doubled over the last decade.  Rapes skyrocketed 150%.  Knife crimes and murders are off the charts.  Foreign nationals who have immigrated into Europe are responsible for roughly fifty percent of violent crime.  

Just as the unelected European Commission ruling the continent continues to cover up immigrant crimes and censor citizens’ online discussion of these ongoing threats, the British government is more concerned about punishing native Brits for noticing that they are under attack than repelling violent invaders from Britain’s shores.  (If Keir Starmer had been in Winston Churchill’s shoes during the Nazi Blitz, the British government would have surely helped the Germans cover up the bombings while blaming all the destruction on British citizens!)  

Starmer’s government spies run a propaganda outfit that controls all public “narratives” regarding immigrant crime against native Brits.  The group of spies write and release misleading statements, presented as coming from the families of victims, that are designed to downplay rapes, murders, and other violent incidents.  While these spies use propaganda and censorship to cover up serious crimes committed by immigrants, they simultaneously engage in information warfare against British citizens by branding legitimate public concerns over safety as “disinformation,” “far-right racism,” “violence,” and “hate speech.”  This spy group in charge of monitoring and shaping the public’s thoughts has flagged “reading Shakespeare, Chaucer or Milton, or books documenting grooming gang scandals as potential indicators of far-Right susceptibility.”  The British spies — a veritable Gestapo fabricating public “truth” — plant media stories, steer online discussions, and deploy operatives to disrupt or direct public protests. 

The British government claims the power to block “false information” that is “legal but harmful.”  On its website, the British government defines “extreme right-wing terrorist ideology” to include the belief that “‘Western culture’ is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups.”  British Technology Secretary Liz Kendall claims that it is “illegal” to promote “disorder” on social media.  Meanwhile, Starmer’s government tyrants are instructing journalists how to report immigrant attacks on British citizens.  These are the actions of dictators who do not care about “protecting the children.”

Surveying the daily violent crime by immigrants and the British government’s ongoing cover-ups, former Prime Minister Liz Truss says there is a government campaign to “undermine the family” and the “nation state.”  She says that forced diversity has corrupted the institutions and that government ministers suppress information and attack citizens while protecting barbarians.  She concludes that mass migration and government control over information are being used as weapons to destroy Western civilization.

For years, we Americans have watched the evils of globalism expand both at home and abroad in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and most of continental Europe.  Branded by its international supporters as some kind of final, utopian stage of human governance, globalism is just another Frankensteinian beast — created from all the worst parts of Marxist-communism, Leninism, Maoism, fascism, Nazism, authoritarianism, oligarchy, corporatism, elitism, and central bank hegemony.  Globalism is totalitarianism.  Its god is government, although it has created special liturgical rituals regarding an imaginary “climate change” apocalypse meant to scare the world’s peasants into accepting the supremacy of government authority and bureaucrats’ (globalism’s “priests”) centralized power over all economic transactions.

Globalist governments seek total control over the people, and every policy that globalist governments shove down our throats is meant to advance this goal of total control.  COVID was not a health emergency.  It was a government excuse to roll out digital identifications, mandatory pharmaceutical injections, “vaccine” passports capable of monitoring real-time citizen movements, and online censorship.  It was a government program meant to condition citizens to accept that government bureaucrats should be empowered with limitless authorities — including the discretion to regulate church services, close and bankrupt businesses, lockdown citizens in their homes, separate family members from dying loved ones, and quarantine citizens for non-compliance.  The “global warming/cooling/climate change/extreme weather” hobgoblin is a government-designed scare tactic identical to the COVID “emergency.”  The only difference is that the “global warming” fearmongers have been telling us that we have twelve years left to live for the last century, while the COVID fearmongers told us that we had twelve days to live unless we complied.  Manufacturing compliance was and remains globalist governments’ only strategic objective.

