Tuesday, June 2, 2026

The World Cup is divisive


Given their proclivity for protesting, there’s this double entendre: “The French are revolting.” They’re at it again, even more violent than ever, after soccer team Paris Saint-Germain won the prestigious Champions League tournament this past Saturday.

Despite their team winning, the violent and filthy Paris urchins took to the streets in mass mayhem to “celebrate” the victory with violence. Admittedly, they are cursed with being French, but are there red flags for the pending World Cup soccer tournament?

It is his job, so we shouldn’t be surprised when Gianni Infantino, the president of FIFA (essentially, the governing body for soccer), proselytizes that football (soccer) unites the world.  I wish it were that simple, but his stance may be grossly Panglossian.

Soccer is a cheap game that even riff-raff in shanty towns and squalid communities throughout the world can play -- they just need a ball and some space that doesn’t have unexploded mines. Even proper boots are dispensable. It engenders intense national pride, and many of the nations that play each other can’t stand each other.

There may be some shallow and token consort between rival fans who manage to remain sober before matches. Add some liquid courage, and the “wrong” result, and that often turns to tribal savagery. As this video documents, the World Cup is not just about “football,” but chaos. It’s incongruous that an event that supposedly “unites” the world requires such robust policing.

The U.S. could potentially face Spain in the quarterfinals. Iran will play Egypt in Seattle. Seeding permutations make it possible that Brazil plays Argentina in the knockout stages of the tournament -- traditionally, they hate each other. Good luck to the authorities responsible for controlling their rival fans (and the on-field refs controlling players). There’s even potential for an Argentina versus England matchup. (Memories live long, including the Falklands and “Hand of God.”) Germany could also face England in the later rounds -- those memories live even longer, especially among the uncouth, uneducated, riff-raff who are inclined to imbibe too much.

Those are just a few of the soccer rivalries that could boil over amongst overwrought hooligans. The point is that the World Cup will, if past is prologue, likely exacerbate disunity, not engender harmony. Then there are this year’s co-hosting nations. International relations are fraught with complex contingencies, but there is only sporadic (at best) unity between the U.S., Mexico (Iran’s team will be based there), and Canada.

If we relish a sporting event that may, at least temporarily, bring some negligible unity to the world, then bring on the Summer Olympics Games (2028 in LA.)  The uplifting spirit and touching camaraderie of that glorious spectacle can inspire (minus the occasional cheating) even grizzled grumps. There’s occasional bad sportsmanship (e.g., Australia), but it’s an event that at least attempts to blend sport, culture, and education to help better our world.

For the World Cup, summon the police. For the Summer Olympic Games, Summon the Heroes.


Podcast thread for June 2nd

 


sighs.

Graham Platner, perfect progressive candidate?


Graham Platner, the already infamous Maine Senate candidate who, remarkably, sports both a Nazi tattoo and a fondness for communism, has managed to bring more (assumedly) unwanted attention to himself in recent days.

Platner is at the center of a sexting scandal in which he admitted to sending salacious texts to several women shortly after he married Amy Gertner.

Platner even sent semi-naked pictures of himself on the site often dubbed “Predator’s Paradise” due to the fact that a substantial percentage of its viewers are underage.

Worse yet, it appears staffers from the Platner campaign physically interfered with reporters who attempted to question the candidate about the breaking news.

Morris Katz, a Democrat strategist employed by both the Platner campaign and New York City’s socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani, reportedly sent former Platner political director and state representative Genevieve McDonald threatening messages warning her to stay clear of answering reporters’ questions pertaining to Platner’s dalliances.

So, to recap: Platner has (or had) a Nazi “Death’s Head” tattoo on his chest, yet is a communist sympathizer, and sends lurid texts and photos to a site where young girls can easily access them, if not directly to them.

And, so far, none of this has mattered, as Maine Democrats keep saying “Platner, Platner, he’s our man, Murkowski belongs in a garbage can!”

A little Nazism, a little communism, a dash of pedophilia — and an occasional bullying threat — makes Platner the perfect modern-day Democrat! Because, if you support “The Narrative” and its end goals, nothing else matters. You are in. Even if you are competing against a female.

I am convinced Platner could club a baby seal to death and kill -- and eat -- a trans mulatto atheist on a live feed streamed across the nation and still be the Democrats’ main Maine guy candidate.

Platner, Bass, Newsom, Pritzker, Hochul, Walz, Frey, Schiff, Pelosi, Mamdani, Harris, AOC, Talarico, Katie Wilson, Buttigieg, etc., etc., … has there ever been a more radical — and repulsive — group of politicians from one party at one time in one nation? Correct answer: no. Their policies directly and unfailingly lead to homelessness, poverty, drug use, despair, the dissolution of the family, and hopelessness.

How the hell can they possibly routinely win elections? Is it stupidity and dementia on the part of the voters? Virtue signaling run amok? Suicidal empathy? Blind hatred of Trump? Massive cheating? A combination of the above?

Sadly, I believe it is a combination of the above. More’s the pity.

But where is the outrage? The kind of outrage that declares, “We will no longer take this anymore!”



GOP Voters Stand by Trump, Dismissing Democrat 'Affordability' Claptrap


In the thick of another high-stakes election year, GOP voters are sending a clear message that cuts through the noise of legacy media chatter. It even transcends far more serious pocketbook worries.

new national survey reveals that Republicans are firmly commited to President Donald J. Trump, rooted in his record on issues that reach beyond dollars and cents. This data was gathered by the Democracy Institute in partnership with me, as host of the current events show News Sight and author of the finance newsletter Dr. Cotto’s Digest.

The poll spotlights a GOP base that stands rock-solid even as broader national surveys show massive economic frustration.

The numbers paint a striking picture of loyalty forged in shared values and proven leadership. When asked if Trump’s performance on non-economic issues outweighs his handling of the economy, a resounding 79 percent of self-identified Republican likely voters said yes. Only 21 percent disagreed.

That is not a lukewarm endorsement. It is a powerful declaration that principles like immigration control, law and order, America-first foreign policy, and combating woke terror carry more weight for these voters than any single economic snapshot.

Dig deeper, and the picture sharpens.

Fully 88 percent affirmed that, when focusing solely on Trump’s actions outside the economy, he remains worthy of their support. Just 12 percent said no. These figures reveal a core truth. Trump’s appeal rests on a foundation that economic headwinds cannot easily erode. Voters see his strength on judicial appointments, national sovereignty, and pushing back against elite institutions that have scorned normal Americans.

This is the kind of steadfastness that wins elections when the pundits least expect it.

Even more telling for November’s midterms, 86 percent declared they would likely vote based mostly on Trump’s non-economic record, even if the economy does not surge before Election Day. A mere 14 percent would not.

This staggering majority is not blind to challenges at the grocery store or gas pump. They simply refuse to let temporary pressures override what they substantively view as enduring successes in protecting the American way of life. That resolve turns vulnerability into strength, signaling that the GOP base is primed and motivated heading into electoral battle.

The ultimate proof of this focus comes in another question. Asked whether Republican voters will turn out mostly to back Trump or their local congressional candidate, a stunning 94 percent chose Trump. Only 6 percent picked the district candidate.

This is loyalty in its purest form.

Republican voters are motivated by the man who delivered results before and promises to fight for them again. This shows the GOP base is not scattered or distracted. They are locked in, rightfully viewing Trump as the standard-bearer who unites their party.

These findings come from a rigorous survey of 910 self-identified Republican likely voters conducted May 26-28 using interactive voice response on mobile and landline phones. The Democracy Institute weighted the sample across gender, age, education, income, region, ethnicity, religion, voting history, and other key factors to mirror the real electorate. With a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percent at 95 percent confidence, the results carry real heft.

The Institute earned its reputation by spotting “shy” voters and cultural currents that other pollsters miss. This most notably happened in 2016 when it accurately projected Brexit within about one point of the actual outcome and correctly forecast Trump’s presidential victory. Legacy media surveys notoriously underestimated his support among working-class and disillusioned voters.

This internal strength stands in sharp contrast to the national mood captured in broader surveys.

The May Marist Poll found 61 percent of Americans disapproving of Trump’s economic management, up from 58 percent earlier, with only 35 percent approving. Many respondents cited personal financial strain, unaffordable local costs, and gas price spikes tied to global tensions. Overall job approval sat at just 37 percent approve versus 59 percent disapprove.

A Quinnipiac University poll released May 20 showed even steeper trouble on the economy. There was only 33 percent approval against 64 percent disapproval. That is the lowest of Trump’s two terms. Among Republicans, 73 percent still approved but 24 percent did not, hinting at pockets of unease. Independents disapproved by a 70-27 margin.

The New York Times/Siena poll from May 11-15 painted a similar scene. Trump’s overall approval hit a second-term low of 37 percent, dragged down by 64 percent disapproval on the economy and widespread frustration over living costs.

These three surveys highlighted how economic perceptions are testing Republican prospects amid global pressures.

Yet the Democracy Institute numbers reveal why these national headwinds hardly doom the GOP. Republican voters are not turning away. They are doubling down on the bigger picture. They care about election integrity, recent conservative Supreme Court rulings, and resistance to woke governance. Many correctly see woke ideology as threatening their communities and children.

Trump’s breathtaking achievements, from immigration crackdowns to energy independence and judicial appointments that protected constitutional rights, resonate deeply. These are the fights that stir the soul of the base and keep them engaged when economic cycles fluctuate.

Democrats understand the terrain and have made affordability their central weapon.

They are pushing the “New Affordability Agenda,” complete with proposals to cap child care, slash housing costs, rein in health premiums, and tackle energy prices. All of that is to be paid for by taxing the wealthy more heavily. Progressive leaders like Rep. Greg Casar and Senate figures such as Chuck Schumer have framed 2026 as the “affordability election,” aiming to tie every problem back to Trump and offer themselves as the practical alternative.

This strategy draws from past wins where pocketbook talk helped candidates exceed expectations.

For all that effort, the Democracy Institute poll exposes the limits. Republican voters overwhelmingly refuse to let affordability arguments eclipse Trump’s broader legacy. They see through attempts to reduce complex national challenges to one issue. Many remember how policies under Biden-Harris led to inflation, open borders, and woke distortions of reality in public policy.

The GOP base's intensity matters enormously for control of Congress.

Inside Elections’ latest projections give Republicans a structural edge in both chambers. In the House, they hold a narrow 220-215 majority, with forecasts showing solid ground for most incumbents, redistricting advantages, and more toss-ups leaning red. Democrats would need a net gain of just three seats to flip the chamber, but the map favors the GOP.

On the Senate side, Republicans sit at 53-47, defending more seats yet with vital lean holds in key states like Iowa, Montana, and Texas. Data suggest Democrats might net two to four seats but face an uphill climb to full control.

The coming months will test whether national economic sentiment overrides bedrock Republican loyalty to President Trump, as well as the GOP's structural edge in Congress. Early signals say no. Republican voters have drawn their line. They back Trump on the issues that touch their homes, heritage, and hopes for the future.

That unity, born of experience and clear-eyed priorities, positions the GOP to weather storms and emerge stronger. When the a party's base stands this firm, the rest of its coalition tends to follow.


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Democrats Still Haven’t Learned That Lawfare Has Consequences



Naturally The New York Times is out with its own patently absurd version of events with regard to the Justice Department’s inquiry into E. Jean Carroll’s lawsuits against President Trump. If the “paper of record” is going to keep acting like DOJ investigations are only legitimate when perpetuated by Democrats against their enemies, then Trump’s “retribution campaign” should continue for as long as it can.

News broke Wednesday that the DOJ had opened a criminal probe involving Carroll, who has told a hysterical tale that includes allegations of Trump, well before he was ever president, having raped her at some unspecified date (in a department store fitting room, mind you). The DOJ hasn’t officially acknowledged any investigation, but the Times reported Thursday that the probe centers not on Carroll but on the nonprofit organization that assisted in funding Carroll’s litigation.

The Times laughably claimed in its report, authored by Glenn Thrush and Benjamin Weiser, that what makes this DOJ target so unique is that Carroll, “an author and columnist, never sought a public role, political power or governmental authority.” Maybe someone should tell Thrush and Weiser that to be a published author is by definition to seek a public role. And of course she wanted political power. She even did it the way all Democrats have done for the greater part of the last 20 years: She claimed to be a victim, thus earning herself fame, authority, influence, and money.

There’s no question that Carroll’s rape allegation, as unbelievable as it was, harmed Trump politically. She said that after the two giggled and gallivanted all over a department store in notoriously sleepy Manhattan, the two of them stumbled into a predictably empty, unattended fitting room, where Trump forced himself inside her, an incident she initially refused to call a rape because “most people think of rape as being sexy” and “think of the fantasies.”

Then, using a brand-new law in New York that turned back the clock on the statute of limitations involving sexual assault, Carroll sued Trump in a Democrat-heavy district where it was impossible for him to get a jury that wouldn’t find him liable. After all, he still needed to be punished for winning the 2016 election.

The trial was itself a joke. Trump’s defense was forbidden from introducing evidence that would have crippled Carroll’s credibility, which is what her entire case rested on. He predictably lost.

And Carroll’s saga is just a piece of the larger Democrat conspiracy to either zero out Trump’s finances or put him in prison. They’d prefer both. Democrat District Attorney Alvin Bragg sued Trump with an argument whose logical conclusion was that it was illegal for Trump to have even run for president in 2016. Democrat Attorney General Letitia James sued Trump for engaging in business deals that resulted in no victims. Democrat District Attorney Fani Willis prosecuted Trump as if he were a gangbanger because he questioned the results of the 2020 election.

But it’s supposed to be out of the realm of decency that Trump would return the favor with his own investigation. That’s how you know Democrats haven’t learned the lesson they should — that every abuse of power they engage in can result in consequences in due time.

The lesson everyone else should learn from this, though, is that when given the chance, Democrats will start this cycle all over again.


Mark Carney Broke Up With America, But For Some Reason He’s Still Parked Outside


Reality just sits there, waiting quietly until everybody gets done performing the fake noises.



Compare the speech Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney gave in New York Thursday to the one he gave in Davos in January, because January Carney seems to have been swapped out for a doppelgΓ€nger who has no idea what three-months-ago Carney thought.

In that January speech to the creepy World Economic Forum, Carney let America have it with both barrels. Rejecting the cruel power of a nation led by a mean orange monster, Carney promised to turn his back on an America-centered “old order” and build a coalition of “middle powers” that would boldly challenge the United States. Canada would “fundamentally shift our strategic posture” to challenge and reject America, not to cooperate with a degenerate and power-mad country. (What Carney didn’t say in Davos was that his big plan to turn away from America would mostly mean, in practice, an aggressive embrace of China.)

Weak, dimwitted pundits ate it up. In The New York Times, witless livestock-adjacent cuckold David French declared that Carney had given a “bracing” speech that “might be the most important address of Trump’s second term so far.” That’s it for America, French concluded, because the Canadian prime minister had just stood up in front of the world and “marked out a path of allied integration and cooperation that could create, in essence, a new great power rival to the United States.” Whatever you say, David.

The media kept banging away on this ludicrous theme, with Politico gushing about Canada’s “Muscular New Anti-Trump Strategy.” Cooler heads intervened, with the Canadian scholar Stephen Nagy writing that Carney’s speech presented an “elegant theory” that was “practically impossible.”

Three months after he boldly tossed that obsolete dinosaur called America into the trash, Carney traveled to New York City this week to pitch, wait for it, a new and strengthened partnership between the United States and Canada:

Carney said the U.S. is dependent on Canadian oil, natural gas, electricity, aluminum, potash, nickel, copper and industrial components, and the two sides should do more business together in these sectors, not less.

‘That is mutual strength. Canada Strong will help make America great again. The examples are legion where we should work together and compete with the world together,’ he said.

The prime minister of a country that shares an enormous border with the largest national GDP in the world suddenly discovers that actually, we’d really like to sustain a close partnership with you guys.

“Canada is far and away America’s biggest customer, and an integrated North American market for production is the best and most durable way to confront intense, truly intense, global competition on critical minerals,” Carney said. We reject your power and we seek closer integration with you.



Speeches, and news about speeches, generally have no meaning or substance. A thing like David French makes empty noise for a living, like a broken player piano that’s too heavy to carry out of the living room.

Politicians and pundits erect meaningless symbols, and dance around them like it means something. Reality just sits there, waiting quietly until everybody gets done performing the fake noises. A prime minister says in January that we utterly reject X, and a bunch of idiots celebrate, and then the same prime minister says in May that we embrace X and need a lot more of it. So what? The world just keeps turning.


DHS Sec. Mullin Provides a Telling Detail About Arrested NJ Agitators Which Explains a Lot


RedState 

There must be something about the month of May for the radical "protesters" at Delaney Hall Detention Center in Newark, New Jersey, because May 2026 has been a lot like May 2025 in terms of the wild scenes that have unfolded there over the past two weeks.

RedState has extensively covered the clashes that the anti-ICE demonstrators have instigated with immigration enforcement agents, with one situation involving a violent agitator who allegedly kicked and bit two agents. New Jersey resident Brendan John Geier, 26, has been arrested in that case.

Another disturbing incident involved an agitator caught on tape threatening to kill an ICE agent and their family. The suspect, 27-year-old Brooklynite Nicholas Matthew Scelfo, has also been arrested after facial recognition technology was used to identify him. In a press release from Monday, the DOJ claimed that Scelfo admitted to the threats in a later interview with law enforcement.

On Saturday, New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill (D), who reluctantly allowed the NJ State Police to get involved with quelling the rioters after several days of coddling them, announced on Saturday that five of the six agitators who had been arrested so far were from "out of state," as RedState also reported.

"We know that people from outside the state have been interfering in the protests and escalating them. Five of the six people arrested last night by state police were from outside New Jersey," Sherrill noted during a press conference, while adding that "national extremist groups" were also helping coordinate the chaos.  

Since then, more have been arrested.

On Monday, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Markwayne Mullin revealed that some of the agitators arrested in recent days were - you guessed it - from Portland.

"We've arrested people that came in from Portland, not from New Jersey," he said. "Came in from Portland to lead. We've seen that they've been well-supplied, we've seen Antifa flags being flown."

Mullin also had praise for the state police, noting that when Sherrill allowed them to be unleashed, things got back under control quickly (though that is, of course, subject to change, as we've seen all too often from leftist rioters).

Watch:

As RedState readers are well aware, Portland, Oregon, is a leftist extremist haven and training ground for well-funded violent groups of pot-stirrers and instigators, including Antifa and other Black Bloc types. The Portland ICE facility and the federal courthouse in Portland have been frequent targets.


Anti-Law-Enforcement Riots Like New Jersey’s Will Escalate Without Stronger Deterrence


The Trump administration cannot stick to occasional prosecutions while allowing the broader ecosystem of anti-ICE extremists to operate with relative impunity.



rioter was charged Friday “for allegedly kicking and biting ICE officers” at a New Jersey illegal immigrant holding center on Thursday, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said on X. Another individual was arrested after threatening to murder an immigration officer and his family, Blanche said Friday. The Department of Homeland Security arrested at least six rioters last Wednesday alone for allegedly assaulting law enforcement, while others were arrested in the subsequent days, ABC 6 reported.

The attacks took place outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in New Jersey called Delaney Hall. Fox News reported that “agitators…were seen establishing a highly organized logistics and support operation before protests began at the site. Stockpiles of masks, duct tape, hard hats and medical supplies were laid out near the facility.”

By Sunday a curfew was imposed near the facility, with Democrat Gov. Mikie Sherill saying, “It has grown unsafe, and that’s completely unacceptable.”

The arrests are welcome. But the Trump administration cannot stick to occasional prosecutions while allowing the broader ecosystem of anti-ICE extremists to operate with relative impunity. Otherwise, such violence will only continue and expand.

The Newark violence is eerily reminiscent of the riots against Operation Metro Surge in Minneapolis just a few months ago. During those riots, one rioter bit the finger off an ICE agent, while others blocked and obstructed roadways and federal law enforcement, threatened authorities, and attempted to interfere with immigration enforcement.

As The Federalist’s Joshua Monnington noted, those riots came after other riots in which “Young men cavalierly chucked rocks at law enforcement vehicles; protesters with freshly ordered (and unironed) Mexican flags blockaded highways. Tennessee congressional candidate Aftyn Behn gleefully announced on Facebook that she and her ‘girl squad’ were ‘bullying the ICE vehicles.’ A government bureaucrat in D.C. heaved a hoagie at agents and walked free.”

Four far-left extremists were also arrested, in December. They were allegedly planning a series of New Year’s Eve bombings and an ambush on ICE officers in Los Angeles.

“In any case,” Monnington wrote, “the administration failed to carry out justice in a manner that was sufficiently swift, decisive, and visible enough to dissuade obstructionists from engaging in reckless, anti-ICE behavior of the kind that ultimately led to Renee Good’s death.”

As has been widely covered, in Minneapolis an ICE agent fatally shot protester Renee Good after she appeared to accelerate her vehicle toward the agent. The shooting spurred additional violence and riotous behavior. As Monnington wrote, the escalation highlighted “the need for a just and decisive crackdown on anti-ICE obstruction…that parallels the Jan. 6 manhunt, not in the corrupt politicization, but in its scale and effectiveness.”

As Monninton wrote shortly after Good’s death, “Now only a law enforcement effort with the magnitude of that launched by the Biden administration in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 protests will have any chance of restoring the law and order ICE needs to enforce immigration law effectively. Leaving aside the Jan. 6 prosecutions’ largely corrupt and politically weaponized underpinnings, the Trump administration needs to imitate its scale justly.”

In fact, the riots outside Delaney Hall happened precisely because the Trump administration has not responded strongly enough to the previous violence. Much like the riots outside Delaney Hall, the riots in Minnesota appeared to be well-funded and planned.

The New York Post reported that Indivisible Twin Cities “led many of the protests against ICE raids in Minnesota.” Indivisible “is an offshoot of the Indivisible Project in Washington, DC, which bills itself as a movement to defeat the ‘Trump agenda,’ and received $7,850,000 from [George] Soros’ Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023…”

Fox News reported that another financial backer of the protesters is a Chinese Communist Party “advocate traced to a multitude of dark money organizations known to fuel far-left, CCP-influenced extremism in the U.S. and across the globe.” One of the groups Neville Roy Singham reportedly bankrolled is the Party for Socialism and Liberation, which the House Oversight Committee flagged as having “organized” and engaged with “a series of destructive protests and civil unrest,” according to Fox News.

Taken together, it’s clear ongoing violence against ICE agents and facilities is not from isolated grassroots protesters but a coordinated, well-funded network willing to use disruption, intimidation, and outright violence to make following federal immigration laws logistically difficult and even impossible.

To the administration’s credit, President Donald Trump has recognized the seriousness of the threat to an extent. Trump announced he was designating Antifa as a terrorist organization just days after Charlie Kirk was murdered by a radical left-winger who engraved bullet casings with slogans including, “Hey fascist! Catch!” The announcement also followed an Antifa cell’s attempt to assassinate police officers outside of ICE’s Prairieland Detention Center in July.

That action suggests the administration understands the underlying problem, but the question is whether it is willing to act with sufficient and necessary force to solve it.

The Biden administration used the full weight of federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies to relentlessly pursue Jan. 6 defendants, including defendants whose offenses were far less serious than assaulting federal officers. In fact, some people Biden targeted had committed no crimes at all, such as parents who peacefully showed up to school board meetings, traditional Catholics, and even innocent grandmothers.

If the Biden administration can weaponize federal agencies to target innocent political dissidents, the least the Trump administration can do is crack down on violent criminal organizations.


♦️𝐖³π πƒπšπ’π₯𝐲 𝐍𝐞𝐰𝐬 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 π“π‘π«πžπšπ


 


W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Welcome to the W³P Daily News Open Thread. 

Post whatever you got in the comments section below.

This feature will post every day at 6:30am Mountain time.