Thursday, January 29, 2026

The Squirt Heard ‘Round the World


I enjoy a good salad, but my go-to for dressing is either olive oil and either red wine vinegar or 18-month-aged balsamic. I know, a snob, right? But I don’t eat it with my pinky out, so there’s that.

I bring this up not to discuss which type of cheese to use with each vinegar (feta with red wine, parmesan with balsamic are the easiest, for the record), but to point out that I am not a connoisseur of apple cider vinegars, so I don’t really know what was going through the head of that weirdo who squirted a flavor injector syringe of the stuff on an ugly sweater Ilhan Omar was wearing Tuesday night, but I suspect it was drugs.

OK, I suspect it was either drugs or hoping he’d remember his cue and things would go as well as they did in rehearsal.

I’m not saying the whole thing was a staged event, but if you were a stupid person trying to distract from all the problems Omar has found herself in recently, this would be near the top of the list for that.

The guy, after getting a little nod from the brother-loving Member of Congress, stood up and went to the right, not toward her. If he wanted to harm Ilhan Omar, he was directly in front of her with nothing between them but the podium and her security seemingly sleeping a good 15 feet off to the side.

It’s all very odd, even staged. While I don’t know exactly what he mumbled as he squired his poultry injector at her, I can say that my listening to the audio rules out him saying, “This MAGA country,” so there’s that.

Also curious was Ilhan’s lack of concern for whatever was squirted on her. If you fear for your life, you might worry it was some kind of toxin or acid, but she only asked for a napkin and “refused” to go get medical attention or have it tested. A cynic might argue that running to the emergency room over a condiment attack undercuts the heroic nature of the case you’d want to make for yourself, so staying and finishing the event is the smart play. I don’t know how it went it dress rehearsal, but the blocking made the Oswald Prison Transfer look like it was choreographed by Bob Fosse.

But it worked. The next day, the day after we learned Omar’s husband, her third (second outside the immediate family), as she is the most sexually liberated woman in Islam (even owns an alleged winery), somehow made a fortune by, as a lawsuit suggests, defrauding investors in some of his businesses, was wiped from the political discussion.

No mention of how her husband’s firm was paid $2.78 million to “consult” on her campaign in 2020, a race she won with 64 percent of the vote after having won with 78 percent, and won again in 2022 with 74 percent. What does $2.78 million of advice look like that ends up making a landslide gerrymandered district closer than it had been since 2006? No one will ever know.

If she had taken a couple of million and stuck it in her bank account, she would be in jail. But she could take the same amount of money, launder it through her husband’s firm for work her district was specifically created to avoid needing, and he could put a huge chunk of it in their joint bank account and it’s perfectly legal corruption.

But no one is talking about it because her ugly sweater got a stain.

By the coverage, you would have thought the guy pulled a gun or, in the tradition of people Ilhan Omar supports, threw acid on her, but no. I’m not saying it isn’t newsworthy, I’m just wondering when the late-night comedians will make “Next time, throw some fries on her first” jokes the way they mocked Senator Rand Paul after his liberal neighbor physically attacked him, breaking ribs and ultimately costing him part of a lung. I’m not holding by breath.

Democrats are gross and evil; there really isn’t any other way to put it. They’re also diabolical. I don’t know if the “squirt heard ‘round the world” was staged or not, but I do know there will not be any serious examination of it, just like there won’t be any investigation into whether or not a guy who kind of looked hammered in the video was or not. If asking questions does Democrats no good, those questions will not only never get answered, but they will be taboo to ask.

It makes the whole thing all the more curious, doesn’t it?


Podcast thread for Jan 29

 


Not much to say.

Europe Cannot And Never Will Be Able To Compete With The United States

For decades, Europe has pursued economic, social, and environmental policies that have degraded its material and human capacity, possibly beyond recovery.


President Trump’s confrontation with Europe’s leaders over Ukraine, NATO funding, and Greenland’s sovereignty has triggered many in Europe to openly insinuate that the United States is no longer a reliable ally and is, in fact, an adversary. This tantrum-like reaction to an American president putting his country’s interests first has prompted European leaders to claim that Europe can compete with the U.S. on the world stage and defend itself without American assistance.