Globalism’s ruling elites lust for wealth, power, and total control over the public.  Their lust will never be sated.  They wish for a small collection of government and economic masters to subjugate as much of the planet’s population as possible as serfs.  Globalism is a conquering empire.  Its oligarchy of central bank popes, chosen political governors, corporate monarchs, and techno-fascist-brownshirt-bureaucrats are modern-day slavers and colonizers.  Instead of putting us in chains and whipping us when we “misbehave,” they put us in a lifetime of debt and prosecute us for expressing opinions contrary to official government orthodoxy.  

Do you believe that marriage is an institution recognizing the sacred union between one man and one woman?  Do you believe that men and women are biologically different?  Do you believe that mass immigration is a threat to national security?  Do you believe “multiculturalism” and forced “diversity” destroy excellence, discount merit, and weaken the naturally salubrious bonds of common cultural heritage?  Do you believe that every human has a God-given right to self-defense?  Do you believe that Christians should remain faithful to their beliefs in both their public and private lives?  If so, globalist governments see you as an “extremist,” “right-winger,” “religious fanatic,” “terrorist,” and “enemy of the State.”  Your thoughts will be condemned.  Your speech will be censored.  You will be fined and prosecuted.  You will go to prison for your beliefs.  

The best way for Americans to fight encroaching globalism over here is to support British patriots in their fight against globalism over there.  As Benjamin Franklin persuasively argued, “We must all hang together, or we shall all hang separately.”


Podcast thread for June 18

 


just a day.

The Dawn of the Modern Nationalist Age


In October 1806, in the small German university town of Jena, the philosopher G.W.F. Hegel witnessed Napoleon Bonaparte on horseback passing in the street.  Napoleon’s French armies had just destroyed the Prussian military, and he was on his way to Berlin as conqueror.

Hegel said he saw history on horseback.  He called Napoleon “the soul of the world,” by which he meant Napoleon was the unconscious embodiment and the manifestation of the “Spirit” of historical progress — the man Fate had chosen to usher in a new age.  For Hegel, Napoleon destroyed the old age of the aristocracy and ushered in the new one of nation states.

The political environment in the West today is similarly febrile.  We do not see a man on a white horse, but we do see nascent movements in the United Kingdom and Europe that reflect the one in the United States that elected President Donald Trump.  They reject the immigration policies of their governments.  In America, Britian, and Europe, the transition is happening from the old globalist age to the new nationalist age. 

The old age was defined by deliberate and sustained mass migration into the West.  For years, the British and European Union governments have allowed tens of millions of mostly young men into their countries.  In America, the Biden administration encouraged and accelerated the immigration of many tens of millions of people in four years.  Years of immigration have transformed America, Australia, Britain, Canada, and Europe.  Their cities and identities have come under deliberate assault.  Mass immigration brought violent crime, including murder and rape, weakened the fabric of these high-trust societies, and stole the birthright of their citizens.  Fundamentally, it advanced the dissolution of these countries and of Western civilization. 

The results of mass migration are found daily in appalling news.  The terrible murders of Jocelyn Nungaray and Laken Riley; the sickening Southport murders, where three young girls at a dance studio were stabbed over two hundred times; the murder of a Polish doctoral student, identified as Klaudia K., in Torun; the Bondi Beach Hanukkah celebration attack; the Scottish girl called “Sophie of Dundee,” who was shown on social media holding a knife and an axe to defend herself from migrants; the murder of Henry Novak in Southampton; and the attempted beheading attack by a Sudanese national in Belfast are a ghastly cavalcade of events.  One wonders what tomorrow or next week will bring.  The British, European, Canadian, and Australian elites ignored all monitory messages from their peoples.  The American elites did so before President Trump stopped President Joe Biden’s open-border policies.

After each monstrous attack, the elites mouthed the typical mummery: The attack was “tragic,” and our “thoughts are with the victims,” but we cannot let the latest horror stop immigration.  Nothing can stop immigration, ever. 

