Sunday, June 7, 2026

The West Owes Islam Nothing


I don’t know what’s worse, junk science or junk history. There is unending propaganda about an Islamic Golden Age of the past that today's Islamists want to recreate. Much the same as a century ago, fables about an “Aryan super-race” long before Western Christianity motivated a lethal totalitarianism. Neither is true, of course, and obscures the amazing story of how Western Civilization got us to where we are.

A good example is a recent podcast by Tharik Hussain, a Muslim travel writer praising the contributions of Muslim Cordoba to Europe. The best evidence this chap offered was an odd paean from an amateur historian a century ago -- that in Cordoba’s prime it had street lighting, public baths, paved streets, arabesque decorations on palaces, schools for children, and an “Alexandrian library,” while Christian Europe was dark, dirty, muddy, and its monks and rulers unlettered.

Sorry, that’s all wrong. A few of the wealthiest Muslim cities in the Middle Ages did manage to hold on to the benefits of the Roman world they had conquered, including architecture and street layouts. But the vast majority of Islam was illiterate and impoverished. Cordoba’s streetlights were just some oil lamps hung along the central arteries. Big deal. Public baths, another legacy of the Romans, were much more common in Europe. Only in the 16th century, with waves of new diseases, did they decline, when some Tony Fauci in that era decreed that hot water spread disease.

Far from being uneducated, Europe’s Christians led the way past the fall of Rome and into the future after the barbarian invasions. Unlike Muslims, Christians have always believed the pen is mightier than the sword. For its first 500 years, the Church didn’t fight -- it preached, argued, evangelized, and published its teachings on a scale the world had never seen. Then, it began a process of previously unimagined formal education, based in churches and tens of thousands of monasteries and convents. Monasteries ran local schools, assembled libraries, published books (before the printing press, everything had to be hand-copied), advanced agriculture and technical research, cared for the poor and elderly, conducted trade fairs, and often protected locals with their massive stone walls.

Compare that to just a few big Muslim towns like Cordoba and Baghdad that had libraries, while in their hands, the greatest library of all, the one in Alexandria, Egypt, fell to ruin. Similarly, the great Roman canal that linked the Red Sea to the Nile and the Mediterranean was neglected, then demolished. Most of the achievements of Islamic scholars descend from the great Persian and Byzantine schools, persisting under their new Arab masters. Raymond Ibrahim and Goldie Ghamari have many podcasts on just that. The question is not what Islam gave Europe, but just how far Europe and the rest of the world might have advanced without Islam.

Anyway, Christian Europe recovered from the barbarian wave because it had the secret sauce. The rule of law, based on the Imago Dei. The rights of all mankind because we are made in His image.

Ordinary people got to live more freely than in any previous society, and they even got to vote on their government -- at towns and cities, often with strong written charters; and judicial officers like the Saxon hundred, in trials by juries; and professed monks and nuns even voted for their leadership.

Beginning with St. Paul’s Letter to the Romans, the modern concept of natural law emerged. As St. Augustine explained, an unjust law is no law at all, while King Alfred and his monks created the English common law by merging Saxon custom with the teaching of the Decalogue and New Testament. Concepts like natural rights, limited government, and separation of powers were already laid out in the Middle Ages and flourished in the centuries to follow, while the Muslim world never got past the simple hierarchy of tribal chieftains.

The Church also prohibited close cousin marriage, so detrimental to the health of Muslims over the centuries, and ended polygamy and most divorce in the West -- a vast step forward in the life of women and families. The Church also steadily abated the institution of chattel slavery in Europe, while the Arab world raided Europe, all the way to Iceland, for millions of slaves. Not to mention the many millions more black Africans enslaved and sold to the Middle East or the New World.

Unsurprisingly, the Muslim world decayed under its authoritarian ways, but once Europe got the Muslim and Viking invaders under control, and its economy took off in the Commercial Revolution. Later era Catholic Scholastic thinkers like Pacioli, Eck, Molina, Suarez, Bellarmine, and Lessius invented modern finance and economics, and the West raced ahead permanently.

Europeans were also happy to get whatever they could from the Muslims: ancient texts of the Greek philosophers, new works by scholars such as Avicenna, or things Muslims imported from China and India, such as gunpowder and advanced mathematics.