But can Europe compete with and take over the role of the United States in NATO? The reality is that Europe stands no chance against the U.S. and never will. Europe also lacks the manufacturing and labor base to produce weapons to defend itself against any major aggressor.

On the surface, the European Union’s 27 member nations, plus the United Kingdom, should be able to compete with the United States. Their combined population is 520 million, compared with 347 million in the United States. Between the EU’s establishment in 1993 and 2008, its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was within ±5 % of that of the United States.

However, during the 16 years between 2008 and 2023, the EU’s GDP grew by just 13.5% (from $16.7 trillion to $18.5 Trillion) while the U.S. GDP grew by 87% (from $14.8 Trillion to $27.8 Trillion), a gap in 2023 of over 50%. This gap will widen further to 65% as the International Monetary Fund predicts that Europe’s GDP will be $23 Trillion by 2030, while the U.S. will hit $38 Trillion.

The primary reason behind this growing disparity is that the EU and the U.S. have long ago chosen different paths and are now experiencing the consequences.

Europe has arrogantly focused on a lifestyle that demands a vast network of exceedingly expensive social safety nets requiring exorbitant taxation, importing millions of immigrants to offset a dwindling native population, mandating numerous paid vacation days, and preserving the past at the expense of the present and future.

Europe has evolved into being the apathetic curator of the world’s largest outdoor museum. It is an entity without a growth-focused system to survive and prosper in a hyper-competitive global economy, while also being confronted by a massive, imported population that is increasingly hostile to that museum’s culture. Immigrants’ hostility and refusal to assimilate means they’re determined to transform their host countries into de facto third-world Islamic enclaves. 

The United States is an economic superpower because it has historically focused on growth, innovation, efficiency, ambition, and the future. This historical focus is again center-stage, and Trump and his team are aggressively promoting it with “America First” policies and their emphasis on manufacturing, innovation, and avoiding Europe’s migrant debacle, not just by stopping unchecked immigration but also by deporting millions of illegal immigrants.

The United States also has the advantage of functioning as a single, massive economic engine the size of the European continent. It is a giant unified market wherein a company can target hundreds of millions of people without dealing with national boundaries, tariffs, onerous regulations, and inexplicable legal impediments—and where a trail-blazing start-up can easily access capital in a business environment that promotes innovation.

As a result, the U.S. not only has far more capital available for investments but also a culture that rewards high-risk ventures. Therefore, it attracts virtually all the world’s best talent and resources. This is why it leads in every major field of technology, from artificial intelligence to aerospace.

On the other hand, the EU comprises 27 countries with diverse languages, laws, and customs. These countries have had to subordinate their nations to the whims of a central, unelected bureaucracy steeped in Euro-socialism. It’s a bureaucracy that is mindlessly focused not on innovation or growth but on regulations, taxes, and tenure, which inevitably foments animosity and resentment among the member nations.

Rather than being an economic superpower, Europe has become a “regulatory superpower.” Instead of promoting innovation, the EU’s bureaucrats are busy writing regulations to control it. As a byproduct of this folly, not only is there little or no innovation, but the best and brightest in Europe’s technology fields are forced to immigrate to the United States to pursue their ambitions.

Meanwhile, European leaders are begging China to dramatically increase its investments and involvement in Europe’s economy, particularly the technology sector. By doing so, Europe will bizarrely tie itself to the most unreliable and hostile nation on earth.

Energy also plays a pivotal role in Europe’s waning competitiveness. The United States has transformed itself into an energy superpower by dramatically expanding oil and natural gas production, not only for domestic consumption but also for export purposes. This determination to develop its resources is a major factor in keeping its industrial base not only growing but massive and competitive.

Meanwhile, much of Europe inexplicably chose to pursue so-called “green energy,” abandoning coal and shuttering nuclear power plants while constraining oil and gas exploration with so many regulations that the EU’s nations are wholly dependent on others for their energy. They are, thus, buffeted by the vagaries of the global oil and gas markets as renewable energy sources have proven themselves to  be grossly unreliable and prohibitively expensive.

Virtually all European countries are experiencing the highest electricity costsamong developed nations worldwide. Together with excessive regulations, this hampers Europe’s remaining manufacturing base and further suppresses the development of new industries and start-up companies, as well as undermining Europe’s ability to produce weapons for its defense.

Lastly, European society is undergoing an irreversible transformation due to apathy, clueless leadership, secularization, and the importation of millions of migrants hostile to Western culture. Except for Poland and other Eastern European nations, there does not seem to be any willingness to act aggressively stop this transformation.

Without a seismic reversal of this societal apathy and a massive change in its approach to economic growth, Europe will continue to fade and could eventually experience civil strife and violent upheaval. Thus, it cannot currently or in the future be competitive with the United States.

As for NATO, the question is not whether Europe can assume America’s role, but whether the U.S. should remain in NATO, particularly given Europe’s overtures to China and the potential cultural upheaval in many NATO countries.

The only way Europe can hope to be competitive with the United States would be if America descends into the same cesspool. That could well happen if the Marxist-controlled Democrat party were allowed to assume power for an extended period. The party’s policies would destroy America’s competitiveness, standard of living, and culture. This highlights, of course, how important the 2026 and 2028 elections will be.


Learning From Minnesota’s Somali Fraud Scandal

 Imprimis

Power Line


The massive public programs fraud committed almost entirely by Somali perpetrators has recently exploded in the national news. The controversy is centered in Minnesota, where the amount of money bilked from American taxpayers could prove to be as high as $9 billion. But the scandal is spreading to other states as well. When Ryan Thorpe and Chris Rufo published an article in the November 2025 issue of City Journal linking the fraud to the funding of Al-Shabaab—a Somali-based Sunni Islamist organization that is designated a terrorist group by several nations, including the U.S.—President Trump took notice and announced the termination of Temporary Protected Status for Somali immigrants. In late December, YouTuber Nick Shirley posted a 42-minute video that showed him knocking on the doors of Somali-run day care centers in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul area that seemed to have no children in attendance. The video went viral, quickly garnering more than 130 million views on X and 2.5 million views on YouTube. But while this story is new to most Americans, it is anything but new to Minnesotans and others who have been paying it the attention it deserves.

***

Long known for having a largely Scandinavian population, Minnesota is now home to the largest Somali population in North America, numbering roughly 100,000, most of whom are congregated in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The seeds of this community were planted in the early 1990s, when the State Department directed thousands of refugees from Somalia’s civil war to Minnesota. Except for a dip in 2008, the immigration of Somalis into Minnesota has continued unabated, augmented by Somalis arriving from other states. The latter likely has to do with Minnesota’s generous welfare and charity policies. As Professor Ahmed Samatar of Saint Paul’s Macalester College was quoted as saying in a 2015 Washington Times story, Minnesota is “the closest thing in the United States to a true social democratic state.”

The massive fraud currently in the news was not the first controversy surrounding the Somali immigrant community. Around 2015, it proved to be a fertile source of ISIS recruits. The FBI’s Minneapolis field office devoted substantial resources to terrorism-related issues. A September 2015 report of the House Homeland Security Committee revealed that Minnesota led all other states in contributing foreign fighters to ISIS. Reviewing the public cases of 58 Americans who joined or attempted to join ISIS, it found that 26 percent of them came from Minnesota. Of ten Minnesota Somalis charged with seeking to join ISIS in Syria, six pleaded guilty and three were convicted at trial in June 2016.

During the trial of the three Somalis who contested the charges, it became clear, primarily from recordings introduced into evidence, that although they gave the outward appearance of American assimilation, they hated America. They took advantage of educational and employment opportunities and moved into and out of the workforce at will. At one time, all three worked at a UPS facility in a leafy Saint Paul suburb, where they enjoyed watching ISIS videos of beheadings during their breaks.

Foreshadowing the fraud scandals of today, the Somalis involved in terrorism showed themselves to be sophisticated in their creative use of social welfare benefits. Two of four Somali ISIS recruits intercepted at New York’s JFK airport while en route to Syria had used federal financial aid funds to pay for their travel. One financed his planned trip to Syria with a $5,000 debit card withdrawal on his student loan account.

In the decade since, the controversy over terrorist recruitment of Somalis has receded and the Somali abuse of social welfare programs has proliferated.

Child Care Fraud

The defrauding of Minnesota’s Child Care Assistance Program for day care services, although brought dramatically to national attention by Nick Shirley in late December, goes back more than ten years. Jeff Baillon, a Twin Cities TV reporter, reported on day care frauds in 2013 and 2015. A year ago this month Jay Kolls, another local reporter, went to two of the ten sites Shirley visited and reported that one of them was guilty of 95 violations—including “no records for 16 children”—between 2019 and 2023. But taxpayer funds continued to flow to these programs.

An illustrative case that arose in 2017 involved Fozia Sheik Ali, whose day care center in south Minneapolis was suspected of billing the government over $1 million for bogus child care services. According to Special Agent Craig Lisher, the FBI “found records that she was collecting a significant amount of money for a much larger number of children than were actually attending the center.” Ali’s case had an international component as well. She used a phone app to charge Minnesota taxpayers for her stay at an $800 per night hotel in Nairobi, and some of the illegally obtained funds were found to have been transferred overseas, although the FBI declined to specify for what purpose. Ali pleaded guilty in March 2018 to a charge of wire fraud and was sentenced to federal prison.

Minnesota’s Office of the Legislative Auditor issued a detailed report on child care fraud in 2019. On the question of how much had been stolen, the report restricted itself to amounts established in convictions. Because convictions were few and far between, that only came to between $5 million and $6 million. But the report concluded, citing the lax administration of the day care program, that the level of fraud was likely higher. Indeed! And the laxity continues. Jim Nobles, the legislative auditor at the time of the 2019 report, wrote a recent column in The Minnesota Star Tribune decrying the “permissive approach” of Minnesota’s state government that makes it “easy for fraudsters to steal” and questioning why nothing had been done over many years to “implement standard financial controls and oversight.”

Feeding Our Future Fraud

In that same Star Tribune column, Nobles wrote: “We now know that the fraud scheme used in the state’s child care program has been used frequently in other state human service programs.” A dramatic example of this is the case that has become known as the Feeding Our Future fraud.

Feeding Our Future is a nonprofit organization that served as a sponsor of sites like day care centers and restaurants that participated in two federal nutrition programs. During the peak Covid period, from April 2020 until January 2022, Feeding Our Future and its sites and their vendors found it remarkably easy to bilk these programs by filing false claims for reimbursement supported by false meal counts, fake rosters, and bogus invoices.

Aimee Bock was the founder and executive director of Feeding Our Future as well as the ringleader of the fraud scheme. As the sponsor of more than 250 Feeding Our Future sites around the state, Bock certified the accuracy of the ludicrously inflated meal claims she submitted for reimbursement. While Feeding Our Future’s sites and vendors are mostly Somali—as are those who have so far been convicted in the trials involving Feeding Our Future—Bock is white, adding a multicultural liberal element to the massive fraud.

The free food programs were administered by the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) and funded by the federal Department of Agriculture. Operating under the law adopted by Congress on account of Covid, the MDE proved a remarkably easy mark. Feeding Our Future sites multiplied like rabbits, and funds kept rolling out the door. In 2021 alone, Feeding Our Future siphoned off nearly $200 million of taxpayer money.

It is important to note that suspected fraud was often never fully investigated because government overseers were easily scared off by absurd claims of racism—charges that continue to be leveled even today.

In February 2021 the FBI passed on allegations of fraud in the programs to the MDE. In April 2021 a frustrated MDE official tipped off the FBI regarding her own suspicions. FBI forensic accountant Pauline Roase followed up in the ensuing months by collecting relevant bank records to track the flow of funds. FBI Special Agents Jared Kary and Travis Wilmer followed up in the field. In the last six weeks of the investigation they posted surveillance cameras outside twelve Feeding Our Future sites that were supposedly feeding thousands of kids a day. The kids were nowhere to be seen.

On January 20, 2022, the investigation went public when federal agents raided sites in the largest such operation ever conducted in Minnesota. The following September, United States Attorney Andrew Luger called a press conference to announce the charges brought against the first 47 defendants in the case. Charges have now been brought against a total of 78 defendants. The latest of the 78 cases were charged this past November.

In the cases resolved so far, there have been 50 guilty pleas, seven guilty verdicts, and two acquittals. Five fugitives remain at large. One defendant has died. Thirteen unresolved cases await trial. Bock was convicted on seven counts of wire fraud, conspiracy, and federal programs bribery and will be sentenced to a long prison term. The total fraud in these cases comes to some $300 million.

Medicaid Fraud

The Feeding Our Future fraud cases opened a window on scams involving several Minnesota Medicaid programs. After the FBI executed search warrants in one such case in July of last year, then-Acting United States Attorney Joe Thompson—who until very recently was leading both the Feeding Our Future and the Medicaid fraud prosecutions—called a press conference in September to announce criminal charges against the first eight Medicaid fraud defendants, all of whom are Somali.

These initial cases were tied to Minnesota’s Housing Stabilization Services (HSS) program, the purpose of which was to help people with disabilities find housing using Medicaid funds. “Most of these cases, unlike a lot of Medicare and Medicaid fraud cases nationally, aren’t just overbilling,” Thompson said at the press conference. “These are often just purely fictitious companies solely created to defraud the system, and that’s unique in the extent to which we have that here in Minnesota.” The press release distributed at the press conference suggested that the HSS program seems to have been designed to facilitate fraud: “By design, the Program had low barriers to entry for new providers and for beneficiaries. The Program also had minimal requirements for reimbursement.”

Uncovering fraud in Minnesota is like playing with Russian nesting dolls. “Many of the owners of [the involved HSS] companies,” Thompson said, “had one or more other companies through which they billed other Medicaid programs such as the [Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention] program, the Adult Rehabilitative Mental Health Services program, the Integrated Community Support program, the Community Access for Disability Inclusion program, [Personal Care Assistance] services, and other Medicaid-waivered services.” The details of these cases were almost incidental to Thompson’s main point—that “Minnesota is drowning in fraud.”

“It feels never-ending,” Thompson said. “I have spent my career as a fraud prosecutor and the depth of fraud in Minnesota takes my breath away.”

On December 18 of last year, Thompson called another press conference to announce charges against six more defendants in connection with Minnesota’s Medicaid programs. The new cases involved allegedly fraudulent claims in programs for housing, autism services, and assistance for disabled adults seeking to live independently. “Every day we look under a rock and find a new $50 million fraud scheme,” Thompson said.

The total amount of money disbursed through these programs since 2018 is $18 billion. Based on his ongoing investigations, Thompson estimated that as much as half that amount—$9 billion!—may have been paid out on fraudulent claims. “The magnitude cannot be overstated,” Thompson said. “What we see in Minnesota is not a handful of bad actors committing crimes. It’s a staggering, industrial-scale fraud.” Four of the six defendants charged in December are Minnesotan Somalis, and those involved in the uncharged cases under investigation are almost entirely Somali.

Political Responsibility

Two defendants from Philadelphia, Anthony Waddell Jefferson and Lester Brown, undertook what Thompson called “fraud tourism.” Having heard that Minnesota’s HSS program presented an easy mark, they set up in Minnesota to become fraudulent service providers. One wonders how word of this was able to make its way to Philadelphia but not to the State Capitol in Saint Paul, where the people’s elected officials are charged with protecting the public interest.

In a Star Tribune interview, Thompson cast the net widely in terms of responsibility: “This fraud crisis didn’t come out of nowhere. It’s the result of widespread failure across nearly every level of leadership in Minnesota: Politicians who turned a blind eye. Agencies that failed to act. Prosecutors and law enforcement who didn’t push hard enough. Reporters who ignored the story. Community leaders who stayed silent. And a public that wanted to believe it couldn’t happen here.”

Partly because it’s a problem that the people can solve directly, I would focus on the politicians. Three in particular.

The first is Governor Tim Walz. In November 2020, Feeding Our Future sued the Minnesota Department of Education for suspending the processing of Feeding Our Future site applications—an action MDE officials had taken because they had good reason to suspect that Feeding Our Future was defrauding the state. The MDE was represented in this lawsuit by the office of Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, which resolved the lawsuit—not under court order, but voluntarily—by backing down and agreeing to continue processing site applications. Two years later in 2022, when the Feeding Our Future scandal erupted and indictments were announced, Walz falsely blamed a state district court judge—rather than his attorney general—for compelling the state to continue payments. This was only the first of many of Walz’s dishonest deflections of responsibility that continue to the present day. Walz will never live down the frauds committed on the agencies under his jurisdiction.

The second is Attorney General Ellison himself. This past December he released a widely mocked video in which he declared, “Scammers think Minnesotans are easy targets. They are wrong.” No, it is abundantly and increasingly clear that the scammers have been right—in large part due to Ellison’s nonfeasance, as seen in the story of his failure to back the MDE against Feeding Our Future in 2020. Like Walz, Ellison continues to refuse to sit for an interview with a serious reporter to answer questions about what he knew about the fraud and when he knew it. Nor has anyone in the mainstream media made an issue of that fact, which is a scandal in its own right.

The third is U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar. Even if we leave aside the fact that she immigrated to the U.S. as a fraudulent member of the Omar family and later married her biological brother in her own Elmi family for further fraudulent purposes, we could still fairly describe her as Somali Fraud Exhibit A. She sponsored the MEALS Act that facilitated the Feeding Our Future fraud, and her congressional district served as its epicenter. She was a friend of Salim Said, Aimee Bock’s co-defendant in the second Feeding Our Future trial. She filmed a promotional video at Said’s restaurant that was introduced by Said’s lawyer at trial, although it actually served to support the charges against Said. Yet despite these facts, Omar claims to have known nothing about the fraud.

***

Public programs fraud on the scale we see today in Minnesota—and to a lesser degree (so far at least) in other states—indicates a leadership class that has either forgotten or no longer takes seriously the idea that public office is a public trust. What more fitting time could there be than the 250th anniversary year of the Declaration of Independence to restore the moral power of that idea in irresponsible state governments like that of Minnesota?

The EU's New War Economy


The president of the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Moritz Schularick, makes no secret in an interview with the Neue OsnabrΓΌcker Zeitung that the signs are pointing toward a war economy. It is bizarre to witness how economists succumb to the intellectual mediocrity of central planning.

Schularick seems to have found the ultimate solution to Germany’s economic problems. In conversation with the Neue OsnabrΓΌcker Zeitung (NOZ), the economist complained about a leadership vacuum in German arms policy. He sees it as central to an active industrial policy that could lead Germany out of its economic woes. Schularick expects that arms production will act as a, in his own words, “job booster.”

He said literally: “If we want Europe to truly stand on its own in defense soon and not remain dependent on the MAGA-USA, then Defense Minister Boris Pistorius must be given the order to work with European partners to eventually replace the USA and its capabilities.”

Fatal War Rhetoric

“Order to march,” military self-sufficiency -- the vocabulary is both revealing and dangerous. It seems politics and state-adjacent economic research are converging on a common path regarding military policy and increasingly centrally planned industrial management. A return to market principles seems like a fairy tale in circles of German economists -- no one believes anymore in the curative power of freedom from climate diktats, overregulation, and fiscal burdens.

According to Schularick, politics should implement a top-level arms coordinator to manage investment funds in response to the Russian threat. Perhaps he envisions himself in this role? After all, over €500 billion in defense investments are planned by the end of the decade to reduce security dependence on the U.S.

Production Capacity Shortfalls

Schularick criticized the extremely slow pace of ramping up arms production. Since the war began four years ago, nothing has been done to significantly increase production capacity.

“How many Taurus missiles are finished per month? Not even a handful,” he laments. A clear industrial policy deficit, he concludes. 

Here, the new spirit of German economic “academia” emerges: everything revolves around the much-praised global steering, an active industrial policy now pursued by Brussels and Berlin, dangerously fed by state-aligned research.

What was long predicted with three-quarter conviction now seems to be happening. Central planners, including Schularick, apparently assume they can repurpose idle German industrial capacity for the defense sector. Civil car production, in their view, can easily be converted into tank production. Besides producing goods private households do not demand, this creates yet another subsidy-dependent industry, consuming resources from civilian production and artificially raising civilian costs.

Germany’s “Rediscovered” Work Ethic in War Mode

Schularick grows euphoric about the promising future of the war economy, astonishingly rediscovering a work ethic long absent in Germany. He notes production is still mostly single-shift, five days a week. Implicitly, we learn, these are the jobs of Germany’s economic future.

No one seems to think about what should be produced in the coming years to avoid empty shelves after just three weeks in a potential conflict. It’s not just about armored vehicles but also future technologies like autonomous systems, satellites, AI, or robotics, Schularick adds. Everywhere, German industry has fallen behind.

Where does this competitive disadvantage come from, the central planner wonders? Perhaps from German policy and the Brussels bureaucratic apparatus acting as internal antagonists?

The interview highlights the widening gap between economic reality and the hermetically sealed ivory tower of politics, state-backed research, and sympathetic media, which promote this massive economic mismanagement while failing to critically assess Russia’s actual military strength, which is not capable of a continental invasion.

We’ve seen this playbook during the COVID era: once set in motion, the state-affiliated media machine drives narratives across newspapers, radio, and social media bot armies, suppressing open discourse. Stories of Russian occupation are defended in apocalyptic tones, wearing the public down.

The Central Planners’ Dreamworld

How do technocrats like Schularick, Merz, or von der Leyen envision converting production lines to military goods in practice? Beyond financing, there’s the question of knowledge transfer. Do blueprints come from the Internet or Boris Pistorius’ ministry?

The knowledge transfer required to build a centrally planned war economy from civilian industry is immense and time-consuming. Even after decades of bitter experience with green transformation -- which only drove capital out of Germany -- political learning curves remain negative.

Was this the goal? Ironically: to push industry into a corner with climate policies until it falters, then fill freed capacities with arms production?

Beyond the failed climate subsidy business emerges a new extraction pillar: the European defense sector. Whether this experiment can withstand real-world economic conditions -- falling productivity, rising debt -- is doubtful. Central planners like Schularick will surely have an explanation: they were blocked by forces opposed to European integration, joint war economy, and Brussels debt accumulation.

The Illusion of Central Planning

No deep economic expertise is needed to see that militarization is doomed to fail. A brief glance at 20th-century history is enough. Beyond massive resource mismanagement, there are issues of national sovereignty, divergent EU geopolitical interests, and a divided Union -- especially an Eastern bloc wary of conflict with Russia.

That even economists like Schularick succumb to the lure of powerful central planning shows they are not immune to personal vanity. Surely, they hope their institutes benefit -- perhaps with a ministerial-level position as arms coordinator. Who knows which job descriptions are already circulating in Berlin and Brussels.

It is tragic, yet the motto everywhere seems to be: “After us, the flood.”


🎭 π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓

 

Welcome to 

The π–πŸ‘π π““π“π“˜π“›π“¨ 𝓗𝓾𝓢𝓸𝓻, π“œπ“Ύπ“Όπ“²π“¬, 𝓐𝓻𝓽, π“žπ“Ÿπ“”π“ 𝓣𝓗𝓑𝓔𝓐𝓓 

Here’s a place to share cartoons, jokes, music, art, nature, 
man-made wonders, and whatever else you can think of. 

No politics or divisive posts on this thread. 

This feature will appear every day at 1pm mountain time. 


Conniving Effort – Alexander Vindman Launches Democrat Senate Campaign in Florida


This is infuriating, and entirely due to something else in the background {GO DEEP}.  Former National Security Council member (Russia/EurAsia desk) Alexander Vindman is running for a Florida senate seat against Republican Ashley Moody.

First, Alexander Vindman doesn’t stand a chance at winning; however, that’s not his objective with this announcement. Here is where it becomes important to understand the game.

Vindman is directly tied to the background issue of the fraudulent impeachment effort, which I have been working to bring to the forefront.  Progress is agonizingly slow but moving forward.

Alexander Vindman has two primary objectives in announcing this effort: (#1) to give himself the political defense against any accountability for his involvement in the IC coup against President Trump in 2019.  By running for the Florida Senate seat, Vindman will claim evidence is only coming to light as an outcome of his seeking elected office, i.e. it is a political attack.  And (#2) running for office allows Vindman to accept campaign donations that will ultimately be used in his defense against #1.  This is how they roll.

FLORIDA – MIAMI — Democrat Alexander Vindman, the former National Security Council aide who helped trigger President Donald Trump’s first impeachment, announced his Senate campaign in Florida on Tuesday to challenge GOP Sen. Ashley Moody.

Vindman’s entrance into the race pulls Trump’s agenda and record to the forefront of the Senate contest in Florida, bringing a national focus to a race in the president’s home state — one now widely seen as Republican-leaning.

[…] Vindman, born in Ukraine when it was still part of the Soviet Union, was an aide on the NSC during Trump’s first term. He testified before Congress about Trump’s 2019 call to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy after the president floated an investigation of then-presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter. Trump appeared to tie future U.S. aid to Ukraine’s willingness to launch and announce a probe that would be damaging to Biden.

The Senate acquitted Trump in that case, and Vindman, an Army combat veteran and lieutenant colonel, was fired from his position with the NSC.

[…] Any statewide Democratic candidate faces an uphill climb in Florida, given that Republican voters in the state outnumber Democratic voters by around 1.4 million people. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report also classified the Senate seat in Florida as being in the “Solid R” category — the most GOP-friendly ranking available. (read more)

Former AAG Mary McCord (working for Schiff/Nadler), McCord’s former staff lawyer, Michael Atkinson (working as ICIG), Alexander Vindman (NSC) and CIA Analyst Eric Ciaramella (fraudulent ICA organizer turned anonymous CIA ‘whistleblower’) worked together to construct the fraudulent impeachment operation.

In 2019 National Security Council (NSC) member Alexander Vindman responsible for Ukraine, Russia Eurasia affairs, told CIA Analyst Eric Ciaramella a fictional narrative about President Trump pressuring Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to provide dirt on Joe Biden in advance of the 2020 election.

Eric Ciaramella then became an “anonymous whistleblower” within the CIA to reveal the story and set up the predicate for the first Trump impeachment effort in late 2019.

You might remember the name, because during the impeachment effort anyone who mentioned Eric Ciaramella on social media had their information deleted, and they were blocked from their accounts.

Facebook, Google, META, Instagram, YouTube and Twitter all deleted any mention of Eric Ciaramella as the anonymous whistleblower and banned any account that posted the name.  However, something else was always sketchy about this.

As the story was told, Ciaramella blew the whistle to Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael Atkinson. It was further said that Atkinson “changed the CIA whistleblower rules” to permit an “anonymous” allegation; thereby protecting Eric Ciaramella.

Knowing, in hindsight, that CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella was one of the main people who constructed the 2016 fraudulent ICA, suddenly the motive to make him “anonymous” a few years later in 2019 for another stop-Trump effort makes sense.

Until recently the commonly accepted narrative was that ICIG Atkinson changed the CIA rules arbitrarily.  This is the main narrative as pushed by the media, allowed to permeate by the larger Intelligence Community, and supported by the willful blindness of a complicit Congress.

It never made sense how an IC Inspector General, especially one that involves review of CIA employees/operations, could make such a substantive change in rules for an agency that is opaque by design. There is just no way any IG can make that kind of decision about the CIA without the Director, the Deputy Director and CIA General Counsel being involved.

Someone in DNI or CIA leadership had to sign off on allowing ICIG Atkinson to change the rules and permit a complaint by Eric Ciaramella being turned into an “anonymous complaint.”

[…] On October 4, 2019, ICIG Michael Atkinson gave closed-door testimony to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) as part of their impeachment investigation.  The key question to Atkinson surrounded the authority of his office to change the CIA whistleblower rules permitting Eric Ciaramella to remain anonymous.  Who gave Atkinson permission?

That Atkinson testimony was then “classified” and sealed under the auspices of “national security” by HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff, the same guy who Ciaramella talked to before filing the complaint.   MORE...

Once you see the strings on the marionettes, you can never return to that moment in the performance when you did not see them.