Sunday, June 14, 2026

Let’s Have a Serious Conversation About Race


“What the hell is wrong with these people?” I heard someone ask as a clip of Jasmine Crockett played on the television at the restaurant bar the other day. What was Crockett talking about? Her sympathy for the murderer named Karmelo Anthony because he’s black. Yes, that’s why she cares, or at least pretends to care, about the fate of the man who’ll spend at least the next 17.5 years of his life in prison in Texas. How could anyone, real or not, go on camera and express sympathy for a murderer, at the expense of the murder victim and his family, no less? There’s really only one possibility: the cancerous cultural rot Democrats have forced and enforced on the black community.

We have a very weird relationship with race in this country, one where white people have been bullied into only talking about other races in apologetic tones, like we did something to everyone else. We didn’t.

I, for one, am sick of watching videos of “teen takeovers” on the news and pretending that 90- plus percent of the “teens” share a characteristic beyond their presumed age. How do you address a problem if you aren’t willing to talk about it honestly?

I’m willing, so let’s go.

Most people can’t, or won’t, have that discussion, which suits Democrats just fine. And the rest of the media is as well.

Have you noticed how you only see white cable news hosts talking about issues involving race with black guests? Liberal or conservative, it doesn’t matter; it’s always the white host with black guests where the hosts do everything they can to agree with the guests.

It never goes anywhere or solves anything because no serious conversation can involve pandering, and pandering is all cable news does anymore on the issue.

The truth is, most minorities who have been convinced by politicians, pundits, and preachers that they are victims are, in fact, victims, only they’re victims of the people who convinced them.

Racism, to any extent that matters in America, exists on the left – both inspired and weaponized by politicians hoping the black community won’t realize they’re in the midst of the longest con ever perpetrated: the Democrat establishment against black people.

For more than three-quarters of a century, we’ve had Democrats, both black and white, controlling the cities where most black people live. I don’t think there’s a majority-black city in the country that has had a Republican elected official in my lifetime. Yet, those cities are the centers of drugs, assaults, and murder.

Yes, all those things happen outside of those areas, too, but from a percentage of the population and from a crime perspective, it’s not even close.

In 2024, 15,795 people were murdered in the United States. Of those victims, 6,753 were white, and 8,158 were black. The numbers are down from 2023, when 8,070 white people were murdered, and 11,060 black people were.

However, if you think about it, those numbers expose a horrifying fact: black people make up just 13 percent of the population, so how the hell can they be the majority of murder victims? Well, that’s just the first worm in the can – as people are about 95 percent more likely to be victims of violent crimes by people who have the same skin color as them, that means the murderers of those black people are also overwhelmingly black.

Democrats ignore this because they have no way to exploit it to their advantage. If a white person kills a black person, which happens sometimes (though rarely), they’re all set up for that and have talking points about “structural racism” and “white supremacy” at the ready. If that configuration is reversed, as it was with Karmelo and Austin Metcalf, they used to have nothing.

Now they have this perversion that somehow a fair trial resulting in someone who stabbed a kid in the heart and killed him was an injustice based on race. They’re sick.

Crockett whined, “Black women, especially black women who have black male children, live in fear and agony every single day. A fear and agony that I promise you the Metcalfs probably never spend a day living that way. And we're going to have to have just some real conversations about race in this country.”

Black women who live in fear for their black male children should live in fear of other black males, as they are the perpetrators in all but a rounding error of the murders of young black men. Crockett isn’t stupid; she’s evil. She knows this is true, but what political mileage can she gain by pointing it out?

In the wake of the murder of Austin Metcalf, black “influencers” and social media users have been positing pictures of themselves urinating on Austin’s grave, taunting his family, and calling for more “white boys” to be killed in some perverted version of “justice.” Members of Congress have expressed more sympathy for the murderer and his family than for the victim. Pundits lie about an “all-white jury,” while others instruct black people to lie to get on juries in the future so they can “protect” other black defendants.

I have seen a lot of each of those disgusting things described above, and I only saw one “black leader” who denounced or spoke in real terms about any of it. It wasn’t a “man of god” like Al Sharpton or Raphael Warnock, nor was it a former President or Vice President like Barack Obama or Kamala Harris. It was a sports commentator, Stephen A. Smith.

