Monday, May 25, 2026

President Trump Notes the Outlines of a Negotiated Deal with Iran – Some Details Emerge


Delivering two messages yesterday from his Truth Social account, President Trump notes the Pakistani and Arab negotiating teams are close to terms of an agreement. However, President Trump emphasizes that any negotiated end to the conflict must include the complete elimination of Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

PRESIDENT TRUMP – “If I make a deal with Iran, it will be a good and proper one, not like the one made by Obama, which gave Iran massive amounts of CASH, and a clear and open path to a Nuclear Weapon. Our deal is the exact opposite, but nobody has seen it, or knows what it is. It isn’t even fully negotiated yet. So don’t listen to the losers, who are critical about something they know nothing about. Unlike those before me who should have solved this problem many years ago, I don’t make bad deals!” ~ President DJT

EARLIER – “One of the worst deals ever made by our Country was the Iran Nuclear Deal, put forth and signed into existence by Barack Hussein Obama and the rank amateurs of the Obama Administration. It was a direct path to Iran developing a Nuclear Weapon. Not so with the transaction currently being negotiated with Iran by the Trump Administration – THE EXACT OPPOSITE, in fact! The negotiations are proceeding in an orderly and constructive manner, and I have informed my representatives not to rush into a deal in that time is on our side. The Blockade will remain in full force and effect until an agreement is reached, certified, and signed. Both sides must take their time and get it right. There can be no mistakes! Our relationship with Iran is becoming a much more professional and productive one. They must understand, however, that they cannot develop or procure a Nuclear Weapon or Bomb. I would like to thank, thus far, all of the countries of the Middle East for their support and cooperation, which will be further enhanced and strengthened by their joining the Nations of the historic Abraham Accords and, who knows, perhaps the Islamic Republic of Iran would like to join, as well! Thank you for your attention to this matter. ~ President DONALD J. TRUMP

It is doubtful the finalized terms will be released any time soon.  However, Scott Jennings is reporting on some of the outlines of the agreement after he had discussions with a “senior Trump official” directly involved in the negotiations.

According to Jennings:

-USA IS NOT GIVING IRANIANS MONEY FOR NOTHING. All speculation and propaganda to the contrary is false. Some hardline elements of Iran’s govt (IRGC) have pushed fake stories & propaganda to try to kill this negotiation.

-Iran deal is NOT done (95%, but still haggling over some language). No deal being signed yet. May be a few more days before this is done.

-Iran will NOT get any money or sanctions relief up front.

-Iran must turn over nuclear stockpile to get anything. USA position is that failure to meet deal commitments means Iran gets nothing.

-Long term USA objective is preventing Iran from having nuclear weapon.

-Initial deal point is to re-establish free flow of commerce by reopening Strait of Hormuz.

Deal should have 2 phases:

Step 1 – Open Strait of Hormuz. Give world economy breathing room. Iran agrees to give up enriched uranium.

Step 2 – Get the nuclear material turned over. Only then can Iran get sanctions relief.

Bottom line: goal is to make a deal that lowers costs for Americans, calms world energy markets, and guarantees that Iranians cannot have a nuclear weapon over the long term. We aren’t there yet. Iran takes forever to get you a response on even small things. But we are close although it still could be a few days.

“If we get what we are demanding, this is going to be a historic deal,” SAO says.

SAO sounds prepared to do no deal at all if all Iran will do is a “bad deal.” SAO admits deal could fall apart yet. But if a deal is reached, SAO expects very senior USA admin officials to take part in a signing ceremony of some sort.

Iran has agreed in principle to the framework but there are still a couple points USA isn’t satisfied with. 95% done. But literally changing words sometimes requires days in Iran’s system. Haggling over language. But USA feels like we have a commitment on nuclear stockpile and on opening Strait of Hormuz.

If IRAN doesn’t deliver on commitments, they get nothing.

“Iran’s ability to project power is a lot more limited than it was two months ago,” SAO says. “Their industrial base for building ballistic missiles has been substantially destroyed.”  {source}

Multiple key republican senators like Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham are not happy with what they are hearing.  Most of the Israel-First ‘influencers’ are also not happy.  Mark Levin and Laura Loomer are particularly upset.  However, as with all things that involve rumor and speculation, the best approach is to wait and see what the deal entails.

I trust President Trump to find the optimal solution.


Iran-backed Hezbollah 'actively trying to drag Lebanon back into chaos': Rubio

 U.S. Secretary of State says 'the era in which a terrorist group held an entire nation hostage is coming to an end'

A poster of Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem who urged Lebanese authorities on May 24, 2026, to abandon direct talks with Israel, ahead of a fourth round of such discussions in Washington early next month. Photo by JOSEPH EID /AFP via Getty Images

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Hezbollah in a statement Sunday of trying to plunge Lebanon “back into chaos.”

Rubio denounced what he called Hezbollah’s “reckless call to overthrow Lebanon’s democratically elected government” and said the pro-Iran armed group was “actively trying to drag Lebanon back into chaos and destruction.”

Naim Qassem, the leader of Hezbollah, said earlier that “the people have the right to go down onto the streets and to bring down the government” in response to Israeli strikes and U.S. sanctions on the Al-Qard Al-Hassan financial institution.

Al-Qard Al-Hassan is affiliated with Hezbollah and provides interest-free loans to mainly Shia Muslim communities who have faced financial difficulty amid Lebanon’s economic crises.

“The aggression against Al-Qard al-Hassan is an aggression against hundreds of thousands of poor people and those with limited income,” Qassem said.

The Lebanese government has been under U.S. pressure to take action against the firm, as Washington ratchets up pressure on Iran-backed Hezbollah.

“Hizballah’s threats of violence and overthrow will not be allowed to succeed,” Rubio said. “The era in which a terrorist group held an entire nation hostage is coming to an end.”

Rubio’s comments, delivered via a statement, came as the top U.S. diplomat was on a visit to India. Photo by Julia Demaree Nikhinson /POOL/AFP

The U.S. is negotiating a deal with Iran to end the Middle East war, with a report in Axios suggesting that a draft memorandum of understanding between the two sides contains language that “makes clear the war between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon would end.”

Early on Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on X that Trump, in a phone call, “reaffirmed Israel’s right to defend itself against threats on every front, including Lebanon.”

Qassem expressed hope for an agreement between Iran and the U.S. and that Lebanon would be part of its terms.

However, he again called on the Lebanese government to abandon direct negotiations with Israel. A fourth round of talks is scheduled

Despite a ceasefire that came into effect on April 17 and was recently extended for several weeks, Israel continues to strike what it describes as pro-Iranian Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, while Hezbollah, for its part, continues its attacks on Israeli targets in the south of the country.

 https://nationalpost.com/news/world/marco-rubio-hezbollah-lebanon-chaos


Marco Rubio Just Torched the Panicans Crying Over the Iran Peace Deal



Despite countless of President Donald Trump’s so-called allies defecting to criticize the administration for coming to a deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has set the record straight on who is actually coming out on top.

“The idea that somehow this president, given everything that he’s already proven that he’s willing to do, is gonna somehow agree to a deal that ultimately winds up putting position when it comes to nuclear ambitions is absurd,” Rubio said at a press conference during his trip to India. “That’s just not gonna happen, but our preference is to address this through a diplomatic means and that’s what we’re endeavoring to do here.”

Rubio further expressed that it has long been Trump’s preference to find global, America First solutions through diplomatic means rather than unnecessarily put American troops in harm's way to achieve the same goals. “The problem is going to be solved one way or the other,” Rubio stated.

Rubio also quieted rumors that the Trump administration would allow the Iranians to have free reign over the Strait of Hormuz, one of the most vital shipping lanes in the world.

“If we allowed that to become normal, we’d be normalizing an unacceptable status quo and setting a dangerous precedent that can be replicated in this region and around the world,” Rubio said.

The details of the negotiated deal are expected to be released soon.


The Intelligence System and Why Tulsi Gabbard Was Essentially the First DNI


Against the backdrop of Tulsi Gabbard resigning her position as Director of National Intelligence, there is an opportunity to explain how the Washington DC Intelligence Community functions in real life.

ODNI Tulsi Gabbard has rightly been receiving a lot of praise for her efforts at removing the shroud of secrecy that is often used by an intensely territorial IC network.  Simultaneously, she has received criticism or what Machiavelli called, “the enmity of all who would profit by the preservation of the old institution”; because, in reality Tulsi Gabbard might be considered the first functional DNI.

One of the reasons Tulsi Gabbard was effective was her willingness to answer this question:

It was DNI Tulsi Gabbard who released the receipts showing how the CIA and IC ran an impeachment operation against President Trump.  CIA operative Eric Ciarmella, ICIG Michael Atkinson and HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff all collaboratively involved.

Here it becomes more important for the next sequence of events to fully understand what it was about Tulsi Gabbard in the position of DNI that made such a big difference.  What was it about her approach to the office of the DNI that made Gabbard stand out?  This is a discussion worth having.

You may have seen reports of the CIA essentially spying on Tulsi Gabbard.  However, no one running with that narrative realizes how silly that sounds to those who understand how the silo system works within the intelligence community.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) is a hub, an interface, a central repository for all intelligence information that can be viewed, analyzed and shared with federal law enforcement, specifically the FBI.  The ODNI operates on essentially the same system as the CIA and NSA for intelligence information.  These sub-silos/offices are territorial yes, but they are not adversarial.

Tulsi Gabbard is not fighting with CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and the CIA doesn’t need to “raid” anything because the DNI and CIA are using the same information network interface.  The DNI works within the CIA database.  Yes, on paper both the CIA and NSA report to the DNI, but they do not operate disconnected information systems. The CIA, NSA and DNI work through the same computer interface, with varying levels of access.

HISTORY:  In the era shortly after 9/11, the DC national security apparatus was constructed to preserve continuity of government and simultaneously view all Americans as potential threats.  The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) were created specifically for this purpose.  Washington DC created the modern national security apparatus immediately and hurriedly after 9/11/01.  DHS came along in 2002 and within the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 the ODNI was formed.

Porter Goss was the last director of Central Intelligence (DCI) from 2004 to 2005. He then became the first director of the Central Intelligence Agency following the passage of the 2004 Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act, which abolished the DCI position and replaced it with the Director of National Intelligence on December 17, 2004. [Goss resigned as Director of the CIA on May 5, 2006.]

The first DNI was former U.S. ambassador to Iraq John Negroponte who was appointed on February 17, 2005, by President George W. Bush. On February 13, 2007, Mike McConnell became the second director of national intelligence, after Negroponte was appointed Deputy Secretary of State. On January 29, 2009, retired Navy admiral Dennis C. Blair became the third DNI on after being nominated by newly inaugurated President Barack Obama. President Obama dismissed Blair whose resignation became effective May 28, 2010. Obama then appointed an intentional doofus, James Clapper.

Thanks to the manipulative efforts of then Vice-President Mike Pence, the fifth DNI was fellow Hoosier, Dan Coats, who was a former member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI). Coats left after the 2019 impeachment began. The sixth DNI, John Ratcliffe, was confirmed May 21, 2020. The seventh DNI was Avril Haines, who took office on January 21, 2021 and stayed throughout Biden’s term in office until January 2025.

The important takeaway here is to understand that none of these former officials to hold the DNI position every fulfilled the legislated and authorized function of the DNI as the top of the Intelligence Community system. Instead, they ran the DNI office as a separate silo disconnected from the other legacy networks. All of it was essentially status quo, until Tulsi Gabbard arrived.

[NOTE: Throughout 2024 you may even remember CTH outlining how the DNI position had power that was never fully understood, because it was never activated. All of the IC silos fall under the ODNI, yet none of the prior Directors used the power of this office. CTH made the case of the DNI position being a great possibility for change. The DNI can reach into any IC sub-silo, extract any intelligence product, review it and declassify it with the support of the President. That’s exactly what Tulsi Gabbard started doing.]

Now, because the DNI is a hub – the office operates in a full 360° spectrum over both foreign and domestic intelligence affairs.

On the domestic side, Tulsi reached into the HPSCI for the Atkinson transcript, because the Intelligence Community Inspector General (IC IG) works for the DNI.  Working with CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Tulsi also took control of the President’s Daily Brief (PDB) and also took the Intelligence Advisory Board out of the CIA and put it under the ODNI.

Again, working collaboratively, Gabbard pulled the background material behind the CIA’s 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) out of the CIA declassified it any gave it to the public.  She also released the HPSCI report on the ICA highlighting the politicization of it.  Additionally, she released all the background material showing how John Brennan, James Comey and James Clapper coordinated with the Obama White House on the Trump targeting effort.

All of that was simply by using the power of the office that always existed but had never been used.

On the international side of the ODNI authority, often people get confused about how this all works, so I tried to create an analogy that would help make it easier to digest. You have heard me say for years now, about the restaurant analogy for the Dept of State.

♦ Historically: The Secretary of State is the maître d’. DoS/CIA personnel are the wait staff. The CIA Director is the chef in the kitchen. USAID were the food runners, and the Dept of War were the bus boys. Every nation gets a different menu…. and, the important part, Israel has a table in the kitchen.

Congress eats for free, and for the past several years the ever-arbitrary client Ukraine was the biggest tipper who obnoxiously reminded the staff.

Notice. No where in this analogy do you see the DNI.

There’s a reason for that.

Until Tulsi Gabbard entered the IC system, no DNI ever engaged in this process. [REMINDER HERE] Tulsi Gabbard did. Strongly. As a consequence, everyone within that historic operation viewed Mrs. Gabbard as a threat.

Gabbard walked into the restaurant, selected her own seat, started to look at the menu options, and began closely watching how the employees were interacting and asking what their functional value to the American people who are paying the bills.

Tulsi Gabbard didn’t do this arbitrarily.  Again, look at the operation described.  In 2025, Marco Rubio is the maître d’, and John Ratcliffe is the chef.  It was all of the people who “profit by the preservation of the old institution” who immediately became the people who freaked out.

♦ Sticking with the metaphor, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is like the public Health Dept. They are supposed to do the food safety and quality inspections.

Unfortunately, the SSCI inspectors are easily bribed and as a consequence there is no oversight per se. The Restaurant donates to the health inspectors, provides them influence and affluence, and like a mafia operation the inspectors fear the restaurant owners they are supposed to oversee. [Schumer: “Seven ways from Sunday”]

For decades the multinational restaurant business operated without interruption. Each maître d’ simply smiled and casually palmed the indulgency bribes from the arriving guests. The status of the restaurant expanded with everyone making bank.

Tulsi just walking in and sitting down was like Eliot Ness casually walking into Al Capone’s favorite speakeasy. The IC equivalent of a WTF moment.

Now, here it becomes important to think about the technical processes that were used with the ODNI was created, and how Tulsi essentially is the very first DNI that wasn’t appointed purposefully just to retain the Patriot Act status quo.

From that perspective, America’s first fully matriculated DNI is Tulsi Gabbard. The rest were placeholders for the status quo; inserted to retain the power of the CIA and the systems of their familiarity.

During the Bush, Obama, Trump (T1) and Biden terms, the IC interface never changed. The basic way the IC system operated was the same. The Dept of State did their thing; the CIA was inside and part of the support system; the FBI/DOJ did their corrupt Lawfare stuff domestically and the DNI was irrelevant.

Go back and look at it.  It was only after Tulsi Gabbard became DNI that the office truly opened up, and the long-neglected, albeit new systems meant to run the control mechanisms were finally dusted off and put to use.

I’m certain, much to the dismay of the DC stakeholders, a lot more information will become public in the next 30-days.

Remember, we are inside every facility, every institution, every meeting, every moment of their existence – and we notice everything. We are there when they do not expect, and we melt away before they notice our appearance. We see what they hide, we hear what they whisper, we decipher their codes, and we understand the complexity they create in their effort to conceal. We go to the places we know they will travel. We have allies and resources inside the core of their machinery. We understand what and why everything is being constructed, and we share all the information we discover. The truth isn’t mean; it’s just The Truth. Oh, and yeah, when I was a kid, Porter Goss was my neighbor. ~ Sundance


Defeated Thomas Massie Promises to Keep Shouting at Trees Until MAGA is Defeated


Appearing on NBC’s Meet the Press to promote his character and principled superiority to all other congressional representatives, the professional political narcissist, Thomas Massie, pledges to create as much turmoil as possible in his final seven months. Video below & Transcript HERE



Massie's Hot Take on Why He Lost Is Likely to Raise Eyebrows With KY Voters and Boomers

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie (KY-04) lost his primary last week by 10 points to former Navy SEAL Ed Gallrein. 

Gallrein was endorsed by President Donald Trump. Massie had been attacking Trump on a variety of issues, including Operation Epic Fury and the Epstein files. He also voted against Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill." 

"Meet the Press" host Kristen Welker asked him about why the voters rejected him, noting the comment of one voter who thought of him almost as a "Republican in Name Only (RINO)." Massie's response showed part of the reason he lost. He claimed there were "a lot of misinformed, uninformed voters." 

"They used artificial intelligence to create a video, lifelike video, that showed me checking into a hotel room with AOC and Ilhan Omar and holding hands with them," Massie said. 

"It was actually very effective on the boomers. But here's the thing, Kristen. That's only going to work for a little bit longer. The boomers are going to, you know, leave this country to the Gen X, and the Gen Z, and the Gen Y, and the millennials. And those folks are the ones that I won overwhelmingly. That makes me really hopeful for this country. They don't get fooled by artificial intelligence, and they check the news. They get news sources, like from podcasts and other sources. So they won this race by fooling my voters and expanding the base of people who vote to the uninformed voters. But, look, I got 45 percent of the vote."

Yikes. So it isn't that they didn't think he wasn't sufficiently supportive of Trump or that he was aligning with Democrats on issues, or not focused on Kentucky. It's because boomers are stupid and are deceived by AI ads. But, hey, no worries, those boomers are going to "leave the country" to the future generations (translation: die) who get news from "podcasts." 

Is it any wonder he's lost touch with Kentucky voters when he talks like this?

Pro tip? Yes, boomers can discern when content is AI, particularly when the PAC ad had "This satirical ad is created with artificial intelligence" running on the bottom.

Meanwhile, a PAC that supported Massie ran an AI ad against Gallrein.

In an AI-generated video, a scared Gallrein flees from a Trump rally and, in another clip, Gallrein appears to flee from a battlefield as Trump shoots at unseen enemies. It does not include any apparent disclosures that AI was used.

“Trump was in the foxhole,” the narrator says, “Woke Eddie Gallrein tucked his tail and ran.”

As we reported, Massie's campaign also sent out last-minute texts with an old Trump endorsement from 2022. So why is the campaign sending that out at the last-minute if not to make the voters think he had the endorsement of Trump? 

How about just recognizing you have to pay more attention to your own voters, rather than podcasters or progressives? It's really that simple. 

But it sounds like he thinks he might have future possibilities, telling Welker he hasn't ruled anything in or out" regarding a 2028 presidential run in the future. If he thinks he's going to walk past Vice President JD Vance (or Secretary of State Marco Rubio), I think he's misjudging again.