On the whole, though, trade with the Muslims was dangerous and unreliable for outsiders. So, Europeans built new types of ships and mastered the world’s oceans, just to get around the troublesome Muslim lands.

One might ask, then, how did the Muslims ever get as far as they did? Here, we do have to credit Muhammad and his companions. They were resourceful and charismatic leaders. They led their powerful desert army into the Levant and North Africa, just as the Byzantines and Persians were exhausted from 20 years of war following a lethal plague that killed a large percentage of the population. The Rashidun Caliphs who succeeded Muhammad were very clever. They kept educated Christians running the civilian government for over a century and, by many accounts, lowered taxes. A public welfare system was set up with Muslims paying the zakat and non-Muslims the jizya to support this. Jews and Christians were largely left alone to pursue their interests. In fact, for over 600 years, Muslims were likely a minority in their own lands.

But the weak foundations of Muslim civilization and government became more obvious with time, leading to a millennium of decline. Beginning with the Mongol invasion, their armies entered a losing streak that, aside from a few highlights during the Ottoman era, continues to this day.

Interestingly, what we never hear about in the West is so-called Islamic Modernism. By the 19th century, the Muslim world could no longer deny its obvious failings. This led in two different directions. Militants wanted a “purer” form of Islam and called for more violence and destruction -- what they show on TV every day. Others, such as the philosopher Syed Khan of India, called for western education and wanted a complete rethinking of the Islamic texts. Other Muslims agreed. Many have come to question the whole idea of hadith. We even see the Saudi crown prince leading modernization in that once forbidding country.

One can only hope the modernizers prevail. That a real exegesis of the Quran comes about, and average Muslims begin to comprehend all the strange and contradictory passages in their sacred texts.

Islam teaches that the Jewish Torah and the Christian Gospel are authoritative, just like the Quran. When it was finally discovered by Muslims in the 11th century how these books differed from the Quran, Ibn Hazm and others asserted that the Bible must have been corrupted and extensively rewritten, a claim found nowhere in Islam until then, and an historical absurdity. Sadly, this is the infantile understanding of many Muslims. We would have a real Islamic Golden Age, however, if more Muslims summoned the intellectual honesty of a Syed Khan and began a genuine re-examination of their religion.


Podcast thread for June 7

 


1 day at a time.

Jim Crow and the Cost of Crying Wolf


Every time Democrats want to shut down a policy debate, they reach for the same emergency brake: Jim Crow.  Voter ID?  Jim Crow.  Eligibility checks?  Jim Crow.  The SAVE America Act — which does nothing more than require proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections — earned the “Jim Crow 2.0” label from Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer earlier this year.  Asking whether taxpayers are financing fraud?  Somehow, Jim Crow again.

When a political party turns a genuine historical wound into a routine talking point, the public eventually stops listening.  That’s the boy who cried wolf, except in modern Washington, the wolf is usually a pollster, and the villagers have smartphones.

Jim Crow was real, brutal, and uniquely evil.  It was the legal architecture of racial segregation and disenfranchisement enforced by Southern Democrats after Reconstruction — literacy tests, poll taxes, violence.  Rep. Wesley Hunt, a Black Republican from Texas, laid out the distinction during a House Judiciary Committee hearing last week: “Jim Crow was a time when Black Americans could not sit in classrooms with white Americans.  It was colored-only water fountains; it was beatings in the streets; it was lynchings.”  His father had to enter a New Orleans restaurant through the back door because of the color of his skin.  Comparing that to showing a photo ID at the polls is not just historically wrong — it’s an insult to everyone who endured the real thing.

Pew Research Center survey from August 2025 found that 83 percent of Americans support requiring photo ID to vote — including 71 percent of Democrats, 76 percent of black respondents, and 82 percent of Hispanic respondents.  CNN’s Jake Tapper cited those numbers to Schumer on air.  Schumer kept going.  Even Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) broke ranks: “I would never refer to the SAVE Act as, like, Jim Crow 2.0 or some kind of mass conspiracy.”  When your party’s most prominent dissenter won’t echo your line, the line has collapsed.

