Wednesday, March 18, 2026

President Trump Asked Directly if He Will Reconsider Staying in NATO


President Donald Trump is not happy with NATO allies over the issue of the Iran war and their refusal to escort oil out of the gulf region.   President Trump criticized the EU member nations for refusing to support U.S. military efforts in the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump is then asked questions about if he would reconsider the U.S. relationship with NATO, warning it’s “not good for a partnership,” and signaling possible reconsideration of U.S. ties with NATO. WATCH:



The folks at the Lyndon LaRouche PAC are getting a ton of content to use in their anti-imperialism analysis as this conflict between President Trump, the U.K, the E.U and the NATO alliance continues.

Conrad Black - Pompous: Europe in a moral quagmire between benefactor US and evil Iran

 

The Western European NATO allies of the United States appear to be celebrating what they mistakenly believe is the discomfort the Americans and Israelis are now encountering in the Iran war. 

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has unctuously announced that this war is not a NATO responsibility since NATO is a defensive alliance. He has at least had the decency to recognize that “The United States and Israel are doing the world’s dirty work for it.” President Trump has made it clear that he does not need the assistance of any other country in clearing the Hormuz Strait, but he considers it a test of the reciprocity of the Western Alliance if America’s so-called allies, who are substantially dependent upon Middle Eastern oil, are prepared to send a token warship or some aircraft to assist in this task.

Several of the Western European NATO allies have pompously announced that since they were not consulted in this action, they see no reason to assist it. The argument that Iran has not initiated hostilities against the United States and its allies is utter nonsense, since the Islamic Republic has long been recognized as the leading sponsor of terrorism in the world and for all of its regrettable existence of 47 years it has never ceased to sponsor and provoke violent acts against the West. The United States is an energy self-sufficient country. It does import some oil but exports more and is not significantly inconvenienced no matter what happens in the Strait of Hormuz.

The waffling and havering of British Prime Minister Starmer and Canadian Prime Minister Carney and even French President Macron not only amount to moral relativism as between the United States upon whom all of them depend militarily and economically, and the barbarous pseudo-theological despotism of Iran. 

It also confirms President Trump’s often expressed concerns that America’s allies are addicted to American support and protection but feel that they retain a right of collegial approval of American initiatives before that country can act. This is the old playbook that Trump has shredded of the Europeans acting as if the United States was a great and powerful mastiff that would do the work and takes the risks while the sober and sage Europeans hold the leash and give the orders. 

Trump has warned that the Western Alliance cannot function on this basis, and it is astonishing that most of the principal European allies and Canada have leapt like gazelles to confirm Trump’s suspicion that the Western alliance is of no use to the United States.

This is a very distressing degeneration of the Cold War Alliance in which eminent statesmen including Churchill, Adenauer, de Gaulle, Thatcher, Mitterrand, de Gasperi, Andreotti and Mulroney all pulled their weight and played their part. Western Europe is increasingly a moral wasteland of declining population, stagnant economies, and the lack of the moral solidity even to prevent waves of destitute people with none of the constructive motives of authentic immigrants from swarming into Europe with no more thought for the jurisdictions they are entering than the Goths, Huns, Saracens and Vandals of the fifth century.

It appears that mere envy at the relaunch of America under Trump, with accelerating economic growth, collapsing crime rates, the end of illegal immigration, the debunking of green extremism, and the shaping up of the American military into an instrument of extraordinary power and precision, has driven much of Europe into the quagmire of moral relativism between their American benefactor and the evil terrorist state of Islamist Iran. One would have expected mere opportunism to produce better judgment than that.

The Americans will open the Hormuz Strait but they will shut it to Iran, including the large oil shipments to China, until the government of Iran is defanged and re-oriented. In those circumstances, where the United States had enabled the return of free movement of oil and its principal allies had deserted it, failed even token support of the American victory, who would blame the United States for imposing its own charges on shipments of oil that it had made possible to its catatonic allies?

 It is almost inconceivable that the Western Europeans and Canadians do not realize that the only chance of bringing peace to the Middle East is to destroy those regimes and terrorist movements that will be endlessly violent in their psychotic intolerance of the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state.

Though the repugnance of the brutal Russian dictatorship and the failure of Russia ever to enjoy one day of good government by Western standards militates against this outcome, the United States could make a more productive alliance with Russia than it now enjoys with most of the NATO countries who chiefly owe their freedom over the last 85 years to the Americans. Western Europe is profoundly afflicted by a political and sociological death wish. The United States will not save them from that; only they can.

https://brusselssignal.eu/2026/03/pompous-europe-in-a-moral-quagmire-between-benefactor-us-and-evil-iran/

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Rejects Request to Send Escorts to Middle East to Support EU Oil Shipments



The EU has balked at the request of President Trump to support military escorts for EU oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz destined for European Ports.  However, it is the position of German Chancellor Fredrich Merz which really highlights the arrogance of the issue.

Germany has deactivated its nuclear reactors and decided not to purchase Russian oil/gas. As a consequence, the German industrial economy is contracting; the German auto industry is collapsing; German manufacturing plants are closing – and mass layoffs have been announced.

Into this self-created dynamic, Germany has become dependent on (1) Oil and Gas from the middle east, and (2) LNG from the USA. Germany is a completely dependent nation on the issue of energy production. Yet, this is Germanys position:

[SOURCE]

Setting aside for a moment that “the middle east is not a matter for NATO,” while reminding ourselves Ukraine is also not a NATO member state – yet Germany is supporting the pro-war ‘coalition of the willing,’  President Trump previously pointed out that NATO would never come to the aid of the USA when the Greenland Arctic Security debate was going on.

The EU in general, and Germany specifically, is essentially proving President Trump’s point.  However, as a result of intentional migration, Germany has over five million Muslim residents now residing inside the country.  We should consider that this overlay is also part of their internal political consideration.

What Chancellor Merz said next is almost too European to be real, but it is:

The German government destroyed affordable energy for Germans.  The German government refuses to escort their own equity stakes to mitigate energy costs for Germans.  Now the German government will limit the price increases to once per day to provide relief to Germans.

Seriously folks, you cannot make this stuff up.

The tectonic plates are shifting, and we are bearing witness to old geopolitical structures collapsing as the ground beneath them moves.

When history is written it will reflect that President Trump didn’t destroy NATO – he simply removed the mask.

PRESIDENT TRUMP – “The United States has been informed by most of our NATO “Allies” that they don’t want to get involved with our Military Operation against the Terrorist Regime of Iran, in the Middle East, this, despite the fact that almost every Country strongly agreed with what we are doing, and that Iran cannot, in any way, shape, or form, be allowed to have a Nuclear Weapon.

I am not surprised by their action, however, because I always considered NATO, where we spend Hundreds of Billions of Dollars per year protecting these same Countries, to be a one-way street — We will protect them, but they will do nothing for us, in particular, in a time of need.

Fortunately, we have decimated Iran’s Military — Their Navy is gone, their Air Force is gone, their Anti-Aircraft and Radar is gone and perhaps, most importantly, their Leaders, at virtually every level, are gone, never to threaten us, our Middle Eastern Allies, or the World, again! Because of the fact that we have had such Military Success, we no longer “need,” or desire, the NATO Countries’ assistance — WE NEVER DID! Likewise, Japan, Australia, or South Korea.

In fact, speaking as President of the United States of America, by far the Most Powerful Country Anywhere in the World, WE DO NOT NEED THE HELP OF ANYONE! Thank you for your attention to this matter.”

President DONALD J. TRUMP

If the EU/NATO countries don’t want to support their own oil shipments, then pull the USA out of EU/NATO support arrangements.


Sen. Kennedy's Epic Takedown of Keir Starmer for Failure to Step Up on Iran


RedState 

I reported on how the Europeans were rejecting President Donald Trump's request to help out with the coalition to protect ships going through the Strait of Hormuz. The response from some of our European allies was that they didn't want to get involved in a war they didn't start. 

Well, weren't they lucky that we didn't have that attitude when we saved their bacon in World War I and II? Aren't they fortunate that we've been willing to throw our large but expensive safety net over them for years to protect them, even when our NATO allies had to be pressured into paying their fair share of the cost? Why did they think we had any obligation to help out with Ukraine, which wasn't even a NATO country? 

Then they had a bit of a moment of karma after rejecting his request when there was an Iran-backed drone attack on the hotel where the EU Advisory Mission has its offices in Baghdad. 

But what Trump exposed with this was that they're perfectly willing to take our money and our protection, but if we ask for something that is more beneficial for them and the security of global trade, they can't be bothered to put themselves out there. That's not much from "allies" after all these years. It's a truly ugly look on their part, especially in the face of fighting one of the biggest propagators of chaos and terrorism against the world. 

Among those holding back was Sir Keir Starmer, the prime minister of our oldest ally, the U.K. He didn't allow us to use British bases in the initial attack, and he held back when Trump asked about ships, saying he didn't want to get more involved in the war. There was some talk about maybe providing mine-detecting drones to help out with the Strait. 

But as our sister site Townhall reported, Starmer may have some advice to offer us about the military effort against Iran, according to Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA). I think Kennedy's opinion of the worth of Starmer's advice is pretty hilarious, particularly given what we've seen from Starmer so far. 

"That's a little bit of seeking the advice of a nun about sex," Kennedy quipped. 

Oof, nicely done. 

Kennedy wasn't quite done yet, as he went on to explain how Starmer was backloading the U.K. defense. So the picture he was painting wasn't quite accurate. 

Bottom line? They don't care as long as the U.S. keeps shelling out to provide cover. 

But President Donald Trump capped off the day of comments about Starmer with a pointed comparison. 

“You see that man right there? Know who that is?" Trump explained to the reporters. "The late, great Winston Churchill. Unfortunately, Keir Starmer is not Winston Churchill," Trump said. 

If you think about the courage of Winston Churchill, how it rallied a nation during war, you realize just how far they have fallen. 


Who Is Joe Kent and What Happened to His Position on Iran


The Director of the National Counterterrorism Center under President Trump, Joe Kent, has resigned in protest of the "Iran War," declaring that "pressure from Israel" was the chief factor in launching Operation Epic Fury, and claiming without evidence that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation." 

But that hasn't always been Kent's position, raising several questions about what might've happened to Kent during his time in the Trump administration. 

In 2020, Kent posted on X that Trump's "red line is American loss of life & IR nuke development."

"I personally think we should have crushed their ballistic & nuke capes, but Trump has a plan, he has definitely earned the confidence of any clear eyed observer," he added.

In September of 2024, Kent wrote on X: "Trump used a balance of diplomacy, economic pressure & targeted strikes to contain Iran. The embodiment of peace through strength."

And in October of 2024, Kent wrote: "October 7th b/c happened Biden/Harris gave Iran access to over 100 billion. Trump used diplomacy to build the Abraham accords, cut off Iran’s funding & killed key terrorists. America & our allies were safe & there was less war. No more neocons, no appeasement, Trump ‘24."

In other words, Joe Kent may have been opposed to the typical neoconservatives of the last 25 years, but that didn't mean he opposed "targeted strikes," "peace through strength," and killing "key terrorists," or supported "appeasement."

And yet his resignation indicates he does oppose all these actions, as it is unclear how Operation Epic Fury is any different, or how prolonged negotiations are different than a form of appeasement.

"Until June of 2025, you understood that the wars in the Middle East were a trap that robbed America of the precious lives of our patriots and depleted the wealth and prosperity of our nation," Kent wrote to Trump in his resignation letter.

Clips have resurfaced showing Kent discussing what he predicted would happen during a potential invasion of Iran with notorious grifter and former conservative Tucker Carlson. Kent warned it would end in disaster, but now, with none of his claims coming to pass, he has chosen to attack the president and his decisions as he exits.

Kent and those aligned with his perspective on foreign policy have yet to explain how the operation is nothing more than a prolonged series of targeted strikes (which Kent used to support), as the president himself said the operation will end soon.

Kent goes on to portray the operation as the start of another “forever war,” a theory pushed by more isolationist Republicans that has yet to prove true, let alone show that the U.S. is even headed in that direction.

The bigger concern is that Kent used his resignation to push theories that aren’t even debatable, claims that Israeli officials somehow maneuvered the United States into a war with Iraq, as he alleges they did the same with Iran.

In reality, the prime minister of Israel at the time of the Iraq war opposed that conflict, urging the U.S. to act against Iran instead, which they viewed as the greater threat. 

Operation Epic Fury, by contrast, has been long anticipated. President Trump made it clear he would not allow the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism to obtain a nuclear weapon, while also promising support to Iranians who were brutally slaughtered by their own regime earlier this year.

This is not an example of Israel forcing the U.S. into war; it is a president following through on his commitments to both the American people and the Iranian people. As President Trump has said, “peace through strength” is an America First policy. Some officials, it seems, have let pure isolationism cloud their judgment.

Top conservative commentators have blasted Kent for what he claims in his resignation letter.



Japan Signs Major $56 Billion Energy Deal with U.S.


CTH has said to watch the U.S.-Japan trade relationship closely because the outlines of multiple geopolitical shifts can be referenced from a new strategic relationship surrounding multiple sectors, including energy.

The U.S, relationship with Japan is both leverage and a hedge against old alliances that may seek to disrupt the global reset currently underway through President Trump policy.  The issues with the European Union, U.K, USMCA and other tenuous allies, look entirely different when President Trump has alternative partnerships for massive energy exports.

ENERGY NEWS – In a major move to secure stable energy supplies amid escalating geopolitical tensions, Japan has inked deals worth up to $56 billion with the United States for oil, natural gas, and liquefied natural gas (LNG) purchases and investments.

This agreement, finalized at the Asia-Pacific Energy Security Forum in Tokyo on March 14, 2026, underscores Japan’s push to diversify its energy imports and deepen economic ties with the US under Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration.

The deals come as part of a broader framework stemming from the 2025 US-Japan trade agreement, where Japan pledged $550 billion in US investments over several years, with energy as a key pillar.

The $56 billion package represents a significant escalation in Japan’s commitment to American energy, building on an initial $36 billion tranche announced earlier in 2026.

This latest round emphasizes immediate purchases and long-term infrastructure projects, responding to global market volatility driven by conflicts in the Middle East and disruptions in key shipping routes like the Strait of Hormuz.

[…] The agreements encompass a mix of direct energy purchases, joint ventures, and infrastructure investments. (read more)

As a nation that needs energy partnerships, Japan seeks stability and predictability.  Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has gone all-in on a strategic energy partnership with the United States.

As the tectonic plates are shaken:

♦ If Canada wants to try and leverage the energy trade infrastructure against a USMCA reset, President Trump has Venezuela production as an offset.

Japanese automakers have already told Canadian trade ministers that if Canada loses the USMCA, there’s no value in maintaining auto manufacturing north of the border – because the target customers are all in the USA.  Japan would move all production out of Canada.  I doubt China could replace at scale.

♦ If Europe, who is now dependent on LNG from Norway and the USA, wants to create geopolitical friction, President Trump now has Japan as a replacement customer.  More behavioral leverage.

U.S. firms are making a lot of money selling LNG to Europe, but Trump has just created a customer base that is more reliable and politically consistent.

♦ Then, as the short-term lifting of LNG and oil sanctions on Russia is proving (petrodollars used), think about the potential for India and Southeast Asia to be supported by Russian exports.  Who holds that distribution key, again Trump.

It is not accidental that India is sending support vessels to the Strait of Hormuz as requested by President Trump.  Here’s the kicker… With oil and gas from Russia, India doesn’t need the Iranian oil and gas; yet, they are sending support. Why? Because Prime Minister Modi wants Trump to keep their Russian purchase exemptions in place.

We can see how a strong collaborative relationship with Japan can negate any negative economic impact the mask wearing Europeans and Canadians might want to try and leverage.  In actuality, Canada, the U.K and Europe don’t have any leverage at all in the new world of trade.

One way to look at this is to say the primary “Build Back Better” nations, those most entrenched in the selling of climate change as a tool for manipulation and control, are being positioned to have the least amount of input into a new, tiered set of established nations for global energy development.

Take a look at that Russian Sanctions map again.  The nations in yellow created the sanctions:

Now, overlay the new energy trade relationships that are forming.

The USA fuels the Western Hemisphere.

Russia fuels the Eastern Hemisphere.

Europe is reliant on the Middle East.

China loses geopolitical power, Russia gains power.

Europe loses geopolitical power, India gains power.

Deal with Iran and most conflict is resolved in the Middle East.

The USA controls the Western Hemisphere.  And with India and Japan as allies, the Indo-Pacific outline is realized.