Saturday, February 14, 2026

Can the US Grid Handle the Next Winter Storm Fern – or Major Solar Flares?


Winter Storm Fern (January 23-27) dumped heavy snow and ice on more than 240 million Americans across 40 states and 2,300 miles, beginning in Arizona and wrapping up in Maine.

Scores died, including 20 in New York City, where Mayor Zohran Mamdani refused to close homeless camps or compel “unhoused residents” to move indoors, instead letting them rely on the “warmth of collectivism.”

Roads and highways were impassable, 11 states declared emergencies, 30 airports closed for a day or more, and many cities recorded 10-24 inches of snow.

The New York Times asked, “What’s up with this big freeze? Some scientists see climate change link.” Two years earlier, its headline warned, “Weirdly warm winter has climate fingerprints all over it, study says.” Fossil fuel fearmongering clearly never ends.

Mid-20s degree temperatures in Florida clobbered citrus groves and froze iguanas. The reptiles fell from trees, providing “tastes-like-chicken” meat for sumptuous stews, curries, gumbos and soups, and helping conservation officials to cull the rampant invasive species.

There were no widespread blackouts from power failures, though there were close calls. Texas gas lines were weatherproofed after Winter Storm Uri (February 2021) and other jurisdictions had kept coal and gas generators operational, instead of opting to rely on wind and solar that were virtually useless during Fern’s mostly windless and sunless onslaught.

However, ice on trees and power lines caused prolonged power outages that left millions of homes and businesses without electricity or heat. Two weeks later, thousands still had no electricity.

In Memphis, a friend got her power back quickly, because her home is near shops, groceries and restaurants. But nearby areas were still without power a week after Fern, despite the local utility deploying 1,800 lineworkers. Several homes caught fire moments after their power was restored, perhaps because they lacked surge suppressors or their old or inadequate electrical systems couldn’t cope.

Stories were similar all across Fern’s impact area. But the United States dodged a potentially huge bullet.

Modern early-warning, communication, building, electricity and other technologies have made our lives far safer than in the past. But big winter storms across the Southwest, Midwest, East Coast or even much of the Lower 48 States still strike frequently and recall deadly historic events like these.

The School Children’s Blizzard (January 1888) sent temperatures from 35 degrees to –20 degrees and lower within hours, dropped several feet of snow, and killed 500 people, mostly in Nebraska and most of them children.

The Great White Hurricane (March 1888) buried New York City and much of the East Coast under mountains of snow, killed over 400 people and became the impetus for NYC’s subway.

The real question: Will we learn lessons from Fern and heed warnings about the US grid and too-heavy reliance on wind, solar, battery and related (heavily Chinese) technologies in time for the next Big One? 

Energy researchers Isaac Orr and Mitch Rolling provide lessons and helpful charts, links and readers’ comments.

  • The Midcontinent Independent System Operator’s territory had an extremely close call when hourly nameplate capacity factors for its wind turbines plunged from over 60 percent before Fern to 7 percent a day later, well below MISO’s expected 29 percent winter capacity value, and didn’t return to 60 percent for two more days.
  • US Department of Energy emergency orders kept three big Indiana and Michigan coal-fired generators operating (using coal stored onsite). Otherwise, the situation would have been dire in those states.
  • New England has been forcing or subsidizing heat pump installations and has built a $1.6-billion transmission line to bring electricity from New York and Quebec. During Fern, natural gas prices skyrocketed, coal power had been eradicated, reliable nuclear did its part, wind was minimal and solar was MIA. Much-hated oil became the foremost electricity generator – because extreme and sustained cold air across Québec forced the Canadians to suspend power delivery to New England!
  • That raises an even bigger question. What happens if large numbers of states go Net Zero, mandate heat pumps or electric home and water heating? If they’re all relying on nearly nonexistent “renewable” energy? Or if they’re dependent on sources like Quebec and a “Clean Energy Connect” transmission line? And they’re caught in a blizzard proportionate to Fern or other historic storms? As Orr and Rolling asked: Where do you turn when you run out of other people’s energy? 
  • The huge PJM Interconnection (wherein I reside) perhaps had Lady Luck on its side, because comparatively mild temperatures across the region kept demand low enough to forestall emergency alerts and load shedding (deliberate, planned interruption or rolling blackouts), and it hasn’t gone hog wild on “renewables.” However, its own gas winterization efforts also paid off.
  • The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) may have weatherized its natural gas transmission system, but higher than predicted temperatures and thus lower than expected peak power demand may have saved the region, because its enormous wind and solar fleet was simply not up to the task.