The trouble with reflexive alarm-pulling is that credibility is a finite asset.  The villagers in Aesop’s fable didn’t become cynics overnight.  They just got tired of being fooled.  Repetition killed the warning.  That same dynamic plays out every time a serious civil-rights framework gets borrowed to describe a modest administrative requirement.  Once the public senses the alarm is rung for effect — not because a real fire exists — trust starts to evaporate.  And when trust goes, so does the capacity to mobilize people around anything that actually matters.

That skepticism matters because policies still have consequences, and real people are paying for them.  California has lost more than $102 billion in income to outmigration from 2020 to 2022, according to IRS data cited by the state’s own Legislative Analyst’s Office.  The same LAO confirmed that outmigration is a drag on long-term revenue growth, one that could push personal income tax growth below its historical average if the trend holds.  I arrived in California in 1990 when the mood was upbeat and the economy was expanding.  Thirty-five years later, I’ve watched productive people and their capital head for Texas, Florida, and Tennessee, taking their real estate listings and their payroll taxes with them.

The LAO’s April 2026 update confirmed that pandemic-era outmigration has eased somewhat but remains elevated by historical standards.  The state’s political leadership responded to all of this with more press releases about fairness.  It’s the fiscal equivalent of stepping on a rake and announcing your commitment to community resilience.

That’s the hidden cost of single-party dominance.  When one party runs the table, there’s no real check on spending, no penalty for ideological overreach, and no one forcing a serious conversation about tradeoffs.  Housing gets worse.  Energy gets pricier.  And the people who built careers and families there look at the math and leave.  Thomas Sowell captured the underlying mechanism decades ago: “It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.”  California has become the proof.

In Minnesota, the Feeding Our Future scandal exposed more than $240 million stolen from a federal child nutrition program.  Ringleader Aimee Bock was sentenced last week to 41.5 years in prison.  That didn’t happen because the paperwork was racist. It happened because accountability was treated as cruelty, and fraud moved in and redecorated.

There’s also a broader economic point that Democrats prefer not to discuss: Regulation isn’t free.  Research from the Mercatus Center found that heavier regulation in Minnesota is associated with higher consumer prices, fewer small business startups, fewer jobs, and greater poverty.  Similar regressive effects were documented in Pennsylvania — higher prices, fewer businesses.  The burden lands hardest on low-income families, who spend a larger share of their income on regulated goods and services.  So much for the idea that more government automatically means more compassion.  Milton Friedman spent a career explaining this.  The data keep proving him right.

That’s where the Jim Crow comparison becomes not just historically wrong, but economically self-defeating.  If every effort to verify eligibility, reduce fraud, or enforce standards gets denounced as racist, government gets weaker at the one thing it’s actually supposed to do.  And weak government is expensive.  It invites waste.  It invites the quiet assumption that no one is really watching.  The result is higher taxes for people who play by the rules and more room for the people who don’t.  That’s a system that punishes honesty.

Markets punish governments that keep promising discipline while producing deficits.  The same logic applies here.  Cry Jim Crow too often, and the public starts hearing static.  Then when a real injustice appears, the language has already been spent.  There’s nothing left to cash in.

There’s a better standard, and it’s not complicated.  Keep civil rights language for actual civil rights violations.  If a law denies people the vote because of race, call it what it is: illegal and immoral.  But if a law asks voters to verify identity — or if a state asks program recipients to prove they qualify for benefits — that’s governance.  There’s a meaningful difference between discrimination and administration, and the country would be better off if more of its political leadership remembered it.

The fix doesn’t require a constitutional convention.  Require stronger fraud controls with independent audits and real consequences.  Restore competitive elections in states that have become one-party laboratories of expensive mistakes.  And stop handing political activists a historical sledgehammer every time a policy fight breaks out.  America can honor its civil rights legacy without turning it into a gimmick.  It can insist on basic accountability without apologizing for doing so.  The public still knows the difference.

The only question is how many times the same alarm can ring before the taxpayers stop answering the call.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Cleveland Clinic Agrees to Stop Sex Changes for Minors After DOJ Investigation

Cleveland Clinic Agrees to Stop Sex Changes for Minors After DOJ Investigation


The Department of Justice announced another resolution arising from its ongoing national investigation into violations of federal law in connection with sex-rejecting procedures on minors.

