Saturday, February 7, 2026

A Leftist Anti-ICE Fantasy


In my meandering imagination, I was a liberal, yearning to join the anti-ICE peaceful protest in Minneapolis and trying to figure out how I would let our government know how strenuously I object to their policy of deporting illegal aliens.

I summoned up an article I had read by the esteemed Daniel Greenfield in which he spelled out in vivid detail the exact kinds of people I would be supporting, defending, and advocating for, all who had been charged with or convicted of the following crimes:  

  • rapists;
  • a “child fondler”;
  • sex predators;
  • child-molesters;
  • pedophiles;
  • the sodomizer of a young girl;
  • another charged with “strongarm sodomy of a girl”;
  • criminal sexual conduct, fourth degree, of a victim 13 to 15 years old;
  • murderers;
  • muggers;
  • “lewd or lascivious acts with a minor”;
  • “sexual exploitation of a minor — prostitution”;
  • “enticement of a minor for indecent purposes”;
  • “sexual exploitation of a minor — material — film”;
  • “strongarm sodomy of a boy”;
  • “sodomy-girl-strongarm.”

“This is what Renée Good died for,” Greenfield wrote.

“Yes,” I responded to Greenfield, in my fantasy as a liberal.  “Keep them all here.  They are human beings.  They are victims of poverty, of deprived upbringings, of mean people who want to deport them.  That’s not who we are!”

How I Joined the Ranks

In my fantasy, I didn’t quite know how I would make my appearance at the anti-ICE protest.  I thought about digging out my “make peace, not war” t-shirt, but I couldn’t find it.  Then I looked for some fairly recent placards I carried quoting phrases from Antifa and BLM, but the only ones I found in my garage were yellow with age and damaged by humidity.

And then it hit me.  What better thing could I do to demonstrate my strong but peaceful intentions than to emulate Alex Pretti and bring my nine-millimeter semi-automatic Sig Sauer handgun with me, complete with two high-capacity magazines, and tuck it into my waistband?

After all, what says peaceful protest more than a loaded gun?

But uh-oh.  As writer and editor Olivia Murray points out, the P320 Sig Sauer Mr. Pretti was wielding is notorious — and has generated numerous lawsuits — for going off spontaneously, even when in a holster! 

Then I asked a liberal friend and avid supporter of the anti-ICE protestors what he would do if his daughter were raped, and he knew who the rapist was.

“I’d kill him...with my bare hands!” he said with conviction.

“So you believe criminals should see justice?” I asked him.  “Like the criminals being deported?”

“That’s different,” he said.

Then I asked an even more left-wing neighbor what she would do if she looked out her second-floor window and saw a guy trying to break into her house.

“I’d call the Sixth Precinct,” she said, referring to our local police department.

“So you believe criminals should be arrested...and tried and convicted?” I asked her.  “Like the criminals they’re deporting in Minnesota?”

“That’s different,” she said.

Maybe it was the sheer hypocrisy, or was it the stupidity, or was it just simple boilerplate leftism?  Whatever it was, it snapped me out of my liberal, leftist, progressive fantasy with a start.  It was the instant that my background as a N.Y. State–certified psychotherapist, who had practiced for over 20 years, recognized the stunning irrationality — or was it the clinical insanity? — of those who have joined this protest, including the elected officials who are fomenting all the chaos and violence.

There’s Good, and There’s Stupid

Less than a month ago, when Renée Good, at a similar demonstration, decided to obstruct traffic and then drove her 4,000-pound SUV into an officer from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) who was rounding up illegal alien career criminals.  She was shot and killed for her attack.

The craven media tried to soften her image by calling her a poet, just as they wanted the public to know that Alex Pretti was an oh, so caring intensive-care nurse.

But why was Mr. Oh, So Caring wearing a tactical vest or failing to have a carry ID for his loaded gun, which is mandated by Minnesota law?  Didn’t he learn his lesson the week before, when he sustained a broken rib after he scuffled with federal agents at another anti-ICE protest?  Here is the video that shows a man identified as Alex Pretti attacking ICE agents and kicking out their tail lightsbefore he is tackled.

In addition, writer Tyler Durden reports that “according to Jeanne Massey, a neighbor, Pretti was part of a ‘Signal ICE’ group chat of volunteers who organized a sophisticated operation to track ICE activity in real time and alert each other when agents were in the area.”

Tip of the Iceberg

According to writer and publisher Terry A. Hurlbut, “the State of Minnesota, alone (so far) among the fifty States, is making insurrection and rebellion against the United States.”  He suggests that the reason may be because the Trump administration discovered such massive fraud —  the president now estimates it at $100 billion — from Minnesota alone, and that is why Governor Tim Walz; Mayor Jacob Frey; and “government employees, in key positions, are actively supporting criminal behavior,” including

  1. obstruction of justice,
  2. stalking and attempted murder of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, and even
  3. stalking and attempted murder of journalists sympathetic to the rule of law.

Washington Times columnist Don Feder reminds his readers that “every totalitarian dictatorship started with violence in the streets.  The French Revolution started with the storming the Bastille and ended in the Reign of Terror.  The Russian Revolution began by Bolsheviks storming the Winter Palace and ended in firing squads and gulags.  National Socialism started with Brownshirts brawling in the streets of Weimar Germany and ended in World War II and the Holocaust.”

Feder adds,

Don’t be fooled by the carefully planned chaos unfolding in Minneapolis.  Today’s street theater isn’t just about immigration enforcement any more than the 2025 “No Kings” protests were just about challenging President Trump’s authority, or the 2020 George Floyd riots were just about so-called police brutality. 

All are part of a revolution in the making that could spell the end of democracy in America. Left-wing agitators plan to destroy constitutional government. The battle to keep U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from deporting murderers and rapists is the latest front in a wide-ranging war.

Businessman and author Kenin M. Spivak believes that “the heated campaign against ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) is really an effort to open the borders and keep them open.”

Most of the recent vitriolic opposition to ICE is a feint by unrepentant open-borders progressives. They won the first round when Joe Biden was elected president, lost the second when Donald Trump returned to office, and are back for a rematch. For most, the venom has little to do with how ICE performs its mission and everything to do with preventing the Trump administration from undoing Biden’s brazen deluge of illegal migrants.

Grown-Up Time

After witnessing this wildly out-of-control situation, the adults in the White House, led by President Trump, sent ICE acting director Tom Homan to Minnesota to take direct command of immigration enforcement, to speak directly to Gov. Walz (who my late always-diplomatic mother would call “not overburdened by brains”), and to Mayor Frey (didn’t we all know this kind of irritating rabble-rouser in school?).

As reported by Pamela Geller, the president confirmed that he and Walz spoke by phone in a “very good” conversation.”  Although the governor bashed Pres. Trump ahead of his meeting with Mr. Homan, apparently he changed his tune after they met.

But Jack Davis reported that “they met, they talked, and they did not agree.”

“President Trump has been clear,” Homan said.  “He wants American cities to be safe and secure for law-abiding residents — and they will be.”

Frey, on the other hand, said that “all he wants is for the federal government to leave his city,” adding defiantly that “Minneapolis Does Not and Will Not Enforce Federal Immigration Laws.”

Always, Always, Always Follow the Money

It costs millions upon millions of dollars to wage a revolution, an insurgency, a massive movement to undermine a government, especially the all-powerful American government.

And you can bet that most of the people participating in this anti-government, anti-law-and-order action are not millionaires or billionaires, but rather regular working-class or middle-class people who are being handsomely paid to act out their benefactors’ fury.

Who is paying for all this?  According to reporting by Cristina Laila for GatewayPundit.com, super-sleuth James O’Keefe “went undercover inside the Minnesota Mob” and learned that “an entire network of NGOs, unions, and activist groups including ‘SEIU’ [Service Employees International Union]‘Make the Road New York’, and the ‘Independent Socialist Group’ are all behind this chaos.”

Newsman Bill O’Reilly was also curious and learned that a man named Neville Roy Singham, a Chinese billionaire, has been funneling “tens of millions” of dollars into America to “radical organizations to foster rebellion and destroy the government.”

“This isn’t some organic thing,” O’Reilly adds.  “This is a foreign power!”

Moreover, writer and economist Antonio Graceffo details how the Minneapolis-based activist group Defend 612 “has mobilized tens of thousands of supporters through encrypted communication networks to disrupt federal operations” through a complex funding structure linked to “liberal foundations, shell entities, politicians, and third-party organizations, some of which ultimately trace back to billionaire George Soros.”

Defend 612, Graceffo adds, “provides anti-ICE ‘know your rights’ training, organizes and supports protests, and maintains a decentralized rapid-response network designed to interfere with ICE enforcement in real time.”

And looky here! Craigslist now advertises for protesters in California, offering $6,500–12,500 a week, depending on one’s level of chaos.

What Now?

If history is any measure, the left-wing anarchists and hired patsies aren’t going anywhere.  But neither are President Trump and his team of law-and-order advocates.

On the law-and-order side, an appeals court just sided with the Trump administration to lift Minnesota protest curbs on ICE agents.  Now it remains to be seen if the Congress will pass the legislation the president has just proposed to end sanctuary cities across the country.

But even more recently, the president has decided on a strategic pullback and has issued this statement:

I have instructed Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, that under no circumstances are we going to participate in various poorly run Democrat Cities with regard to their Protests and/or Riots unless, and until, they ask us for help. We will, however, guard, and very powerfully so, any and all Federal Buildings that are being attacked by these highly paid Lunatics, Agitators, and Insurrectionists.

Gotta love it...let them devolve and self-destruct on their own!

Journalist Don Feder sums the whole mess up neatly: “The battle of Minneapolis will decide whether America is governed democratically or ruled by self-appointed elites backed by goon squads.”

As for me, I can only hope that the god of mercy spares me another liberal fantasy!


Podcast thread for Feb 7

 


Don't let whiners ruin your fun.

How Long Can America Go on Like This?


There is an unbridgeable gap in the United States right now between two people with polar opposite views of the world, its purpose, man’s place in it, and what the country should be in the future. And nobody can sit on the fence; you are on one side or another. “You are either for me or against me,” Jesus said, and that is the situation every American faces right now, regarding the future and destiny of the nation.

The Left isn’t going to change, folks. They are, for the foreseeable and indefinite future, rooted in their beliefs and ideology, and they aren’t going to be converted. Just like Xi Jinping will never change from his communist dogma, Leftist Americans are too convinced in their religion to ever swing over to the “other side”—traditional, virtuous, conservative American values. As James Madison said, America’s success and future are in the laws of God. Xi Jinping has rejected that for China, and Nancy Pelosi, Tim Walz, AOC, Gavin Newsom and every Democrat have rejected it for America as well. They will never be transformed, en masse.

But they never will convert me, either. And countless millions of Americans stand with me on that, and will never sacrifice the truths they believe in. But therein lies the divide. We aren’t going to change; they aren’t going to change. The current beliefs of the Right and Left are 180 degrees opposite. Can America keep going like this when it appears that 50 percent of the people want some form of traditional American values of virtuous freedom and equality before the law, and 50 percent of the people want to remake the country into a licentious, Marxist, barbarian totalitarian state where the federal government has all power and, as in all communist countries, the people suffer and are oppressed, become wards and dependents of the state, and slaves of the few, the fat cat nomenklatura who enjoy their special privileges until they destroy their nation. How long can America vacillate between these two world views?

We are at a very crucial turning point in the 250 th year of our existence. If the Democrats win control of one or both houses of Congress this year—which is distinctly possible—then Trump’s presidency will effectively be over. Congress won’t be able to do anything on Trump’s agenda, and any executive orders he issues will be immediately overturned the next time a Democrat becomes President. That makes 2028 an incredibly significant election year.

If the Democrats win the Presidency in 2028 and both houses of Congress, they will feel like the country has rejected Trumpian populism and traditional American values, and that they have been given carte blanche to do whatever they please. They will put the pedal to the metal, and it will make Joe Biden’s four years of horror look like a Sunday picnic on the beach. They will try to silence us, and it will be far worse than anything they tried under Biden. They will be feeling their Wheaties, and they won’t be in the least hesitant to enact their radical agenda.

If, horror of horrors, that scenario comes to pass—a Democratic Party sweep in 2028—what are we “conservatives” going to do? Are we finally going to take to the streets and tear things up if we don’t get our way, as the thugs and babies of the Left do? Are we going to just continue to write our articles and do our podcasts (if allowed) in the absolutely vain hope that we can convert Leftists, or perhaps persuade enough fence-sitters to vote for true America? Or are we going to be like the typical Chinese citizen in China, just cower in our homes, keep our mouths shut and heads down, and accept that the government knows all and will solve our problems and “take care of us,” and eat the few crumbs they throw to us?

What are we conservatives going to do the next time the Democrats come to power? We had better be thinking about that and planning for it—just in case it happens.

The Left isn’t going to keep playing ping-pong with us, batting the government back and forth between Republicans and Democrats, letting us have it for a while and do what we want if we’ll let them have it for a while and do what they want. We believe in freedom, in allowing people the right to believe what they want to, as long as they don’t harm others or trample on our God-given rights. I really couldn’t care less if some sissy, mind-degenerate male wants to claim he is a woman—as long as he doesn’t deprive true women of the right to compete fairly against their own sex, and keeps his perversion out of schools and female locker rooms and restrooms. Freedom means the freedom to be perverted, stupid, obnoxious, and an utterly licentious barbarian—but not infringe on others’ rights. Jesus never forced anyone to believe and practice what He taught, and we shouldn’t either.

The problem is that it isn’t what the Left believes. They don’t believe in freedom; they believe in tyranny, which means they get to practice whatever they want to, and they get to ram it down our throats and we must approve of it, not condemn it, and pay for it. They want to control the government forever, and they demand we either cower into accepting their decadence and tyranny, or they’ll imprison or kill us if we cause too much trouble. And if you don’t believe that is what they want, go live in communist China for 10 years as I did and see what Leftism really is and what the Leftist Democratic Party in America really wants. If Americans don’t wake up to that, then the country will eventually endure it.

The gap is unbridgeable. What can we do about it?


From Open Borders to Ruinous Powderkegs


The post-Reagan era triumphantly promised a unified sense of national purpose, self-confidence, and moral clarity. Yet, what successive presidential administrations and congressional formations have delivered instead has been a gradual increase of the corrosion of the democratically spirited and trust-based American political culture. As a result, domestic politics has hardened into poisonous clannish cum tribal identities, all kinds of disagreements into hidden cum open hostilities, and fellow American citizens into caricatures to be feared or despised. Today, the United States of America as a nation is caught in the most vicious circles of mutual hatred, in which concocted outrage is feeding more outlandish hostility, conspiracy theories breeding more suspicions that lead to ever more ruthless retaliations. Simultaneously, compromise is treated as betrayal and empathy as weakness. What began in the 1980s as a celebration of the reestablishment of individual freedom and national renewal has curdled into collective isolation, leaving a nation more divided than at any point in its history.

In this national convulsion, the beginning of global migration and the resulting enormous illegal immigration are best understood not as an isolated chain of events, but as the convergence of political, economic, and cultural forces that intensified in the late 20th century. Globalization has disrupted national as well as regional economies in the so-called Third World, while integrating markets unevenly, creating sharp disparities between labor supply and opportunity. At the same time, progress in transportation and communication lessened the psychological and physical barriers to movement, transforming migration from an exceptional act into an elementary individual survival strategy. Moreover, the multiplying occurrences of bloody armed conflicts, frequent collapses of non-functioning states, and existential stress further accelerated flights from failed countries, while the corresponding demand for low-wage labor in developed countries often illegally absorbed migrants because the slow-reacting national legislations could not adapt to the new legal challenges.

The resulting mass illegal immigration has become a global political and economic challenge. In the United States of America, the duplicitous dishonesty of the Obama administration, the Biden administration's uneven enforcement rhetoric, and the lack of a clear-cut legal strategy have created a legislative gap that incentivized illegal entry, the emergence of informal labor markets, and an unsolvable chaos of the undocumented population from all over the world. With time running out, what has begun a temporary or cyclical migration, has become permanent settlements that only entrenched social, legal and political tensions. Thus, in the United States of America, such as in other parts of the world, mass migration and illegal immigration have not been primarily failures of border control, but causes of global inequality, domestic labor dependence, and political and legal inability to regulate the brand new phenomenon of sustained human mobility.

However, what appears to be unprecedented today had, in reality, already been confronted by the Western Roman Empire at the beginning of the third century. This millennium-old civilization's central pillar of law and order had crashed in ruins. As today, the migration challenge was an unsolvable problem because of the near paralysis of the institutions meant to govern and the increasingly complex, interconnected world. More substantially, what became known as the "Gothic Crisis" between 370 and 376 CE turned into a devastating rebellion between 377 and 378 CE, which at the Battle of Adrianople destroyed the Roman army, killed Emperor Valens, and proved that the Roman legions were no longer unbeatable. Finally, the loss of border integrity resulted in internal fragmentation, psychological climax, and the formal collapse of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE.

The politically motivated, mendacious crusade against the truth by small marauding elements of American society started on August 9, 2014, with the killing of Michael Brown Jr. by Officer Darren Wilson and the almost identical case of George Perry Floyd Jr. of Minneapolis on May 25, 2020. Although both persons were hardened criminals caught in unlawful acts, the just-organized Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation rapidly elevated them to the corrupt pedestal of minority "Sainthood." The mass protests, riots, arson, and the ubiquitous breakdown of public order were quickly sanctified by former President Barack Hussein Obama and the great majority of the Democratic Party. The mantra of "Systematic and Institutionalized Racism" of the standardbearers of the existing constitutional order has become a rallying cry of these same elements, fortified by the various criminal groups of the illegal immigrants. Moreover, the overpoliticization of these criminal cases already foreshadowed the start of an illegitimate drive of these criminal cum extremely radical organizations to seize power through unconstitutional political cum judicial tyranny across the United States of America. Adding more lawless fire to the already burning hatred among the illegal masses in the state of Minnesota, the two shooting incidents in the capital city of Minneapolis on January 26, 2026, have sparked large-scale protests, political outcry, and the obligatory demands for accountability and reforms. The uncompromising position by both sides – the Trump administration and the state officeholders in Minnesota – has demonstrated serious gaps in managing these situations legitimately, coupled with the lack of obligatory transparency on both sides. Therefore, grossly exaggerated and even fully opposite narratives only further deepened the hatred between the state's communities and the federal political, as well as law enforcement agencies.

In this conundrum, President Trump must assume the role of the leader to reestablish the Reaganite order. First, he is successfully solving the main problem of "Open Borders." Second, he must break up the existing large geographic settlements that encourage separatism as opposed to integration of the different legal as well as illegal foreign ethnic groups. Third, President Trump and his administration must focus on the main objective of integration and reintegration of these presently foreign elements in American society. Fourth, he must move to initiate dialogues with the opposition. The reason being that, to make peace, he must identify credible partners. Then, trust must be built by eliminating contradictions in political strategy, tactics, and legislation. Only then can President Trump be successful. Finally, with the support of the greater part of the nation – if not the whole of it – he can regain the lost respect for the most fundamental of all the laws pertaining to a civilized society that the United states of America has been for 250 years, namely the restoration of the humanization of the entire American nation, in which individual freedom is intertwined with respect of law and order, and trust of the federal and state governments is restored to its past significance.


🎭 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The 𝐖𝟑𝐏 𝓓𝓐𝓘𝓛𝓨 𝓗𝓾𝓶𝓸𝓻, 𝓜𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, 𝓞𝓟𝓔𝓝 𝓣𝓗𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Democrats Hate Anyone Who Doesn’t Love Crime And Fraud As Much As They Do — Even Leftists



Democrats hate certain other Democrats and leftists about as much as they hate you, and their targets are quite revealing.

In Los Angeles, elected City Controller Kenneth Mejia has unearthed significant social services fraud and waste and is pushing to fund more investigators — without success — so he can dig deeper. Mejia is way left, a high-octane Bernie bro who ostensibly “left” the Democrat Party in 2024. He has at times identified with the Green Party, apparently because the Democrats were much too far to the right for him. But Mejia is also a certified public accountant and a true believer in leftist social intervention, and he takes it personally when people steal from government programs that are supposed to help the poor. Mejia’s investigators are the reason a homeless services contractor in Los Angeles is awaiting trial on a massive list of state and federal felony charges for fraud.

Mejia revealed earlier this week that real estate and private equity “executives” as well as multiple “billionaires” are “pouring money” into the 2026 controller’s race to “oust” him amid his reelection bid.

Mejia’s two opponents are endorsed by a who’s-who of establishment democrats. Former state legislator Isadore Hall is, kind of bizarrely, endorsed by (among others) California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara, probably the most controversial figure in state politics at the moment. The Los Angeles Times characterized a race between these two candidates like this: “Hall and Mejia represent vastly different flanks of the Democratic Party, and the coming race will almost certainly pit L.A. establishment politics against the city’s ascendant left.” (Mejia is the ascendant left. He said in November last year he would “not be seeking the endorsement from politicians.”)

His other opponent, Zach Sokoloff, is a real estate developer who got a bunch of the other establishment endorsements, like the powerful Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas. Campaign finance reports filed with the Los Angeles City Ethics Commission also show that Sokoloff is the one soaking up the real estate cash that Mejia refers to in his video. So Mejia, the “ascendant left,” faces a sharp challenge from the establishment.

As we’re seeing in Minneapolis, the first rule of Democrat Club is that you aren’t supposed to mention the fraud and the grift. Kenneth Mejia is ideologically aligned with the way-left Los Angeles political machine, but he also isn’t a member of that insider club. He calls out waste and fraud, which is very unorthodox and impolite.

Meanwhile, California Governor Gavin Newsom keeps pretending that San Jose doesn’t have a mayor. But that mayor (Matt Mahan) does provably exist, having been spotted in his natural habitat, and does the unforgivable: He describes Gavin Newsom as a do-nothing prima donna. In an op-ed essay that got a lot of attention in the state, Mahan discussed the preening Newsom’s persistent neglect of real problems like crime and rampant homelessness. The headline of that op-ed piece tells the story: “How about less time breaking the internet and more time fixing California?”

Those kinds of criticisms make a California Democrat an immediate unperson. Mahan has announced his plans to run for governor, and Newsom … can’t quite place the name. Mahan, Mahan, uh — give me a reminder?

The bad blood started building even before that, as Newsom traveled to San Jose in 2024 to sign legislation that Mahan had supported, but didn’t invite the mayor to the otherwise well-attended ceremony. People noticed, and were meant to. Mahan is mostly a fairly conventional Democrat, but he says things, and you’re not supposed to say things. You’re supposed to be on the team.

If you’ve argued with Democrats, you think that they’re brittle and instantly hostile in the face of the slightest disagreement, preferring to enforce rigid groupthink. 


Parents Can’t Be ‘Assigned At Birth’ Any More Than Sex Can

Parents Can’t Be ‘Assigned At Birth’ Any More Than Sex Can


Through a legal doctrine known as ‘intent-based parenthood,’ you no longer become a parent by creating a child.


Josh Wood for The Federalist 



The phrase “sex assigned at birth” was dreamed up to suggest that biological sex (male or female, determined at fertilization and encoded in chromosones) is not an objective reality but a label slapped on a baby by a doctor in a delivery room. As if maleness and femaleness were within the purview and authority of adults to decide. As if the biology was negotiable.


Most people now recognize this for what it is: a denial of biological reality. The fact of male and female can be suppressed for a while — dress it up, pump hormones into a body, issue new documents. But like pushing a beach ball under water, the truth surges back to the surface. Doctors cannot assign sex. We can only recognize it.


Now another denial of biological reality is surfacing, one that has quietly reshaped American family law for decades, and one most people don’t even know exists: surrogate parenting.


Parent Assigned at Birth


Every child ever born is the offspring of one man and one woman. One sperm, one egg. That biological fact creates a relationship as real and observable as the child’s sex. That child belongs to those two people, looks like those two people, and ideally is loved by those two people.


For most of human history, the law recognized this. The state did not create the parent-child bond any more than the delivering doctor created the baby’s sex. The state simply recorded what nature had already established.

That is no longer the case.


Through a legal doctrine known as “intent-based parenthood,” people no longer become parents only by creating a child. They can become parents by wanting a child badly enough and proving it with enough money, contracts, and lawyers. The adults who intend to be parents are legally declared to be parents. The child’s actual biological mother or father (who were often paid for their “contribution” of sperm, egg, or womb) are then thanked for their service, shown the door, and replaced on the birth certificate by whoever the adults have chosen. Labeled donors. Vendors. Nonessential actors in the creation of their own child. As if biology were a clerical error the courts can correct.


Adult Desires are Paramount


Notice the operating principle. It is the same one driving gender ideology: adult desire is sufficient to override biological fact. A child is born male, but if an adult really wants that child to be female, really wanting it is enough in the new regime. A child is born to a specific mother and father, but if an adult really wants that child to be theirs, really wanting it is enough. In both cases, a biological reality about a child is denied and overwritten because an adult’s desire demands it. The child’s biology is not a fact to be respected but an obstacle to be overcome.


If “sex assigned at birth” strikes you as Orwellian, “parent assigned at birth” should terrify you.


For decades, this played out in pockets. California led the way when its courts ruled in Johnson v. Calvert (1993) that “intent to parent” could determine legal parentage, later extending it in Buzzanca (1998) to establish “parents” with zero genetic connection to the child. Other states held the line, maintaining that children had a right to belong to the mother and father who created them.


Then came Obergefell. The 2015 Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage granted same-sex couples the “constellation of benefits” that opposite-sex couples enjoyed. One of those benefits: the right to be recognized as the parents of your children from the moment they are born. But here the court confronted an uncomfortable biological fact — two men or two women cannot both be biological parents of the same child. So how can access to that benefit be equalized? The court could have acknowledged that the marital presumption of parentage functions differently when biology functions differently. Instead, it mandated that every state provide adults full access to unrelated children, requiring them to legalize the mechanism to assign parents, not recognize them.


Two years later, Arkansas tried to push back. In Pavan v. Smith (2017), the state argued that birth certificates are biological documents, medical records giving children access to family health history. Surely the court didn’t intend to pretend children come from two women?


Wrong. Birth certificates, the court ruled, are also part of the “constellation” attached to marriage. The biological document that once recorded who a child came from became an instrument recording who the state assigns to that child.


Parent Assigned at Birth Became Constitutionally Mandated


The consequences of surrogate parenting for children are not theoretical. Donor-conceived adults describe “genealogical bewilderment,” a disenfranchisement from their own body. The largest study of donor-conceived adults found they were twice as likely to report substance abuse, twice as likely to report problems with the law, and 50 percent more likely to report mental health struggles, even after controlling for socioeconomic factors. Nearly half feared being romantically attracted to an unknown biological relative. Forty-three percent said they felt confused about who was even a member of their family.


The right to have your sex recognized and your parents recognized are two sides of the same coin, connected by biological facts. “Sex assigned at birth” says the state can override what your DNA tells you about your body. “Parent assigned at birth” says the state can override what your DNA tells you about your family. Both are lies, sold with compassionate language — “gender-affirming care” for one, “modern family” for the other.


We know better. The data is clear, the testimonies devastating. Children have a right to their biological mother and father, not adults assigned to them by the state, not strangers connected by contract. Their actual mother and father.


Any legal regime that gives the government the authority to assign parents at birth is an injustice to children. And any Supreme Court ruling that mandates it nationwide must fall.