In fact, it must be accelerated.  On January 27, 2026, president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen and Indian prime minister Narendra Modi announced a new free trade agreement.  This includes an India-E.U. Comprehensive Framework of Cooperation on Mobility.  This mobility agreement “will ease movement” from India to E.U. members for highly skilled workers, students, researchers, and seasonal workers.  It also contains the first E.U. Legal Gateway Office in India, to add rocket fuel to the population movement from India to the E.U.

Though it has not received much attention in America, it should, because the E.U. just murdered the West.  It has opened the doors of Europe to what is sure to be tens of millions of Indians.  We have seen this before.  In 2015, and in direct violation of the E.U.’s Dublin Regulation, German chancellor Angela Merkel opened Germany’s, and Europe’s, borders to mass migration.  Wir schaffen das — “We can manage this,” she said at the time.  Over ten years later, she is a reviled figure for Germans and other Europeans who must navigate the consequences of her decision.

That is bad enough, but it gets worse.  On June 12, 2026, the E.U. Pact on Migration and Asylum took effect.  It promises cooperation and tougher action on deportations, which no one believes will happen.  What everyone does believe is that it requires every E.U. state, every year, to take migrants from E.U. states “under migratory pressure,” like the fiercely pro-migrant Socialist government in Spain, or pay about 21,000 euros per person.  Rather than stopping migrants, it will redistribute them throughout the E.U., mostly from Spain, France, Germany, and Greece.  That yearly quota of immigrants clearly targets Hungary and Poland, states that so far have refused to take immigrants.  Hungary’s new leader, Peter Magyar, is expected to reverse the steadfast refusal of his predecessor, Viktor OrbΓ‘n, to accept them.

Moreover, as the United States cracks down on current and future H-1B visa holders and applicants, Britian and the E.U., especially Ireland, will receive more migrants from India.  India has the largest surplus of young, educated, English-speaking professionals on Earth.  Modi’s demand of the E.U. was that they be allowed to move into Europe.  This will rapidly eliminate the employment of native Irish in information technology and professional positions — all done with the approval of the Irish government.  Already, India is Ireland’s single largest source of non-E.U. labor migration driven by aggressive international student recruitment, and because Ireland is a gateway to the United Kingdom and the wider E.U. economy.

The new age is defined by a renaissance of populist nationalism.  Western populations have witnessed the consequences of mass immigration for their countries, so they reject it.  Most importantly, they know that their elites have betrayed them.  The elites broke the social contract that exists between the people and their government, which is the foundation of legitimate rule.  People know that the elites — the universities, media, the billionaires, and the Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) they fund — define the old regime.  Hence, they reject their elites and their leadership, their media, the thought at their universities, and their priorities.  Over decades, the elites took sledgehammer blows to their countries.  Now the people see the damage and know they must repair it or lose their nations forever.

Western peoples want a return to nationalist government.  They want their countries and their birthright restored.  They want a new elite, a fair economy, honest media.  They want remigration.  They want an educational system, media, and popular culture that support the country.  They want the political elite to support their nations and to focus on the problems of their countries, rather than globalist chimeras and the adoption of intentionally self-destructive policies.  In the United Kingdom, the “Raise the Colours” movement, and Tommy Robinson’s “Unite the Kingdom” patriotic rallies are great symbols of the new age.  On the continent, the remigration movement is, too. 

The old age won’t give up without a fight.  It is increasingly coercive, imprisoning citizens for their social media postings while laboring to ban the social media platform X, the only major one left for free expression.  Most importantly, there is a race between the old age’s efforts to import a new population by the tens of millions and the new age’s effort to halt and reverse migration. 

Winning that race will be helped by the development of tools and networks.  This includes an organization that can coordinate not only within countries, but among them to formulate the hard-won responses and share lessons learned and the fruits of experience.