Why ERCOT – covering oil and natural gas capital Texas – would add 31 GW of solar, 9 GW of wind and only 3 GW of gas over the past decade is inconceivable. Maybe that lone star will keep bringing it luck during the next Winter Storm Uri or Fern. But responsible energy providers shouldn’t count on it.

Other harbingers of danger must also be addressed.

More than half of the entire US electric grid will soon reach high or elevated risk of blackouts, due to growing demand, accelerating retirements of reliable coal, gas and nuclear generators, and increasing reliance on unreliable, weather-dependent wind, solar and battery storage power, according to a new North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Long-Term Reliability Assessment.

Making the grid even more vulnerable, Carrington Events triggered by giant sunspots (like AR4366 on February 1) and solar flares can send coronal mass ejections slamming into Earth’s magnetic field. A large enough CME can electrify the planet’s surface, send massive currents into high-voltage transmission lines, fry transformers and other equipment, cause widespread blackouts lasting months or years, shut down refrigeration, transportation, water systems and our entire lives – and kill countless millions.

We must also consider risks of sabotage, terrorism and deliberate shutdowns by malevolent foreign or domestic actors. China is our primary source not only for rare earth elements, but also for wind turbines, solar panels, transformers and grid-scale batteries. Beijing, Moscow and their surrogates could employ strategic minerals and these technologies as strategic weapons: banning exports to impose political goals – or even embedding trip-switches or backdoors that allow them to close down limited or vast sections of our already vulnerable grid and economy.

If our politicians, judges and regulators cannot end their obsession with climate change nightmares, renewable energy fantasies and other nitpicking topics – and our nation is plunged into widespread, prolonged and deadlyblackouts – “accountability” must come in much stronger forms than merely voting them out of office. Prosecution for gross malfeasance and dereliction in office will also be in order.


Podcast thread for Feb 14 💘

 


Hope you had a really SWEET day. :)) 💖

Tired of Winning


During the 2024 presidential campaign, Donald Trump repeated the line that, under his administration, America would “win, win, win,” so much so that Americans would become “tired of winning.”

In just one year, President Trump has scored so many wins that it would be difficult to list all of them in a brief article, but it may be, just as he predicted, that some Americans have become tired of winning.  For some, it’s hard to accept the fact that their country is now the sole global superpower and is exerting its strength; that inflation is under control, and the GDP is predicted to grow at 5% in 2026; that the borders are largely closed, and three million illegal aliens have been deported or self-deported; that women’s bathrooms are now safer and males excluded from women’s sports; and on and on...

There is no doubt that tens of millions of Americans, those we call “progressives,” would rather live in a country that does not stand out, that conforms to global standards rather than its own rules and traditions, and that is sinking gradually into mediocrity.  In other words, a country that is failing, failing, failing.  That is what their hysteria about Trump is all about.  They are globalists and Marxists, and they do not want America to be exceptional.

In a sense, it’s easier to be a second-rate nation that never initiates change and that takes no responsibility for events.  It’s easier to be invisible or even “dead,” as we were just one year ago under Biden.  If Democrats win at the polls in November, it will be in part because of the fact that it is stressful to be a global leader and to see one’s domestic economy growing at such a pace that the DOW has just hit 50,000.  Better to tuck our heads in the sand and depend on a stimulus check from Biden instead of a good job.

What is not always admitted is that a large percentage of our population want to be “dead” in this sense.  They do not want America to be a global leader; they don’t even want us to be able to defend ourselves against growing threats from around the world.  They want us to sink and be defeated in the way that Spain declined after the loss of its armada or that Britain sank after WWII.  Liberalism is a psychosis, and at its core is a self-punishing impulse that amounts to a death wish.  Liberals and progressives are insanely opposed to the sanctity of life, personal liberty, economic growth, wholesome habits, and all else that leads to happiness.  They are like teenagers who self-harm in the sense that they live within their own cosmos of self-hatred.

For those on the left, there really is a kind of psychological stress associated with winning.  Nearly half of Americans would prefer the Clintonesque complacency of not responding when attacked and not facing up to China on trade matters.  The problem is that not facing up to  problems just makes them worse.  When the first attack on the World Trade Center took place in 1993, Clinton pledged a “full investigation” but not much else.  A second, devastating attack followed in 2001.  When China entered the World Trade Organization in 2001 (after years of lobbying on China’s part and with the enthusiastic support of President Clinton), China did not alter its ways; it continued to steal intellectual property and engage in unfair trading practices, in violation of its agreements.  The only way for America to survive is through strength.

Strength involves sacrifices, including a $1.5-trillion budget for the military.  But it also involves rewards such as the benefits of economic growth.  This month’s final reading of the third quarter GDP with a growth rate of 4.4% is just the beginning of what is projected to be a series of quarters of strong economic growth, and there are huge benefits to GDP growth, just as there are consequences to its stagnation (as occurred for four years under Biden and before that under Obama).