Smith said, “I would give anything to be able to say something definitively in Karmelo Anthony’s defense. If there was a shred of innocence to the incident itself, I would say so. I don’t want to see another black young man going to jail. But I don’t give a damn about what your race, I don't give a damn about what your race or ethnicity is. Just because you’re white and young doesn’t mean you deserve to be murdered. And just because you’re black and young with challenges that black folks face every single day doesn’t give you a license to murder someone. That's what happened.”

There were no roundtables convened on MSNow or CNN to discuss the cultural rot that would lead to only one man calling a murderer a murderer. There was no discussion or condemnation of the justification of the murder or the calls for more. And there was no one daring to point out the reality of violent crime in this country.

How can you solve a problem when you won’t acknowledge it? You can’t.

When black men are calling for other 15 and 16-year-old black men to kill more white people because “y’all will be out at 30, y’all ain’t gonna do life,” where is the condemnation? Where are the politicians and pastors?

I have been told my whole life how “important the black church is in the black community,” but I have never seen it mobilized for anything more than to elect Democrats. They’re great at mourning – George Floyd had three funerals that were quite the production – but they don’t seem to do much in the way of preventing the need for mourning in the first place.

Politicians are ready to show up to “show support” for whatever lie they’ve got trending on social media, but they suck at doing anything to avoid outrages and improve the lives of the people they claim to care about more than anything else.

Generations of black people have lived and died knowing nothing but Democrats in political power, punditry, and the pulpit, and never saw their family’s lives improve. That’s not “the system” being rigged against them; that’s the Democrats making sure they keep their heads above water enough, so they don’t drown while they routinely promise the alternative would somehow be worse. Never have these Democrats attempted to teach anyone the importance of learning to swim, as anyone who learns on their own is denounced as an “Uncle Tom.”

Democrats created a failed education system designed to keep poor minorities where they are and ensure government dependence indefinitely, and nothing more. They tolerate a culture of violence, where actually learning is attacked as “acting white” and getting ahead is called “selling out.”

Karmelo Anthony murdered a kid, not because “he felt threatened,” as he could have easily walked out of the tent if that were the case. He killed Austin Metcalf because he’d been conditioned by the left to be a victim and to believe that anything he did in response to that victimhood was justified.

It’s a mentality that leads to thousands of dead young black men every year, and millions more giving up hope of improving their lives. It’s also a mentality that leads to Democrats getting reelected in places that are the third world economically and have been for decades, because they’ve successfully conned black people into thinking Democrats actually care about them more than on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November in an election year.

You can’t have a serious conversation about race in this country when half the political world benefits from an unserious series of lies on the subject.


Podcast thread for June 14

 


ohhhh what a day.

Self-Serving Politicians Spawned Today’s Festering Dystopia


The 18th-century French philosopher Voltaire is to have once remarked, “Common sense is not so common” when assessing the lack of logic and basic reasoning prevalent in France during the Age of Enlightenment. He certainly had a knack for distilling his views of humanity in that era. The dominant questions confronting society in that time were markedly different than those which the U.S. currently faces, but his stark observation can still be applied to a distinct segment of American society today.

The particular U.S. factions who support the “woke” and similar philosophies may hold that their beliefs are well-grounded in solid reasoning. But  many policies based on good intentions, which fit neatly onto bumper-stickers, have resulted in disaster as they were not fully examined for negative ramifications. Recent developments are illustrative.

Now, various appeals in support of benevolent sounding policies abound: who amongst you would not extend a helping hand to those escaping a foreign government’s oppression? Shouldn’t we as a society offer second chances to those who, for good reasons, violate our border, criminal theft, and voting laws? How can Americans be so heartless to restrict people’s actions when feeling estranged from their biological genders? And who can argue that a truly just society is not based on kindness?

When policy advocates concocted such grievances, ladled out ill-conceived public programs, and dumped them on a trusting society, they rained great misfortune on  U.S. culture and taxpayers. The outcomes of what were sold as well-meaning policies mutated into a mishmash of madnesses and pure folly.