Whereas Napoleon swept away the old age with brilliant military victories, the supporters of the new age must become modern Napoleons in political warfare to sweep away the detritus of the old.  That is a formidable task and will define the years to come.  As Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky first said, and American author and journalist Whittaker Chambers echoed, “anybody looking for a quiet life has picked the wrong century to be born in.”  That is as true of the twenty-first century as it was of the last.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


ACTION ALERT – One More Lap Through the Piranha Pool


Many have said we have had a lot of success. Others have noted we have pulled off some impossible tasks. However, I’m still pushing; there is a long way to go.  One thing is certain, a lot more people who can do something are now looking more seriously about how things connect.

The no longer hidden Michael Atkinson transcript, and the IC IG report behind it, highlight proof of how CIA and the aligned IC actively worked to impeach a sitting President.  Previously few people believed it; however, the evidence has opened a lot of eyes to the reality around them.

Now we are engaged in expanding that understanding to see an even bigger picture about the specific tools used by the DC system to manipulate outcomes detrimental to our national health.  FISA (702) is at the heart of it.

The only thing needed to expose the tools, is honesty.  If redactions were removed, reports made public and context delivered, well, I doubt seriously FISA (702) as a tool would exist without radical and structural reform.

The process is not easy and begins with questions:

What specific authorities, what definitions, were used by the DOJ -under Biden- to target the crowd at the J6 protest?

What methods, manner and processes were used by Jack Smith and the DOJ crew to define, then identify, search and assemble the targeting of January 6th protesters??

It’s all available, people just need to put the dots together.

https://privacyinternational.org/examples/5273/fbi-uses-digital-surveillance-identify-january-6-participants

What investigative authorities were used in Arctic Frost?

https://cnn.com/2025/10/06/politics/jack-smith-january-6-gop-lawmakers-phone-records

Do you think it is just accidental that the following year OIG Michael Horowitz outlined how FISA (702) search abuses skyrocketed – during the exact same time as Jack Smith (et al) were using the FBI to arrest thousands of people?

https://oig.justice.gov/news/testimony/statement-michael-e-horowitz-inspector-general-us-department-justice-us-house-3

Office of Inspector General Michael Horowitz testified April 27, 2023, that more than 3.4 million search queries into the NSA database took place between Dec. 1st, 2020, and Nov. 30th, 2021, by government officials and/or contractors working on behalf of the federal government. These search queries were based on authorizations related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

IG Horowitz also stated that somewhere north of 10,000 federal employees have access to conduct these searches of the NSA database; a database which contains the electronic data of every single American, including emails, text messages, social media posts, instant messages, direct messages, phone calls, geolocation identifiers, purchases by electronic funds, banking records and any keystroke any American person puts into any electronic device for any reason.

What IG Horowitz outlined was the FISA (702) trail that followed in the wake of Jack Smith and the FBI targeting mass surveillance of persons who may or may not be connected to the J6 protest.

At its core, this is all about FISA (702) as an internal tool to identify domestic “threats” as defined by highly political national security parameters.

https://fbi.gov/news/speeches-and-testimony/examining-the-january-6-attack-on-the-us-capitol-wray-061521

People just have to connect it all to see how FISA (702) was/is being used. From that reality, people can then understand why 702 is so important to Washington DC, and you also discover why the J6 committee needed to delete all their records.

♦ Senator Chuck Grassley first revealed the existence of FBI “Operation Arctic Frost,” the intentional targeting of J6 attendees and those who supported President Trump in the 2020 election (consider that silo #1).

https://grassley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/arctic_frost_bank_record_subpoenas.pdf

♦ Two years later OIG Michael Horowitz outlined how during this exact timeframe (Dec ’20 to – Nov ’21) more than 3.4 million search queries into the NSA database took place during this timeframe (consider that silo #2).

https://oig.justice.gov/news/testimony/statement-michael-e-horowitz-inspector-general-us-department-justice-us-house-3

♦ Senator Rand Paul then outlined how TSA operation “Quiet Skies” was an outcome of the J6 monitoring (consider that Silo #3).

https://tsa.gov/news/press/releases/2025/09/30/dhs-and-tsa-expose-targeting-political-opponents-former-biden

SUMMARY: (1) Arctic Frost was the weaponized FBI operation that empowered (2) the FBI searches of the NSA database noted by Horowitz. Those results were then cross fed to the J6 committee and DHS, where (3) the TSA triggered Quiet Skies against the target results. THIS IS WEAPONIZING GOVT. This was how it worked.

♦ Underpinning all of it is the unconstitutional method to conduct the surveillance, FISA (702).  There are a lot of opposition voices against accepting or understanding this issue.

All this information has been out before; the real issue is that no one connects the dots. The inability to see the trees within the forest is at the heart of how the silo system works in Washington, DC—and it’s designed that way on purpose.

Against the background of current urgencies, timing is critical.  There are new eyes and new voices paying attention.

Once again, summary assistance has been requested; however, I cannot swim back across this DC piranha pool without (1) angels on my shoulder (that’s you), and (2) a strong legal shield (Dubes).

I am praying for guidance. I also only have one-day to make a decision.

With appreciation to all,

~Sundance


There Are Some Hints About What’s Really Going On With The Gavin Newsom Investigation


The ‘behested payments’ corporations made at the behest of the governor included contributions to a non-profit run by the governor’s wife.



Getting on our last nerve, greasy California Gov. Gavin Newsom forces us to talk about something we would prefer to not discuss.

Investigations mostly shouldn’t be covered as news. By definition, if cops are investigating, they haven’t nailed down what happened. They have some preliminary allegations that they can’t prove yet. Even when they think they know what happened and get a prosecutor to file charges, we say that a defendant faces allegations. Talking about things that may in the future turn into allegations is a losing game, but one that a sitting governor forces us to play when he explicitly announces that he’s under investigation.

So all of this is speculation through the fog about things that may in the future be alleged, but we have some hints about the kinds of things that might draw law enforcement attention to Newsom and his wife.

The first is probably not the thing that you’ve heard about most recently, the charges involving Newsom’s former chief of staff stealing from campaign funds. The most likely topic of an investigation is a much-discussed reality of California politics called “behested payments.”

None of this is a new story. Way back in 2021, the Los Angeles Times reported that Newsom was causing concern in Sacramento by asking corporations to donate money to his favorite causes: “Facebook, Google, other corporate giants flooded Newsom with record $226 million in charity donations in 2020.” Knowing that a governor signs bills into law that can impose burdens on their businesses and choose companies for big government contracts, corporations turned out to be eager to comply.

And about those charities: “Three organizations, including Silicon Valley Bank, collectively gave $175,000 this year on behalf of the governor to the California Partners Project, a nonprofit launched by First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom that focuses on promoting gender equity and understanding the impact of technology and media on children.”

So the “behested payments” corporations made at the behest of the governor included contributions to a non-profit run by the governor’s wife.

Advancing the appearance of quid pro quo donations, the Washington Free Beacon reported last year that Newsom intervened with federal regulators in a dispute between tribes over the right to operate Indian casinos.

“In April 2024, a few months before Newsom sent his letter to the Biden Interior Department, the Democratic governor requested Graton Rancheria to contribute $500,000 to his wife’s charity, the California Partners Project,” the Free Beacon wrote. “And in April 2025, one month before Newsom filed his lawsuit against the Trump administration, he again asked Graton Rancheria to contribute another $500,000 to his wife’s charity.”

While Newsom suggests that Mean Orange Man is making prosecutors target him because he wants to run for president, then, a more plausible explanation for federal law enforcement interest centers on some not-at-all-new heat around pay-to-play allegations that are at least plausible: Give my wife’s charity some cash and I can do things for you as governor.