Growth of 5% compounded for the next 10 years — not impossible under Trump and a conservative successor) would increase the real standard of living by 65%.  There is an enormous difference between the current U.S. average household income of $83,730 and $138,154, a 65% increase.  Given that level of growth, the sense of financial well-being would be palpable, and it would open many opportunities that do not now exist.

Progressives find this level of affluence distasteful.  These include Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, although Sanders’s net worth is reportedly between $2 and $3 million and Warren’s between $7 and $12 million (which pales in comparison with that of the Obamas at $120 million — so much for “pay it forward”).  Maybe it’s just that they don’t want others, especially that large class of what Obama called “ignorant folks” who drive pickup trucks, to enjoy the same.  Like most liberals, progressive leaders seem to think they arebetter than ordinary Americans.

Most Americans, I believe, would rather have the $138,154 that 5% growth will bring, even if it does involve work.  They would rather be winners than losers.

Much the same goes for winning abroad.  Those who criticize Trump’s attack on Iran’s nuclear sites, his tariffs (particularly against China), and his seizure of Maduro and his wife on drug-trafficking charges are utterly mistaken in their view of the world.  That includes Gavin Newsom and nearly all Democrat leaders.  America wins by having a strong military and exercising it when necessary.  But it appears that Democrats do not want to win; they just want to appease, and appeasement always ends tragically.

Winning entails a burden.  The United States is a global target for both criticism and actual attack  because of its power and status.  But power and status also garner respect.  As a prominent Japanese academic once told me, “I don’t admire the U.S. because of its wealth or culture, but I  respect your country because of its power.”

The only way forward is for Americans to accept their role in history and the burdens that this role entails.  A strong leader like Donald Trump will never be popular abroad, and he will not be popular among those at home who want us to fail.  But America will be respected, and the chances of America’s entering a global war are vastly reduced by our strength.  It is time to win, win, win, not just abroad, but at home as well, with a soaring stock market, wages rising, cities returning to law and order, and schools reformed so that they actually teach what they’re supposed to.

Winning is not easy, and the 2026 elections will reveal just how many are tired of winning.  The media are full of progressives who constantly complain about Trump’s victories.  But think about the opposite: a decades-long slide into mediocrity and second-class nationhood.  Then we would really have something to complain about.


What We are Forgetting About Trump


Amid all the cyclonic turbulence that emanates from America's 47th president, the world is forgetting what the man has done.

This is not some sort of weird Julius Caesar moment for me. I have not come to bury him (figuratively) or for that matter praise him for everything like some of his diehard supporters. Yes, I did vote for him three times, but I did so largely because I could not in all good conscience cast a ballot for a person (Hillary Clinton) who called me and my ilk "deplorable," nor could I pull the lever for an ineffectual lifelong inept politician (Joe Biden), or a person who proclaimed her love for Venn diagrams and yellow school buses (Kamala Harris).

While that should clarify my reasons for voting for Donald Trump, I realize that it will not protect me from criticism from the left as a "willing co-conspirator" with the president on everything he says or does. This is one of the big present-day tactics of the Democrats as they attempt to label all conservatives as "fascists-in-waiting" and use false equivocation to their advantage leading up to the midterm elections just nine months away.

To them, and to any one who will listen, Trump supporters, MAGAts (as they say) or those who voted for the president now have automatic complicity in every action he takes whether that be from calling up the National Guard, bombing drug-running boats in the Caribbean or helping maintain law and order in the Middle East by setting Iran's nuclear program back.

Before I get to the point about what we are forgetting about Donald Trump, let me just remind everybody that the United States has been barreling towards a national nervous breakdown for a decade or more and this nervous breakdown will, if something major is not done soon, lead to an unamicable divorce whose cause will be "irreconcilable differences." 

But don't take my word for it; look at just about any public poll and read just about any analysis of Americans' feelings about their government, their culture and every other aspect of their lives. Americans are fearful, angry, resentful, combative and have lost their capacity to be objective about a whole range of issues, and when objectivity goes, the group that stood for it will inevitably migrate to one of the two political parties that represent either conservative or liberal views. The question is are there enough of them to make a difference and which party will they join?

When Donald Trump took office for the second time he knew that he had to hurry to effect change, so instead of wasting his time conducting a hopeless crusade to unite Americans, he decided to make "his" share of the electorate stronger.

His method was to quickly rip off the bandage that covered the festering wound of four years of Joe Biden's presidency.

This defied the conventional wisdom that a new president should seek to bring Americans together for the "good of the country." 