One of the most recent egregious examples cited, according to the General Accounting Office, occurred in FY 2025. Rampant fraud discovered in the Medicaid and Medicare programs in Minnesota, Ohio, California, and Maine has resulted in $186 billion (thus far) spent on “improper payments stolen from taxpayers.” In Minnesota, more than 90% of those indicted for massive swindles in the “Feeding Our Future” food program, housing stabilization, and specialized Medicaid programs were centered in the Somali community. Testimony revealed that Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison were put on notice of fraud in 2020, but funds kept flowing as their oversight responsibilities were ignored. In another instance, in Van Nuys, California, investigators found that a three-story dilapidated building, which was supposed to house 50 hospices and 97 home health companies, did not; the building even lacked a constructed wheel chair ramp for incoming patients. Even more proof of fraud was uncovered in a government report finding that six million ineligible people were  enrolled in “Obamacare” in 2026; these illegal subsidies cost taxpayers upwards of $25 billion.

In all of these cases, elected officials were unwilling to enforce laws which prohibited “paying someone who was ineligible for federal assistance.” To be clear, these amounts were not minor rounding errors but the result of governing authorities who ignored established laws, their responsibilities and, in many instances, gained political support from recipients for their largesse. Treasury Secretary Bessent estimated that if  all 50 states are audited for these brazen thefts and such schemes are eliminated, the U.S. could balance its budget. In 2025, the federal deficit added up to $1.8 trillion in overspending.

Another issue tearing at the fabric of the U.S. culture is the policy that boys, if they identify as female, should not only be allowed to participate in girls’ sports but have access to women’s locker rooms. This is seen as insanity by the vast majority of America. The adoption of this policy by the Fairfax County (VA) School Board was that youngsters can identify as another gender despite not having reached the Age of Reason. Thus, their choices must be respected. The Board completely ignored the rights to privacy for girls/females under Virginia Code § 18.2-386.1 “prohibiting…observing another person without consent for sexual gratification or to arouse or satisfy sexual desires when the person is in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g., locker rooms, bathrooms, changing rooms)”. In Fairfax County, rapes and assaults have been the result of governing entities closing their eyes to established laws and the XX/XY chromosome differences.

In 2025, a California proposal penalized parents who did not affirm a child’s trans identity. But state law maintains until age 18, a child is not capable of understanding the effect of their reasoning and conduct. So, for lawmakers and parents to subject a child to either life-altering surgery or ruinous psychological damage because of their youngster’s immature feelings is despicable and malfeasance. A natural outgrowth of that theory would be if a second grader came home from school to announce she was now a giraffe, California law and parents would be forced to send that child off to the Serengeti for fear of prosecution.

More warped governing sensibilities have emerged in the form of lax treatment for indicted felons. Cashless bail is now granted in some metropolitan areas for those arrested for certain felonies…felonies! And the accused are then deposited back on the streets where they often repeat the same crime, sometimes in the same day. This is ludicrous. Illinois became the first state to entirely abolish cash bail under the so-called Pretrial Fairness Act. Defendants charged with particular felonies are released on cashless bail with specific, harsh conditions to include “checking-in.” Also, in 30 states, theft below $1,000 is now prosecuted as a misdemeanor; thieves often receive community service as “punishment.” Looters everywhere have rejoiced. Retail merchants, not so much. Mores are evaporating right in front of our eyes.

And of course one cannot overlook the travesty of not requiring a government-issued ID to vote in U.S. elections. On a secular basis, is there anything more sacred than guaranteeing the integrity of the American electoral process? There is no plausible reason to ignore adjudicated cases of non-citizen voting in recent elections. Oddly enough, the no ID requirement occurs almost uniformly in Democrat-run states. In light of the facts that two government-issued IDs were required to shovel snow in New York City last winter, and one was even necessary to enter the 2024 Democrat National Convention, it strikes many as rank hypocrisy to turn a blind eye to  something so vital to this country. Everyone is aware of ID requirements to open bank accounts, receive welfare, buy alcohol, and receive driver’s licenses, but there is no necessity to ensure the integrity of elections?