Related to the appearance of financial benefit for Jennifer Siebel Newsom from government business, the conservative journalist Jennifer Van Laar has been scrutinizing the Newsom family’s interesting real estate deals for years. Sample story: “Gavin Newsom’s $3.7 Million Estate Was Gifted to Him in 2019; 3 Months Later He Got a $2.7 Million Tax Free Cash-Out.”

And finally, proven corruption has been recently and successfully prosecuted in immediate proximity to the governor, as Newsom’s former chief of staff pled guilty in May to charges related to her theft from a political campaign fund that belonged to current gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra.

Whatever investigation turns out to be underway, none of this is recent, and every potential topic of controversy dates to the Biden administration. A Monday story in The New York Times explicitly added the detail that at least one federal investigation into Newsom began before Trump’s second term: “When Ms. Williamson was indicted last year, her attorney said that federal agents first approached her during the Biden administration. She was working for Mr. Newsom at the time, and the agents asked her if she would cooperate in an investigation of the governor.”

So Newsom is now in the awkward position of arguing that a Trump administration witch hunt began when Joe Biden was the president.

It’s highly unlikely that Newsom is under federal investigation because Trump said so, and there’s no reason for Newsom to announce the investigation if he thought it was likely to end without charges. He’s trying to get ahead of something, and there are old reasons to believe that the something is real.

We’re forced into the bizarre position of saying that Newsom has due process rights, and is entitled to the presumption of innocence, even as he himself drops hints that he may be facing charges.

Tread carefully around the California governor’s announcement that the governor of California is under investigation.

Finally, federal investigators have been mucking out California politics for decades, long before they answered to Trump. Among the many available examples, a Democrat former state senator went to prison for running a weapons trafficking racket, and the Los Angeles City Council just seems to cycle through regular seasons of federal indictment. This one is from 2024: “Former Los Angeles City Councilmember JosΓ© Luis Huizar was sentenced today to 156 months in federal prison for using his powerful position at City Hall to enrich himself and his associates, as well as for cheating on his taxes.”

Political corruption investigations are a proud California tradition that began long before Trump became president. They’ll continue long after he leaves office. It’s the local version of normal.


Trump Should Cut Ties With Starmer Government Over UK Rape Gang Scandal


Trump should treat the U.K. like the hostile 
Third World country it has become until it rediscovers Western justice and morality.



The entire Western world was stopped in its tracks this week with the release of Britain’s Rape Gang Inquiry Report, documenting the industrial-scale sexual abuse of thousands of British girls at the hands of Pakistani Muslims.

While anyone with a functional cultural reference point might not have been surprised by those results generally, the fact that successive governments of the United Kingdom decided to look the other way and protect the rapists requires any moral government to make a pariah of the U.K. until it can prove it is equipped and willing to protect its own people. The United Kingdom’s repeated failure to do so requires President Donald Trump to cut ties with the U.K. until it proves itself a viable member of Western civilization again.

The report, spearheaded by Restore Britain Leader and Member of Parliament Rupert Lowe, states that “at the very least, 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma,” and estimates that between 87 percent and 95 percent of perpetrators were Muslim.

While most objective observers might have assumed it was almost entirely Muslim — and predominantly Pakistani — men perpetrating these heinous offenses, perhaps few would have guessed at how uniformly the perpetrators belonged to that demographic, or imagined the scale of the evil they wrought on British society.

By way of comparison, the Rape of Nanking during the Second Sino-Japanese War saw somewhere between 20,000 and 80,000 rapes, according to eyewitness accounts and subsequent research.

The rapes have been ongoing for decades, and governments run by both the Conservative and Labour parties have either ignored them or done everything they could to obscure the tragedy’s scale and the identities of the perpetrators. Yet the report lays the lion’s share of the blame at the feet of the Labour Party: “Successive governments lacked the will to confront the ethnic and religious patterns. The Labour Party bears particular responsibility. It initially refused a public inquiry and only relented under pressure by ordering a process viewed with widespread scepticism.”

A disgrace to Western civilization of this proportion might have convinced American leaders of times past to invade Europe in order to save it, but the very least the Trump administration can do is cut all ties with the U.K. until it rounds up all the perpetrators and either deports or executes them.

Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer initially refused to have an inquiry done until he was publicly shamed by many, including Elon Musk, who said Starmer was “deeply complicit in the mass rapes in exchange for votes.” Starmer should have been at the tip of the spear as the head of the Crown Prosecution Service from 2008 to 2013; as prime minister now, he has even more authority.

Even after reluctantly calling for an investigation late in the game, Starmer has done everything possible to cover for the demographic realities of the perpetrators. When choosing to mention demographics, Starmer has elected to say “Asian grooming gang.”

Such vague language has prompted Lowe to respond, “Stop calling them ‘Asian’ ‘grooming gangs.’ They are not Japanese. Call them what they are. Predominately Pakistani Muslim rape gangs.”

The report details both parties holding responsibility for the cover-up, noting that even the Starmer-backed inquiry was conducted in such a way as to shield Muslims from culpability:

Labour-dominated councils and MPs were briefed on the gangs long ago yet later denied knowledge. The party prioritised electoral reliance on Muslim voting blocs and then blocked or watered down inquiries, suppressed ethnicity data, and framed legitimate concerns as ‘far-right’ agitation. When finally forced to act, the Labour government produced a national inquiry whose tightly drawn terms of reference deliberately excluded systematic examination of the demographic, cultural, and religious drivers. The Conservative Party, while in government, continued with Labour’s approach and failed to impose mandatory ethnicity recording or launch a full statutory inquiry despite clear evidence from Rotherham and elsewhere. Scottish political parties have refused a dedicated inquiry and failed to record offender ethnicity. Political correctness, fear of accusations of racism, and fear of losing electoral support from certain demographics have taken precedence over the protection of British children.

“The demographic and cultural drivers are clear. Perpetrators from Pakistani Muslim and other Muslim backgrounds operated under an honour- and shame-based clan code that treated non-Muslim girls, especially white working class girls, as property available for sexual use,” the report notes.

Authorities who should have protected victims instead systematically ignored them. Police even “criminalised victims instead of perpetrators, destroyed evidence, and allowed known rapists to walk free on bail,” according to the report.

This kind of corrupted system was on display recently in the case of Henry Nowak, the 18-year-old British college student brutally slain by Sikh Vickrum Digwa. Bodycam footage effectively proved that criminalizing white victims in service to non-white perpetrators is part of police training. When Nowak screamed while drowning in his own blood that he could not breathe and that he had been stabbed, white police officers told him he was lying. In his last moments on earth, they handcuffed him and dragged him on the ground, only later offering first aid.

Tracing the same theme of institutional anti-white bias, the rape gang report details how non-white attackers, often from foreign countries, are institutionally shielded from accountability.

In addition to police misconduct, “Social care services undermined protective parents, placed children in trafficking hubs inside children’s homes, closed cases despite clear indicators of exploitation, and retaliated against whistleblowers. The NHS recorded genital injuries, multiple sexually transmitted infections in children as young as 13, pregnancies caused by rape, and suicide attempts, yet discharged victims back to their abusers without safeguarding referrals or trauma care. Schools observed older men collecting girls at the gates, heard disclosures of rape on school premises, and responded by excluding victims rather than protecting them.”

Trump has been heavily critical of Starmer’s government on the issue of free speech, with his administration promising to “take action” if the situation degrades further. However, while free speech needs to be forced on Britain as well, it is not as existential a concern as the country’s refusal to protect its young girls from rape gangs.

Trump should immediately break off relations with the Starmer government and treat the United Kingdom like the hostile Third World country it has become until it rediscovers the Western justice and morality it had such a major role in spreading across the globe.