The Cleveland Clinic Foundation has entered into agreements with the Department and the Ohio Attorney General that include a decades-long commitment to not perform or offer sex-rejecting procedures—which include the administration of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones—for minors. 

Cleveland Clinic has also agreed to pay a monetary penalty and, in a landmark commitment, dedicate additional millions to help provide essential medical care for individuals living with the harmful consequences of such misguided medical interventions performed on them as children and adolescents who are called “detransitioners”.

“The Department of Justice is steadfastly committed to protecting America’s children,” said Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward. “Just as the resolution with Texas Children’s, today’s resolution with Cleveland Clinic furthers that commitment and puts these providers on notice that this Department will vigorously enforce federal law where children are put at risk.”

According to the terms of the agreements, which the Department reached in coordination with Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Cleveland Clinic—a partner in other Administration priority initiatives—will pay $308,000 to resolve allegations regarding false billings submitted to public and private payors to secure insurance coverage for sex-rejecting procedures on minors. 

As part of the resolution, Cleveland Clinic has committed $2 million to provide restorative care for detransitioners—the very victims of these predatory and dangerous practices—regardless of their insured status or ability to pay.

The agreements come less than a month after the Justice Department announced its resolution with Texas Children’s Hospital, which the Department secured through a partnership with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. As previously announced, Texas Children’s agreed to pay a $10 million penalty and, much like Cleveland Clinic’s commitment today, create the first-of-its-kind clinic dedicated to treating detransitioners. Texas Children’s also agreed to permanently cease providing any sex-rejecting procedures to minors.

These historic commitments pair the cessation of these dangerous practices masquerading as medical treatment with substantial investments in remediating the destruction they cause and restoring the health of the victims.

In working towards this settlement, the United States acknowledged that Cleveland Clinic took significant steps entitling it to credit for cooperation with the Department in its investigation. At all times during the investigation, Cleveland Clinic remained cooperative, proactive, and solution-driven, as highlighted by its multi-million dollar commitment to providing care to the victims who most need it.

“I am grateful that institutions like Cleveland Clinic and Texas Children’s have decided to be part of the solution, not part of the problem,” said Brett Shumate, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division. “Cleveland Clinic’s commitment to providing millions of dollars towards care for detransitioners is emblematic of just that. I am grateful for this resolution with Cleveland Clinic, but our work is far from over, and our division will continue to work tirelessly to protect America’s children and hold accountable those that have preyed on vulnerable children, whether they be pharmaceutical companies or medical providers.”

These matters and the investigations into sex-rejecting procedures on minors are being led by the Justice Department’s Civil Division Enforcement and Affirmative Litigation Branch and Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section.

The claims resolved by the United States in the settlements are allegations only, and there has been no determination of liability. Cleveland Clinic has denied all allegations.


Anti-ICE Crew Finds Out It's a Bad Move to Block Vehicles at Newark ICE Facility


RedState 

The anti-ICE crew created a lot of chaos outside the Newark, NJ, Delaney Hall ICE facility on Friday. 

Local police scaled back their presence, and that emboldened the activists.

They were blocking vehicles, and not just trying to stop the officers, but attacking the vehicles of the poor civilian staffers as well. They told one person, "You're Spanish, you should be ashamed of yourself." 

Warning for graphic language in the following videos: 

You can see another guy in a keffiyeh jumping on top of a car, here in an Instagram post. They found out that wasn't a smart idea. You can see the staffers in blue shirts losing patience with these characters, and taking down at least one of them. 

But it got worse in the evening, as the horde was bigger, surrounding, banging on, and even kicking the cars. At least one person was hit in the chaos. 

Agitators could be heard shouting, "Let's go coward," "F--- you," "Are you proud of yourself a------" and "quit your f------ job."

An agent directly addressed one agitator, saying, "What did you say? You're going to kill me?" before appearing to detain the person.

That's not protesting, that's harassing and intimidating the workers. 

At least two people were arrested on the day, and they were both from out of state. One, from Seattle, Washington, was arrested by the Newark Police Department and charged with three counts of criminal mischief for smashing the windows of a car. Another, from Arizona, was arrested by Homeland Security (DHS) for allegedly assaulting an ICE officer. 

But it should have been a lot more than just two. And this is what happens when you remove the police presence; the agitators get out of hand again. 

Newark Mayor Ras Baraka said on Thursday:

."It is not the responsibility of the Newark Police Division to secure a private facility. We have made clear to the GEO Group, who has its own private security firm, that securing their facility is their responsibility, not the City’s. Our intention was never to protect Delaney Hall or HSI but to bring calm." 

No, it's your responsibility to make sure that the citizens in your city are kept safe. 

The Newark police finally had to show up anyway to help, and the Department of Homeland Security had a message to the anti-ICE crew: you are not going to be able to stop us. "You will not slow us down." 


Police Bring Down the Fire When Radical Activists Create Chaos at TPUSA Women's Summit in TX


RedState 

Turning Point USA is holding a Women's Leadership Conference in San Antonio, TX, over the weekend. Erika Kirk and Riley Gaines are among the women at the event. 

But the event also drew the attention of radical leftists, who were angry about the event, claiming it was somehow harming "feminism." 

Warning for graphic language and images: 

The full post reads:

HAPPENING NOW: Far-left activists are preparing to march towards the San Antonio Marriott Rivercenter to protest @TPUSA and @MrsErikaKirk

.Organizers have been plotting this for months — ever since TPUSA announced the Women’s Leadership Summit.

They claim the event “actively harms feminist movements” and insist “hateful obstructions to feminism” are not welcome in San Antonio.

Gee, what a good look, protesting women, including a widow whose husband was assassinated, allegedly for his political beliefs. Can you get any lower? Check out the Mao sign, and the sign reading, "Que tenemos nada, que queremos todos (We who have nothing, want everything)." 

Then they marched to the hotel, chanting against Erika Kirk by name. You can see them holding a banner with a hammer and sickle, and they also chant for "revolution." 

Once the activist mob got to the hotel, they shouted, "Get out, Kirk!" 

What lovely people, mocking Charlie Kirk being assassinated, and telling Gaines she should "swim faster." 

They were also blowing loud noisemakers, and flipping off women. Some feminists. 

The irony of these characters shouting about "Nazis," when they're yelling at people who think differently from them to "get out" and disrupting an event. Do they know what the Nazi brown shirts used to do? Then, too, they should check in with their fellow leftists who are embracing Graham Platner, ignoring the Nazi tattoo and the boatload of other issues. 

Finally, the leftists got in the face of law enforcement, and tried to battle the police. The San Antonio police don't play, and promptly took them in hand.


Texas Rangers to Hold 'Faith and Family Night' Instead of Caving to LGBT Pressure

Texas Rangers to Hold 'Faith and Family Night' Instead of Caving to LGBT Pressure


The Texas Rangers have made the decision to stand up to the woke mob and will not be hosting any pro-LGBT events for the month of June, referred to by many as “Pride Month.”

The Rangers appear to be the only MLB team with the courage to buck the gay pride trend, as they are the lone club to refuse to post any pro-LBGT content as of now. The team further decided that they would stand on the side of Christians and have opted to host a “Faith and Family Night” on June 18.

“Join us for a special afternoon of community, connection, and celebration,” the advertisement for the event read. “Tickets purchased through this offer include an exclusive experience featuring personal testimonies from Rangers players Wyatt Langford, Josh Jung, Cody Bradford, Jacob Latz, Jalen Beeks, and others, sharing how faith impacts their lives both on and off the field.”

Other upcoming events from the Rangers include a Military Appreciation Night on Jul 4 and a First Responders Day on July 12.


Sunday Scripture

 



Context and Meaning

  • This verse is part of the Beatitudes, which are teachings from Jesus during the Sermon on the Mount.
  • It emphasizes the importance of showing mercy to others, suggesting that those who are compassionate will receive mercy in return.


Key Points

  • Mercy: Refers to kindness and compassion towards others, especially those in need.
  • Blessed: Indicates a state of happiness or fulfillment that comes from living according to these principles.


This teaching encourages individuals to act with kindness and empathy, reinforcing the reciprocal nature of mercy.


♦️𝐖³π πƒπšπ’π₯𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 π“π‘π«πžπšπ


 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time.