The motives in this particular instance are quite clear. The borders were flung wide open under President Biden, illegals flooded the country, and in many states and municipalities authorities gave illegals with no citizenship verifications permission to enter our voting booths. This was a blatant effort to cement political power for those who facilitated unlawful access to the country. Senator Rand Paul summed up: “Democrats have once again shown they do not want elections to remain free, fair, and decided by Americans.”

Odious, narcissistic politicians routinely divert attention from all of these disastrous outcomes and attempt to refocus arguments only on perceived injustices. Recall that Obama’s Rahm Emanuel, who is weighing a presidential bid in 2028,  infamously said “Never let a crisis go to waste.”

If officials who continue to promote these philosophies have their way, America will no longer be a nation of laws but a country where political expediency is the rule. If we do not stop the assault on and corrosion of our principles, we will no longer have a durable republic. Maybe we should rename AI “Voltaire,” and task it to do the job that contemptuous, woke politicians will not.


🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


The MSM and the Democrats - but I Repeat Myself - Should Stop Trying to Make Inflation Happen


RedState 

As RedState has already reported, the Iran war has led to another boost in inflation:

Consumer prices rose 4.2 percent from a year earlier in May, the highest annual reading since April 2023, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Consumer Price Index increased 0.5 percent during the month, matching what economists had forecast. One number explains most of it: Energy accounted for more than 60 percent of the overall increase.

To put this number in context, it’s important to note that “(p)olicymakers at the Fed generally believe that an inflation rate of 2 percent (or slightly below) is acceptable for a stable economy that is healthy for both consumers and businesses” although “most central banks and governments closely monitor the annual inflation rate to ensure it is at a balanced and modest level, around 2 percent to 3 percent.” 

So, an inflation rate above 3 percent should be somewhat dangerous to the public, and, as a result, to politicians. 

Of course, the MSM – and certain “traitorous” Republicans – have rushed to use this increase, coupled with a supposedly “insensitive” statement by President Trump, to portray him in the worst light possible. As always, context is key, and believe it or not, Politico, of all media organs, helpfully explained the key context, as the president said: 

“I love the inflation,” he said. “You know why? Because as soon as this war is over, … it’s going to come down like a rock.”

The Real Key Political Question, however, is whether this increase in inflation, which impacts “affordability,” will politically harm the GOP in the House elections of 2026? Since I previously took a stab at answering this question before, let me revise and extend my reporting. 

Here is a list of the yearly inflation rates from 1929 through 2024. Here are the monthly changes of inflation from 1914 through 2026. Here, thanks to Wikipedia (which can be trusted in this case), are the changes in the House over the years. 

I am going to focus only on modern times, where modern campaign technology and tactics were used, which I will date from 1968 onwards.

As we can see from these charts, inflation rates from 3 to 4 percent are not particularly dangerous to the party that holds the presidency. Further, since 1968, we know that the inflation rate was 4.2 percent or higher:

  • 1968 through 1970 = in 1968, the Democrats had the presidency and lost 5 seats; in 1970, the Republicans had the presidency and lost 12 seats.
  • 1973 through 1981 (the final rate during 1982 dwindled down to 3.8 percent) = in 1974 the GOP had the presidency and lost 48 seats; in 1976 the GOP had the presidency and dropped another seat; in 1978, the Democrats had the presidency and lost 15 seats; in 1982, the GOP had the presidency, and despite the inflation rate steadily dipping from 8.9 percent to 3.8 percent, still lost 26 seats; 
  • 1987 through 1990 = the GOP had the presidency, and yet barely lost House seats, 2 in 1988 and 7 in 1990;
  • 2021 through 2022 = the Democrats had the presidency and lost 9 seats in 2022.

As I said before, this chart shows that inflation itself doesn’t have a consistently major effect on House elections. It also demonstrates that the really big House losses only came during times when the inflation rate was much higher than 4.2 percent. In 1974, the Democrats won yuge because of inflation at 12.30 percent, but also because of the bad economy in general, the Watergate Scandal, and the tensions regarding the Vietnam War. 

In 1982, with a rate that went down during the year from 1981’s 8.9 percent to 1982’s final 3.8 percent, the Democrats also won big, although their redistricting edge also helped them immeasurably, and there were a host of other economic problems besetting the GOP president, including high unemployment. The Democrats were also coming off an awful 1980 House ‘bust’ cycle that allowed for a ‘boom’ in 1982. But in 1978, with inflation at 9 percent, and in 2022, with inflation at 6.5 percent, the Democrats only lost a relatively small number of seats, which may have been a result of an effective campaign run by the Democrats in those years to blunt the GOP attacks on inflation.

So, I am not seeing this recent rise of inflation being of much assistance to the Democrat campaigns this year (aside from being a readily available talking point). Especially since the rest of the economic indicators seem to be pretty good. Not that the Democrats need much help – they just need a net three seats to win control over the House of Representatives. 

Despite the Democrat's loss in the gerrymandering battles of 2026, this is not an insurmountable hurdle.


Bad News for Dems With Latest Polling Data on Platner


RedState 

As we reported, Democrats went all in for their nominee for the Senate in Maine, Graham Platner, despite all the vile things that have been revealed about him. 

Why did they do that? He had been polling about nine points ahead of Republican incumbent Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) about two weeks ago. 

About a week ago, we reported how the data indicated that the margin was closing, despite Democrats' protestations that people didn't care about the things being revealed about Platner. An internal poll for Platner even indicated the numbers had closed - to Platner just leading by four, when an internal poll generally tends toward the person for whom they're polling. This is with the polling generally underestimating Collins by a lot for the past three elections. 

Then, President Donald Trump endorsed Collins, despite noting they had differences on policy, and he blasted Platner. 

Now, Quantus Insights has some new numbers in on the race, and the Democrats who threw in with Platner have to be kicking themselves. They debased themselves to support him, and his lead has essentially disappeared. It's now a statistical tie. 

It has Platner at 46 percent, Collins at 45, with 7 percent undecided, and 2 percent other. 

Notice that in the generic congressional ballot, Democrats are up by 10. So Platner is doing worse than the generic Democrat, and Collins is doing better than the generic Republican. So much for Democrats attaching their hopes to him. 

Co-founder of Quantus, Jason Corley, confirmed how much it had closed, and he thinks it's now a "toss-up." 

He may be being kind. 

As we noted, this is before you count in the 8 or so points the polls tend to underestimate Collins. If that holds in this election, as it has in the last three elections, she may be up by a fair amount. 

There's likely more to drop on Platner, and they haven't even fully directed their attacks at him, which they will do, now that he is past the primary. 

You have to think that it is probably lean R now, given Collins' history of resilience in elections. Democrats were obviously wrong - character and Nazi tattoos do mean something to the electorate. 


Gavin Newsom and Media Outlet Tag Team for Two Wild Takes on Elon Becoming a Trillionaire


RedState 

Elon Musk became a trillionaire through his companies, following SpaceX's initial public offering (IPO) on Friday. 

That caused something of a freakout from people on the left, as we reported, including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and the Democrats' scandal-plagued nominee for the Senate in Maine, Graham Platner, with Platner actually saying, "Let's make sure he is the last." 

This was actually a Globe and Mail headline: 

After a backlash, they posted this saying their prior headline did not meet their editorial standards, although their post on X is still up. 

Then there was this winner from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. 

This is not sustainable. 

Plutarch warned us 2,000 years ago that the imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatal ailment of all republics. 

We have got to democratize our economy so that it works for all.

First, it appears the quote from Plutarch may not be real, so that's typical Gavin. 

But what does that even mean, "This is not sustainable," and "We have got to democratize our economy"?

Is it not sustainable to create successful companies and make a lot of money? We should hope it is, because that's a good thing, despite what the Democrats are pitching. 

Elon is the opposite of these Democrats who urge us to hate him. He's contributed to the world greatly by what he has produced, rather than being a power-hungry government-sucking leech. He's also employed hundreds of thousands of people in the process. 