Trump's vision of America did not include one that had an equal partnership with the opposition because he knew that his base would never accept that nor did he personally believe that America was stronger when the liberals had equal power over his efforts to return America to its fundamental values.

In this case, he was way more honest than his predecessors whose "respect for the presidency" included appeasing their opponents.

Now, what are we forgetting about the new Donald Trump presidency? First and foremost, we have forgotten how old-style rhetoric almost always got us nowhere as a country. For all of Barack Obama's silver-tongued oratory, America did not move one step closer to unification, and this goes double for racial unity. Obama's presidency was like that of the "lost boys" of J.M. Barrie's book "Peter and Wendy." 

Obama was Peter Pan and the boys were all those true believers of Mr. Obama's who lived with him in the Neverland of their heads. Barrie's lost boys were adventurous, playful, and sometimes mischievous and would be sent back to the prams from whence they came if anyone claimed them — but no one ever did.

Donald Trump is no Peter Pan nor Pied Piper nor Johnny Appleseed though he has planted his seeds in all of us. We cannot escape him and we cannot escape hearing about him. He is in our waking hours and in our subconscious. He is also responsible for a massive increase in interest in the United States if only to see the latest episode of the "Trump diaries" unfolding in real time in social media, the traditional media, at the water cooler, the dinner table and just about anywhere human beings gather. In that, he has succeeded in his ambition to create a brand legacy that will be talked about long after he has left the White House and indeed the face of the Earth.

Writers love Trump for giving them a villain or at least a foil to write about. And they hate him for his politics, but he is their catnip. Publishers and television station owners and network executives love him as well, cashing in on his off-the-wall daily pronouncements or actions by instructing the producers of their programs to go full bore on reporting and debating what he's done or said.

The Democrats both love and hate him because he is the "gift that keeps on giving" that enables them to raise vast sums of money to solidify their opposition to him. Pollsters and analysts, think tanks and university professors love him because he provides them with a living example of unorthodox leadership, one which they are able to use in "teachable moments."

Foreign leaders love him (and hate him simultaneously) because his example can be vilified and used to stick it to their respective "right wings" and give them an excuse to criticize the United States which is now almost daily fare in many European countries – these same countries I might add that are adopting some of Trump's policies, especially with respect to immigration.

In countries such as Denmark (where I live), there is a backlash against Donald Trump which has spilled over to a rejection of American products and services as well as tourism to the United States. This has benefited European food producers and manufacturers as the Danes are saying "Amerika, nej tak" (America, no thanks).

The Danes really should be saying "Thank you Donald Trump for boosting the sales of European-made goods," but of course, they don't.

In the case of Greenland, one should probably ask the Greenlanders if Donald Trump hasn't been good for their cause and if they have not gotten considerably more attention to their needs from their territory's protector in Copenhagen.  

I realize that thanking Donald Trump for anything is the absolute last thing on any Democrat's, Progressive's, or leftist's mind, but all I ask of them is to be honest when it comes to looking at how much Donald Trump has improved their bottom line and how many more "followers" they have on their social media accounts or "likes" on their podcasts and how much Trump Derangement Syndrome has done to motivate people to leave the comfort of their easy chairs and "just say no" to passivity.

If no one else will thank you, Mr. Trump, I sure will.


🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Republicans Will Keep Losing Until They Realize Power Isn’t Evil


We can exercise power, or we can allow
 our enemies to exercise it. Choose wisely. 



Unless Virginia voters reject the new congressional district plan created and passed by a Democrat legislature and signed by a “moderate” Democrat governor, Republicans are set to lose four congressional seats they currently hold. The new map allows only one of Virginia’s 11 districts to be represented by a Republican, despite Republicans representing almost half of the Virginia electorate. Meanwhile, Republicans in Indiana refused to redraw their congressional maps because of “principle.”

The contrast between Indiana and Virginia gets to the heart of the GOP’s biggest problem. Too many Republicans and conservatives seem to think that exercising the slightest hint of power is tantamount to putting on the One Ring of Sauron. Power, in this set-up, is not only dangerous and corrupting but unconstitutional, since the whole point of checks and balances is to prevent power from becoming concentrated. Thus, Republicans, up to now, have refused to follow Texas’ example and redraw congressional red-state maps, have refused to shelve the filibuster to get their agenda past the Democrat piranhas, and have been reluctant to pass national voter ID laws, even though it is a wildly popular issue, with even 71 percent of Democrats being for it. Actually exercising power unilaterally (and not bipartisanly) would make us no different from the Democrats. 

While Republicans worry about their virtue, Democrats have already promised to end the filibuster if they retake the Senate. They have already promised to punish their enemies (us) if they retake power. And where they have regained power, they have damned the torpedoes and gone full steam ahead.

Virginia’s new blue overlords are not just disenfranchising almost the whole Republican population — aka, 48 percent of the state’s electorate. They are also pushing bills to abolish minimum sentences for manslaughter, rape, and child pornography (HB863); to take away Second Amendment rights from anyone convicted of a misdemeanor “hate crime” (HB1015); to make it illegal to investigate allegations of Minnesota-style fraud (HB1369); and to make home ownership more burdensome (HB557 and HB881).

And it is not just Virginia. Washington state’s Democrat-dominated legislature has on its agenda: SB5974, which allows the state to decertify elected county sheriffs and appoint their replacements; SB5068, which allows non-Americans to be law enforcement officers and prosecutors; SB6081, which blocks public access to records; and HB2123, which allows foreign participation in state elections. As author Mark Steyn has said, “When Democrats win, they’re in power; when Republicans win, they’re in office.”

What the GOP has forgotten is that power is like money. It is neither good nor bad. The love of power may be a root of evil, just as the love of money is. But power, in and of itself, is not evil. In fact, power is the key ingredient to accomplishing anything in the world, no matter how small the scale.

Take something as mundane as a garden. For the garden to actually be successful, i.e., produce food, you first need to know what sort of fruits and vegetables will grow in your climate region and soil (intellectual and prudential power). You then have to prepare the garden patch, plant the seeds, weed, water, cultivate, and eventually harvest the crops (all examples of physical power and willpower — you can’t weed if you’re confined to a wheelchair, and your harvest will be zero if you can’t pull yourself away from Netflix to actually bring in the produce). The scale of what you want to accomplish will determine the amount of power you need to possess and spend to accomplish your goal. The bigger the goal, the greater the amount of power required. 

The point can be taken a step further: You cannot accomplish anything good unless you have and exercise power. Take the examples of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, still the two best examples of American presidents who faced herculean odds and stayed loyal to the Constitution.

Contrary to the image we have of him today, Washington intimately understood the dynamics of power. As historian Edmund Morgan said, “George Washington’s genius lay in his understanding of power, both military power and political power, an understanding unmatched by that of any of his contemporaries.” It’s not just that Washington practically single-handedly created the presidency (Article II of the Constitution is relatively sparse on details). It was also the situation which Washington found himself in — responsible for creating a government that would be republican but, at the same time, command the respect of the world and the states.

This was an especially tricky task after the woolly days of the Revolution and the Articles of Confederation, in which state legislatures were the real powers (the Continental Congress could request but never command). To this effect, Washington was mild when he could be — he chose the democratic title “Mr. President” over the more aristocratic options proposed — and hard as oak when needed. He declared foreign relations the sole province of the presidency (the Senate could merely advise) and forged those early foreign relations through the Neutrality Proclamation and his support of the Jay Treaty. And when the Union was threatened by the Whiskey Rebellion, Washington personally led the militias of Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and New Jersey against the rabble rousers after publicly proclaiming the rebellion to be war against the United States. 

According to 19th-century British historian James Bryce, “Abraham Lincoln wielded more authority than any single Englishman has done since Oliver Cromwell.” This is undoubtedly true. Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus, his closing down of pro-secession newspapers in the North, his calling up of the militias (without congressional approval), and his censorship of telegrams and mail going in and out of the capital are all examples of his muscular exercise of power. In the words of James G. Randall, another historian, “No president has carried the power of presidential edict and executive order (independently of Congress) so far as [Lincoln]…”

It is practically impossible to imagine Republicans acting like this today; too many would be worried about what CNN and The Washington Post would say about them. But for all the claims of “dictatorship” by mush brains on the left and right, it was Lincoln’s use of power, especially in the 80 days between the firing on Fort Sumter and the convening of Congress on July 4, that helped save the Union. We might not exist as a united country if Lincoln had not pushed his power to the limit to save her. 

Power is not the One Ring. It is, instead, Excalibur. It exists to win good ends and to protect those ends once they are won. Especially now, at this inflection point for our country, Republicans and conservatives must make this mind shift. Because power, like nature, abhors a vacuum. As Napoleon said, “I found the crown of France lying in the gutter, and I picked it up with my sword.”

We can exercise power, or we can allow our enemies to exercise it. Choose wisely. 


There's a Small Problem With That List of Names a Dem Lawmaker Connected to Epstein


RedState 

Congressional lawmakers were given access to see the unredacted names in the Epstein files, and some have looked at the documents.

Shortly after that, Democrat Rep. Ro Khanna (CA-17) and Republican Rep. Thomas Massie (KY-4) said they found the names of six men whose names had been redacted, whom Massie said were "likely incriminated by their inclusion in these files." 

Khanna claimed they were “wealthy, powerful men that (sic) the DOJ hid," and then he read their names on the House floor for all to hear. 

Except there was a small problem with this claim. 

While two of the names had some connection to Epstein, four of the names I'd never heard of before, and I'd been covering the case for years. Then I went looking to find out who they were. The first thing I thought was: how wealthy and powerful can they be, if I can't even find much on these people? 

But it turns out that those four did not have contact with Epstein, according to reporting from The Guardian. The men had just been used in a line-up in New York, which is why their names and some pictures were found in the files. 

Now Khanna is trying to blame the DOJ for what he did. He acknowledged the reporting that the people "were just part of a photo line-up and are not connected to Epstein's crimes."

I wish DOJ had provided that explanation earlier instead of redacting then unredacting their names. They have failed to protect survivors, created confusion for innocent men, and have protected rich and powerful abusers.

But it wasn't the DOJ that went on the House floor and read their names. Khanna did that. Khanna claimed they were "wealthy and powerful," and he didn't even know that about the four. 

This is the problem of reading random things in the files, without knowing the context. This is why you should operate based not on random emails or documents you don't fully understand, but on specific allegations. 

Now imagine, too, the monumental job of going through all those millions of files, trying to figure them out and get everything correct. The DOJ has to determine the context, and what happened in any prior investigations as well. 

In response to the news about the four men, Massie claimed that he'd mentioned the possibility of a line-up during a CNN interview. But even in that interview clip, it was still implied that the DOJ was somehow improperly protecting the men. 

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche scolded Khanna. 

"The 'problem' is that you didn’t come to us, but immediately ran to X and the House floor and made false accusations about four men," Blanche said, "while we were checking the facts." He also said that while the two other men who had had contact with Epstein had been redacted in one document, they were otherwise mentioned unredacted in the files. So the association wasn't being hidden. 

Bottom line? Let's look at the actual allegations, if any of those can still be pursued. 


Mamdani and Newsom: The Democratic Party’s Fraternal Twins

Mamdani and Newsom: The Democratic Party’s Fraternal Twins

Mamdani and Newsom sell rival myths, but their shared model—big government fused with big corporate power—centralizes control, inflates costs, and leaves ordinary Americans paying the price. 

California Governor Gavin Newsom wants to be the 48th President of the United States. In pursuit of that lifelong ambition, Newsom has positioned himself as principled but practical.

Even if Newsom’s positioning is genuine, his career conflicts with the promise of his new image. California’s considerable remaining economic vitality is in spite of Newsom, not because of him. On every issue that might differentiate him from the Democratic machine that runs California, Newsom’s pronouncements have been suspect. Either they have been completely fraudulent—his claims to have alleviated homelessness are a perfect example—or they have been flip-flops necessitated to avoid disaster.

And in those cases where Newsom actually flipped into doing something right, however incremental and inadequate it may have been, “disaster” to his presidential ambitions has been his primary concern. Avoiding the disastrous impacts his policies are having on California’s law-abiding citizens, working families, and beleaguered businesses is a secondary concern, only motivated by Newsom’s desire to avoid the first.

Newsom is also counting on his charm and charisma to propel his candidacy ahead of his competitors. Being 6’3″, telegenic, photogenic, effortlessly glib, and sporting a world-class pompadour should be worth at least five to ten points in the polls. In a democracy awash with low-information voters, races are won or lost with soundbites and clicks. Appearances have an outsized influence on results, no matter how shallow and deceptive they may be.

Another advantage Newsom brings with him is being born into extraordinary privilege. Newsom is an intimate member of California’s ongoing, firmly entrenched political aristocracy. When Governor Brown left office and Gavin Newsom began his first term as governor in 2018, noted political columnist Dan Walters had this to say about his family connections:

“Newsom is succeeding someone who could be considered his quasi-uncle, since his inauguration continues the decades-long saga of four San Francisco families intertwined by blood, by marriage, by money, by culture, and, of course, by politics—the Browns, the Newsoms, the Pelosis, and the Gettys.”

On the other side of the country, a rising political star has been elected mayor of New York City. Zohran Mamdani also has a privileged background. His father is a professor at Columbia University and considered an “influential postcolonial scholar.” His mother is a noted filmmaker with an international reputation. Mamdani graduated from Bowdoin College, where the annual tuition exceeds $70,000.

While Mamdani’s lineage doesn’t quite match Newsom’s, it’s certainly opened a lot of doors for him. And in the charisma department, Mamdani is also collecting votes beyond the mean. Just over a month before the election, Vanity Fair described him as a “suave and handsome upstart.” The influential New York quarterly Jacobin, an openly communist publication, had this to say about Mamdani: “In every New York Post photo, as well as in this new TV ad, he looks fantastic and is smiling radiantly.”

Newsom and Mamdani are both “radiant,” and they both had well-heeled, influential parents. But it would be a mistake to say the comparisons end there, even though at first glance it might appear they embrace competing versions of Democratic Party ideology. Newsom’s latest political value proposition is to present himself as a moderate, practical policymaker. Mamdani was elected promising free housing, free food, and free transportation.

The reason these ostensibly competing visions of the future are not in conflict, however, is because Mamdani’s socialism and Newsom’s corporatism are two sides of the same exploitative coin. The growth of socialist benefits and bureaucracy is synergistic with the centralization of corporate power. The creation and encouragement of a population dependent on government doesn’t destroy big corporations; it empowers them.

This fact is probably the biggest irony in politics and the biggest deception that Democratic politicians (with more than a little help from many Republicans) have successfully perpetrated on American voters. Gavin Newsom’s California is the proving ground for this deception, with New York poised to go from a close second to taking the lead.

In California, Gavin Newsom recognizes that public sector unions exercise nearly absolute political power in his state. These unions collect and spend more than a billion dollars per year, with about one-third of that donated explicitly to political campaigns and roughly another one-third allocated to “nonpartisan” public information campaigns. These unions control state and local government bureaucracies, which, while technically prohibited from political advocacy, also spend additional hundreds of millions of dollars on “information” campaigns to obliquely argue for increased taxes and spending.

The corporate role in California is one of a partner to this political machine. The biggest corporations in the state almost never challenge the growth of government, the tax increases, or the smothering avalanche of new regulations every year, because the bigger the corporation is, the more they benefit from all of this. Reports of California being hostile to business miss the point. The state is only hostile to small- or medium-sized businesses that can’t afford the regulatory overhead. The big corporations mop up the pieces and consolidate their markets.

Completing the picture are powerful NGOs that have invaded and influenced policy in every sector of the state’s economy and institutions, including energy, housing, healthcare, agriculture, hospitality, and media. Focused on environmental protection and “equity,” these NGOs have added their weight to the trend. More regulations and rules. More subsidies. Higher taxes.

The emergence of NGOs underscores a transformational shift that has deepened the alliance of corporations and socialists. Corporations used to support unrestricted immigration to have a source of cheap labor. But in recent years, corporate vendors and NGOs have profited by collecting tax dollars to provide benefits to immigrants regardless of their employability. The economic incentives have shifted from prioritizing more cheap labor to just maximizing how many warm bodies we can import.

The corporatist/socialist axis represented by Newsom and Mamdani, incarnate in California’s political economy, explains why the state now has the highest cost of living in America. For every essential, certainly including housing and energy, healthy capitalist competition has been suppressed, reducing the available supply at the same time as an exploding population of marginally employable residents has magnified overall demand.

The common thread that unites the biggest, most politically connected corporations (Newsom’s base) with the socialist goal of big government (Mamdani’s base) is centralization. To achieve these ends, they employ rhetoric of shocking hypocrisy. Because all of it, from the “climate emergency” to “systemic racism” and every other seductive avenue on which to promote panic and extremism, leads to the same authoritarian destination.

When the cost of living is elevated, household discretionary cash evaporates. The earnings of ordinary workers go to the corporate monopolies that control markets and prices for every essential good. On top of that, middle-class wage earners face a crippling tax burden, causing their own economic prospects as well to descend to subsistence. And all the while, the phony antagonism continues between socialist saints and capitalist ogres, painting a deceptive drama that nonetheless manages to captivate a majority of desperate, disenfranchised voters.

This is the world of Mamdani and Newsom. This is the political model they personify. An alliance of big corporations and big government. Some might call this fascist, but they’ve co-opted that word, too, using it to describe their political opponents. Newsom could ride this train all the way into the White House. Mamdani will preside over New York City, wondering if someday his charisma could carry him to the pinnacle of power as well.

There is no easy way to debunk the false promises of socialism. But we can begin by recognizing that socialists in America are not fighting capitalists. They are allied with the world’s biggest and most powerful corporations and financial institutions to destroy emerging competitors, centralize power and profit, and engineer the biggest transfer of wealth in history, from poor to rich. The next time Newsom or Mamdani flash their radiant smiles, remember who they really represent.




Unhinged Anti-ICE Agitator Allegedly Points Shotgun at Driver


I understand that not everyone likes the look of mass deportations or legions of Customs and Border Patrol agents descending upon a neighborhood to round up illegals in job lots. I'm not super comfortable with the optics myself, though at least I have the sense to understand why it's happening.

But regardless of how you feel about it or how the media has spun literally everything, there are some things you just shouldn't do.

If you do them, you have a good chance of ending up like Renee Good or Alex Pretti, and for far more cause.

A case in point is a...ahem...gentleman in Nebraska who is just lucky he's being charged instead of treated for gunshot wounds:

Charges of felony pointing a firearm and misdemeanor battery have been lodged against an Ellettsville man witnesses say aimed a loaded shotgun at people during a Jan. 30 anti-ICE protest in downtown Bloomington.

Footage from a video surveillance camera at the corner of Kirkwood Avenue and Walnut Street confirmed witness accounts of the 2:13 p.m. incident that day.


"It can be seen in the bottom or the video that someone wearing all black, is holding a long gun, consistent with shotgun, and the gun is being held in firing position because it is at shoulder level and held perpendicular to the body and being pointed at the driver's side of the white van," a police officer's report said.

The 47-year-old man behind the wheel told police he feared for his life when a protester, identified as Ryan Hughes, stepped in front of his van, pointed a shotgun in his direction and said, "I'll f--- you up," according to the affidavit filed in the case.

The affidavit requested a second felony, intimidation, be filed as well.

I don't have any legal issues with someone carrying a gun at a protest. I don't care if it's a shotgun, a handgun, or an AR-15. Sometimes, like this, I think it's a bad idea, if for no other reason than it deflects from the message one is trying to send, but legally? Yeah, you've got a right to do it, and I'll defend it with my every breath.

You don't, however, have a right to point a shotgun at some dude who is just driving by, threatening to f**k them up, all because you think your cause is too righteous for you to actually cross the line.

The dude is lucky that whoever was in that van either wasn't carrying a firearm themselves or simply didn't feel they could use it for whatever reason, because if Hughes had gotten perforated repeatedly for his actions, I wouldn't bother to shed a single tear over it.

You cannot threaten people's lives simply because you want to. I honestly don't care what the driver of the van in question was doing, just so long as he didn't start with the threats, and there's no evidence of that happening.

This is the deranged Left, and guess what you won't see? You won't see leftists telling their buddies that this doesn't help anyone, that they should leave their guns at home if they can't carry them responsibly, or literally anything.

They've largely ignored this, as if it never happened, but you know good and well that if anyone on the Right did something similar, it would have 24/7 coverage from CNN.

The Left is unhinged, and they like it.


School, Who Needs School? LA HS Students Ditch Class for Anti-ICE Protest, Hit Officer in Head With Pole



High schoolers in numerous blue cities around the country have regularly been playing hooky, preferring to attend anti-ICE protests rather than focus on their education. Not surprisingly, the data show that many of these so-called learning institutions have disastrous academic records.

The kids don’t need to worry about consequences, though — all too often, the teachers and administrators are egging them on and skipping school themselves to join in the fun.

Our teachers' unions should be so proud.

On Friday, it was Los Angeles that got hit as hundreds of students left campus and headed downtown to create a little mayhem:

What began as a peaceful march and rally against federal immigration raids escalated into an altercation between federal police and students in downtown Los Angeles on Friday afternoon.

Police called for additional backup at the Metropolitan Detention Center as tensions rose.

Sky5 was over the scene at about 1:30 p.m., where items were seen being thrown toward officers and some shoving occurred. Police moved in to push back the crowd.

Similar demonstrations have been reported in multiple cities across the country, with participants calling for changes to federal immigration enforcement.

Anti-ICE protests have become increasingly common since the Trump administration started trying to clean up the disastrous illegal immigrant mess that former President Joe Biden thrust upon this country. This latest action, led mostly by teenagers, mind you, took a dark turn:

The students’ march started at City Hall, blocking traffic on Spring Street, police said. 

The protest overwhelmed streets in the area, moving across First Street and Main Street.

On Los Angeles Street, demonstrators engaged in vandalism, according to police.

Agitators then engaged in more vandalism on Alameda Street before attacking federal agents there, according to police.   

(Warning: Profanity in the following tweet.)

At least one law enforcement agent suffered injuries. During the melee, a “peaceful protester” started waving a pole at an officer, striking him in the head twice. It’s not clear if that’s the one who officially reported as hurt.

First Assistant United States Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli expressed his disgust on X Friday evening, and vowed they would track down violent offenders.

“Where are the parents?” he asked. Unfortunately, they’re probably out protesting somewhere too.

That’s what blue state governors and mayors have brought us: a culture of permanent protest. The adults (and the conservatives) should ignore the noise and keep on doing what’s right to fix America.

Minutes ago (as of 11:00 p.m. EST Friday), Essayli announced that he’s surging officers into DTLA. Good: