Sunday, March 29, 2026

Tensions Surface Between Secretary Marco Rubio and Insufferable EU Foreign Affairs Rep Kaja Kallas


If you’ve ever watched the intrapersonal aspects of the EU as a governing body, you have likely noticed that EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, is an annoying person always injecting herself into every discussion. The DEI infected bureaucrats always go along with it.

Last month, Kallas came to the USA to meet with members of congress sympathetic to World War Reddit and Zelenskyy. A cashmere dustup was created because Secretary of State Marco Rubio didn’t meet with her on the eve of Operation Epic Fury.  Mrs Kallas felt slighted.

According to insider reports, during Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s recent visit to the G7 foreign minister’s assembly in Paris Mrs Kallas took the opportunity to snark at Secretary Rubio.

(Via Axios) – EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas asked Secretary of State Marco Rubio when the U.S. would get tough on Russia during a G7 ministers meeting on Friday, sparking a sharp retort, according to three sources who attended the meeting.

She noted that Rubio had said at the same forum a year earlier that if Russia hampered U.S. efforts to end the war, the U.S. would run out of patience and take more steps against the Kremlin.

“A year has passed and Russia hasn’t moved,” Kallas told Rubio, according to the sources. “When is your patience going to run out?”

Rubio was visibly annoyed, “We are doing the best we can to end the war. If you think you can do it better, go ahead. We will step aside,” he fired back, raising his voice. (read more)


Drone Attack That Destroyed U.S. Aircraft and Wounded Servicemembers Calls Preparedness Into Question


RedState 

Friday, the U.S. military suffered what in competent hands would've been a potentially game-changing loss in our ongoing war with Iran. At least twelve U.S. servicemembers were wounded, two seriously, and at least two KC-135 aerial tankers, the Wall Street Journal says "multiple," and one E-3 Sentry Airborne Early Warning and Control aircraft were seriously damaged. My colleague Ward Clark posted on the attack earlier today; see New: 12 US Troops Injured in Iranian Strike on Saudi Arabian Base.

The Iranians launched a combined ballistic missile and drone attack against the U.S. center of gravity in the theater, the sprawling Prince Sultan airbase. This is the third major attack on Prince Sultan Air Base since the war started. The first, on March 1, resulted in the death of a U.S. Army sergeant. An attack on or about March 13 damaged five KC-135 aerial tankers.

Commercially available satellite imagery confirms the damage. What is noticeable is the lack of evidence of a ballistic missile strike on the base, implying the damage was done by a drone swarm.

One KC-135 appears to be destroyed. If so, this would be the first aerial refueling tanker ever lost to hostile fire. 

All of the U.S. military personnel killed or injured by Iranian attacks to date have been killed in facilities that were not hardened or defended from drone attacks.

According to The New York Times, the lack of protection from drones has forced the abandonment of facilities on military bases in favor of remote work from hotel rooms and office complexes in civilian areas. 

Many of the 13 military bases in the region used by American troops are all but uninhabitable, with the ones in Kuwait, which is next door to Iran, suffering perhaps the most damage. Six U.S. service members were killed in a strike on Port Shuaiba that destroyed an Army tactical operations center. Iranian drones and missiles also targeted Ali Al Salem Air Base, damaging aircraft structures and injuring personnel, and Camp Buehring, damaging maintenance and fuel facilities.

In Qatar, Iran struck Al Udeid Air Base, the regional air headquarters of U.S. Central Command, damaging an early-warning radar system. In Bahrain, a one-way Iranian attack drone struck communications equipment at the headquarters of the U.S. Fifth Fleet. At Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia, Iranian missiles and drones damaged communications equipment and several refueling tankers.

If true, this raises a lot of questions, perhaps the least of which is how information security and force protection are maintained.

The last time U.S. forces came under air attack by a hostile power was on the night of April 15, 1953. Then, a U.S. Army anti-aircraft unit on the North Korean island of Chodo was attacked at night by an undetermined number of North Korean Po-2 biplanes. The biplane's wood-and-fabric construction could not be detected by U.S. radar, and nighttime raids rendered optics useless. The Po-2's slow speed, paradoxically, gave it protection from (most) UN fighter aircraft, which had a stall speed higher than the Po-2's at full throttle, downhill, and with a tailwind.

While there is no doubt that the Iranian's collective butt is being handed to them, we can't let that obscure what has been a major revealed weakness of the U.S. military. We've fought wars with secure rear areas for so long that we seem to have lost the concept of how to defend critical installations from relatively low-tech threats.

There is evidence that the threat has been recognized.

The Defense Department is trying to quickly find vendors who are able to ship pre-made shelters to protect troops in the Middle East as the United States’ war with Iran continues. 

The department is looking for information from private contractors who can provide “prefabricated, transportable, hardened shelter systems designed to protect personnel from blast and fragmentation threats,” according to a new federal contract notice posted Monday.

The March 23 notice has a deadline of Friday and asks for companies to submit possible delivery timelines for 3 days, 15 days, and 30 days and include information about the “highest threat level” that the bunkers could withstand, like blast force, fragmentation, or ballistic impact. The bunkers will be sent to the Aqaba Air Cargo Terminal at King Hussein International Airport in Aqaba, Jordan, according to the posting.

Additionally, heavy equipment transporters loaded with the Avenger short-range air defense system have been spotted heading to McDill AFB, the stateside headquarters of U.S. Central Command.

The question remains, though. How can it be that even though Iran has been our principal adversary in the region for two generations, critical logistics and combat support facilities are not hardened? Knowing that Iran is one of the world's main manufacturers of suicide drones, in fact we copied and improved their Shahed, which has been omnipresent over Ukraine for thee years, to make the LUCAS (Low-cost Uncrewed Combat Attack System), how did we not anticipate that swarms of these deadly, but extremely vulnerable to countermeasures, drones would swarm U.S. installations in the region?



 I can understand the perceived reluctance to appear to be "escalating" tensions by flowing air defense assets into the region and hardening our facilities, but after the U.S./Israel demolition of Iran's nuclear program in Operation Midnight Hammer ('Operation Midnight Hammer' Was a Flawless Success - SecDef Hegseth, CJCS Caine Speak From the Pentagon), didn't any consider that it might only be the first round in a longer bout? 


When I look at the satellite images of our aircraft lined up wingtip-to-wingtip at Prince Sultan Air Base a month after the war started and after the air base had been attacked at least, I say again, at least, two previous times by drones and ballistic missiles, didn't anyone take the threat seriously? This seems like Clark Field, the Philippines, being attacked ten hours after Pearl Harbor and still achieving total surprise.

This kind of strategic nonchalance is why, unlike some members of the comments section, I think the drone flights that shut down our B-52 base at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana (see Mysterious Drone Swarms Plague Major B-52 Base Housing Nuclear Weapons - Met With a Yawn) are the product of a hostile power, and not an exercise (see There's No Hiding It; China's Actions Say It's Planning a Preemptive Attack on the US). It is why I fear that a Chinese attack in the Western Pacific will succeed in knocking us out of the war in a matter of weeks. It won't be because the Chinese are better or smarter; it will be because, even though we know what to do, it simply isn't important enough to the military to do anything in the way of prevention.


'No Kings' Mob Allegedly Gets Violent in LA, Multiple Injuries; US Atty. Essayli Reacts


RedState 

RedState wrote earlier on Saturday about the third edition of the "No Kings" protest events across the U.S., in cities like Minneapolis/St. Paul, Washington, D.C., and strangely, London, U.K.

Things got out of hand during a "No Kings" protest action in downtown Los Angeles on Saturday night.

After mob members broke up the cement blocks, hey then reportedly began throwing them at DHS agents, with multiple people allegedly injured. 

The Los Angeles Police Department arrived, and closed down the street to take them all in. 

First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, Bill Essayli, said they were all going to be charged with a felony if they assaulted law enforcement. 

Post updates in comments.


Would-Be Bomber Stopped by Paris Police at Last Second, Investigators Look Into Terrorism


RedState 

It could almost be the plotline of an international suspense thriller, but the stakes could not have been more real in Paris, France's centuries-old capital city, in the late night hours leading into the weekend.

Authorities say they foiled what's being termed a terror plot outside a branch of major banking titan, Bank of America, overnight from Friday into Saturday morning. And it was their bonne chance (good luck) that the suspect made a major slip up that allowed police to catch him mere seconds before he planned to set off an explosive device.

Another lucky break: since the would-be bomber or bombers were active at such a late hour, no one was inside the bank at the time. No employees were reported as injured in the attack plot.

France24 reported:

French police stopped an apparent bomb attack outside a US bank in Paris early Saturday when they arrested a man about to set off a homemade explosive device, sources close to the case said.

The incident occurred around 3:30am (0130 GMT) in front of a Bank of America building in the chic 8th arrondissement, a couple of streets from the Champs-Elysees.

Police grabbed the man just after he placed a device, made of five litres of liquid believed to be fuel and an ignition system, one of the sources said.

The report continued, saying that a second person of interest, who was seen running from the scene when the other man was captured, is still at-large and being sought by French authorities.

France24 cites reporting from the Le Parisien outlet on the nature of the explosive device:

The device consisted of a five-litre container filled with an unidentified liquid ⁠and an explosive charge made of about 650 grams of powder, Le Parisien added. It was secured and handed over to forensic experts from the Paris police laboratory, it reported.*

Meanwhile, the suspect whom police have in cutody is reportedly already talking:

According to a police source, the suspect said he had been recruited via the Snapchat app to carry out the bombing in exchange for the sum of 600 euros ($692). When the patrolling officers arrested him, he was about to ignite the device with a lighter.

A separate police source told AFP that while he was placing the charge, the accomplice stepped back, apparently to take a photo or video of the crime with his mobile phone.

France's interior minister, Laurent Nunez, reacted to the terror-related event in an X post, heaping praise on the law enforcement officers who took down the suspect before he could commit "a violent action of a terrorist nature last night in Paris."

CBS News spoke to French prosecutors, the National Anti-Terrorist Prosecutor's Office, who shared a list of the potential charges, while confirming the event will be investigated as terrorism:

The office told CBS News it has opened an investigation into the charges of attempted arson or dangerous damage in connection with a terrorist enterprise, manufacture of an incendiary or explosive device in connection with a terrorist enterprise, possession and transport of an incendiary or explosive device with the intent to prepare dangerous damage, in connection with a terrorist enterprise and terrorist conspiracy.

The Paris police and France's domestic intelligence service are also investigating, the prosecutor's office said. 

The CBS News story linked above included a comment from Bank of America:

Bank of America head of global media relations Jessica Oppenheim told CBS News that the company is "aware of the situation" and is "communicating with authorities." 

Post updates in the comments.