Talk about making others rich. Even with this IPO, Elon has helped those who had shares in SpaceX and even made a lot of people who were employees rich through shares. That includes people like welders and engineers.

According to an analysis by Hill.com cited by The New York Times (1), more than 4,400 current and former SpaceX employees are likely to become millionaires when the company goes public on June 12.

How would Newsom "democratize the economy"? Because that sounds like some redistributionist Communist pap right there. The government doesn't have the right to dictate to us how much we can earn.

How many people has Gavin Newsom or any of those other Democrats made rich? They all have or came from money. If Gavin truly believes what he's saying, why doesn't he share some of his money to make things more "equitable"? Why doesn't Bernie give up one of his three homes? 

But you know they wouldn't do that. All they want to do is preach class warfare as a hook for their own power. 


‘Sophie Of Dundee’ Has Been Vindicated, But It Won’t Change Anything In Britain


The hatchet-wielding Scottish girl was right, and her detractors were wrong. But there’ll be no apologies from the British elite.



Last August, there was a shocking news story about a 12-year-old Scottish girl who pulled a hatchet and knife on an immigrant in Dundee. A video clip of the hatchet-wielding girl, with other terrified and angry girls shouting at the man to leave them alone, went viral.

The story made international headlines. The girl in the video was dubbed “Sophie of Dundee,” and for some, she became a symbol of everything that has gone wrong in Britain: a working-class child in an impoverished, post-industrial city, harassed by a predatory migrant man, reduced to carrying crude weapons to defend herself, abandoned by the institutions and authorities that were supposed to protect her. The whole tragic story of Britain was contained in that one video. I wrote at the time that these kinds of incidents, and the refusal of political leaders to acknowledge or take them seriously, were driving Britain toward civil war.

But plenty of others, including many in the corporate press and even the police and political leaders in Dundee, saw nothing more than a group of racist little guttersnipes threatening a migrant man simply because of the color of his skin. Indeed, the police initially arrested the girl for carrying a bladed weapon and issued statements saying that what was being shared on the internet was wrong, that the migrant man and his adult sister were the victims, not the girls.

Powerful politicians and major media figures mocked the story of the girls being attacked by a migrant as racist “propaganda slop,” and those who spread the story as “far-right.” The entire intellectual establishment, reacting instinctively with classist prejudice, accused anyone who supported the girls as “scum.”

But it turns out the story was true. The man, a 22-year-old Bulgarian named Ilia Belov, has been found guilty of sexually harassing and assaulting the girls. His sister, 20-year-old Nadjedzha Belova, previously pled guilty to assaulting a 13-year-old girl “by seizing and pulling her hair, dragging her to the ground, and striking her on the head to her injury during the incident.”

All of this came out in court, where the judge heard that the man had approached the girls and said, “Hello, sexy, I’ll show you a good time.” When the girls rebuffed him, he called his sister, who arrived shortly afterward and attacked one of the girls. Amid that confrontation, “Sophie” pulled out the hatchet and knife.

Why didn’t the politicians and commentators and even the police initially believe the girls? Because they’re white and working-class, and the Belovs are minorities. Here again we see the same dynamic that played out in the recent murder of Henry Nowak: The authorities assume the white Briton must be guilty and racist, while the innocent racial minority must be telling the truth.

In the case of “Sophie,” there was the added class element, which should come as no surprise. Contempt for working-class Britons among the British elite has been a recurring feature of life in that country — especially in the context of the rape gangs, which disproportionately targeted working-class girls in cities like Dundee. The authorities often dismissed the claims of the girls and their families as racially motivated, when in fact they were true in every horrifying detail.

After the conviction, “Sophie’s” mother said, “They were telling the truth and they were slandered. There were too many lies at the start, so I’m glad it’s all come out.”

They should be glad the truth has come out, but they should not expect an apology from the politicians, journalists, and prominent public figures who slandered them and sided with the migrant predator. So far, nothing — not the rape gang scandal, not the murder of Henry Nowak, not even rioting in the streets of Belfast after an African migrant tried to behead a man in the street — has prompted Britain’s leadership class to reflect at all on why so many native Britons are staunchly opposed to mass migration.

And probably nothing will, which is why Britain is still marching down the terrible road to civil war. When war comes, Britain’s leaders, who have lost all legitimacy through their indifference to the wishes of native Britons, will be entirely to blame.


Sunday Scripture


 

The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge.


These verses expresse that the heavens and the sky continuously declare the glory of God, showcasing His creation and power. 


The passage emphasizes that all of creation communicates knowledge about God, inviting believers to recognize His handiwork in the natural world.




♦️𝐖³𝐏 𝐃𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝


 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time. 

 

Canadian PM Carney Affirms that “Middle Powers” with Same Ideological Construct Can Collectively Counterbalance U.S. Global Power


Making his ninth trip to Europe since become prime minister 15 months ago, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney once again outlined his governing model to combat a U.S. administration that he claims has fractured the globalist norms.

During his press conference with Micheal Martin, Ireland’s taoiseach (Prime Minister), Carney once again built upon the idea of “middle powers” uniting together in common ideology against U.S. dominance until such a time as the U.S. government can once again return to a leftist ideology.

The specific objectives become clear about halfway through the presser today as Carney notes the importance of grouping nations together who agree on climate change, energy controls and the green agenda.

Canada’s alignment with Europe is seemingly centered on the net-zero carbon model.  This perspective makes sense from Carney as it is the same priority he’s carried since his time as governor for the Bank of England.  WATCH:



As the former Governor of the Bank of England and Bank of Canada, Carney used his platform to position climate change as a systemic financial risk.  He then championed the view that private capital must be the primary tool to force an economic energy transition. [Post-COVID this was known as “Build Back Better.“]

President Trump’s perspective and the majority American view on climate change and energy development is against the core professional effort of Carney and the banking interests he has always represented.  This becomes very important to understand as the U.S-Canada conflict is about to hit an inflection point.

HISTORY: Through the “Net Zero” Banking Alliance (NZBA) Mark Carney pushed banks to agree with policies and protocols that forced them to set lower lending targets to high-carbon industries and clients.  The goal was to force companies to ‘decarbonize’ or find themselves starved of capital.

While working at the Bank of England and Canada Carney famously warned multinational interests and insurance companies, most of which were centered in London, that fossil fuel assets that did not fit the net-zero industrial model would become “stranded assets” worth nothing because they could not be capitalized or insured.  This threat signaled to multinationals that any investment in a project that was against the “Paris Climate Treaty” was a bad financial risk.

This approach endeared Mark Carney to King Charles III, who is himself a major climate alarmist.

Unfortunately, U.S. politicians -particularly during the Trump first term- accused the Carney banking/finance and insurance alliance of operating an illegal banking cartel to choke the larger American energy sector.  Facing legal threats over antitrust violations, in combination with obvious violations of fiduciary duty, NZBA has to strip out its strict, mandatory lending restrictions.

Slowly banks began retreating from the net-zero alliance.  Regional and national banks began citing the economic necessity of supporting traditional energy companies, and energy security became more important than adherence to voluntary restrictions on carbon emissions.  This angered Carney as his life construct was under pressure.

Carney then entered Canadian federal politics and sought to downplay his ideological climate agenda.  However, all of his energy policies essentially come from the same mindset of opposition to fossil fuels.

The disparity in energy production is the core issue inside the details of the USMCA.  The United States and Mexico are both aligned with low-cost fossil fuel use, which is particularly important for large scale industrial manufacturing (steel etc.).  Whereas Canada doesn’t want the dirty jobs and wants only to focus on electricity production.

You can make electricity from windmills, solar farms and nuclear power. However, you cannot make iron, steel or aluminum without fossil fuels.

In scientific fact, part of the largest global irony is because it’s impossible to make windmill components, solar panels or nuclear power equipment without using fossil fuels.

In the video below, while he was a banker you can see Mark Carney admitting on tape: When voters blocked his ESG plans, “We” (Central Bankers) shifted into the position of “Regulators” to work around the voters through the back door of finance and insurance.  They manipulated fossil fuel production and prices by withholding lending and insurance.



This is the ESG model in actionable terms: